Faculty Bibliography

RATIONALE: Food restriction (FR) enhances learned and unlearned behavioral responses to drugs of abuse and increases D-1 dopamine (DA) receptor-mediated activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) 1/2 MAP kinase in nucleus accumbens (NAc). While a role has been established for ERK signaling in drug-mediated associative learning, it is not clear whether ERK regulates unconditioned behavioral effects of abused drugs. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether blockade of ERK signaling, using the brain-penetrant MEK inhibitor, SL-327, decreases behavioral or NAc cellular responses to acute drug treatment and their augmentation by FR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Separate experiments assessed the effects of SL-327 (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) on (1) the reward-potentiating effect of D-amphetamine in an intracranial self-stimulation protocol, (2) the locomotor-activating effect of the D-1 agonist, SKF-82958, and (3) Fos-immunostaining induced in the NAc by SKF-82958. RESULTS: FR rats displayed enhanced responses to drug treatment on all measures. SL-327 had no effect on sensitivity to rewarding brain stimulation or the reward-potentiating effect of D-amphetamine. The MEK inhibitor, U0126, microinjected into the NAc was also without effect. The locomotor-activating effect of SKF-82958 was unaffected by SL-327. In contrast, SL-327 decreased NAc Fos-immunostaining and abolished the difference between feeding groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the conclusion that ERK signaling does not mediate unlearned behavioral responses to drug treatment. However, the upregulation of ERK and downstream transcriptional responses to acute drug treatment may underlie the reported enhancement of reward-related learning in FR subjects

Adenosine A(2A) receptors are preferentially expressed in rat striatum, where they are concentrated in dendritic spines of striatopallidal medium spiny neurons and exist in a heteromeric complex with D(2) dopamine (DA) receptors. Behavioral and biochemical studies indicate an antagonistic relationship between A(2A) and D(2) receptors. Previous studies have demonstrated that food-restricted (FR) rats display behavioral and striatal cellular hypersensitivity to D(1) and D(2) DA receptor stimulation. These alterations may underlie adaptive, as well as maladaptive, behaviors characteristic of the FR rat. The present study examined whether FR rats are hypersensitive to the A(2A) receptor agonist, CGS-21680. In Experiment 1, spontaneous horizontal motor activity did not differ between FR and ad libitum fed (AL) rats, while vertical activity was greater in the former. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of CGS-21680 (0.25 and 1.0 nmol) decreased both types of motor activity in FR rats, and returned vertical activity levels to those observed in AL rats. In Experiment 2, FR rats given access to a running wheel for a brief period outside of the home cage rapidly acquired wheel running while AL rats did not. Pretreatment with CGS-21680 (1.0 nmol) blocked the acquisition of wheel running. When administered to FR subjects that had previously acquired wheel running, CGS-21680 suppressed the behavior. In Experiment 3, CGS-21680 (1.0 nmol) activated both ERK 1/2 and CREB in caudate-putamen with no difference between feeding groups. However, in nucleus accumbens (NAc), CGS-21680 failed to activate ERK 1/2 and selectively activated CREB in FR rats. These results indicate that FR subjects are hypersensitive to several effects of an adenosine A(2A) agonist, and suggest the involvement of an upregulated A(2A) receptor-linked signaling pathway in NAc. Medications targeting the A(2A) receptor may have utility in the treatment of maladaptive behaviors associated with FR, including substance abuse and compulsive exercise.

The present experiments were undertaken to clarify the role of central alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in reward processes. Rats, trained to self-stimulate via electrodes in the medial forebrain bundle of the lateral hypothalamus, were administered alpha(1)-selective drugs near the locus coeruleus (LC), a site of a dense concentration of alpha(1)-receptors. Effects on reward potency were assessed from shifts in rate-frequency curves while effects on motor response capacity were judged from changes in the maximal rates of responding. It was found that local blockade of LC alpha(1)-receptors with terazosin produced a significant dose-dependent and site-dependent rightward shift of 0.08 log units and a significant decrease of 16.3% in the maximum response rate. Both effects were completely reversed by coadministration of the alpha(1)-agonist, phenylephrine and were not attributable to terazosin's weak action at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. It is concluded that LC alpha(1)-adrenoceptors are involved both in reward/motivational processes and operant response elaboration which are postulated to work together to facilitate goal attainment.Neuropsychopharmacology advance online publication, 5 July 2006; doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301145

