Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Emphysema in asymptomatic heavy smokers can be detected during CT-scan screening for lung cancer. Metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been found to play a role in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to possibly serve as biomarkers for emphysema. METHODS:The NYU Lung Cancer Biomarker Center enrolled study subjects over 50 years of age with lung cancer risk factors from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015. These subjects received chest multi-detector computed tomography, spirometry, and provided serum for immunoassays for metalloproteinases (MMP) -1, -2, -7, -9, -10 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) -1 and -2. RESULTS:/FVC percent compared to smokers without emphysema (68 ± 11 (mean ± sd) versus 75 ± 8; p < 0.0001). Increased age and pack-years of smoking were associated with increased odds of emphysema. None of the metalloproteinases or tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases were useful to predict the presence of emphysema in smokers. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:/FVC ratio).

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare heart and lung doses for adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) between radiation plans generated supine with deep inspiratory breath hold (S-DIBH) and prone with free-breathing (P-FB) and examine the effect of breast volume (BV) on dosimetric parameters. MATERIALS/METHODS/METHODS:Patients with left breast DCIS or invasive cancer receiving adjuvant WBI were enrolled on a single-institutional prospective protocol. Patients were simulated S-DIBH and P-FB; plans were generated using both scans. Wilcoxon's Signed Rank and Rank Sum tests were used to compare intra-patient differences between plans for the entire cohort and within BV groups defined by tertiles. RESULTS:Forty patients were enrolled. Thirty-four patients are included in the analysis due to patient withdrawal or inability to hold breath. With WBI dose of 4005 - 4256 cGy, mean heart dose (MHD) was 80 cGy in S-DIBH, 77 cGy in P-FB (p=0.08). Mean ipsilateral lung dose (MLD) was 453 cGy in S-DIBH, 45 cGy in P-FB (p<0.0001). Mean and max LAD dose were 251 cGy and 551 cGy in S-DIBH respectively, 324 cGy (p=0.1) and 993 cGy in P-FB (p=0.3) respectively. Hot spot and separation was 109% and 22 cm in S-DIBH respectively, 107% and 16 cm in P-FB respectively (p<0.0001). For patients with smallest BV, S-DIBH improved MHD and LAD doses; for those with largest BV, P-FB improved cardiac dosimetry. With increasing BV, there was an increasing advantage of P-FB for MHD (p=0.05), and max (p=0.03) and mean (p=0.02) LAD dose, and the reduction in MLD, hot spot, and separation with P-FB increased (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:MHD did not differ between P-FB and S-DIBH, whereas MLD was significantly lower with P-FB. Analysis according to breast volume revealed improved cardiac dosimetry with S-DIBH for women with smallest BV and improved cardiac dosimetry with P-FB for women with larger BV, thereby providing a dosimetric rationale for using breast size to help determine the optimal positioning for WBI.

OBJECTIVE:To determine if the concentration and saturation of natalizumab (NTZ) administration at extended interval dosing (EID; every 5-8 weeks) over 18 months is able to be maintained in the range considered adequate to sustain the clinical efficacy of NTZ. METHODS:-integrin receptor saturations were analyzed via cytometry, in blood samples obtained at trough timepoints. RESULTS:Trough serum concentration was above the "therapeutic" concentration of 2.0 μg/mL in 72% of EID patients. Trough saturation was above the "therapeutic" 50% threshold in 79% of EID-treated patients. Our model predicted that at least 9 NTZ infusions/year are required to maintain adequate trough saturation and concentration levels. Higher body mass index (BMI) was a predictor of suboptimal trough saturation on EID NTZ. CONCLUSIONS:Trough α4-integrin receptor saturation >50% correlated with high clinical efficacy of NTZ in previous studies. A continual treatment with EID maintains receptor saturation and concentration that are in the "therapeutic range" for most patients. This finding provides biological plausibility for the clinical efficacy of NTZ EID. Patients with higher BMI may require closer clinical and MRI follow-up.

Background: Preoperative chemoRT is a standardof- care as shown in the CROSS trial (N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074-2084), Surgery is sometimes deferred in pts with clinical CR (cCR) based on lack of overall survival benefit (J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2310-2317, J Clin Oncol2007;25:1160-1168). Nivolumab has activity in advanced ESCC (Lancet Oncol 2017;18:631-639), and adding it to chemoRT may improve outcomes.
Method(s): This phase I/II study was designed to assess the safety and tolerability and efficacy of nivolumab added to chemoRT (6 weekly carboplatin AUC 2, paclitaxel 50mg/m2, RT 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions 5/7 days) for pts with TanyN1-3 or T3-4N0M0 ESCC. The phase I primary endpoint is 'unacceptable toxicity' at 28 days after the last dose of chemotherapy. The phase II primary endpoints are cCR (endoscopy + PET/CT) and pCR rates for pts undergoing surgery. Nivolumab is given q2W x2, then concurrent chemoRT with nivolumab q2W x3. If no cCR, pt proceeds to esophagectomy, then adjuvant nivolumab q2W x3; if cCR, pt has an option of no surgery but receives nivolumab q2W x3.
Result(s):From 7/20/17 to 12/27/18, 6 pts were enrolled. No unacceptable or grade 5 toxicities were observed. The most common grade 1/2 AEs in >1 pt were anorexia, myelosuppression, elevated AST and nausea. Grade 3/4 AEs in >1 pt were lymphopenia and leukocytopenia. 2 pts required hospitalizations (dyspnea 1, colitis 1). All pts completed therapy; 1 pt had dose delay due to grade 2 esophagitis; 2 pts progressed, 4 achieved cCR. Of 4 pts with cCR, 2 pts chose surgery and both achieved pCR. None of the 4 pts recurred.
Conclusion(s): ChemoRT with nivolumab is tolerable with manageable toxicities in locally advanced ESCC. Enrollment to the phase II portion ended because of slow accrual. Adverse Events. Grade 1 &2 in > 1 pt: 4/6: Anorexia & Anemia 3/6: Leukocytopenia Neutropenia Thrombocytopenia Nausea & Elevated AST 2/6: Hypomagnesemia Hypokalemia Grade 3 & 4 in > 1 pt: 5/6: Lymphopenia, 2/6: Leukocytopenia

