Faculty Bibliography

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Two phase 1 trials were performed in healthy women with the overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome and urodynamically demonstrated detrusor overactivity (DO), with the aim to demonstrate the safety and potential efficacy of URO-902, which comprises a gene therapy plasmid vector expressing the human big potassium channel α subunit. METHODS:ION-02 (intravesical instillation) and ION-03 (direct injection) were double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies without overlap in enrollment between studies. Active doses were administered and evaluated sequentially (lowest dose first) for safety. ION-02 participants received either 5000 µg or 10 000 µg URO-902, or placebo. ION-03 participants received either 16 000 or 24 000 µg URO-902, or placebo, injected directly into the bladder wall using cystoscopy. Primary outcome variables were safety parameters occurring subsequent to URO-902 administration; secondary efficacy variables also were evaluated. RESULTS:Among the safety outcomes, there were no dose-limiting toxicities or significant adverse events (AEs) preventing dose escalation during either trial, and no participants withdrew due to AEs. For efficacy, in ION-02 (N = 21), involuntary detrusor contractions on urodynamics at 24 weeks in patients receiving URO-902 (P < .0508 vs placebo) and mean urgency incontinence episodes in the 5000 µg group (P = .0812 vs placebo) each showed a downward trend. In ION-03 (N = 13), significant reduction versus placebo in urgency episodes (16 000 µg, P = .036; 24 000 µg, P = .046) and number of voids (16 000 µg, -2.16, P = .044; 24 000 µg, -2.73, P = .047) were observed 1 week after injection. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Promising safety and efficacy results in these preliminary phase 1 studies suggest gene transfer may be a promising therapy for OAB/DO, warranting further investigation.

AIMS:To compare the efficacy and safety of a neuromuscular external electrical stimulation device (INNOVO; "NMES") with an FDA-approved intravaginal device (iTouch sure; "comparator device") for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS:This prospective, single-blind, multicenter, noninferiority study randomized women with SUI to treatment with the NMES or the comparator device for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion achieving >50% reduction in pad weight from baseline to 12 weeks in the provocative pad weight test. RESULTS:Most subjects in both groups achieved >50% reduction in pad weight in the provocative pad test at week 12 (NMES 56.3%; comparator 63.0%), although noninferiority was not established. Significant improvements in pad tests, number of incontinence episodes, and pads used per day, and incontinence quality of life score were seen with both devices at week 12, with no clinically relevant between-group differences. Adverse events were predominantly mild/moderate and there were few discontinuations due to adverse events. The incidence of urinary tract/vaginal infections was higher with the comparator device than the NMES (7.7% versus 0%). The most common device-related adverse effect with the NMES was device discomfort (9.0%), which was generally manageable by modifying the stimulation intensity. CONCLUSIONS:The NMES significantly improved objective and subjective measures of SUI, although statistical noninferiority was not established. The NMES was well tolerated and associated with fewer urinary tract infections than the comparator. The NMES provides a safe, clinically effective, conservative treatment option for female SUI and a low-risk alternative to intravaginal devices.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:These studies were undertaken to determine if fexapotide triflutate 2.5 mg transrectal injectable (FT) has significant long-term (LT) safety and efficacy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS:Two placebo controlled double-blind randomized parallel group trials with 995 BPH patients at 72 sites treated 3:2 FT:placebo, with open-label FT crossover (CO) re-injection in 2 trials n = 344 and long-term follow-up (LF) 2-6.75 years (mean 3.58 years, median 3.67 years; FT re-injection CO mean 4.27 years, median 4.42 years) were evaluated. 12 months post-treatment patients elected no further treatment, approved oral medications, FT, or interventional treatment. Primary endpoint variable was change in Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 months and at LF. CO primary co-endpoints were 3-year incidence of (1) surgery for BPH in FT treated CO patients versus patients crossed over to oral BPH medications and (2) surgery or acute urinary retention in FT-treated CO placebo patients versus placebo patients crossed over to oral BPH medications. 28 CO secondary endpoints assessed surgical and symptomatic outcomes in FT reinjected patients versus conventional BPH medication CO and control subgroups at 2 and 3 years. RESULTS:FT injection had no significant safety differences from placebo. LF IPSS change from baseline was higher in FT treated patients compared to placebo (median FT group improvement - 5.2 versus placebo - 3.0, p < 0.0001). LF incidence of AUR (1.08% p = 0.0058) and prostate cancer (PCa) (1.1% p = 0.0116) were both reduced in FT treated patients. LF incidence of intervention for BPH was reduced in the FT group versus oral BPH medications (8.08% versus 27.85% at 3 years, p < 0.0001). LF incidence of intervention or AUR in placebo CO group with FT versus placebo CO group with oral medications was reduced (6.07% versus 33.3% at 3 years, p < 0.0001). 28/28 secondary efficacy endpoints were reached in LF CO re-injection studies. CONCLUSIONS:FT 2.5 mg is a safe and effective transrectal injectable for LT treatment of BPH. FT treated patients also had reduced need for BPH intervention, and reduced incidence of PCa and AUR.

