Faculty Bibliography

AIM: To investigate diagnostic accuracy of high, low and mixed voltage dual energy computed tomography (DECT) for detection of prior myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients (88% male, mean age 65 +/- 11 years old) with clinically documented prior MI (> 6 mo) were prospectively recruited to undergo late phase DECT for characterization of their MI. Computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed using a dual source CT system (64-slice Definition or 128-slice Definition FLASH, Siemens Healthcare) with initial first pass and 10 min late phase image acquisitions. Using the 17-segment model, regional systolic function was analyzed using first pass CT as normal or abnormal (hypokinetic, akinetic, dyskinetic). Regions with abnormal systolic function were identified as infarct segments. Late phase DE scans were reconstructed into: 140 kVp, 100 kVp, mixed (120 kVp) images and iodine-only datasets. Using the same 17-segment model, each dataset was evaluated for possible (grade 2) or definite (grade 3) late phase myocardial enhancement abnormalities. Logistic regression for correlated data was used to compare reconstructions in terms of the accuracy for detecting infarct segments using late myocardial hyperenhancement scores. RESULTS: All patients reported prior history of documented myocardial infarction, with most occurring more than 5 years prior (n = 18; 75% of cohort). Fifty-five of 408 (13%) segments demonstrated abnormal wall motion and were classified as infarct. The remaining 353 segments were classified as non-infarcted segments. A total of 1692 segments were analyzed for late phase enhancement abnormalities, with 91 (5.5%) segments not interpretable due to artifact. Combined grades 2 and 3 compared to grade 3 only enhancement abnormalities demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity and similar specificity for detection of infarct segments for all reconstructions evaluated. Evaluation of different voltage acquisitions demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for the 100 kVp reconstruction which had higher diagnostic accuracy (87%; 95%CI: 80%-90%), sensitivity (86%-93%; 95%CI: 54%-78%) and specificity (90%; 95%CI: 86%-93%) compared to the other reconstructions. For sensitivity, there were significant differences noted between 100 kVp vs 140 kVp (P < 0.0005), 100 kVp vs mixed (P < 0.0001), and 100 kVp vs iodine only (P < 0.005) using combined grade 2 and grade 3 perfusion abnormalities. For specificity, there were significant differences noted between 100 kVp vs 140 kVp (P < 0.005), and 100 kVp vs mixed (P < 0.01) using combined grades 2 and 3 perfusion abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Low voltage acquisition CT, 100 kVp in this study, demonstrates superior diagnostic performance when compared to higher and mixed voltage acquisitions for detection of prior MI.

Chronic chest pain can arise from a variety of etiologies. However, of those potential causes, the most life-threatening include cardiac disease. Chronic cardiac chest pain may be caused either by ischemia or atherosclerotic coronary artery disease or by other cardiac-related etiologies, such as pericardial disease. To consider in patients, especially those who are at low risk for coronary artery disease, are etiologies of chronic noncardiac chest pain. Noncardiac chest pain is most commonly related to gastroesophageal reflux disease or other esophageal diseases. Alternatively, it may be related to costochondritis, arthritic or degenerative diseases, old trauma, primary or metastatic tumors, or pleural disease. Rarely, noncardiac chest pain may be referred pain from organ systems below the diaphragm, such as the gallbladder. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining diagnostic coronary CT angiography with low radiation exposure in patients with irregular heart rhythms such as atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated image quality and inter-reader variability with the use of prospective electrocardiographic (ECG)-triggered sequential dual-source acquisition at end systole for coronary artery disease (CAD) evaluation in patients with AF. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with AF who underwent prospective ECG-triggered sequential dual-source acquisition were evaluated. Images were reconstructed every 50 milliseconds from 250 to 400 milliseconds after the R wave. Two independent, blinded readers evaluated the coronaries for image quality on a 5-point scale (worst to best) and stenosis on 5-point semiquantitative (none to severe) and binary scales (>50% or <50%). Diagnostic image quality was graded for each reconstruction. RESULTS: Eleven patients (37%) had significant (>/=50% stenosis) CAD. Average heart rate was 82 +/- 20 beats/min and variability range was 71 +/- 22 beats/min. Mean effective radiation dose was 6.5 +/- 2.4 mSv. Diagnostic image quality was noted in 97.9% of 304 coronary segments with median image quality of 3.0. The 300-millisecond reconstruction phase provided the highest image quality; 70% of patients showed diagnostic image quality. Combination of all phases (250-400 milliseconds) performed significantly better than single or other phase combinations (P < 0.0005 for all comparisons). Inter-reader variability for stenosis detection was excellent, with 98.4% concordance by using a binary scale (50% stenosis cutoff). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective ECG-triggered sequential dual-source CT acquisition with the use of end-systolic acquisition provides diagnostic image quality with potentially low radiation doses for evaluation of CAD in patients with AF. Use of multiple end-systolic phases over a 150-millisecond window improves diagnostic image quality.

