Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:duboim01

Total Results:

45


Pain management at the end of life: often a difficult call [Case Report]

Dubois, Michel Y; Fine, Perry G; Fischberg, Daniel; Ferrell, Betty; Taylor, Mary Lou
PMID: 12873281
ISSN: 1526-2375
CID: 45554

Pharmacologic treatment of complex regional pain syndrome [invited review]

Cohen SP; Dubois M
ORIGINAL:0004834
ISSN: 0891-9917
CID: 45595

Chronic pain management

Chapter by: Dubois MY; Gharibo C; Lebovits AH
in: Wylie and Churchill-Davidson's a practice of anesthesia by Wylie WD; Healy TEJ; Knight PR [Eds]
London : Arnold, 2003
pp. 1235-1253
ISBN: 0340731303
CID: 3486

Is optimal pain relief at the end of life real relief?

Dubois, Michel Y; Cahana, Alex; Portenoy, Russell K; Zhukovsky, Donna S
PMID: 15099264
ISSN: 1526-2375
CID: 96435

Psychologists and pain physicians: can they share all the information about their patients?

Dubois, Michel Y; Okifuji, Akiko; Hamaty, Daniel; Taylor, Mary Lou
PMID: 15102167
ISSN: 1526-2375
CID: 96434

Incompetence, drug diversion or pain management? Trying to draw the line

Dubois, Michel Y; Livovich, Jeffrey; Fletwood, Janet; Joranson, David E; Vaillancourt, Philippe D
PMID: 15102221
ISSN: 1526-2375
CID: 96433

Chronic nonmalignat pain

Dubois MY; Fisher P; Heckber LA; Paice JA
EMBASE:2002243598
ISSN: 1525-9404
CID: 32118

Satisfaction with epidural and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia

Lebovits AH; Zenetos P; O'Neill DK; Cox D; Dubois MY; Jansen LA; Turndorf H
Objective. Postoperative intravenous (IV) versus epidural morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) were compared regarding maintenance of initial PCA route, pain levels, side effects, and levels of satisfaction. Additionally, the role of preoperative attitudinal expectations in predicting postoperative levels of satisfaction with pain management as well as maintenance of initial PCA route was evaluated. Design. After either abdominal or thoracic surgery, 70 eligible patients were randomized to receive morphine either through an epidural route (n = 37) or an intravenous PCA pump (n = 33). Setting. A large tertiary university teaching hospital in a major northeastern city. Outcome measures. Patients completed visual analogue rating scales 1 week before surgery regarding attitudes such as expectations of satisfaction with pain management after surgery and expectations of medication efficacy postsurgically. Postoperatively, beginning the day after surgery, patients were asked to complete visual analogue rating scales every 12 hours until they were discharged, for a maximum of 3 postoperative days. The scales evaluated included pain, ability to think, and satisfaction with pain control. Results. There were no significant between-group differences on the postoperative visual analogue scales. Although the overall rate of changing the initial PCA route to which the patients were randomized was identical for both groups (30%), those patients who had thoracic surgery changed their route of PCA administration significantly less when their initial PCA route was epidural (20%) than when their initial PCA route was IV (46%) (P <.05). Patients who were satisfied with pain control postoperatively were more likely to have been started on IV PCA (P =.001), have lower preoperative expectations of postoperative satisfaction with pain (P <.001), and have higher preoperative expectations of medication effects on postoperative pain (P <.001). Additionally, older patients (P =.007) and patients with lower preoperative expectations of postoperative satisfaction with pain (P =.003) were more likely to adhere to their initial treatment protocol. Conclusions. Both techniques, IV and epidural PCA, result in high levels of satisfaction. Satisfaction with PCA can be accurately predicted in nearly three of four patients based on initial PCA route and preoperative attitudes. Additionally, maintaining the initial treatment plan can be accurately predicted based on age and preoperative attitudes. Patient expectations about pain relief should be addressed preoperatively, particularly with younger patients, for optimal results
PMID: 15102232
ISSN: 1526-2375
CID: 45485

Ethics and standards of care

Dubois, M Y; Welz, M; Livovich, J; King, L A; Arnold, B; Gordin, V
PMID: 15102240
ISSN: 1526-2375
CID: 130402

Ethical dilemmas in pain management

Ferrell BR; Novy D; Sullivan MD; Banja J; Dubois MY; Gitlin MC; Hamaty D; Lebovits A; Lipman AG; Lippe PM; Livovich J
The purpose of this study was to survey the membership of the American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain Medicine to determine their beliefs about ethical dilemmas in pain management practice. Respondents rated ethical dilemmas for their importance as well as their own competence in dealing with these ethical issues. The survey also included an open-ended question that asked respondents to describe clinical situations in which they had encountered ethical dilemmas. A total of 1,105 surveys were analyzed, with physicians (N = 612), nurses (N = 189), and psychologists (N = 166) representing the professions with the greatest response. Management of pain at the end of life, general undertreatment of pain, and undertreatment of pain in the elderly were the most frequently encountered dilemmas. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify ethical issues in the case examples provided by the respondents. Major themes included inappropriate pain management, barriers to care, interactions and conflicts with others, regulatory/legal issues, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and research issues. We conclude that ethical dilemmas are common in pain management practice and that resolution of these dilemmas requires commitment by individual professionals as well as health systems
PMID: 14622827
ISSN: 1526-5900
CID: 45553