OBJECTIVE:Testosterone replacement therapy is indicated for male hypogonadism. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of testosterone gel 2% (Tgel) over 90 days. METHODS:) between 300 and 1,050 ng/dL on Day 90. Safety endpoints were adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, and vital signs. RESULTS:criteria on Day 90. Most AEs were mild to moderate. There were 5 serious AEs, and 1 (myocardial infarction) was judged as possibly related to Tgel. Confirmed excessive increases in prostate-specific antigen or hematocrit levels were rare. Tgel had a favorable local skin tolerability profile. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:between 300 and 1,050 ng/dL with Tgel. Symptoms of testosterone deficiency improved with few safety concerns. ABBREVIATIONS/BACKGROUND:= time to achieve maximum concentration TRT = testosterone replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE:To assess effects of tadalafil vs placebo on prostatic blood flow measured by transrectal ultrasonography in men aged ≥45 years with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms. METHODS:After screening and washout, patients were randomized to placebo (n = 50) or tadalafil 5 mg (n = 47) once daily for 8 weeks. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed at baseline, 4, and 8 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the prostate transition zone (TZ) resistive index (RI). Secondary efficacy measures were RI in the peripheral zone and bladder neck, color pixel intensity (CPI), and color pixel density (CPD) in all 3 regions. Outcomes were assessed using mixed-model repeated-measures analyses. RESULTS:The overall treatment effect (tadalafil vs placebo) for the change from baseline through week 8 in prostate TZ RI was not statistically significant (least squares mean change: placebo, -0.01; tadalafil, 0.00; P = .118), nor was the change from baseline in prostate TZ CPI (P = .564) or CPD (P = .592). Results were similar for all flow measures in prostate peripheral zone and bladder neck. The adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies with no new safety findings. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Tadalafil for 8 weeks in men with BPH-LUTS did not result in detectable decreases in arterial RI or increases in CPI or CPD in the prostate or bladder neck. Detection of changes may not be possible because of already low baseline RI, insufficient sensitivity of techniques used, or may have been confounded by methodologic variability across sites. Alternatively, other possible mechanisms not assessed in this study may be more prominently involved.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U vs placebo to treat lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia in men previously treated with oral benign prostatic hyperplasia medication in a 24-week phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, parallel group trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Patients with I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) 14 or greater, peak urinary flow rate 4 to 15 ml per second and total prostate volume 30 to 80 ml were randomized 1:1 to a single intraprostatic treatment of onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U or placebo. A single-blind sham procedure followed by a 4-week run-in was included to attempt to minimize any potential placebo effect. Patients who still met eligibility criteria after the run-in entered the double-blind active treatment period. The primary end point was the change from baseline in total I-PSS at week 12. Other end points assessed at weeks 6, 12 and 24 included the change from baseline in total I-PSS, peak urinary flow rate, total prostate volume and post-void residual urine volume. RESULTS:Of 427 patients enrolled 315 were randomized and treated. Decreases from baseline in I-PSS were observed in the onabotulinumtoxinA and placebo groups (-6.3 vs -5.6 points, p <0.001) with no difference between the groups overall or in subgroups. Improvement was observed in the peak urinary flow rate, which was significant only at week 6 compared to placebo. Improvement was significant at all time points in a patient subgroup on stable concurrent α-blockers or 5α-reductase inhibitors during the study. Adverse events were similar in the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS:OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U and placebo improved I-PSS and were well tolerated but no between group difference in efficacy was observed.