Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) leads to the most severe form of viral hepatitis; however, the prevalence of HDV is not well understood. Using real-world data from the All-Payer Claims Database (APCD), this study estimates the prevalence of HBV/HDV infection among the chronic hepatitis B (HBV) population and describes patient/clinical characteristics for adults with HBV/HDV infection in the United States (US). APPROACH AND RESULTS/RESULTS:Adults (≥ 18 y) with ≥1 inpatient claim or ≥2 outpatient claims for HDV infection or HBV in the APCD from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2020 were identified. HDV prevalence was calculated as the proportion of patients with HBV/HDV infection among total patients with HBV infection. Patient characteristics, socioeconomic status, advanced liver complications (e.g., cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma), and comorbidities were assessed. A total of 6,719 -patients were diagnosed with HBV/HDV among 144,975 with HBV and 12-months of continuous data, for a prevalence of 4.6%. At diagnosis, 31.7% of patients with HBV/HDV had advanced liver complications, including compensated cirrhosis (16.3%) and decompensated cirrhosis (10.4%). Diabetes (50.5%), hypertension (49.8%), HIV infection (30.9%), were the top three comorbidities. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In a large database capturing approximately 80% of the US insured population, HBV/HDV infection prevalence was 4.6% among HBV-infected adults. HDV-infected patients had high rates of baseline liver complications and other comorbidities at time of diagnosis, suggesting potentially delayed diagnosis and/or treatment. Earlier identification of HBV/HDV infection among the HBV population may provide opportunities to improve linkage to care and treatment, thereby reducing the risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is linked to reduced female fertility, but it is unclear how fertility rates vary by histological disease activity. METHODS:Nationwide IBD cohort of Swedish women aged 15-44 years. We examined fertility rates during periods with vs. without histological inflammation (n=21,046; follow-up: 1990-2016) and during periods with vs. without clinical activity (IBD-related hospitalization, surgery, or treatment escalation) (n=24,995; follow-up: 2006-2020). Accounting for socio-demographics and comorbidities, we used Poisson regression to estimate adjusted fertility rate ratios (aFRRs) for live-births conceived during 12-month-periods of histological inflammation (vs. histological remission) and 3-month-periods of clinically active IBD (vs. quiescent IBD). RESULTS:During periods with vs. without histological inflammation, there were 6.35 (95%CI=5.98-6.73) and 7.09 (95%CI=6.48-7.70) live-births conceived per 100 person-years of follow-up, respectively, or one fewer child per fourteen women with 10 years of histological inflammation (aFRR=0.90; 95%CI=0.81-1.00). In women with histological inflammation fertility was similarly reduced in ulcerative colitis (UC, aFRR=0.89 [95%CI=0.78-1.02]) and Crohn's disease (CD, aFRR=0.86 [95%CI=0.72-1.04]). Clinical IBD activity was associated with an aFRR of 0.76 (95%CI=0.72-0.79) or one fewer child per six women with 10 years of clinical activity. Fertility was reduced in clinically active UC (aFRR=0.75 [95%CI=0.70-0.81]) and CD (aFRR=0.76 [95%CI=0.70-0.82]). Finally, also among women with clinically quiescent IBD, histological inflammation (vs. histological remission) was associated with reduced fertility (aFRR=0.85 [95%CI=0.73-0.98]). CONCLUSIONS:An association between histological and clinical activity and reduced female fertility in CD and UC was found. Notably, histological inflammation was linked to reduced fertility also in women with clinically quiescent IBD.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Preoperative risk stratification may help guide prophylactic biologic utilization for the prevention of postoperative Crohn's disease (CD) recurrence; however, there are limited data exploring and validating proposed clinical risk factors. We aimed to explore the preoperative clinical risk profiles, quantify individual risk factors, and assess the impact of biologic prophylaxis on postoperative recurrence risk in a real-world cohort. METHODS:In this multicenter retrospective analysis, patients with CD who underwent ileocolonic resection (ICR) from 2009 to 2020 were identified. High-risk (active smoking, ≥2 prior surgeries, penetrating disease, and/or perianal disease) and low-risk (nonsmokers and age >50 y) features were used to stratify patients. We assessed the risk of endoscopic (Rutgeert score, ≥i2b) and surgical recurrence by risk strata and biologic prophylaxis (≤90 days postoperatively) with logistic and time-to-event analyses. RESULTS:A total of 1404 adult CD patients who underwent ICR were included. Of the high-risk factors, 2 or more ICRs (odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.13-2.57), active smoking (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.53), penetrating disease (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02-1.94), and history of perianal disease alone (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.42-2.79) were associated with surgical but not endoscopic recurrence. Surgical recurrence was lower in high-risk patients receiving prophylaxis vs not (10.2% vs 16.7%; P = .02), and endoscopic recurrence was lower in those receiving prophylaxis irrespective of risk strata (high-risk, 28.1% vs 37.4%; P = .03; and low-risk, 21.1% vs 38.3%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS:Clinical risk factors accurately illustrate patients at risk for surgical recurrence, but have limited utility in predicting endoscopic recurrence. Biologic prophylaxis may be of benefit irrespective of risk stratification and future studies should assess this.