Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Abdominal tissue is the preferred donor source for autologous breast reconstruction, but in select patients with inadequate tissue, additional volume must be recruited to achieve optimal outcomes. Stacked flaps are an effective approach in these cases, but can be limited by the need for adequate recipient vessels. This study reports outcomes for the use of the retrograde internal mammary system for stacked flap breast reconstruction in a large number of consecutive patients. METHODS:Fifty-three patients underwent stacked autologous tissue breast reconstruction with a total of 142 free flaps. Thirty patients underwent unilateral stacked DIEP reconstruction, 5 had unilateral stacked PAP reconstruction, 1 had bilateral stacked DIEP/SGAP reconstruction, and 17 underwent bilateral stacked DIEP/PAP reconstruction. In all cases the antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels were used for anastomoses. In situ manometry studies were also conducted comparing the retrograde internal mammary (RIM) arteries in 10 patients to the corresponding systemic pressures. RESULTS:There were 3 total flap losses (97.9 percent flap survival rate), 2 partial flap losses, 4 re-explorations for venous congestion, and 3 patients had operable fat necrosis. The mean weight of the stacked flaps for each reconstructed breast was 622.8 grams. The RIM mean arterial pressures (MAP) were on average 76.6 percent of the systemic MAP. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The results demonstrate that the RIM system is capable of independently supporting free tissue transfer. These vessels provide for convenient dissection and improved efficiency of these cases with successful post-surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The process of harvesting and performing microsurgical anastomosis in a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for breast reconstruction can be a lengthy procedure, which could affect outcomes and patient safety. We hypothesize that the implementation of a high volume center, preoperative planning, and the adaptation of key intraoperative components will optimize the efficiency of perforator flap surgery for breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of 68 consecutive patients who underwent 104 DIEP flaps for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction was performed. Standardized preoperative planning, including computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging angiogram, operating room setup, and operative technique, was followed. The times of flap harvest, internal mammary vessel harvest, microsurgical anastomosis, flap inset, wound closure, and total length of procedure were reviewed as well as patient outcomes. RESULTS: The average length of surgery for a unilateral DIEP was 3 hours and 21 minutes and for a bilateral DIEP was 5 hours and 46 minutes. In bilateral DIEP flaps, a significantly longer operative time was noted in immediate (363 +/- 14 minutes) compared to delayed (296 +/- 17 minutes) (P < 0.05) reconstruction and between procedures performed by 1 surgeon (400 +/- 29 minutes) versus 2 surgeons (326 +/- 11 minutes) (P < 0.05). Interestingly, no significant difference in operative time was seen in DIEP flaps performed on patients with a body mass index (BMI) less than 30 (193 +/- 7.6, 352 +/- 17 minutes) versus a BMI greater than 30 (213 +/- 11, 333 +/- 14 minutes) in both unilateral and bilateral procedures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Efficiency is optimized by preoperative planning with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging angiogram, a dedicated operating room team, including 2 microsurgeons and a systematic approach for surgery. The BMI may not significantly affect the duration of surgery.

BACKGROUND: In cases of bilateral breast reconstruction when the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap alone does not provide sufficient volume for body-specific reconstruction, stacking each DIEP flap with a second free flap will deliver added volume and maintain a purely autologous reconstruction. Stacking the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap with the DIEP flap offers favorable aesthetics and ideal operative efficiency. We present the indications, technique, and outcomes of our experience with 4-flap breast reconstruction using stacked DIEP/PAP flaps. METHODS: The authors performed 4-flap DIEP/PAP breast reconstruction in 20 patients who required bilateral reconstruction without adequate single donor flap volume. The timing of reconstruction, average mastectomy/flap weights, and operative time are reported. Complications reviewed include fat necrosis, dehiscence, hematoma, seroma, mastectomy flap necrosis, and flap loss. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent 4-flap DIEP/PAP breast reconstruction. Surgical time averaged 7 hours and 20 minutes. The primary recipient vessels were the antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels. No flap losses occurred. Complications included 1 hematoma, 1 incidence of arterial and venous thrombosis successfully treated with anastomotic revision, 1 incidence of thigh donor site dehiscence, and 3 episodes of minor mastectomy skin flap necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Four-flap breast reconstruction is a favorable autologous reconstructive option for patients requiring bilateral reconstruction without adequate single donor flap volume. Stacking DIEP/PAP flaps as described is both safe and efficient. Furthermore, this combination provides superior aesthetics mirroring the natural geometry of the breast. Bilateral stacked DIEP/PAP flaps represent our first choice for breast reconstruction in this patient population.

Background The purpose of this investigation was to examine patients with low body mass index (BMI) regarding the feasibility to perform autologous breast reconstruction in such patients, as well as to determine optimal donor sites and evaluate outcomes accordingly. Patients and Methods All patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction were divided into three cohorts based on BMI. Group 1 included patients with BMI greater than or equal to 22 kg/m2 and was defined "low-normal BMI." Patients with BMI 22 to 25 kg/m2 were placed in Group 2, labeled as "high-normal BMI." Group 3, defined as "overweight," included patients with BMI greater than 25 kg/m2, but less than 30 kg/m2. Patients were then analyzed based on demographics, breast cancer history, intraoperative details, complications, and revisionary surgeries. F-tests, chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, and Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. Results During the study period, a total of 259 reconstructions were performed. Group 1 included 30 patients (n = 49 flaps), Group 2 included 58 patients (n = 98 flaps), and Group 3 included 69 patients (n = 112 flaps). Patients undergoing nipple-areolar sparing mastectomy were more likely to be in Groups 1 (39% [n = 19]) and 2 (37% [n = 37]) as compared with Group 3 (14.2% [n = 16]) (p < 0.001) as compared with the overweight cohort. Patients with increasing BMI were more likely to undergo abdominally based free flaps as compared with alternative donor sites (Group 1 = 2.26, Group 2 = 7.9, Group 3 = 27 [p < 0.001]). Conclusions Abdominally based free flaps are possible in the majority of patients, however alternative harvest sites have to be used more frequently in low BMI patients.