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to examine the effects of a green and black tea extract blend [AssuriTEA Men's Health (AMH)] in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). METHODS:In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 46 men aged 30-70 with an American Urologic Association symptom score (AUAss) of at least 8 and up to 24 were randomized to 500 mg AMH, 1000 mg AMH, or placebo daily for 12 weeks. Measurements were taken at baseline (BL), week 6 and week 12 for AUAss, simple uroflowmetry, postvoid residual volume (PVR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). RESULTS:A total of 40 subjects completed the study. AUAss decreased 34.5% from BL to week 12 in the 1000 mg AMH group (p = 0.008). At week 12, CRP increased in the 500 mg AMH (p = 0.003) and placebo (p = 0.012) groups from their BL levels but not in the 1000 mg group. Average urine flow (Qmean) increased in the 500 mg (p = 0.033) and 1000 mg AMH (p = 0.002) groups versus placebo. PVR decreased in the 1000 mg AMH group (p = 0.034) from BL at week 6. Treatment group effects were observed for the physical functioning and sexual desire domains of the SF-36 and IIEF (p = 0.051 and p = 0.005 respectively). AMH was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS:Oral administration of AMH improved LUTS and quality of life in as little as 6 weeks.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We evaluated the clinical usefulness of the PROGENSA® PCA3 Assay for predicting repeat prostate biopsy outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Men with at least 1 prior negative prostate biopsy who were scheduled for repeat prostate biopsy based on best clinical judgment were enrolled at 14 centers. Whole blood and post-digital rectal examination urine samples were collected before extended template transrectal biopsy with 12 or more cores. Urinary PCA3 scores and biopsy outcomes were assessed by logistic regression analysis, which also included age, race, serum prostate specific antigen, clinical stage, family history of prostate cancer and the number of previous negative biopsy sessions. RESULTS:A total of 466 men were included in study and prostate cancer was identified in 21.9%. A PCA3 score cutoff of 25 yielded 77.5% sensitivity, 57.1% specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of 90% and 33.6%, respectively. On multivariable logistic regression men with a PCA3 score of less than 25 were 4.56 times as likely to have a negative repeat biopsy as men with a score of 25 or greater. PCA3 score significantly increased the predictive accuracy of the logistic regression model. At 90% sensitivity adding the PCA3 score to the model increased specificity, and positive and negative predictive values by 22.6%, 6.4% and 7.1%, respectively, relative to the model without the PCA3 score. CONCLUSIONS:The PCA3 score supplements serum prostate specific antigen and other clinical information to provide more accurate prediction of repeat biopsy outcome. Thus, it provides clinicians and patients with independent, clinically useful information to make more informed repeat biopsy decisions.

The soy compound genistein has been observed preclinically to inhibit bladder cancer growth with one potential mechanism being the inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation (p-EGFR). A phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigated whether daily, oral genistein (300 or 600 mg/d as the purified soy extract G-2535) for 14 to 21 days before surgery alters molecular pathways in bladder epithelial tissue in 59 subjects diagnosed with urothelial bladder cancer (median age, 71 years). G-2535 treatment was well tolerated; observed toxicities were primarily mild to moderate gastrointestinal or metabolic and usually not attributed to study drug. Genistein was detected in plasma and urine of subjects receiving G-2535 at concentrations greater than placebo subjects' but were not dose-dependent. Reduction in bladder cancer tissue p-EGFR staining between the placebo arm and the combined genistein arms was significant at the protocol-specified significance level of 0.10 (P = 0.07). This difference was most prominent when comparing the 300-mg group with placebo (P = 0.015), but there was no significant reduction in p-EGFR staining between the 600-mg group and placebo. No difference in normal bladder epithelium p-EGFR staining was observed between treatment groups. No significant differences in tumor tissue staining between treatment groups were observed for COX-2, Ki-67, activated caspase-3, Akt, p-Akt, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), or p-MAPK. No significant differences in urinary survivin or BLCA-4 levels between treatment groups were observed. Genistein displayed a possible bimodal effect (more effective at the lower dose) on bladder cancer tissue EGFR phosphorylation that should be evaluated further, possibly in combination with other agents.