This document outlines the usefulness of available diagnostic imaging for patients without known coronary artery disease and at low probability for having coronary artery disease who do not present with classic signs, symptoms, or electrocardiographic abnormalities indicating acute coronary syndrome but rather with nonspecific chest pain leading to a differential diagnosis, including pulmonary, gastrointestinal, or musculoskeletal pathologies. A number of imaging modalities are available to evaluate the broad spectrum of possible pathologies in these patients, such as chest radiography, multidetector CT, MRI, ventilation-perfusion scans, cardiac perfusion scintigraphy, transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography, PET, spine and rib radiography, barium esophageal and upper gastrointestinal studies, and abdominal ultrasound. It is considered appropriate to start the assessment of these patients with a low-cost, low-risk diagnostic test such as a chest x-ray. Contrast-enhanced gated cardiac and ungated thoracic multidetector CT as well as transthoracic echocardiography are also usually considered as appropriate in the evaluation of these patients as a second step if necessary. A number of rest and stress single-photon emission CT myocardial perfusion imaging, ventilation-perfusion scanning, aortic and chest MR angiographic, and more specific x-ray and abdominal examinations may be appropriate as a third layer of testing, whereas MRI of the heart or coronary arteries and invasive testing such as transesophageal echocardiography or selective coronary angiography are not considered appropriate in these patients. Given the low risk of these patients, it is mandated to minimize radiation exposure as much as possible using advanced and appropriate testing protocols. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a wellestablished consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Abstract Background: Early identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) among symptomatic women is critical given their worse outcomes as compared to men. We evaluated the value of the Morise score, a simple clinical risk score, for the assessment for CAD as determined by computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and compared it to the Diamond-Forrester risk assessment. Methods: One hundred forty women (mean age, 64+/-11 years) with chest pain syndromes and no known CAD referred for CTCA were analyzed. Patients were risk stratified for likelihood of CAD by Morise and Diamond-Forrester scores. The presence and degree of CAD were determined by CTCA and classified as normal, nonobstructive (<50% stenosis), or obstructive (>50% stenosis). Total coronary calcium was calculated based on Agatston scores. Results: When risk was assessed by Morise vs. Diamond-Forrester, 5% vs. 7% of women were stratified as low, 41% vs. 82% as intermediate, and 54% vs. 11% as high risk for CAD, respectively. CAD was present in 95 (68%) patients; 22 (16%) had obstructive CAD, and 73 (52%) had nonobstructive CAD. Morise scores significantly correlated with calcium scores (p<0.001) as well as the presence and degree of CAD (p<0.0001). Morise scores also demonstrated significantly higher accuracy (66% vs. 48%, p<0.005) and higher sensitivity (56% vs. 16%, p<0.001) but lower specificity (82% vs. 97%, p<0.05) when compared to Diamond-Forrester risk assessment. Conclusions: The Morise score performed better than Diamond-Forrester for CAD risk assessment, which highlights the importance and power of a simple history and physical examination in determining women at risk for CAD.

AIM: To evaluate safety and utility of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in new cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Eighteen patients (mean age 56.5 years, 10 males) who presented for evaluation of new onset heart failure with evidence of systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction < 40%) on echocardiography and recent ICA were prospectively enrolled. Patients with known coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, creatinine > 1.5 g/dL, and contraindication to intravenous contrast administration were excluded. CCTA was performed using a dual source 64-slice scanner. Mean heart rate was 75 beats per minute. Stenosis was graded for each coronary segment as: none, mild (< 50%), moderate (50%-70%), severe (> 70%), or non-evaluable. Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) was diagnosed if severe stenosis was present in the left main, proximal left anterior descending artery, or two or more major arteries. RESULTS: Two patients were diagnosed with ICM by ICA. CCTA correctly identified 2 patients with ICM and 16 patients as non-ICM. CCTA successfully evaluated 240/246 coronary segments with an accuracy of 97.5%, sensitivity 70%, specificity 98.7%, positive predictive value of 70%, and negative predictive value of 98.7% for identifying severe stenosis on a per-segment level. CONCLUSION: Dual source 64-slice multi-detector CCTA is a safe, accurate, and non-invasive technique for diagnosing ICM in patients presenting during the acute phase of newly diagnosed cardiomyopathy.

