Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: The impact of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial and a part of the scientific community believes it as a biased interpretation of data. Many studies have reported an aggressive pattern of HCC after DAA use. In this study, we attempted to assess the changes in the pattern of HCC after treatment with DAAs or PI (PEG, pegylated-interferon). METHODS: A total of 37 HCC patients after DAA treatment and 21 HCC patients after PI treatment were included. The diagnosis of HCC was made and information about demographics, HCC infiltrative pattern, portal vein thrombosis (PVT), time at initial presentation, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage were compared in the two groups. RESULTS: The total number of male patients in the DAA group was 62% while either gender was almost equal in PI. The age group of 40-60 was more prevalent in the DAA group while the PI group comprised more patients who were above 60 years. Patients in the DAA group presented after 3.35 years on average while patients in the PI group presented after about seven years. Most of the patients presented with the CTP stage of A. That is true for both groups. For BCLC staging, most of the patients had stage C, which means multiple lesions. At the initial presentation, most of the patients presented with multifocal lesions. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no significant difference in the initial presentation between both groups. However, HCC patients with prior DAA therapy presented early than those with PI therapy.

BACKGROUND:The impact of COVID-19 on heart transplant (HTx) recipients remains unclear, particularly in the early post-transplant period. METHODS:We share novel insights from our experience in five HTx patients with COVID-19 (three within 2 months post-transplant) from our institution at the epicenter of the pandemic. RESULTS:All five exhibited moderate (requiring hospitalization, n = 3) or severe (requiring ICU and/or mechanical ventilation, n = 2) illness. Both cases with severe illness were transplanted approximately 6 weeks before presentation and acquired COVID-19 through community spread. All five patients were on immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus, and three that were transplanted within the prior 2 months were additionally on prednisone. The two cases with severe illness had profound lymphopenia with markedly elevated C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and ferritin. All had bilateral ground-glass opacities on chest imaging. MMF was discontinued in all five, and both severe cases received convalescent plasma. All three recent transplants underwent routine endomyocardial biopsies, revealing mild (n = 1) or no acute cellular rejection (n = 2), and no visible viral particles on electron microscopy. Within 30 days of admission, the two cases with severe illness remain hospitalized but have clinically improved, while the other three have been discharged. CONCLUSIONS:COVID-19 appears to negatively impact outcomes early after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND:Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a serious condition with high morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the association of surgical treatment with survival among patients with PVE. METHODS:A retrospective cohort study was done of patients with PVE hospitalized over 8 years in a large referral center. Association of surgery with survival was evaluated with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for propensity to be accepted for surgery, and analyzing surgery as a time-dependent covariate. Survival was also compared separately in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort of patients accepted for surgery and control patients consigned to nonsurgical treatment. RESULTS:Of 523 patients (mean [SD] age, 61 [14] years; 370 [71%] men; 393 [75%] initially accepted for surgery), 404 ultimately underwent surgery and 119 received nonsurgical treatment alone. Surgical treatment was associated with significantly lower hazard of death in the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.48; P < .001) and in the 1:1 matched cohort (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19-0.57; P < .001). Initial acceptance for surgery was associated with significantly lower odds of in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR] = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.11-0.59; P < .001), death or readmission within 90 days (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07-0.43; P < .001), and death within 1 year (OR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.08-0.34; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:Surgical treatment is associated with a large survival benefit in PVE. A decision to pursue nonsurgical treatment in PVE should entail close follow-up for any development of an indication for surgery.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Pain is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Analgesics may be appropriate for some CKD patients. Objectives/UNASSIGNED:To determine the prevalence of overall analgesic use and the use of different types of analgesics including acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), adjuvants, and opioids in patients with CKD. Design/UNASSIGNED:Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting/UNASSIGNED:Interventional and observational studies presenting data from 2000 or later. Exclusion criteria included acute kidney injury or studies that limited the study population to a specific cause, symptom, and/or comorbidity. Patients/UNASSIGNED:Adults with stage 3-5 CKD including dialysis patients and those managed conservatively without dialysis. Measurements/UNASSIGNED:Data extracted included title, first author, design, country, year of data collection, publication year, mean age, stage of CKD, prevalence of analgesic use, and the types of analgesics prescribed. Methods/UNASSIGNED:statistic was computed to measure heterogeneity. Random-effects models were used to account for variations in study design and sample populations, and a double arcsine transformation of the prevalence variables was used to accommodate potential overweighting of studies with very large or very small prevalence measurements. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the magnitude of publication bias and assess possible sources of heterogeneity. Results/UNASSIGNED:Forty studies were included in the analysis. The prevalence of overall analgesic use in the random-effects model was 50.8%. The prevalence of acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and adjuvant use was 27.5%, 17.2%, and 23.4%, respectively, while the prevalence of opioid use was 23.8%. Due to the possibility of publication bias, the actual prevalence of acetaminophen use in patients with advanced CKD may be substantially lower than this meta-analysis indicates. A trim-and-fill analysis decreased the pooled prevalence estimate of acetaminophen use to 5.4%. The prevalence rate for opioid use was highly influenced by 2 large US studies. When these were removed, the estimated prevalence decreased to 17.3%. Limitations/UNASSIGNED:There was a lack of detailed information regarding the analgesic regimen (such as specific analgesics used within each class and inconsistent accounting for patients on multiple drugs and the use of over-the-counter analgesics such as acetaminophen and NSAIDs), patient characteristics, type of pain being treated, and the outcomes of treatment. Data on adjuvant use were very limited. These results, therefore, must be interpreted with caution. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:There was tremendous variability in the prescribing patterns of both nonopioid and opioid analgesics within and between countries suggesting widespread uncertainty about the optimal pharmacological approach to treating pain. Further research that incorporates robust reporting of analgesic regimens and links prescribing patterns to clinical outcomes is needed to guide optimal clinical practice.

