Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To describe the revenue from a collaboration between a dedicated wound care center and an interventional radiology (IR) practice for venous leg ulcer (VLU) management at a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This retrospective study included 36 patients with VLU referred from a wound care center to an IR division during the 10-month active study period (April 2017 to January 2018) with a 6-month surveillance period (January 2018 to June 2018). A total of 15 patients underwent endovascular therapy (intervention group), whereas 21 patients did not (nonintervention group). Work relative value units (wRVUs) and dollar revenue were calculated using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule. RESULTS:Three sources of revenue were identified: evaluation and management (E&M), diagnostic imaging, and procedures. The pathway generated 518.15 wRVUs, translating to $37,522. Procedures contributed the most revenue (342.27 wRVUs, $18,042), followed by E&M (124.23 wRVUs, $8,881), and diagnostic imaging (51.65 wRVUs, $10,599). Intervention patients accounted for 86.7% of wRVUs (449.48) and 80.0% of the revenue ($30,010). An average of 33 minutes (38.3 hours total) and 2.06 hours (36.8 hours total) were spent on E&M visits and procedures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:In this collaboration between the wound center and IR undertaken to treat VLU, IR and E&M visits generated revenue and enabled procedural and downstream imaging revenue.

Familiarity with different instruments and understanding the basics of image guidance techniques are essential for interventional radiology trainees. However, there are no structured references in the literature, and trainees are left to "pick it up as they go". Puncture needles, guidewires, sheath systems, and catheters represent some of the most commonly used daily instruments by interventional radiologists. There is a large variety of instruments, and understanding the properties of each tool will allow trainees to better assess which type is needed for each specific procedure. Along with understanding the tools required to perform various interventional radiology procedures, it is important for trainees to learn how to organize the room, procedural table, and various equipment that is used during the procedure. Minimizing clutter and improving organization leads to improved efficiency and decreased errors. In addition, having a fundamental knowledge of fluoroscopy, the most commonly used imaging modality, is an integral part of beginning training in interventional radiology.

PURPOSE:To analyze outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE). MATERIALS AND METHODS:A retrospective analysis of survival, recurrence, and complications was performed in 82 patients with HCC undergoing preoperative PVE and surgical treatment with curative intention from June 2006 to December 2014. RESULTS:Rate of major adverse events after PVE was 11% with no mortality. Twenty-eight (34.1%) patients showed radiologic progression of HCC after PVE; 72 patients (87.8%) eventually were accepted as surgical candidates. Median interval between PVE and surgery was 37 days, and 69 patients (84.1%) ultimately underwent surgical resection. At 1 and 3 years, disease-free survival rates were 81.3% and 53.1%, respectively, and overall patient survival rates were 77.5% and 63.1%. Compared with patients accepted as surgical candidates, patients who did not undergo surgery had a higher median number of HCC tumors (1 [range, 1-5] vs 2 [range, 1-4], P = .031). At 1 and 3 years, patients with disease progression after PVE but who still underwent surgical resection showed similar recurrence-free (90% vs 79.6% and 75% vs 48.6%) and overall (72.2% vs 78.4% and 57.8% vs 64%) survival rates as the rest of the patients who underwent resection. CONCLUSIONS:PVE is a safe technique with good outcomes that potentially increases the number of patients with initially unresectable HCC who can be offered resection. Radiologic progression after PVE should not be seen as a contraindication to offer resection if it is still deemed possible.

