Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the impact of traditional counseling and patient-centered counseling, either alone or with recorded audio counseling reinforcement, on glaucoma knowledge and clinical follow-up. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective randomized controlled trial. METHODS:Newly diagnosed adult glaucoma patients were randomized to 1 of 3 categories of glaucoma counseling: traditional counseling, patient-centered counseling, or patient-centered counseling with audio counseling reinforcement. Demographic and clinical information from each subject was ascertained, and all subjects completed the Glaucoma Knowledge Assessment before and after counseling sessions at the time of diagnosis and at 1-month follow-up. Patients were instructed to return to clinic for routine follow-up at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine factors associated with appropriate clinical follow-up. RESULTS:Overall, only 13.5% of subjects had appropriate clinical follow-up at 1 year, defined as attending at least 3 follow-up visits during that interval, and there was no significant difference between counseling groups. The mean glaucoma knowledge assessment score (GKAS) improved by 77.6% with the initial counseling intervention (P < .0001), decreased by 17.4% within a 1-month period following initial counseling, and improved by 22.8% (P < .001) after the second counseling intervention. Monthly household income over 2500 rupees, GKAS greater than 5 after initial counseling, and undergoing any ocular surgical procedure were all independent predictors of appropriate follow-up. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While all 3 counseling methods resulted in transient improvement of patient knowledge regarding glaucomatous disease, follow-up rates were poor for all groups. Poor retention of glaucoma knowledge may impact the likelihood of patient follow-up, and reinforcement with repeated counseling may be beneficial with regard to both disease knowledge and follow-up.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of toric intraocular lens (IOL) with suture ring implantation in adult patients with subluxated lenses. SETTING/METHODS:Department of Ophthalmology, Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara, California, and the Eye Institute of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective case review. METHODS:Eyes with subluxated cataractous lenses and preoperative corneal astigmatism having toric IOL implantation with a sutured ring or segment were studied. Preoperative and postoperative analyses included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and cylindrical power postoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS:Twenty-one eyes of 15 patients were studied. The median follow-up was 14.6 months. The mean CDVA at the final follow-up (0.10 logMAR ± 0.15 [SD]) was significantly improved from the mean preoperative CDVA (0.73 ± 0.40 logMAR). Postoperative cylindrical power was significantly improved in all patients (mean reduction in astigmatism 2.37 ± 1.46 diopters). Patients who required postoperative enhancement had anterior laser capsulotomy for bilateral capsule phimosis (2 eyes), photorefractive keratectomy (1 eye), pupilloplasty (1 eye), and posterior laser capsulotomy (2 eyes). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Cataract removal and implantation of a toric IOL combined with a sutured ring or segment capsule stabilizing device was a safe and efficacious long-term solution for patients with subluxated cataract lenses and corneal astigmatism.

CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:In India, where the heavy burden of visual impairment exists, low vision services are scarce and under-utilized. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Our study was designed to survey the effectiveness of low vision exams and visual aids in improving patient quality of life in southern rural India. SUBJECTS AND METHODS/METHODS:The low vision quality of life (LVQOL) questionnaire measures vision-related quality of life through 25 questions on a Likert scale of 0-5 that pertain to (1) mobility, distance vision, and lighting; (2) psychological adjustment; (3) reading and fine work; and (4) activities of daily living. This tool was translated into Tamil and verbally administered to 55 new low vision referral patients before their first visit at the low vision clinic at Aravind Eye Hospital. Low vision aids (LVAs) were prescribed at the discretion of the low vision specialist. 1-month later, the same questionnaire was administered over the phone. RESULTS:About 44 of 55 low vision patients completed baseline and follow-up LVQOL surveys, and 30 normal vision controls matched for age, gender, and education were also surveyed (average 117.34 points). After the low vision clinic visit, the low vision group demonstrated a 4.55-point improvement in quality of life (from 77.77 to 82.33 points, P = 0.001). Adjusting for age, gender, and education, the low vision patients who also received LVAs (n = 24) experienced an even larger increase than those who did not (n = 20) (8.89 points, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Low vision services and visual aids can improve the quality of life in South Indian rural population regardless of age, gender, and education level. Thus, all low vision patients who meet the criteria should be referred for evaluation.