Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Robotic-assisted peritoneal flap gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV) with the da Vinci Xi system has been reported to be a safe alternative to traditional penile inversion vaginoplasty. Utilizing the Single Port (SP) robot system, our surgical approach has evolved. OBJECTIVE:To describe a step-by-step technique for RPGAV using the SP robot and to compare outcomes between Xi and SP systems. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:A total of 145 transgender women underwent RPGAV between September 2017 and December 2019. We retrospectively reviewed data for patients with a minimum 6 mo of follow-up. SURGICAL PROCEDURE/METHODS:Peritoneal flaps are harvested from the posterior bladder and pararectal fossa. The vaginal space is dissected transabdominally. Inverted penile flap with or without scrotal graft is sutured to the peritoneal flaps, which form the neovaginal apex. MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Demographics, perioperative data, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:A total of 100 (Xi = 47; SP = 53) patients had a minimum 6 mo of follow-up. The mean age was 36.2 (range 16.1-71.4) yr. Average procedure times were 4.2 and 3.7 h in Xi and SP cohorts, respectively (p <0.001). At the mean follow-up of 11.9 (range 6.0-25.4) mo, vaginal depth and width were 13.6 (range 9.7-14.5) and 3.7 (range 2.9-3.8) cm in the Xi group, and 14.1 (range 9.7-14.5) and 3.7 (range 3.5-3.8) cm in the SP group (p =0.07 and 0.04, respectively). Complications included transfusion (6%), rectovaginal fistula (1%), bowel obstruction (2%), pelvic abscess (1%), and vaginal stenosis (7%). CONCLUSIONS:RPGAV using the SP robot reduces operative time by facilitating a dual-surgeon abdominal-perineal approach. There is no difference in complication rates between the two approaches. PATIENT SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:We studied the outcomes of robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty with two robot systems. With both systems, patients had good vaginal depth and width at an average follow-up of 1 yr. Surgery time was shorter with the Single Port (SP) robot.

OBJECTIVE:To describe a technique for perineal urethrostomy (PU) revision using a posterior thigh propeller flap for a complex repair at high risk for stenosis. METHODS:Our technique utilizes the consistent posterior thigh perforators for a local flap with ideal length and thickness for repair. The stenotic PU is incised. Potential flaps are marked around a perforator blood supply closest to the defect. The flap is then elevated and rotated on its pedicle with its apex placed directly in the defect. Absorbable sutures partially tubularize the flap apex at the level of the urethrotomy which is calibrated to 30 Fr. We subsequently monitored the patient's clinical progress. RESULTS:With 17 months of follow-up the patient is voiding well without complaint, reports improved quality of life with a patent PU. Post void residuals have been less than 100cc. The patient, who has had a long history of urinary tract infections requiring hospitalization, has only reported one infection during follow up which was treated as an out-patient. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:For challenging PU revisions a distant local propeller flap of healthy tissue outside the zone of injury is the ideal choice for length, thickness, and minimal morbidity resulting in excellent clinical results for our patient.

BACKGROUND:Metoidioplasty is a gender-affirming surgical option for individuals who desire masculine genitalia while preserving erogenous sensation and avoiding the morbidity of phalloplasty. Concurrent urethral lengthening offers patients the potential to stand to urinate. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To demonstrate an adaptation of the Belgrade technique of gender-affirming metoidioplasty and describe outcomes. MATERIALS/METHODS:We identified 33 patients of which 12 underwent simple metoidioplasty and 21 underwent metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening between 2016 and 2020. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent at least 1 year of testosterone therapy to maximize clitoral growth. The clitoris is degloved and the superficial suspensory ligament divided to maximize phallic length. Labia minora flaps are developed and the urethral plate is divided to allow for maximal ventral extension. The resultant urethral defect is bridged with a buccal mucosa graft. To construct the ventral aspect of the urethra, an anterior vaginal wall flap and labia minora flap are sutured to the urethral plate and tubularized over a 16 Fr catheter. The medial aspect of the contralateral labia minora is de-epithelialized and overlaps the urethra, serving as ventral skin coverage for the phallic shaft. Bilateral labia majora flaps are then rotated anteriorly and superiorly to create a neoscrotum using the Ghent technique. RESULTS:For metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening, the median operative time was 408 minutes, estimated blood loss 400 ml, and length of stay 3 days. Of the 21 patients, 10 (47%) elected to undergo second stage scrotoplasty, 7 (33%) underwent testicular implant placement, and 2 (9%) required revision urethroplasty. Of the 10 patients (48%) who experienced post-operative complications, 7 were Clavien-Dindo grade I-II. There were no fistulae at a median follow up time of 5.5 months (range 1-27.2). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We provide a stepwise approach to metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening using a modified Belgrade technique, which was associated with a low rate of urethral complications.