The 2016 American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) guidelines for surgical treatment of infective endocarditis (IE) are question based and address questions of specific relevance to cardiac surgeons. Clinical scenarios in IE are often complex, requiring prompt diagnosis, early institution of antibiotics, and decision-making related to complications, including risk of embolism and timing of surgery when indicated. The importance of an early, multispecialty team approach to patients with IE is emphasized. Management issues are divided into groups of questions related to indications for and timing of surgery, pre-surgical work-up, preoperative antibiotic treatment, surgical risk assessment, intraoperative management, surgical management, surveillance, and follow up. Standard indications for surgery are severe heart failure, severe valve dysfunction, prosthetic valve infection, invasion beyond the valve leaflets, recurrent systemic embolization, large mobile vegetations, or persistent sepsis despite adequate antibiotic therapy for more than 5-7 days. The guidelines emphasize that once an indication for surgery is established, the operation should be performed as soon as possible. Timing of surgery in patients with strokes and neurologic deficits require close collaboration with neurological services. In surgery infected and necrotic tissue and foreign material is radically debrided and removed. Valve repair is performed whenever possible, particularly for the mitral and tricuspid valves. When simple valve replacement is required, choice of valve-mechanical or tissue prosthesis-should be based on normal criteria for valve replacement. For patients with invasive disease and destruction, reconstruction should depend on the involved valve, severity of destruction, and available options for cardiac reconstruction. For the aortic valve, use of allograft is still favored.