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of serious infections, but whether this risk varies by histologic disease activity is unclear. METHODS:This was a national population-based study of 55,626 individuals diagnosed with IBD in 1990 to 2016 with longitudinal data on ileocolorectal biopsy specimens followed up through 2016. Serious infections were defined as having an inpatient infectious disease diagnosis in the Swedish National Patient Register. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for serious infections in the 12 months after documentation of histologic inflammation (vs histologic remission), adjusting for social and demographic factors, chronic comorbidities, prior IBD-related surgery, and hospitalization. We also adjusted for IBD-related medications in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS:With histologic inflammation vs remission, there was 4.62 (95% CI, 4.46-4.78) and 2.53 (95% CI, 2.36-2.70) serious infections per 100 person-years of follow-up, respectively (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.48-1.72). Histologic inflammation (vs remission) was associated with an increased risk of serious infections in ulcerative colitis (aHR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.51-1.87) and Crohn's disease (aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.40-1.80). The aHRs of sepsis and opportunistic infections were 1.66 (95% CI, 1.28-2.15) and 1.71 (95% CI, 1.22-2.41), respectively. Overall, results were consistent across age groups, sex, and education level, and remained largely unchanged after adjustment for IBD-related medications (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.34-1.61). CONCLUSIONS:Histologic inflammation of IBD was an independent risk factor of serious infections, including sepsis, suggesting that achieving histologic remission may reduce infections in IBD. The study was approved by the Stockholm Ethics Review Board (approval numbers 2014/1287-31/4, 2018/972-32, and 2021-06209-01).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformative implications to the practice of gastroenterology and endoscopy. The aims of this study were to understand the perceptions of the gastroenterology community toward AI and to identify potential barriers for adoption. METHODS:analysis was performed to determine the association between participant demographic information and perceptions of AI. RESULTS:Of 10,162 invited gastroenterologists, 374 completed the survey. The mean age of participants was 46 years (standard deviation, 12), and 299 participants (80.0%) were men. One hundred seventy-nine participants (47.9%) had >10 years of practice experience, with nearly half working in the community setting. Only 25 participants (6.7%) reported the current use of AI in their clinical practice. Most participants (95.5%) believed that AI solutions will have a positive impact in their practice. One hundred seventy-six participants (47.1%) believed that AI will make clinical duties more technical but will also ease the burden of the electronic medical record (54.0%). The top 3 areas where AI was predicted to be most influential were endoscopic lesion detection (65.3%), endoscopic lesion characterization (65.8%), and quality metrics (32.6%). Participants voiced a desire for education on topics such as the clinical use of AI applications (64.4%), the advantages and limitations of AI applications (57.0%), and the technical methodology of AI (44.7%). Most participants (42.8%) expressed that the cost of AI implementation should be covered by their hospital. Demographic characteristics significantly associated with this perception included participants' years in practice and practice setting. CONCLUSIONS:Gastroenterologists have an overall positive perception regarding the use of AI in clinical practice but voiced concerns regarding its technical aspects and coverage of costs associated with implementation. Further education on the clinical use of AI applications with understanding of the advantages and limitations appears to be valuable in promoting adoption.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/UNASSIGNED:The investigational first-generation core inhibitor vebicorvir (VBR) demonstrated safety and antiviral activity over 24 weeks in two phase IIa studies in patients with chronic HBV infection. In this long-term extension study, patients received open-label VBR with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NrtIs). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Patients in this study (NCT03780543) previously received VBR + NrtI or placebo + NrtI in parent studies 201 (NCT03576066) or 202 (NCT03577171). After receiving VBR + NrtI for ≥52 weeks, stopping criteria (based on the treatment history and hepatitis B e antigen status in the parent studies) were applied, and patients either discontinued both VBR + NrtI, discontinued VBR only, or continued both VBR + NrtI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <20 IU/ml at 24 weeks off treatment. