Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) have a poor prognosis and high mortality. Nivolumab monotherapy demonstrated clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile in patients with aHCC in the CheckMate 040 study. Five-year follow-up of the sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced cohorts of CheckMate 040 are presented here. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Patients received nivolumab monotherapy at dose levels of 0.1-10.0 mg/kg (dose-escalation phase) or 3 mg/kg (dose-expansion phase) every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability (dose escalation), and objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and by investigator per RECIST version 1.1 (dose expansion). RESULTS:Eighty sorafenib-naive and 154 sorafenib-experienced patients were treated. Minimum follow-up in both groups was 60 months. ORR per BICR was 20% (95% CI 12-30) and 14% (95% CI 9-21) in the sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced groups, respectively. Responses occurred regardless of HCC etiology or baseline tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels. Median overall survival (OS) was 26.6 months (95% CI 16.6-30.6) and 15.1 months (95% CI 13.0-18.2) in sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced patients, respectively. The 3-year OS rates were 28% in the sorafenib-naive and 20% in the sorafenib-experienced group; 5-year OS rates were 14% and 12%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 33% and 21% in the sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced patients, respectively. Biomarker analyses showed that baseline PD-L1 expression ≥1% was associated with higher ORR and longer OS compared with PD-L1 <1%. In the sorafenib-naive group, patients with OS ≥3 years exhibited higher baseline CD8 T-cell density compared with those with OS <1 year. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:With 5 years of follow-up, nivolumab monotherapy continued to provide durable clinical benefit with manageable safety in sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced patients with aHCC.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of co-occurring symptoms in patients with advanced cancer and malignant fungating wounds (MFWs) on palliative and functional performance, and the feasibility of collecting self-reported data in this population. DESIGN: This was an exploratory, observational study. Quantitative surveys and qualitative semistructured interviews using a phenomenological approach were employed. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 5 adults with advanced breast, oral, and ovarian cancer and MFWs. Participants were recruited from an urban outpatient cancer center, hospice, and wound center located in the Northeastern United States. METHODS: Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, and self-reported symptom and functional performance data measured. Descriptive statistics, T scores, confidence intervals, and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative data. One-to-one semistructured interviews were conducted by the first author to gain deeper understanding of participants' symptom experience. Qualitative data were analyzed using an iterative and inductive thematic data analysis method to identify major themes. RESULTS: The mean cancer-related and wound-specific symptom occurrence was 17 (SD = 5.56) and 4 (SD = 1.26), respectively. Distressing, extensive co-occurring symptom burdens were experienced by all participants; they also reported poor functional performance and diminished palliative performance. Qualitative findings supported quantitative results. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that co-occurring cancer-related and wound-specific symptoms have incremental and negative impact on functional performance. The use of multiple data collection methods was feasible, including self-reported data in this advanced cancer population.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of co-occurring symptoms in patients with advanced cancer and malignant fungating wounds (MFWs) on palliative and functional performance, and the feasibility of collecting self-reported data in this population. DESIGN/METHODS:This was an exploratory, observational study. Quantitative surveys and qualitative semistructured interviews using a phenomenological approach were employed. SUBJECTS AND SETTING/METHODS:The sample comprised 5 adults with advanced breast, oral, and ovarian cancer and MFWs. Participants were recruited from an urban outpatient cancer center, hospice, and wound center located in the Northeastern United States. METHODS:Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, and self-reported symptom and functional performance data measured. Descriptive statistics, T scores, confidence intervals, and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative data. One-to-one semistructured interviews were conducted by the first author to gain deeper understanding of participants' symptom experience. Qualitative data were analyzed using an iterative and inductive thematic data analysis method to identify major themes. RESULTS:The mean cancer-related and wound-specific symptom occurrence was 17 (SD = 5.56) and 4 (SD = 1.26), respectively. Distressing, extensive co-occurring symptom burdens were experienced by all participants; they also reported poor functional performance and diminished palliative performance. Qualitative findings supported quantitative results. CONCLUSIONS:Findings suggest that co-occurring cancer-related and wound-specific symptoms have incremental and negative impact on functional performance. The use of multiple data collection methods was feasible, including self-reported data in this advanced cancer population.