It is over 20 years since the inaugural deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. We review the type of flap utilized and indications in 2,850 microvascular breast reconstruction over the subsequent 20 years in the senior author's practice (Robert J. Allen). Data were extracted from a personal logbook of all microsurgical free flap breast reconstructions performed between August 1992 and August 2012. Indication for surgery; mastectomy pattern in primary reconstruction; flap type, whether unilateral or bilateral; recipient vessels; and adjunctive procedures were recorded. The DIEP was the most commonly performed flap (66%), followed by the superior gluteal artery perforator flap (12%), superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (9%), inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (6%), profunda artery perforator flap (3%), and transverse upper gracilis flap (3%). Primary reconstruction accounted for 1,430 flaps (50%), secondary 992 (35%), and tertiary 425 (15%). As simultaneous bilateral reconstructions, 59% flaps were performed. With each flap, there typically ensues a period of enthusiasm which translated into surge in flap numbers. However, each flap has its own nuances and characteristics that influence patient and physician choice. Of note, each newly introduced flap, either buttock or thigh, results in a sharp decline in its predecessor. In this practice, the DIEP flap has remained the first choice in autologous breast reconstruction.

A patient with a severe case of Poland syndrome presented with a painful capsular contracture from a previous implant-based breast reconstruction. She desired the implant to be removed and to proceed with autologous reconstruction, sizeable enough to match the volume of her contralateral breast. A paucity of abdominal donor tissue combined with the patient's hesitancy to acquire an anterior scar excluded this location as a free tissue transfer option. As an alternative donor site, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap was chosen. Bilateral PAP flaps were harvested and stacked using anterograde and retrograde anastomoses to the internal mammary vessels. Enough volume was present to fill her chest wall concavity and provide adequate projection to achieve symmetry with her contralateral breast. Her donor sites healed well and remained inconspicuous, without generating difficulties sitting. In conclusion, stacked PAP flaps provide an excellent alternative to an abdominal donor site for achieving large volume unilateral breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Recent evolutions of oncologic breast surgery and reconstruction now allow surgeons to offer the appropriate patients a single-stage, autologous tissue reconstruction with the least donor-site morbidity. The authors present their series of buried free flaps in nipple-sparing mastectomies as proof of concept, and to explore indications, techniques, and early outcomes from their series. METHODS: From 2001 to 2011, a total of 2262 perforator-based free flaps for breast reconstruction were reviewed from the authors' prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: There were 338 free flaps performed on 215 patients following nipple-sparing mastectomy, including 84 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with 134 buried free flaps. Ductal carcinoma in situ and BRCA-positive were the most common diagnoses, in 26 patients (30.9 percent) each. The most common flaps used were the deep inferior epigastric perforator (77.6 percent), transverse upper gracilis (7.5 percent), profunda artery perforator (7.5 percent), and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps (3.7 percent). An implantable Cook-Swartz Doppler was used to monitor all buried flaps. Fat necrosis requiring excision was present in 5.2 percent of breast reconstructions, and there were three flap losses (2.2 percent). Seventy-eight flaps (58.2 percent) underwent minor revision for improved cosmesis; 56 (41.8 percent) needed no further surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate autologous breast reconstruction can successfully and safely be performed in a single stage; however, the authors are not yet ready to offer this as their standard of care. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

BACKGROUND: Autologous microvascular breast reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure. While arterial anastomoses are traditionally being hand-sewn, venous anastomoses are often completed with a coupler device. The largest coupler size possible should be used, as determined by the smaller of either the donor or recipient vein. While its efficacy has been shown using 3.0-mm size and greater couplers, little is known about the consequences of using coupler sizes less than or equal to 2.5 mm. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction was conducted at NYU Medical Center between November 2007 and November 2011. Flaps were divided into cohorts based on coupler size used: 2.0 mm, 2.5 mm, and 3.0 mm. Outcomes included incidence of arterial or venous insufficiency, hematoma, fat necrosis, partial flap loss, full flap loss, and need for future fat grafting. Results: One-hundred ninety-seven patients underwent 392 flaps during the study period. Patients were similar in age, type of flap, smoking status, and radiation history. Coupler size less than or equal to 2.0 mm was found to be a significant risk factor for venous insufficiency (P = 0.038), as well as for development of fat necrosis (P = 0.041) and future need for fat grafting (P = 0.050). In multivariate analysis, body mass index was found to be an independent risk factor for skin flap necrosis (P = 0.010) and full flap loss (P = 0.035). Conclusions: Complications were significantly increased in patients where couplers of 2.0 mm or less were used, therefore to be avoided whenever possible. When needed, more aggressive vessel exposure through rib harvest, the use of thoracodorsal vessels or hand-sewing the anastomosis should be considered in cases of internal mammary vein caliber of 2.0 mm or less. CLINICAL QUESTION: Therapeutic LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2013.