Faculty Bibliography

Neurologic symptoms are common in all practice settings, and neurologic diseases comprise a large and increasing proportion of health care expenditures and global disease burden. Consequently, the training of all physicians should prepare them to recognize patients who may have neurologic disease, and to take the initial steps in evaluating and managing those patients. We present a core curriculum outlining the clinical neurology skills and knowledge necessary to achieve that degree of preparation. The curriculum emphasizes general principles and a systematic approach to patients with neurologic symptoms and signs. The ability to perform and interpret the neurologic examination is fundamental to that approach, so the curriculum delineates the essential components of the examination in three different clinical settings. The focus of the curriculum is on symptom-based rather than disease-based learning. The only specific diseases selected for inclusion are conditions that are common or require urgent management. This curriculum has been approved by the national organization of neurology clerkship directors and endorsed by the major national professional organizations of neurologists. It is intended as a template for planning a neurology clerkship and as a benchmark for evaluating existing clerkships. It should be especially helpful to clerkship directors, neurology chairs, deans of medical education, and members of external accreditation groups

Despite its importance and widespread usage, the term mixed dementia, referring to the coexistence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VsD), has been ill-defined and poorly conceptualized. The authors review the use of the term mixed dementia in neuropathological and clinical research. As a result of recent developments in the categorization of dementias, they recommend discarding the term mixed dementia in favor of a more precise terminology based on AD and VsD concurrently meeting established criteria for each diagnosis

Normal men exhibited more characteristics of borderline personality disorder than did normal women on a questionnaire. In light of that finding, the authors suggest that labeling processes may be a contributing factor in the overrepresentation of women among patients diagnosed as borderline