BACKGROUND:Reporting race and ethnicity in clinical trial publications is critical for determining the generalizability and effectiveness of new treatments. This is particularly important for breast cancer, in which Black women have been shown to have between 40 and 100% higher mortality rate yet are underrepresented in trials. Our objective was to describe changes over time in the reporting of race/ethnicity in breast trial publications. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify the primary publication linked to trials with results posted from May 2010-2022. Statistical analysis included summed frequencies and a linear regression model of the proportion of articles reporting race/ethnicity and the proportion of non-White enrollees over time. RESULTS:A proportion of 72 of the 98 (73.4%) studies that met inclusion criteria reported race/ethnicity. In a linear regression model of the proportion of studies reporting race/ethnicity as a function of time, there was no statistically significant change, although we detected a signal toward a decreasing trend (coefficient for quarter = -2.2, p = 0.2). Among all studies reporting race and ethnicity over the study period, the overall percentage of non-White enrollees during the study period was 21.9%, [standard error (s.e.) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18.4, 25.5] with a signal towards a decreasing trend in Non-White enrollment [coefficient for year-quarter = -0.8 (p = 0.2)]. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our data demonstrate that both race reporting and overall representation of minority groups in breast cancer clinical trials did not improve over the last 12 years and may have, in fact, decreased. Increased reporting of race and ethnicity data forces the medical community to confront disparities in access to clinical trials. This may improve efforts to recruit and retain members of minority groups in clinical trials, and over time, reduce racial disparities in oncologic outcomes.

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) include diverse carcinomas with heterogeneous clinical behavior. DNA methylation is a useful tool in classifying a variety of cancers. In this study, we analyzed TNBC using DNA methylation profiling and compared the results to those of mutational analysis. DNA methylation profiling (Infinium MethylationEPIC array, Illumina) and 50-gene panel-targeted DNA sequencing were performed in 44 treatment-naïve TNBC. We identified 3 distinct DNA methylation clusters with specific clinicopathologic and molecular features. Cluster 1 (phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B-enriched cluster; n = 9) patients were significantly older (mean age, 71 years; P = .008) with tumors that were more likely to exhibit apocrine differentiation (78%; P < .001), a lower grade (44% were grade 2), a lower proliferation index (median Ki-67, 15%; P = .002), and lower tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte fractions (median, 15%; P = .0142). Tumors carried recurrent PIK3CA and AKT1 mutations and a higher percentage of low HER-2 expression (89%; P = .033). Cluster 3 (chromosomal instability cluster; n = 28) patients were significantly younger (median age, 57 years). Tumors were of higher grade (grade 3, 93%), had a higher proliferation index (median Ki-67, 75%), and were with a high fraction of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (median, 30%). Ninety-one percent of the germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were in cluster 3, and these tumors showed the highest level of copy number alterations. Cluster 2 represented cases with intermediate clinicopathologic characteristics and no specific molecular profile (no specific molecular profile cluster; n = 7). There were no differences in relation to stage, recurrence, and survival. In conclusion, DNA methylation profiling is a promising tool to classify patients with TNBC into biologically relevant groups, which may result in better disease characterization and reveal potential targets for emerging therapies.

