Faculty Bibliography

Background: The germline I1307K mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene is a well known alteration identified in approximately 6% of the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Individuals with this mutation have an increased risk of developing colorectal and other cancers. The implications of the APC (I1307K) mutation in patients with prostate cancer are unknown. We sought to determine the clinical outcomes of patients with prostate cancer and the germline APC (I1307K) mutation.
Method(s): We retrospectively reviewed records from New York University and Johns Hopkins University to identify patients with the APC (I1307K) mutation. Eligibility criteria included the identification of the mutation either on germline or somatic tissue testing (when germline testing was not available). Aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC) was defined using previously established criteria including: presence of small cell histology, presence of exclusively visceral metastases, bulky prostate mass or lymphadenopathy, low PSA with high-volume ( > 20) bone metastases, neuroendocrine marker positivity or short interval ( < 6 months) to castration resistance. Combined somatic alterations in two or more of following genes were assessed: RB1, TP53, PTEN. These somatic alterations have been previously associated with AVPC. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient data.
Result(s): From 2016-2021, 13 patients with the germline APC (I1307K) mutation were identified. At the time of analysis 9 (69%) patients were alive. Most patients (7; 54%) had metastatic disease at presentation. Median PSA at diagnosis was 0.4 ng/mL (range: 0.4-20 ng/mL). The median time to castration resistance among those receiving hormonal therapy was 9 months (range: 3-13 months). Presence of small cell histology was found on initial biopsy in 3 patients and on subsequent biopsy in 1 additional patient (31% overall). Bulky prostate mass or lymphadenopathy was found in 3 (23%) patients. There were 2 (15%) patients who had low PSA with high-volume bone metastases. Four (31%) patients had radiographic progression with no concordant PSA increase. Clinically-defined AVPC was found in 7 (54%) patients and in 100% of those patients with metastatic disease. Combined somatic alterations in two or more of RB1, TP53 or PTEN were identified in 3 (23%) patients.
Conclusion(s): Prostate cancers that develop in the presence of the germline APC (I1307K) mutation appear to be enriched for clinically-defined and molecularly-defined AVPC. Several of these patients demonstrated small cell histology and PSA-independent progression, higher than the expected background rate. This raises the hypothesis that the germline APC (I1307K) mutation influences the somatic genomic and/or epigenomic landscape of prostate cancer. Larger studies to validate the increased risk of AVPC in APC (I1307K) carriers, and to elucidate the somatic alteration landscape in these patients, are ongoing

Background: First-line treatment with pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy has shown durable clinical activity in selected patients (pts) with advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). In a pooled population of pts with advanced UC from the single-arm phase 2 KEYNOTE-052 (NCT02335424) and the randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 (NCT02853305) studies, this exploratory analysis evaluated the relationship between baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of first-line pembro monotherapy.
Method(s): Cisplatin-ineligible pts with advanced UC were enrolled in KEYNOTE-052 and chemotherapy-naive pts with advanced UC were enrolled in KEYNOTE-361. For analysis of predictive factors for ORR and OS in pembro-treated pts, the purposeful selection method was used to build the multivariable logistic regression model (ORR) and multivariable Cox model (OS), beginning with a univariable analysis of each independent variable. Any variable in the univariate model with P < 0.10 was a candidate for the multivariate model. The stepwise selection method was used to select the variables in the final model. Significance of the final model was set at P < 0.05. Data cutoff dates were September 26, 2020 (KEYNOTE-052) and April 29, 2020 (KEYNOTE-361).
Result(s): This pooled analysis included 681 pts treated with pembro monotherapy (KEYNOTE-052, N = 374; KEYNOTE-361, N = 307 [170 were cisplatin ineligible]). Median follow-up was 51.9 mo (range, 22.0-65.3). ORR was 29.4% (95% CI, 26.0-32.9; 69 CRs, 131 PRs), and median DOR was 33.2 mo (range, 1.4+ to 60.7+). Median OS was 12.5 mo (95% CI, 11.0-14.6). By multivariate analysis, independent factors significantly associated with higher ORR were PD-L1 status (combined positive score [CPS] >=10 vs CPS < 10; odds ratio [OR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.33-2.71]; P = 0.0004), site of metastasis (lymph node only vs visceral disease; OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.06-2.59]; P = 0.0265), liver involvement (absent vs present; OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.06-2.89]; P = 0.0294), and baseline hemoglobin level >=10 vs < 10 g/dL; OR, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.09-4.31]; P = 0.0276). Multivariate analysis of OS is displayed in the Table.
Conclusion(s): This exploratory multivariate analysis identified numerous factors, including PD-L1-positive status (CPS >=10), lymph node only metastasis, and lower ECOG PS score, associated with improved clinical outcomes in pts with advanced UC treated with first-line pembro monotherapy

