Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:emm417

in-biosketch:true

Total Results:

5


Genicular Artery Embolization: A Review of Essential Anatomic Considerations

Liu, Shu; Swilling, David; Morris, Elizabeth; Macaulay, William; Golzarian, Jafar; Hickey, Ryan; Taslakian, Bedros
Genicular artery embolization is increasingly recognized as a safe and effective treatment option for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and recurrent hemarthrosis following total knee arthroplasty. Genicular arteries are an essential vascular supply for the knee joint and demonstrate considerable variability. Familiarity with the anatomy and common variations is critical for pre-procedural planning, accurate target selection, and minimizing adverse events in trans-arterial embolization procedures. This review aims to provide a detailed discussion of the genicular artery anatomy that is relevant to interventional radiologists performing genicular artery embolization.
PMID: 38128722
ISSN: 1535-7732
CID: 5612112

Genicular Artery Embolization for Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Pilot Trial Including Effect on Serum Osteoarthritis-Associated Biomarkers

Taslakian, Bedros; Swilling, David; Attur, Mukundan; Alaia, Erin F; Kijowski, Richard; Samuels, Jonathan; Macaulay, William; Ramos, Danibel; Liu, Shu; Morris, Elizabeth M; Hickey, Ryan
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To characterize the safety, efficacy, and potential role of genicular artery embolization (GAE) as a disease-modifying treatment for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This is an interim analysis of a prospective, single-arm clinical trial of patients with symptomatic knee OA who failed conservative therapy for greater than 3 months. Sixteen patients who underwent GAE using 250-μm microspheres and had at least 1 month of follow-up were included. Six patients completed the 12-month follow-up, and 10 patients remain enrolled. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, and 12 months. Serum and plasma samples were collected for biomarker analysis. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for WOMAC pain score at 12 months. Baseline and follow-up outcomes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. RESULTS:Technical success of the procedure was 100%, with no major adverse events. The MCID was achieved in 5 of the 6 (83%) patients at 12 months. The mean WOMAC pain score decreased from 8.6 ± 2.7 at baseline to 4.9 ± 2.7 (P = .001), 4.4 ± 2.8 (P < .001), and 4.7 ± 2.7 (P = .094) at 1, 3, and 12 months, respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease in nerve growth factor (NGF) levels at 12 months. The remaining 8 biomarkers showed no significant change at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS:GAE is a safe and efficacious treatment for symptomatic knee OA. Decreased NGF levels after GAE may contribute to pain reduction and slowing of cartilage degeneration.
PMID: 37640104
ISSN: 1535-7732
CID: 5611392

Abstract No. 350 Genicular artery embolization for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: interim analysis of a prospective pilot trial including effect on serum osteoarthritis-associated biomarkers [Meeting Abstract]

Taslakian, B; Mabud, T; Attur, M; Samuels, J; Alaia, E; Morris, E; Sista, A
Purpose: To determine the safety and effectiveness of genicular artery embolization (GAE) in reducing knee pain in patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA), as measured by validated patient reported outcome measures, and to characterize pre/post-procedural trends in multiple OA-associated serum biomarkers
Material(s) and Method(s): In an ongoing, prospective, single-arm clinical trial, patients with mild to moderate (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3) symptomatic knee OA, without prior surgery and who failed conservative therapy, were included. Pre-intervention imaging (plain radiographs and MRI), patient-reported outcome measures (KOOS, WOMAC, VAS), and serum biomarkers (IL-1Ra, CRP, Hyaluronan, COMP, VEGF, CCL2-MCP-1) were obtained. Each patient underwent transcatheter arterial embolization of one or more genicular arteries in the affected knee using 250-mum microspheres (Embozene, Varian). One- and three-month post-intervention patient-reported outcome measures and serum biomarkers were obtained. Baseline and follow-up outcomes were compared using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Result(s): The first 7 patients (4 male, mean age 68 +/- 6y, mean BMI 30 +/- 2) recruited into this trial were included in this preliminary analysis. Technical success was 100%. There were no adverse events. By 3 months, VAS pain scores decreased from 56 to 21 (63% decrease); WOMAC pain scores decreased from 8 to 4 (50% decrease); and KOOS pain scores (for which higher scores indicate less pain) increased from 57 to 81 (42% increase), all P >0.05. Baseline and 3-month mean biomarker values were: IL-1Ra (471 +/- 276 vs 590 +/- 320 pg/mL), CRP (1.81 +/- 1.78 vs 3.24 +/- 4.25 mg/L), Hyaluronan (92 +/- 66 vs 166 +/- 102 ng/mL), COMP (942 +/- 336 vs 1057 +/- 462 ng/mL), VEGF (372 +/- 283 vs 303 +/- 101 pg/mL), and CCL2-MCP-1 (335 +/- 90 vs 323 +/- 69 pg/mL), all P >0.05.
Conclusion(s): Patient-reported pain scores demonstrated a trend in improvement 3 months after GAE at our interim analysis. There were no significant changes between baseline and 3-month follow-up in serum OA biomarkers in this small sample size. Full study analysis will further delineate trends in serum biomarkers after GAE.
Copyright
EMBASE:2018384800
ISSN: 1535-7732
CID: 5291102

Frailty in liver transplantation: A comprehensive review

Liapakis, AnnMarie; Morris, Elizabeth; Emre, Sukru
Frailty, a global impairment of multiple organ systems resulting in increased vulnerability to health stressors, is common in end-stage liver disease, multifactorial in etiology, and impacts overall mortality as well as outcomes in liver transplantation. This is a review of the currently available data, a synopsis of expert consensus, and a framework for transplant centers to approach frailty. We suggest that centers use a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers and approach frailty in a programmatic fashion to provide effective patient care and ensure optimal transplant outcomes. The utilization of standardized protocols to address both malnutrition and physical debility is ideal and can help ensure safety. A toolbox of resources has been made available by experts in the field to facilitate this approach. The incorporation of new technology tailored to overcome barriers is another resource under investigation.
PMCID:9138922
PMID: 35783898
ISSN: 2757-7392
CID: 5362432

MRI in the Assessment of BI-RADS® 4 lesions

Leithner, Doris; Wengert, Georg; Helbich, Thomas; Morris, Elizabeth; Pinker, Katja
The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon, which is used ubiquitously to standardize reporting of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), provides 7 BI-RADS assessment categories to indicate the level of suspicion of malignancy and guide further management. A BI-RADS category 4 assessment is assigned when an imaging abnormality does not fulfill the typical criteria for malignancy, but is suspicious enough to warrant a recommendation for biopsy. The BI-RADS category 4 assessment covers a wide range of probability of malignancy, from >2 to <95%. MRI is an essential noninvasive technique in breast imaging and the role of MRI in the assessment of ACR BI-RADS 4 lesions is manifold. In lesions classified as suspicious on imaging with mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and sonography, MRI can aid in the noninvasive differentiation of benign and malignant lesions and obviate unnecessary breast biopsies. When the suspicion of cancer is confirmed with MRI, concurrent staging of disease for treatment planning can be accomplished. This article will provide a comprehensive overview of the role of breast MRI in the assessment of ACR BI-RADS 4 lesions. In addition, we will discuss strategies to decrease false positives and avoid false negative results when reporting MRI of the breast.
PMID: 28961568
ISSN: 1536-1004
CID: 5475452