It was previously reported that chronic food restriction and maintenance of rats at 75-80% of initial body weight enhanced the reward-potentiating effect of D-amphetamine in the lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) paradigm. Moreover, the enhancement reversed in parallel with body weight recovery when ad libitum access to food was reinstated. The present study tested the hypothesis that hypoleptinemia during food restriction is necessary for expression of enhanced drug reward. In Experiment 1, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of leptin (0.5 microg/0.5 microl/hr for 8 days) in food-restricted rats did not alter the rewarding effect of D-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Considering that i.c.v. leptin may not diffuse into deep brain regions where direct effects on drug reward sensitivity may be exerted, effects of acute bilateral microinjection of leptin (0.5 microg) in ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens were tested in Experiment 2 and found to have no effect. In Experiment 3, chronic i.c.v. leptin infusion in ad libitum fed rats decreased food intake and body weight and enhanced the rewarding effect of D-amphetamine. Sensitivity to D-amphetamine returned to normal as body weight recovered following cessation of leptin infusion. This result suggests that weight loss, whether from hormone-induced appetite suppression or experimenter-imposed food restriction, is sufficient to enhance drug reward sensitivity. Experiment 4 tested whether food restriction in the absence of body weight loss alters drug reward sensitivity. Rats received chronic i.c.v. infusion of the orexigenic melanocortin receptor antagonist, SHU9119 (0.02 microg/0.5 microl/hr for 12 days), and a subset were pair-fed to vehicle-infused controls. Although these subjects ingested approximately 50% of the amount of food ingested by free-feeding SHU9119-infused rats, they displayed no weight loss and no change in sensitivity to D-amphetamine. Together, results of this study support the importance of weight loss, but not leptin, in the enhancement of drug reward sensitivity

The brain melanocortin system mediates downstream effects of hypothalamic leptin and insulin signaling. Yet, there have been few studies of chronic intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) melanocortin receptor (MCR) agonist or antagonist infusion. Although there is evidence of interaction between melanocortin and dopamine (DA) systems, effects of chronic MCR ligand infusion on behavioral sensitivity to non-ingestive reward stimuli have not been investigated. The objective of this study was to investigate effects of chronic i.c.v. infusion of the MCR agonist, MTII, and the MCR antagonist, SHU9119, on food intake, body weight, and sensitivity to rewarding lateral hypothalamic electrical stimulation (LHSS) and the reward-potentiating (i.e., threshold-lowering) effect of D-amphetamine. The MCR antagonist, SHU9119 (0.02 microg/h) produced sustained hyperphagia and weight gain during the 12-day infusion period, followed by compensatory hypophagia and an arrest of body weight gain during the 24-day post-infusion period. At no point during the experiment was sensitivity to LHSS or D-amphetamine (0.25mg/kg, i.p.) altered. The MCR agonist, MTII (0.02 microg/h) produced a brief hypophagia (3 days) followed by a return to control levels of daily intake, but with body weight remaining at a reduced level throughout the 12-day infusion period. This was followed by compensatory hyperphagia and weight gain during the 24-day post-infusion period. There was no change in sensitivity to non-ingestive reward stimuli during the infusion of MTII. However, sensitivity to D-amphetamine was increased during the 24-day post-infusion period. It therefore seems that changes in ingestive behavior that occur during chronic MCR ligand infusion may not affect the response to non-ingestive reward stimuli. However, it is possible that the drive to re-feed and restore body weight following MCR agonist treatment includes neuroadaptations that enhance the incentive effects of drug stimuli