Purpose: To determine whether routine preoperative evaluation of patient coagulation status, as reflected by the calculated International Normalized Ratio (INR), is necessary prior to placement of a tunneled subcutaneous port. Materials: We conducted a retrospective analysis of tunneled subcutaneous port placements performed by interventional radiology in the ambulatory setting at a single institution over a 6-month period from March to September 2017. The INR values at time of initial outpatient referral, as well as any subsequent preoperative coagulation testing, were compiled from the electronic medical record. Any INR abnormalities, defined as a value greater than 1.5, were then cross-referenced with specific patient past medical history. Results: A total of 263 patients had subcutaneous ports placed during the 6-month study period (29.7% male, mean age 59). INR testing was performed within 30 days of port placement for every patient, as per departmental protocol based on the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines for management of patient coagulation status. Of the 263 port placements, only 4 patients (1.5%) demonstrated INR values above the threshold limit: Two patients were on Coumadin therapy for chronic thromboembolic disease and atrial fibrillation respectively, one patient was on Apixaban (Eliquis) for atrial fibrillation and one patient had known non-Alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis. Conclusions: The incidence of an abnormal INR in patients is very low. Within the study period, only 1.5% of patients undergoing tunneled subcutaneous port placement demonstrated a coagulation abnormality on routine preoperative testing. All noted abnormalities were explained by a review of the individual patient medical history; specifically, these patients were either on anticoagulation or had known hepatic dysfunction. These findings suggest that the majority of patients do not require routine preoperative testing of coagulation status and that a preprocedural INR can be obtained on a case-by-case basis as predicted by relevant patient medical history

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of portal vein embolization (PVE) with sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) foam. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of 35 patients (27 men and 8 women; mean age, 61 y) who underwent PVE with STS foam was performed. The technical success rate, rate of PVE at producing adequate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy, and rate of disease progression precluding resection after PVE were analyzed. Complications of PVE and liver resection after PVE were recorded. RESULTS: PVE was performed on 35 patients before right hepatic resection for both primary and secondary hepatic malignancies (22 hepatocellular carcinoma, 10 metastasis, 2 cholangiocarcinoma, 1 invasive gallbladder carcinoma). Technical success was achieved in 97.1% (34 of 35) of patients. Mean FLR of the total estimated liver volume increased from 24.5% (SD, 7.7%) to 36.5% (SD, 14.5%), a mean percentage increase of 48.8% (SD, 34.3%). PVE produced adequate FLR hypertrophy in 31 of 35 patients (88.6%). Proposed right hepatectomy was subsequently performed in 27 patients (77.1%). One patient remains scheduled for surgery, two had peritoneal spread at surgery and resection was aborted, two had disease progression on imaging after PVE, and three had inadequate FLR hypertrophy with no surgery. One major complication was observed related to PVE that involved nontarget embolization to segment III, which was managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PVE with STS foam is a safe and effective method to induce hypertrophy of the FLR.

The feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of renal tumors using a high-powered, carbon dioxide-cooled probe were evaluated. There were 15 tumors treated in 14 patients. Computed tomography was performed immediately after MWA, and follow-up imaging was performed to evaluate for recurrence. Immediate technical effectiveness was 100%. One complication involved the formation of a renal artery pseudoaneurysm. At follow-up (mean interval, 12.5 wk) evaluation, 14 of 15 (93.3%) tumors demonstrated complete necrosis. MWA is a safe, effective treatment modality; larger studies are warranted to demonstrate long-term oncologic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess associations between quantitative MRI metrics and pathologic indicators of aggressiveness of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective biinstitutional study, 37 patients (28 men and nine women; mean age, 73 +/- 12 years) who underwent pelvic MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (b values 0, 400, and 800 s/mm(2)) and T2-weighted imaging before transurethral resection or cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were identified. Tumor diameter (measured on T2-weighted imaging), normalized T2 signal intensity (to muscle; hereafter labeled normalized T2) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured for all tumors. Mann-Whitney test and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to identify associations between these metrics and histopathologic tumor stage and grade. RESULTS. Thirty-seven tumors were assessed (mean size, 35 +/- 23 mm; range 8-88 mm). At histopathologic analysis, 16 of 37 (43%) tumors were stage T2 or greater and 21 of 37 (57%) were stage T1 or lower, whereas 34 of 37 (92%) were high grade and three of 37 (8%) were low grade. High-stage (>/= T2) tumors showed greater tumor diameter, lower normalized T2, and lower ADC (p = 0.005-0.032) than low-stage (