Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The prevalence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased with continued evidence of their efficacy and ease of use. However, the rise in their utilization also surfaced a concern regarding their reversal in patients actively bleeding and/or those requiring invasive procedures. Up until 2018, there were several reversal options available including 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-factor PCC), activated charcoal, desmopressin, and tranexamic acid. Then, in 2018, andexanet alpha, a recombinant factor Xa, was approved for the reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Nonetheless, because 4-factor PCC is more easily attainable and cost-effective, it continues to be the more favorable option for many health-care professionals. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective chart review was conducted at NYU Winthrop Hospital in patients who received 4-factor PCC for the reversal of DOACs from January 2018 to July 2018. Patient charts were reviewed and relevant data was collected (admitting diagnosis, dose of 4-factor PCC utilized, etc). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Fifty-three patients were evaluated with 85% experiencing a positive response and complete recovery following the administration of 4-factor PCC; 8 (15%) patients died after receiving 4-factor PCC, none as a result of its administration; 3 patients died secondary to other underlying comorbidities, 4 patients died due to an intracranial hemorrhage, and 1 died due to hematoma of the tongue. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Based on the results thus far, the use of 4-factor PCC may be a good treatment option in patients requiring DOAC reversal.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the most common cause of death and disability in persons between 15 and 30 years of age. Although various pharmacological agents have been reported to enhance consciousness recovery, few trials have studied these medications in patients with acute TBI. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of modafinil, methylphenidate, amantadine, and zolpidem in improving wakefulness in patients with TBI in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting and to identify any adverse drug reactions. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified all patients prescribed modafinil, methylphenidate, amantadine, or zolpidem; only patients older than 18 years with TBI in an ICU setting were further analyzed. The electronic medical record was used to retrieve clinical data including patient demographics, mechanism of TBI, drug dosage, treatment duration, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, length of time to improve GCS score, hospital length of stay, reported adverse drug reactions associated with above medications, and mortality. The primary outcome was the rate of positive response in the clinical neurological exam. Secondary outcomes included change in baseline and final GCS score, time to response, duration of treatment, change in GCS score over time, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The final analysis included a total of 53 patients. Median ages ranged from 44.0 to 61.5 years; 85% of patients were male. Baseline median GCS score was 8.0 in the amantadine group; 6.5, modafinil; 7.5, methylphenidate; and 7.0, zolpidem. The highest positive response rate was 90% in the amantadine group, followed by modafinil, 77%; methylphenidate, 50%; and zolpidem, 36%. The change in baseline GCS score and median final GCS score for amantadine, modafinil, methylphenidate, and zolpidem was 2.5, 3.0, 1.0, and 0, respectively (P = 0.20). The median time to response in days was 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, and 1.0, respectively. Change in GCS score over time for amantadine, modafinil, methylphenidate, and zolpidem was 0.16, 0.38, 0.12, and 0, respectively. Though rare, the most common adverse events were agitation, hypertension, and posturing. CONCLUSION: It remains to be determined if these medications have a role in reducing ICU and hospital length of stay, length of mechanical ventilation, tracheostomies, and overall medical costs in managing TBI patients. In our study amantadine was associated with the highest overall positive response rate when used as an awakening agent in TBI. Modafinil was associated with the largest change in GCS score over time.

Objective: To determine whether the concomitant administration of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine improves sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and mortality in a patient with septic and cardiogenic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), gram negative bacteremia, cardiomyopathy, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and 95% mortality on presentation. Design: A case report and literature review. Setting: Surgical Intensive Care Unit at NYU Winthrop Hospital. Patient: Patient with 95% mortality received appropriate treatment for septic and cardiogenic shock with no clinical improvement. Intervention: Hydrocortisone 50 mg intravenous push (IVP) every 6 hours for four days, vitamin C 1,500 mg IV every 6 hours for four days, and thiamine 200 mg intravenous piggyback (IVPB) every 12 hours for four days. Measurements and results: As seen in a retro-. spective study by Marik and associates analyzing patients with severe sepsis with elevated procalcitonin levels, administration of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine significantly reduced the SOFA score and mortality rates. Patient was treated with combination regimen and within 72 hours of administration, he had significant improvement in his cardiac dysfunction, kidney failure, liver failure, and respiratory failure. His SOFA score greatly improved from 18 and 95% mortality to 8 and <33% mortality. Conclusion: Our patient had a remarkable survival of what was thought to be indefinite mortality with the intervention of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine. The administration of the vitamin C protocol warrants a randomized controlled trial to change management of septic shock and mortality. We are very optimistic that it will show similar results yielding a significant decrease in mortality rates in patients with septic shock.