Background: Pembro monotherapy is a standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) and showed antitumor activity and acceptable safety when combined with lenva in the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-146 study. We present results of LEAP-011 (NCT03898180), a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, global, phase 3 study of first-line pembro + lenva vs pembro + placebo in pts with locally advanced or metastatic UC who are cisplatin-ineligible with PD-L1-positive tumors or are ineligible to receive platinum-based chemotherapy.
Method(s): Adults with histologically confirmed, locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC who were cisplatin-ineligible with tumors expressing PD-L1 (combined positive score >=10) or were ineligible to receive platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembro 200 mg IV Q3W for up to 35 cycles (2 y) + either lenva 20 mg orally once daily or placebo. Primary end points were PFS per RECIST v1.1 and OS. The key secondary end point was ORR per RECIST v1.1. An independent data monitoring committee (DMC) regularly 441 randomly assigned pts, 218 were assigned to receive pembro + lenva (median age, 74 y [range, 43-93]; ECOG PS 2, 83.5%) and 223 (median age, 73 y [range, 47-92]; ECOG PS 2, 83.0%) were assigned to receive pembro + placebo. Median duration of treatment was 3.8 mo (range, 0.0-20.7) for pembro + lenva and 3.4 mo (range, 0.0-22.0) for pembro + placebo. Median PFS was 4.2 mo (95% CI, 3.8-5.9) in the pembro + lenva group and 4.0 mo (95% CI, 2.7-5.4) in the pembro + placebo group (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.71-1.16]). Median OS was 11.2 mo (95% CI, 7.4-14.9) with pembro + lenva vs 13.8 mo (95% CI, 9.8-18.8) with pembro + placebo (HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.94-1.67]; 6-mo OS rate, 63.6% vs 70.7%). ORR was 31.2% with pembro + lenva vs 26.5% with pembro + placebo. In 436 treated pts, treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 186 of 214 pts (86.9%) in the pembro + lenva group and in 149 of 222 pts (67.1%) in the pembro + placebo group. Grade 3-5 TRAEs occurred in 107 pts (50.0%) in the pembro + lenva group and in 62 pts (27.9%) in the pembro + placebo group. Death from a TRAE occurred in 6 pts (2.8%) in the pembro + lenva group and in 1 pt (0.5%) in the pembro + placebo group.
Conclusion(s): The safety profile of pembro + lenva was consistent with that of previous studies; no new safety signals were observed. The benefit/risk ratio for pembro + lenva was not considered positive vs pembro + placebo in platinum-ineligible pts with advanced UC. Antitumor activity of pembro + placebo was similar to what has been reported in previous studies, and pembro monotherapy remains standard of care as first-line therapy in platinum-ineligible pts with advanced UC

Background: Pembro is a 1L treatment for cisplatin-ineligible pts with UC. This post hoc landmark analysis evaluated clinical outcomes by response at 9 wk to 1L pembro monotherapy in pts with advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC from the single-arm phase 2 KEYNOTE-052 (NCT02335424) and the randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 (NCT02853305) trials.
Method(s): Cisplatin-ineligible pts with advanced UC were enrolled in KEYNOTE-052 and received pembro (200 mg Q3W for <=2 y). Platinum-eligible pts with advanced UC who had not previously received systemic chemotherapy (chemo) were enrolled in KEYNOTE-361 and randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive pembro (200 mg Q3W for <=2 y), pembro + chemo (1000 mg/m² gemcitabine on d1 and d8 + cisplatin [70 mg/m²] or carboplatin [AUC 5] on d1 of each 3-wk cycle), or chemo. The primary analysis group included pembro monotherapy-treated pts; the sensitivity analysis group included pembro monotherapy-treated pts from KEYNOTE-052 and the choice of carboplatin subpopulation of pembro monotherapy-treated pts from KEYNOTE-361. Landmark analyses of OS by pts with CR, PR, SD, or PD per RECIST v1.1 by BICR at first imaging assessment (wk 9) were pooled for the ITT populations. Duration of CR/PR/SD and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data cutoffs were Sep 26, 2020 (KEYNOTE-052) and Apr 29, 2020 (KEYNOTE-361).
Result(s): The primary analysis group included 681 pembro-treated pts (KEYNOTE-052, N = 374; KEYNOTE-361, N = 307); the sensitivity analysis group included 544 pembro-treated pts (KEYNOTE-052, N = 374; KEYNOTE-361, N = 170). Median time from randomization to cutoff was 51.9 mo (range, 22.0-65.3) and 53.7 mo (range, 22.0-65.3) for the primary and sensitivity analysis groups, respectively. Twenty-five pts (4.6%) had CR and 135 (24.6%) had PR (primary group); 17 pts (3.9%) had CR and 105 (24.1%) had PR (sensitivity group). Median DOR was 25.9 mo for pts with CR/PR at wk 9; pts with CR/PR or SD at wk 9 had longer OS than pts with PD at wk 9 (Table).
Conclusion(s): In this post hoc analysis, pts with advanced UC in KEYNOTE-052 and KEYNOTE-361 with CR/PR at wk 9 had better clinical outcomes with pembro monotherapy than pts with SD or PD; 1L pembro monotherapy continues to show efficacy in advanced UC