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Ninety-two patients entered the extension study and received VBR + NrtI. Long-term VBR + NrtI treatment led to continued suppression of HBV nucleic acids and, to a lesser extent, HBV antigens. Forty-three patients met criteria to discontinue VBR + NrtI, with no patients achieving the primary endpoint; the majority of virologic rebound occurred ≥4 weeks off treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). There were no deaths. Most AEs and laboratory abnormalities were related to elevations in alanine aminotransferase and occurred during the off-treatment or NrtI-restart phases. No drug-drug interactions between VBR + NrtI and no cases of treatment-emergent resistance among patients who adhered to treatment were observed. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Long-term VBR + NrtI was safe and resulted in continued reductions in HBV nucleic acids following completion of the 24-week parent studies. Following treatment discontinuation, virologic relapse was observed in all patients. This first-generation core inhibitor administered with NrtI for at least 52 weeks was not sufficient for HBV cure. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER/UNASSIGNED:NCT03780543. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS/UNASSIGNED:Approved treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (cHBV) suppress viral replication, but viral rebound is almost always observed after treatment discontinuation, highlighting an unmet need for improved therapies with finite treatment duration producing greater therapeutic responses that can be sustained off treatment. First-generation core inhibitors, such as vebicorvir, have mechanisms of action orthogonal to standard-of-care therapies that deeply suppress HBV viral replication during treatment; however, to date, durable virologic responses have not been observed after treatment discontinuation. The results reported here will help researchers with the design and interpretation of future studies investigating core inhibitors as possible components of finite treatment regimens for patients with cHBV. It is possible that next-generation core inhibitors with enhanced potency may produce deeper and more durable antiviral activity than first-generation agents, including vebicorvir.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We sought to determine the yield of somatic mutational analysis from EUS-guided biopsies of pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared to that of surgical resection and to assess the impact of these results on oncologic treatment. METHODS:We determined the yield of EUS sampling and surgical resection. We evaluated the potential impact of mutational analysis by identifying actionable mutations and its direct impact by reviewing actual treatment decisions. RESULTS:Yield of EUS sampling was 89.5%, comparable to the 95.8% yield of surgical resection. Over a quarter in the EUS cohort carried actionable mutations, and of these, over one in six had treatment impacted by mutational analysis. CONCLUSIONS:EUS sampling is nearly always adequate for somatic testing and may have substantial potential and real impact on treatment decisions.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) prevents recurrent C. difficile infections (rCDI) in IBD. Patients. Bezlotoxumab is also indicated to prevent rCDI. We assess the impact of FMT in combination with bezlotoxumab in patients with IBD and rCDI. We conducted a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial. All received a single colonoscopic FMT. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive bezlotoxumab or placebo. Sixty-one patients were enrolled (30 received treatment and 31 placebo. Overall, 5 participants (8%) experienced a CDI recurrence; 4 in the treatment arm, 1 in placebo (13% vs 3%, p=0.15). There was no clear benefit to the combination approach compared to FMT alone.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:We previously reported the results of tofacitinib induction therapy in the prospective multi-site US real-world TOUR registry. We now assessed patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) and predictors of success during tofacitinib maintenance therapy. METHODS:TOUR included 103 patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC); 67% had failed ≥ 2 biologics. Patients reported the simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI), PRO Measurement Information Systems measures (PROMIS) for anxiety, depression, social satisfaction, and adverse events between weeks 8 and 52 using a web-based system. Paired t-tests and p for trend were utilized to compare changes in PRO measures over time. Bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with response (SCCAI<5) or remission (SCCAI<2) at week 52. RESULTS:Of 103 patients, 82.5% entered the maintenance phase and 43.7% remained on tofacitinib at week 52. Tofacitinib de-escalation to 5 mg BID occurred in 15% of patients. At week 52, 42.7% and 31.1% of all patients reported an SCCAI<5 and SCCAI≤2, respectively. Normalization of bowel frequency, rectal bleeding, and urgency occurred in 79%, 61%, and 48% of patients remaining on maintenance therapy. Social satisfaction improved significantly (p<0.001), while anxiety and depression scores only numerically improved. No consistent predictors for tofacitinib long-term treatment efficacy were identified, and safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of tofacitinib. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Tofacitinib is an effective maintenance therapy in refractory UC patients. Dose reductions infrequently occurred during maintenance. Unmet needs in UC maintenance include improvement of urgency and psychosocial factors. (NCT03772145).