Recently, attention has turned to the possibility that endocrine adiposity hormones, such as leptin, may regulate appetitively motivated behavior by modulating brain dopamine function. By extension, it has been hypothesized that the increased behavioral sensitivity of food-restricted, underweight rats to psychostimulant challenge may be triggered by the accompanying hypoleptinemia. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether two weeks of continuous intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of leptin alters the motor-activating effect of D-amphetamine (0.75 mg/kg, IP) in food-restricted rats. Lateral ventricular infusion of leptin, using a regimen that decreases food intake and body weight in ad libitum fed rats (12 microg/day), had no effect on the locomotor response to D-amphetamine in food-restricted rats that were maintained at 80% of prerestriction body weight. This result may indicate that hypoleptinemia is not involved in the induction/maintenance of neuroadaptations that mediate enhanced behavioral sensitivity to psychostimulant challenge. Interestingly, ad libitum fed rats treated with leptin displayed an increased locomotor response to D-amphetamine that was most prominent 3-5 days after termination of the infusion. Body weights and D-amphetamine sensitivity of these subjects returned to control values by 8-10 days postinfusion. The enhanced behavioral sensitivity to D-amphetamine in leptin-treated ad libitum fed rats may be a by-product of adipose depletion and, if so, would further support involvement of a peripheral signal other than hypoleptinemia in the modulation of central sensitivity to psychostimulant challenge

RATIONALE: Prior research indicates that psychostimulant-induced sensitization is not expressed in lateral hypothalamic electrical self-stimulation (LHSS)-based measures of drug reward, although the augmenting effect of chronic food restriction is. Neuroadaptations within the brain dopamine system have been identified in both psychostimulant-sensitized and food-restricted animals. Consequently, a variant of the LHSS paradigm in which responding is particularly sensitive to changes in dopaminergic tone may be best suited to detect and compare effects of chronic d-amphetamine and food restriction. Instrumental responding on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule is more sensitive to dopaminergic manipulations than is responding on a continuous reinforcement (CRF) schedule, but has not previously been used to examine chronic psychostimulant and food restriction effects on LHSS-based measures of drug reward. OBJECTIVE: The first aim of this study was to determine whether a regimen of d-amphetamine treatment, that produces locomotor sensitization (5 mg/kg per day x5 days), increases the reward-potentiating effect of d-amphetamine in a PR LHSS protocol. The second aim, was to determine whether chronic food restriction produces a marked increase in the reward-potentiating effect of d-amphetamine in the PR LHSS protocol and, if so, whether it is reversible in parallel with body weight recovery when free feeding is restored. METHOD: Reward-potentiating effects of a challenge dose of d-amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg, IP) were measured in terms of the break point of LHSS responding on a PR schedule of reinforcement, in ad libitum fed and food-restricted rats. RESULTS: A regimen of d-amphetamine treatment that produced locomotor sensitization did not increase the break point for LHSS in the presence or absence of d-amphetamine. Chronic food restriction produced a marked increase in the break point-increasing effect of d-amphetamine (3-fold), which returned to baseline in parallel with body weight recovery over a 4-week period of restored free-feeding. CONCLUSIONS: A locomotor-sensitizing regimen of d-amphetamine treatment does not increase the rewarding effect of LH electrical stimulation or the reward-potentiating effect of d-amphetamine in a PR LHSS protocol. The augmenting effect of chronic food restriction on drug reward is mechanistically and functionally different from psychostimulant sensitization and may be controlled by signals associated with adipose depletion and repletion

Lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) and the threshold-lowering effects of abused drugs are increased by chronic food restriction. LHSS is also modulated by the endocrine adiposity hormones insulin and leptin. The endogenous melanocortin receptor (MCR) ligands, AGRP (antagonist) and alpha-MSH (agonist) mediate opponent physiological and behavioral actions in response to changes in mediobasal hypothalamic leptin and insulin exposure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether chronic stimulation or blockade of central MCRs alters the rewarding effect of LH stimulation or the threshold-lowering effect of d-amphetamine. Thirty rats were trained in a rate-frequency LHSS paradigm and the threshold-lowering effect of d-amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.) was determined. Rats were then divided into 3 groups of 10 and implanted with subcutaneous osmotic minipumps that delivered either the MCR agonist MTII (0.5 mug/12 mul/24 hr), the MCR antagonist SHU9119 (0.5 mug/12 mul/24 hr), or vehicle (12 mul/24 hr) via a lateral ventricular cannula for 12 days. LHSS and the threshold-lowering effect of d-amphetamine were tested again on days 3, 8 and 12 of icv infusions. MTII and SHU9119 produced a sustained decrease and increase, respectively, in food intake. SHU9119 had no effect on LHSS threshold or the threshold-lowering effect of d-amphetamine. MTII, however, lowered LHSS thresholds and augmented the threshold-lowering effect of d-amphetamine. It is not yet clear whether these effects result directly from MCR stimulation or arise secondarily as a consequence of the progressive weight loss produced by MTII infusion