Background: Pembro showed antitumor activity in 1L and 2L for pts with UC in the single-arm, phase 2 KEYNOTE-052 study (NCT02335424) and the randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 (NCT02256436) study, respectively. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated whether primary tumor location affected efficacy and safety of pembro (KEYNOTE-052; KEYNOTE-045) and chemotherapy (chemo; KEYNOTE-045).
Method(s): KEYNOTE-052 enrolled cisplatin-ineligible pts with advanced/metastatic UC who had not previously received systemic therapy; they received pembro (200 mg IV Q3W). KEYNOTE-045 enrolled pts with advanced/metastatic UC who had received platinum-containing chemo; pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembro (200 mg IV Q3W) or investigator's choice of chemo (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine). Both studies required pts to have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Upper tract (UT) UC included primary tumors in the renal pelvis or ureter; lower tract (LT) UC included primary tumors in the bladder or urethra. Pts with UT and LT disease (UT/LT) were classified as LT. Pts receiving pembro were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, for up to 2y. End points were PFS, ORR, and DOR per RECIST v1.1 by central radiology assessment and OS.
Result(s): A total of 369 pembro-treated pts (68 UT; 301 LT [79 UT/LT]) from KEYNOTE-052 plus 270 pembro-treated pts (93 UT; 177 LT [33 UT/LT]) and 272 chemo-treated pts (94 UT; 178 LT) from KEYNOTE-045 were evaluated. Median follow-up from randomization to data cutoff (09/26/20 and 10/1/20, respectively) was >=56 mo. Both studies enrolled a similar percentage of pts with PD-L1-positive tumors (25%-30%). PFS, ORR, DOR, and OS for pembro were consistent regardless of tumor location, although ORR for KEYNOTE-045 was lower for the UT group (Table). In the chemo arm of KEYNOTE-045, similar efficacy was observed regardless of tumor location or regimen. Grade 3-5 TRAEs occurred at similar rates in KEYNOTE-052 (19.1% UT; 21.6% LT) and KEYNOTE-045 (17.2% UT; 16.8% LT).
Conclusion(s): In this exploratory analysis, pembro showed similar clinical activity and manageable safety regardless of primary UC tumor location

Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro) has shown efficacy in advanced/unresectable and metastatic UC (mUC). There is interest in determining whether pts should be treated subsequently with checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 therapy if mUC responds then later progresses. Pembro retreatment after disease progression has shown efficacy in melanoma and NSCLC. This post hoc exploratory analysis investigated the efficacy of pembro retreatment for pts with advanced UC or mUC enrolled in KEYNOTE-045 and KEYNOTE-052 with a best overall response (BOR) of SD or better and whose disease progressed after discontinuation or completion of 2 y of therapy.
Method(s): The phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial (NCT02256436) was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of pembro vs chemotherapy (chemo) in pts with mUC that recurred/progressed on platinum containing chemo; <=2 prior lines of systemic chemo for mUC were permitted. The phase 2 KEYNOTE-052 trial (NCT02335424) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line pembro in cisplatin-ineligible pts with advanced UC. In both studies, pembro was administered for up to 2 y; pts were eligible for retreatment if they stopped pembro after CR or had a BOR of CR, PR, or SD and completed 2 y of treatment. Pts must have investigator-confirmed radiographic PD after therapy cessation, have ECOG PS score 0-1, and not have received anticancer treatment after the last pembro dose. BOR to retreatment is reported.
Result(s): At data cutoff for KEYNOTE-045 (Oct 1, 2020), 11 pts were retreated: 5 (45%) achieved objective response to retreatment (3 CR; 2 PR; Table) and 6 had SD, for a disease control rate (DCR; CR+PR+SD) of 100%. Median treatment-free interval was 7.7 mo (IQR, 3.6-16.5); median duration of retreatment was 11.4 mo (IQR, 7.6-12.0). Seven pts (64%) were alive at cutoff. At data cutoff for KEYNOTE-052 (Sep 26, 2020), 10 pts were retreated; 5 (50%) had objective response to retreatment (1 CR; 4 PR) and 4 had SD, for a DCR of 90%. Retreatment BOR was PD for 1 pt (10%). Median treatment-free interval was 13.0 mo (9.2-16.6); median duration of retreatment was 6.0 mo (IQR, 4.9-9.2). Four pts (40%) were alive at cutoff.
Conclusion(s): Although the number of pts who received retreatment was small, objective responses were observed. The findings are generally consistent with observations from retreatment in other tumor types (e.g., melanoma)