Significant disparities exist in detecting and treating breast cancer in women with disabilities, leading to cancer detection at advanced stages. This paper provides an overview of disparities for women with disabilities related to breast cancer screening and care, primarily focusing on significant mobility disabilities. Current care gaps include screening barriers related to accessibility and inequitable treatment options, with race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and disability severity factors, mediating the disparities for this population. The reasons for these disparities are myriad and stem from both system-level deficiencies and individual-level provider bias. Although structural changes are warranted, individual healthcare providers must also be incorporated in the requisite change. Intersectionality is critical to disparities and inequities and should be central to any discussion of strategies for improving care for people with disabilities, many of whom have intersectional identities. Efforts to reduce screening rate disparities for breast cancer in women with significant mobility disabilities should start with improving accessibility through removing structural barriers, establishing comprehensive accessibility standards, and addressing healthcare provider bias. Future interventional studies are needed to implement and assess the value of programs to improve breast cancer screening rates in women with disabilities. Increasing the representation of women with disabilities in clinical trials may provide another avenue for reducing treatment disparities, as these trials often provide breakthrough treatment to women with cancer diagnosed at later stages. Ultimately, attention to the specific needs of patients with disabilities should be improved across the US to promote inclusive and effective cancer screening and treatment.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes of patients with stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and identify survival benchmarks for comparison when considering resection in these patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Highly selected cohorts of patients with liver-oligometastatic pancreas cancer have reported prolonged survival following resection. The long-term impact of surgery in this setting remains undefined due to a lack of appropriate control groups. METHODS:We identified patients with clinical stage IV PDAC with synchronous liver metastases within our cancer registry. We estimated overall survival (OS) among various patient subgroups using the Kaplan-Meier method. To mitigate immortal time bias, we analyzed long-term outcomes of patients who survived beyond 12 months (landmark time) from diagnosis. RESULTS:We identified 241 patients. Median OS was 7 months (95%CI 5-9), both overall and for patients with liver-only metastasis (n=144). Ninety patients (38% of liver-only; 40% of whole cohort) survived at least 12 months; those who received chemotherapy in this subgroup had a median OS of 26 months (95%CI 17-39). Of these patients, those with resectable or borderline resectable primary tumors and resectable liver-only metastasis (n=9, 4%) had a median OS of 39 months (95%CI 13-NR). CONCLUSIONS:The 4% of our cohort that were potentially eligible for surgery experienced a prolonged survival compared to all-comers with stage IV disease. Oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing resection of metastatic pancreas cancer should be assessed in the context of the expected survival of patients potentially eligible for surgery and not relative to all patients with stage IV disease.

BACKGROUND:Screening MRI as an adjunct to mammography is recommended by the ACS for patients with a lifetime risk for breast cancer > 20%. While the benefits are clear, MRI screening is associated with an increase in false-positive results. The purpose of this study was to analyze our institutional database of high-risk patients and assess the uptake of screening MRI examinations and the results of those screenings. METHODS:Our institutional review board-approved High-Risk Breast Cancer Database was queried for patients enrolled from January 2017 to January 2023 who were at high risk for breast cancer in a comparative analysis between those who were screened versus not screened with MRIs. Variables of interest included risk factor, background, MRI screening uptake, and frequency and results of image-guided breast biopsies. RESULTS:A total of 254 of 1106 high-risk patients (23%) had MRI screening. Forty-six of 852 (5.3%) patients in the non-MRI-screened cohort and nine of 254 (3.5%) patients in the MRI-screened cohort were diagnosed with a malignant lesion after image-guided biopsy (p = 0.6). There was no significant difference between MRI and non-MRI guided biopsies in detecting breast cancer. All malignant lesions were T1 or in situ disease. The 254 patients in the MRI-screened group underwent 185 biopsies. Fifty-seven percent of MRI-guided biopsies yielded benign results. CONCLUSIONS:Although the addition of MRI screening in our high-risk cohort did not produce a significant number of additional cancer diagnoses, patients monitored in our high-risk cohort who developed breast cancer were diagnosed at very early stages of disease, underscoring the benefit of participation in the program.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:There is no consensus regarding the role of primary tumor resection for patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNET). We assessed surgical treatment patterns and evaluated the survival impact of primary tumor resection in patients with metastatic panNET. METHODS:Patients with synchronous metastatic nonfunctional panNET in the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) were categorized based on whether they underwent primary tumor resection. We used logistic regressions to assess associations with primary tumor resection. We performed survival analyses with Kaplan-Meier survival functions, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression within a propensity score matched cohort. RESULTS:In the overall cohort of 2613 patients, 68% (n = 839) underwent primary tumor resection. The proportion of patients who underwent primary tumor resection decreased over time from 36% (2004) to 16% (2016, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching on age at diagnosis, median income quartile, tumor grade, size, liver metastasis, and hospital type, primary tumor resection was associated with longer median overall survival (OS) (65 vs. 24 months; p < 0.001) and was associated with lower hazard of mortality (HR: 0.39, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Primary tumor resection was significantly associated with improved OS, suggesting that, if feasible, surgical resection can be considered for well-selected patients with panNET and synchronous metastasis.