BACKGROUND: There is no effective therapy for patients (pts) with IDH-mutant gliomas that progress after RT and chemotherapy. At time of progression, these tumors have often transformed to glioblastoma (GBM) and have increased numbers of somatic mutations, i.e. have a ?hypermutator phenotype?. We hypothesized that there is synergistic efficacy of Avelumab (anti-PD-L1) combined with HFRT in pts with secondarily trans- formed IDH-mutant GBMs. Safety-lead-in results will be presented.
METHOD(S): This is a phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of Avelumab with HFRT in adults with transformed IDH-mutant GBM who previously received RT and TMZ and/or PCV. All pts received Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV followed at Day 8 by HFRT (25 Gy in 5 daily 5-Gy fractions) and then Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. A 3 + 3 design was used for a 6-patient safety-lead-in cohort. Adverse events were recorded according to CTCAE.
RESULT(S): Six pts (F=4, M=2) with a median age= 45.5 yrs (range 31.5-54.4 yrs) were enrolled in the safety-lead-in cohort. No DLT was observed. Grade >= 3 AEs included increased cerebral edema (3 pts), hyponatremia (1 pt) and worsening hemiparesis (3 pts). Grade <= 2 AEs included nausea, hypothyroidism, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, transaminase elevation, and fever/chills. Median follow-up time was 8.9 mo. Best treatment response was SD in 1 patient. At time of last follow-up all pts have discontinued treatment for PD. Median PFS was 4.2 mo (range 1.4-5.7). Median OS was 10.1 (range 6.8-21+) mo. 4 pts (67%) died, 2 pts remain alive in follow-up at 6.9 and 21.6 months after treatment initiation. The study was closed after the safety lead-in completed enrollment due to slow accrual.
CONCLUSION(S): Avelumab combined with HFRT was tolerable without dose-limiting toxicity in this safety-lead-in cohort of adult patients with transformed IDH-mutant GBM. Further studies are necessary to determine efficacy of this treatment regimen

Prior studies have reported high response rates with recombinant interferon-α (rIFN-α) therapy in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV). To further define the role of rIFN-α, we investigated the outcomes of pegylated-rIFN-α2a (PEG) therapy in patients with ET/PV previously treated with hydroxyurea (HU). The Myeloproliferative Disorders Research Consortium (MPD-RC) 111 study was an investigator-initiated, international, multicenter, phase 2 trial evaluating the ability of PEG therapy to induce complete (CR) and partial (PR) hematologic responses in patients with high-risk ET/PV who were either refractory or intolerant to HU. The study included 65 patients with ET and 50 patients with PV. The overall response rate ORR (CR / PR) at 12 months was 69.2% (43.1% / 26.2%) in ET, and 60% (22%/38%) in PV patients. CR rates were higher in CALR mutated ET patients (56.5% vs. 28.0%, p= 0.01) as compared to subjects lacking a CALR mutation. The median absolute reduction in JAK2V617F variant allele fraction (VAF) was -6% (range -84%-47%) in patients achieving a CR versus +4% (range -18%-56%) in patients with PR/non-response (NR). Therapy was associated with a significant rate of adverse events (AE), most were manageable, and PEG discontinuation due to AEs occurred only in 13.9% of subjects. We conclude that PEG is an effective therapy for patients with ET/PV who were previously refractory and/or intolerant to HU. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01259856).

OBJECTIVE:To use the large dataset from the Tysabri Outreach: Unified Commitment to Health (TOUCH) program to compare progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk with natalizumab extended interval dosing (EID) vs standard interval dosing (SID) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS:This retrospective cohort study included anti-JC virus antibody-positive patients (n = 35,521) in the TOUCH database as of June 1, 2017. The effect of EID on PML risk was evaluated with 3 planned analyses using Kaplan-Meier methods stratified by prior immunosuppressant use. Risk of PML was analyzed by Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, prior immunosuppressants, time since natalizumab initiation, and cumulative number of infusions. RESULTS:< 0.001) for the primary and secondary analyses, respectively. Relative risk reductions were 94% and 88% in favor of EID for the primary and secondary analyses, respectively. The tertiary analysis included no cases of PML with EID. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Natalizumab EID is associated with clinically and statistically significantly lower PML risk than SID. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with MS, natalizumab EID is associated with a lower PML risk than SID.