Amiodarone (Cordarone^®, Pfizer Inc) is an antiarrhythmic medication with a well-known toxicity profile, including rare cases of hyponatremia as a result of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). We report on such a case in which a patient was found to be hyponatremic after evaluation. An 88-year-old male who presented to the emergency department was found to be hyponatremic secondary to amiodarone-induced SIADH following a fall, with possible seizure and traumatic brain injury. He had a history of hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, emphysema, myocardial infarction, benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic kidney disease, Meniere's disease, anemia, and gastroesophageal reflux. Upon admission, his urine sodium level was elevated, and his serum sodium, urine osmolality, and anion gap were below normal. In the setting of hyponatremia, the patient's amiodarone was held: he had been taking amiodarone 200 mg once daily for nine months prior to admission. He was treated with intravenous (IV) normal saline over four days. He was fluid-restricted and his sodium levels were closely monitored every two hours. Within 19 hours, his serum sodium levels had improved. Amiodarone was restarted approximately three days later. Upon follow-up after discharge, the patient remained on amiodarone for the next two months. His serum sodium level ranged from 126 mEq/L to 131 mEq/L over a two-week period. He was supplemented with sodium chloride tablets and has been otherwise stable. Amiodarone may cause acute or chronic SIADH, with a wide range of symptoms. Seizures have not been reported in the literature but our patient had a witnessed seizure, although his electroencephalogram (EEG) was negative. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone can occur with any formulation of amiodarone in a dose-dependent fashion. Our patient's sodium levels stabilized within two weeks after amiodarone was resumed. The mechanism of amiodarone-induced SIADH remains unclear.

Orthostatic hypotension is defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure of at least 20 mmHg or a decrease in diastolic blood pressure of at least 10 mmHg (or both), within three minutes of moving from a supine to an upright or standing position. Droxidopa is a synthetic amino acid analog that is directly metabolized to norepinephrine by dopa-decarboxylase, subsequently providing alpha and beta-agonist effects to increase blood pressure. It is indicated in the treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension caused by primary autonomic failure that is associated with Parkinson disease, multi-system atrophy, pure autonomic failure, dopamine beta-hydroxylase deficiency, and/or non-diabetic autonomic neuropathy. In addition, it has been studied in other disease states, such as diabetic autonomic neuropathy-associated orthostatic hypotension and supine hypotension. We report on two cases of off-label droxidopa use. The first case was for diabetic autonomic neuropathy-associated orthostatic hypotension, and the second case was for hypotension due to autonomic dysfunction associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Although the outcomes differed in each case, this article contributes to the literature demonstrating that droxidopa may have varying effects in treating orthostatic hypotension of non-neurogenic etiology.

Hemophilia A, also known as factor VIII deficiency, is a rare disorder caused by an insufficient level of factor VIII, an essential clotting protein. Hemophilia A can be inherited or acquired. Inherited hemophilia A is caused by a mutation to the factor VIII gene on the X chromosome, which is commonly passed down from parents to children. However, in about one-third of cases, the cause is a spontaneous mutation in that gene. Acquired hemophilia A is due to an autoantibody to factor VIII, which is termed an inhibitor. This rare disorder can cause life-threatening bleeding complications. Management relies on a rapid and accurate diagnosis, control of bleeding episodes, and eradication of the inhibitor by immunosuppression therapy. Most treatment strategies are centered around anecdotal reports or small case series. This case report summarizes the successful treatment of a patient with acquired hemophilia A and major bleeding following a surgical procedure, with the use of desmopressin, recombinant factor VIIa, repeated doses of recombinant factor VIII, rituximab, and prednisone.