Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION: Revascularization is an important strategy for reducing stroke risk in patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and/or carotid ultrasound have traditionally been used as the only diagnostic modalities prior to revascularization. Patients undergoing CEA frequently have no further assessments of carotid anatomy prior to surgery. Evaluation with carotid ultrasound and MRA can often overestimate the degree of stenosis. We sought to determine if noninvasive imaging was sufficient for determining whether a patient should be referred for carotid intervention. METHODS: We performed an analysis of 101 patients referred for carotid artery stenting (CAS). All patients had previously been evaluated with carotid ultrasound and 94% had undergone MRA as well. We sought to determine if noninvasive diagnostic imaging for carotid stenosis was sufficient to determine the necessity for endovascular intervention. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients referred for carotid intervention, 36 (36%) were shown to have <70% stenoses and did not require intervention. Of those who had significant disease, 49 (75%) underwent successful CAS, 15 (23%) underwent CEA, and 1 patient was treated medically for a total occlusion. Three of the 36 patients not requiring carotid intervention were found to have subclavian stenosis. Two (4%) of the patients undergoing CAS and 4 (27%) of the patients undergoing CEA had minor complications. No patients suffered a major stroke, MI, or death at follow-up. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates that 36% of patients referred for endovascular intervention based on noninvasive imaging did not meet criteria by angiography. This emphasizes the need for carotid angiography prior to carotid intervention

The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate the clinical value of electrocardiographically gated single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) imaging in a cohort of postmenopausal women with symptoms suggestive of ischemic heart disease. Forty-six postmenopausal women with no history of coronary artery disease (CAD), but with typical or atypical angina and >or=1 risk factor for CAD, were enrolled and underwent both coronary angiography and technetium-99m sestamibi MPS with exercise (n = 36) or pharmacologic stress (n = 10). All women were followed up for 5.0 +/- 3 years for the occurrence of hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, and/or new-onset or worsening angina. CAD prevalence (>or=50% diameter stenosis) was 62% (26 of 42 patients). Fifteen patients (36%) had 1-vessel disease, 7 (17%) had 2-vessel disease, and 4 (10%) had 3-vessel disease. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the exercise electrocardiogram were 67% and 69%, respectively. By comparison, sensitivity of MPS was 88% and specificity was 87.5% (p <0.0001). Cox survival analysis showed 3- and 5-year cumulative event-free survival rates of 97% and 94% for patients with normal MPS results compared with 60% and 48% for those with abnormal MPS findings (p <0.001). In conclusion, results of this study indicate high diagnostic and prognostic accuracy for MPS in symptomatic postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary rotational atherectomy (PCRA) is a potent stimulus of platelet activation and aggregation in vivo. For this reason, many patients undergoing PCRA are treated with platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors. However, there is limited data regarding the ability of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors to reduce ischemic complications of PCRA and no data regarding their effect on long-term survival. METHODS: Data on 1138 consecutive patients undergoing PCRA in 5 hospitals in 1998-1999 were pooled and analyzed. Long-term survival was available for all 530 patients treated in 3 of the hospitals. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered to 315 of 1138 (28%) PCRA patients. There was no difference in age, gender or race among patients treated with and without GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, renal insufficiency and peripheral vascular disease did not differ between groups. Unstable angina was more common among patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (45% vs. 38%, P = 0.036) Patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors had lower ejection fractions (50% vs. 55%, P < 0.001) and more 3-vessel coronary disease (24% vs. 16%, P = 0.002). Angiographic success was over 99% in both groups (P = NS). The frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was slightly greater in GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treated patients (3.8% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.126). At a mean follow-up of 3 years, mortality was 13.3% in the GP IIb/IIIa treated patients and 12% in the untreated patients (P = 0.224). On Cox proportional hazards analysis, treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was not significantly associated with increased survival (Hazard Ratio, 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval, 0.631-1.039, P = 0.098). These data do not indicate a significant association between GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment during PCRA and MACE or survival. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: There is limited data regarding the ability of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors to reduce ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary rotational atherectomy (PCRA) and no data regarding their effect on long-term survival. These data do not indicate a significant association between GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment during PCRA and MACE or survival