RATIONALE: Previous studies indicate that the D(3) dopamine (DA) receptor is preferentially expressed in limbic forebrain DA terminal areas and may mediate functional effects opposite those of the D(1) and D(2) receptor types. However, the locations of the D(3) receptors that regulate behavior, and the range of behavioral functions regulated, are not clear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate behavioral and cellular effects of the preferential D(3) dopamine receptor antagonist, U99194A. METHODS: In experiment 1, the rewarding effect of U99194A (5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 mg/kg, SC) was measured in terms of its ability to lower the threshold for lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) in ad libitum fed rats. To amplify a possibly weak reward signal, testing was also conducted in food-restricted rats. The ability of U99194A to alter the threshold-lowering effect of d-amphetamine was also assessed. In experiment 2, effects of U99194A on horizontal and vertical motor activity were compared in ad libitum fed and food-restricted rats. In experiment 3, effects of a behaviorally active dose of U99194A (5.0 mg/kg) on brain c-fos expression were measured and compared to those produced by d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg, IP). In experiment 4, the motor and cellular activating effects of U99194A were challenged with the D(1) dopamine receptor antagonist, SCH-23390 (0.1 mg/kg). RESULTS: U99194A displayed no rewarding efficacy in the LHSS paradigm. U99194A did, however, augment the rewarding effect of d-amphetamine. U99194A also produced a motor activating effect, reversible by SCH-23390, which was greater in food-restricted than ad libitum fed rats. The pattern and intensity of fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) induced by U99194A was similar to that produced by d-amphetamine and was blocked, in caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens, by SCH-23390. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that U99194A has psychostimulant-like effects on motor activity and striatal c-fos expression that are dependent upon the D(1) DA receptor. However, doses of U99194A that are adequate to stimulate motor activity and c-fos expression in striatal and limbic structures do not possess direct rewarding effects in the LHSS paradigm. Overall, these results seem consistent with the hypothesis that D(3) antagonism enhances D(1)/D(2) mediated signaling with behavioral effects dependent on both the density of D(3) receptors and the prevailing level of DA transmission in particular brain regions

RATIONALE: Numerous forms of evidence support a functional association between drug-seeking and ingestive behavior. One example is the augmentation of rewarding and cellular-activating effects of abused drugs by chronic food restriction. Within the past several years, a variety of orexigenic and anorexigenic neuropeptides that mediate adaptive responses to changes in energy balance and body weight have been identified. The involvement of these neuropeptidergic signaling systems in the modulation of drug reward has received little experimental attention. alpha-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) and agouti-related protein, which act as agonist and antagonist, respectively, at melanocortin receptors (MCRs), are of particular interest because of their neuroanatomical distribution and opponent actions at a common receptor type. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine whether lateral ventricular (i.c.v.) injections of the MCR agonist MTII and MCR antagonist SHU9119 at doses that decrease and increase food intake, respectively, modify the rewarding effect of amphetamine. METHODS: The rewarding effect of amphetamine was measured in terms of its ability to lower the threshold for lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) using a rate-frequency method. The modulatory effects of MTII and SHU9119 were evaluated by preceding i.c.v. amphetamine injection with i.c.v. injection of one of these MCR ligands or vehicle. Tests were conducted in both ad-libitum-fed and food-restricted subjects. RESULTS: SHU9119, the agouti-related protein-like antagonist, markedly increased overnight food intake of ad-libitum-fm-fed rats following i.c.v. injection of 1.0 microg and 0.5 microg. However, these injections had no effect on thresholds for LHSS tested 25 min or 60 min post-injection, nor did they alter the threshold-lowering effect of amphetamine (50 microg) tested 25 min, 100 min, or 24 h post-injection. MTII, the alpha-MSH-like agonist, suppressed overnight food intake of ad-libitum-fed rats following i.c.v. injection of 1.0 microg. MTII had no effect on thresholds for LHSS tested 60 min post-injection. However, this MCR agonist potentiated the threshold-lowering effect of amphetamine tested 100 min but not 24 h post-injection. This effect was evident in both ad-libitum-fed and food-restricted rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that agonist activity at MCRs potentiates amphetamine reward and that the anorexigenic neuropeptide alpha-MSH may exert this effect physiologically