We have read with great interest the article published by Ramadan et al(1). This manuscript assembled an interdisciplinary team with the expertise to examine the primary areas of clinical management for kidney transplantation in transgender and non-binary (TGNB) people, which was exemplified by a small case series at their institution. We commend the authors for discussing several key points relevant to this scenario. However, we would like to highlight a key collaborator and value that the authors omitted from their review - the clinical laboratory and eGFR measurements.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Gender-affirming vaginoplasty creates the vulva and vaginal canal for those people assigned male sex at birth who have gender dysphoria. Dissection of the neovaginal space can be particularly challenging, with risk of injury to anal and urethral sphincters, urethra, and rectum. We present an anatomic-based technique for vaginal canal dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who underwent gender-affirming vaginoplasty with a single surgeon between May 2016 and July 2019. We describe our technique for dissection and report relevant outcomes. RESULTS:We performed 200 vaginoplasty procedures during the study period. Patient age ranged 15 - 70 (median 41). BMI ranged 16 - 50.5 (median 27). The vaginal depth ranged 10 - 16cm, with a median of 14cm, and mean of 13.7 cm. Vaginal depth was slightly greater for patients BMI >=30 vs BMI <=30 (p=0.0145). Operative complications included 2 patients (1.0%) with a full-thickness rectal injury, and 3 (1.5%) with partial-thickness rectal injury. Two of these patients (1.0%) progressed to a rectovaginal fistula (1 full- and 1 partial-thickness injury); one urethral injury (0.5%); 8 (4.0%) with vaginal stenosis; 3 (1.5%) with introital stenosis; 10 patients (5.0%) had stress urinary incontinence that later resolved. CONCLUSIONS:Neovaginal canal dissection in gender-affirming vaginoplasty is technically challenging. An anatomic-based approach is associated with a low complication rate in our center.

OBJECTIVE:To describe a novel technique of ureteral reimplantation via robotic non-transecting side-to-side anastomosis. While the standard approach to ureteroneocystostomy has a high rate of success, it involves transection of the ureter which may impair vascularity and contribute to recurrent strictures. Our method seeks to maximally preserve distal ureteral blood flow which may reduce this risk. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed a multi-institutional ureteral reconstruction database to identify patients who underwent this operation between 2014-2018, analyzing perioperative and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS:Our technique was utilized in 16 patients across three U.S. academic institutions. Median operative time and estimated blood loss were 178 minutes (IQR 150 - 204) and 50 mL (IQR 38 - 100) respectively. The median length of stay was 1 day (IQR 1-2). No intraoperative complications or post-operative complications with Clavien score ≥3 were reported. Post-operatively, 15/16 (93.8%) patients reported clinical improvement in flank pain, and all patients who underwent follow-up imaging had radiographic improvement with decrease in hydronephrosis at a median follow-up of 12.5 months. CONCLUSIONS:Ureteral reimplantation via a robotic non-transecting side-to-side anastomosis is a feasible and effective operation for distal ureteral stricture which may have advantages over the standard of care transecting ureteroneocystostomy.

Penile inversion vaginoplasty involves creation of vulva and a vaginal canal. Few studies describe techniques for creating aesthetic vulvar components, particularly the clitoral hood and labia minora. The authors present their approach to primary vulvoplasty, aiming to achieve the following: (1) labia minora that are well-defined and three-dimensional; (2) labia minora that frame the introitus; (3) sufficient clitoral hooding; (4) a patent introitus that appears closed at rest; and (5) prominent labia majora. In this technique, the labia majora are created by first pulling the superolateral scrotal skin inferiorly and medially toward the perineum. The labia majora incisions may be made laterally, medially, or both laterally and medially, dependent on the amount of penile and scrotal skin available. Initial approximating sutures are placed to anchor the labia inferiorly, and then excess skin is removed medially. The surgeon should avoid excess defatting of the labia majora, which are subject to initial edema and often atrophy with time. The preputial or distal penile shaft skin is used for the clitoral hood and medial aspect of the labia minora, with proximal penile shaft skin used for the lateral surface. The penile skin used for the lateral aspect of the labia minora must be pulled inferomedially toward the perineum, to create a narrow, tapered appearance and avoid effacement of the labia minora. Interrupted horizontal mattress quilting sutures are used to define the labia minora as distinct subunits. By considering homologous structures and anatomical subunits, we are able to create well-defined, aesthetic vulva in trans women and nonbinary individuals.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The prostate biopsy pathology report represents a critical document used for decision-making in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, yet the content exceeds the health literacy of most patients. We sought to create and compare the effectiveness of a patient-centered prostate biopsy report compared with standard reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Using a modified Delphi approach, prostate cancer experts identified critical components of a prostate biopsy report. Patient focus groups provided input for syntax and formatting of patient-centered pathology reports. Ninety-four patients with recent prostate biopsies were block randomized to the standard report with or without the patient-centered report. We evaluated patient activation, self-efficacy, provider communication skills, and prostate cancer knowledge. RESULTS:Experts selected primary and secondary Gleason score and the number of positive scores as the most important elements of the report. Patients prioritized a narrative design, non-threatening language and information on risk classification. Initial assessments were completed by 87% (40/46) in the standard report group and 81% (39/48) in the patient-centered report group. There were no differences in patient activation, self-efficacy, or provider communication skills between groups. Patients who received the patient-centered report had significantly improved ability to recall their Gleason score (100% vs. 85%, p = 0.026) and number of positive cores (90% vs. 65%, p = 0.014). In total, 86% of patients who received the patient-centered report felt that it helped them better understand their results and should always be provided. CONCLUSIONS:Patient-centered pathology reports are associated with significantly higher knowledge about a prostate cancer diagnosis. These important health information documents may improve patient-provider communication and help facilitate shared decision-making among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.