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:The recruitment of underserved patients into therapeutic oncology trials is imperative. The National Institutes of Health mandates the inclusion of minorities in clinical research, although their participation remains under-represented. Institutions have used data mining to match patients to clinical trials. In a public health care system, such expensive tools are unavailable. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The NYU Clinical Trials Office implemented a quality improvement program at Bellevue Hospital Cancer Center to increase therapeutic trial enrollment. Patients are screened through the electronic medical record, tumor board conferences, and the cancer registry. Our analysis evaluated two variables: number of patients identified and those enrolled into clinical trials. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Two years before the program, there were 31 patients enrolled. For a period of 24 months (July 2017 to July 2019), we identified 255 patients, of whom 143 (56.1%) were enrolled. Of those enrolled, 121 (84.6%) received treatment, and 22 (15%) were screen failures. Fifty-five (38.5%) were referred to NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center for therapy. Of the total enrollees, 64% were female, 56% were non-White, and overall median age was 55 years (range: 33-88 years). Our participants spoke 16 different languages, and 57% were non-English-speaking. We enrolled patients into eight different disease categories, with 38% recruited to breast cancer trials. Eighty-three percent of our patients reside in low-income areas, with 62% in both low-income and Health Professional Shortage Areas. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Prescreening at Bellevue has led to a 4.6-fold increase in patient enrollment to clinical trials. Future research into using prescreening programs at public institutions may improve access to clinical trials for underserved populations.

Background PVSRIPO, a novel intratumoral viral immunotherapy, infects cells via CD155, which is widely expressed on solid tumors and antigen-presenting cells (APC). Infection is lethal in malignant cells, but a unique, activating, nonlethal infection of local APCs yields type-I/III interferon (IFN)-dominant inflammation with subsequent anti-tumor T-cell priming and activation resulting in anti-tumor efficacy. In preclinical models, PVSRIPO-dependent inflammation upregulated the PD-1/L1 pathway, and greater anti-tumor response was observed with PVSRIPO + anti-PD-1/L1 (aPD-1/L1). Promising clinical activity with PVSRIPO monotherapy was observed in patients with recurrent glioblastoma and advanced aPD-1- refractory melanoma.1 2 Collectively, these results warrant further clinical investigation of PVSRIPO +/- aPD-1/L1. Methods LUMINOS-103 (NCT04690699) is a phase (Ph) 1/2, open-label, multi-center, single-arm basket trial evaluating repeat administration of PVSRIPO +/- aPD-1/L1 in adults with solid tumors. Trial objectives are to assess the safety and tolerability of PVSRIPO monotherapy in each cohort in Ph 1 and the safety, tolerability, and antitumor efficacy of PVSRIPO + aPD-1/L1 in each cohort in Ph 2. The first two study cohorts include patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer being treated in the neoadjuvant setting (A) and patients with metastatic bladder cancer being treated in the 1st/2nd line setting (B); these cohorts have been described previously.3 Cohort C includes patients with resectable, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) being treated in the neoadjuvant setting; Cohort D includes patients with recurrent/ metastatic HNSCC with a PD-L1 Combined Positive Score >=1 being treated in the 1st line setting. Eligibility: HNSCC patients must have histologically or cytologically-proven SCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. All patients must have prior and boosted PV immunization and tumors amenable to injection and biopsy. Key exclusion criteria: Requirement for oxygen supplementation, systemic or intratumoral therapy <=6 months prior to the first dose of study drug, CNS metastases requiring immediate treatment, systemic immunosuppressive medications <=4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug, and severe active comorbidities. Patients who are HIV+, HBV+ or HCV+ are eligible provided they meet certain criteria. Primary endpoints include safety (all cohorts), tolerability (all cohorts), surgical complication rate (A, C), pathologic treatment effect/response (A, C), and objective response rate (B, D). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (all cohorts), pathologic downstaging and relapse-free survival (A, C), duration of response and progression- free survival (B, D), and assessment of tumor/blood biomarkers (all cohorts)

Cancers of the genitourinary (GU) tract are common malignancies in both men and women and are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1 have provided clinical benefit, particularly in renal cell and urothelial carcinoma, and have been incorporated into standard of care treatment in both localized and metastatic settings. However, a large fraction of patients do not derive benefit. Identification of patient and tumor-derived factors which associate with response have led to insights into mechanisms of response and resistance to ICI. Herein, we review current approvals and clinical development of ICI in GU malignancies and discuss exploratory biomarkers which aid in personalized treatment selection.