OBJECTIVE:Right-sided infective endocarditis is increasing because of increasing prevalence of predisposing conditions, and the role and outcomes of surgery are unclear. We therefore investigated the surgical outcomes for right-sided infective endocarditis. METHODS:From January 2002 to January 2015, 134 adults underwent surgery for right-sided infective endocarditis. Patients were grouped according to predisposing condition. Hospital outcomes, time-related death, and reoperation for infective endocarditis were analyzed. RESULTS:A total of 127 patients (95%) had tricuspid valve and 7 patients (5%) pulmonary valve infective endocarditis; 66 patients (49%) had isolated right-sided infective endocarditis, and 68 patients (51%) had right- and left-sided infective endocarditis. Predisposing conditions included injection drug use (30%), cardiac implantable devices (26%), chronic vascular access (19%), and other/none (25%). One native tricuspid valve was excised, 76% were repaired or reconstructed, and 23% were replaced. Intensive care unit and postoperative hospital stays were similar among groups. Injection drug users had the best early survival (no hospital mortality), and patients with chronic vascular access had the worst late survival (18% at 5 years). Survival was worst for concomitant mitral valve versus isolated right-sided infective endocarditis or concomitant aortic valve infective endocarditis. Survival after tricuspid valve replacement was worse than after repair/reconstruction. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was the strongest risk factor for death, not predisposing condition. Eleven patients underwent 12 reoperations for infective endocarditis; more reoperations occurred in injection drug users (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS:Overall outcomes after surgery are variable and affected by patient condition, not predisposing condition. Injection drug use carries a higher risk of reoperation for infective endocarditis. Earlier surgery may permit more valve repairs and improve outcomes. Whenever possible, tricuspid valve replacement should be avoided.

OBJECTIVES:Surgical management of invasive double-valve infective endocarditis (IE) involving the intervalvular fibrosa (IVF) is a technical challenge that requires extensive debridement followed by complex reconstruction. In this study, we present the early and mid-term outcomes of the hemi-Commando procedure and aortic root replacement with reconstruction of IVF using an aortomitral allograft. METHODS:From 2010 to 2017, 37 patients with IE involving the IVF underwent the hemi-Commando procedure. Postoperative clinical data and echocardiograms were reviewed for the assessment of cardiac structural integrity and clinical outcomes. RESULTS:Twenty-nine (78%) cases were redo surgery and 15 (41%) were emergency surgery. Preoperatively, 70% (n = 26) of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit and 11% (n = 4) of patients were in septic shock. Ten (27%) patients had native aortic valve IE, while 27 (73%) patients had prosthetic valve IE. Hospital death occurred in 8% (n = 3) of patients due to multisystem organ failure. Postoperative echocardiogram showed no aortic regurgitation in 86% (n = 32) and mild regurgitation in 14% (n = 5) of patients, while mitral regurgitation prevalence was none/trivial in 62% (n = 23), mild in 32% (n = 12) and moderate in 5%. Intact IVF reconstruction was confirmed in all patients with no abnormal communication between the left heart chambers. One-year survival was 91%, while 3-year survival was 82%. Mid-term follow up revealed 1 death secondary to recurrent IE. CONCLUSIONS:Compared to double-valve replacement with IVF reconstruction ('Commando operation'), the early and mid-term outcomes of the hemi-Commando procedure proved to be a feasible treatment option for IVF reconstruction, enabling preservation of the mitral valve and the subvalvular apparatus in high-risk patients with invasive double-valve IE.

OBJECTIVES:Risk of reoperation and loss of a second native valve are major drawbacks of the Ross operation. Rather than discarding the failed autograft, it can be placed back into the native pulmonary position by "Ross reversal." We review our early and mid-term results with this operation. METHODS:From 2006 to 2017, 39 patients underwent reoperation for autograft dysfunction. The autograft was successfully rescued in 35 patients: by Ross reversal in 30, David procedure in 4, and autograft repair in 1. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics (mean age was 46 ± 13 years, range 18-67 years, and 23 were male), previous operations, indications for reoperation, hospital outcomes, and echocardiographic findings for the 30 patients undergoing successful Ross reversal. Follow-up was 4.1 ± 3.5 years (range 7 months-11 years). RESULTS:Median interval between the original Ross procedure and Ross reversal was 12 years (range 5-19 years). Eight patients also had absolute indications for replacement of the pulmonary allograft. There was no operative mortality. One patient required reoperation for bleeding. Another had an abdominal aorta injury from use of an endoballoon clamp. There was no other major postoperative morbidity, and median postoperative hospital stay was 7.2 days (range 4-41 days). No patient required reoperation during follow-up. Twenty-four patients had acceptable pulmonary valve function, and 6 had clinically well-tolerated moderate or severe pulmonary regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS:Ross reversal can be performed with low morbidity and acceptable pulmonary valve function, reducing patient risk of losing 2 native valves when the autograft fails in the aortic position.