Cardiac computed tomographic angiography algorithms emphasize radiation reduction while maintaining diagnostic image quality (IQ). The aim of this study was to evaluate IQ and interreader variability using prospective electrocardiographically triggered high-pitch spiral cardiac computed tomographic angiography (FLASH-CT) compared to retrospective electrocardiographic gating (RETRO-CT) for coronary artery disease evaluation in a patient population including overweight and obese individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients (24 women; mean age, 60 years) matched for gender, age, body mass index (27.4 ± 5.5 kg/m(2)), and calcium score (184 ± 328) underwent cardiac computed tomographic angiography, 35 with FLASH-CT (Definition Flash) and 35 with RETRO-CT (Somatom Definition). Images were reconstructed using standard protocols and least motion phase for RETRO-CT acquisitions. Two independent, blinded readers evaluated the coronary arteries using an 18-segment model, grading IQ on a 5-point, Likert-type scale and coronary stenosis on a 5-point semiquantitative and binary scale. RESULTS: Effective radiation dose (1.50 vs 17.3 mSv, P < .0001) and mean heart rate (58 vs 62 beats/min, P < .05) were significantly lower for FLASH-CT compared to RETRO-CT. Seven hundred forty segments (> 1.5 mm) were evaluated. There was no significant difference between FLASH-CT and RETRO-CT scans in overall per-segment IQ (3.11 ± 0.75 vs 3.10 ± 0.82, P = .94). FLASH-CT had noninferior IQ relative to RETRO-CT (95% confidence interval, -0.25 to 0.26). There was no significant difference in interreader variability in diagnosis between FLASH-CT and RETRO-CT for all coronary segments (77.5% vs 78.2%, P = .83). CONCLUSIONS: FLASH-CT is an acceptable coronary computed tomographic angiographic method for reducing radiation dose without compromising IQ for a patient population including overweight and obese individuals.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined short-term cardiac catheterization rates and medication changes after cardiac imaging. BACKGROUND: Noninvasive cardiac imaging is widely used in coronary artery disease, but its effects on subsequent patient management are unclear. METHODS: We assessed the 90-day post-test rates of catheterization and medication changes in a prospective registry of 1,703 patients without a documented history of coronary artery disease and an intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease undergoing cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, or 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography. RESULTS: Baseline medication use was relatively infrequent. At 90 days, 9.6% of patients underwent catheterization. The rates of catheterization and medication changes increased in proportion to test abnormality findings. Among patients with the most severe test result findings, 38% to 61% were not referred to catheterization, 20% to 30% were not receiving aspirin, 35% to 44% were not receiving a beta-blocker, and 20% to 25% were not receiving a lipid-lowering agent at 90 days after the index test. Risk-adjusted analyses revealed that compared with stress single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography, changes in aspirin and lipid-lowering agent use was greater after computed tomography angiography, as was the 90-day catheterization referral rate in the setting of normal/nonobstructive and mildly abnormal test results. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, noninvasive testing had only a modest impact on clinical management of patients referred for clinical testing. Although post-imaging use of cardiac catheterization and medical therapy increased in proportion to the degree of abnormality findings, the frequency of catheterization and medication change suggests possible undertreatment of higher risk patients. Patients were more likely to undergo cardiac catheterization after computed tomography angiography than after single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography after normal/nonobstructive and mildly abnormal study findings. (Study of Perfusion and Anatomy's Role in Coronary Artery [CAD] [SPARC]; NCT00321399).

Coronary anomalies occur in <1% of the general population and can range from a benign incidental finding to the cause of sudden cardiac death. The coronary anomalies are classified here according to the traditional grouping into those of origin and course, intrinsic arterial anatomy, and termination. Classic coronary anomalies of origin and course include those in which a coronary artery originates from the contralateral aortic sinus or the pulmonary artery with anomalous course. Single coronary artery anomalies, in which single coronary artery branches to supply the entire coronary tree, are also included in this category. Anomalies of intrinsic arterial anatomy are a broad class that includes myocardial bridges, coronary ectasia and aneurysms, subendocardial coursing arteries, and coronary artery duplication. Coronary anomalies of termination are those in which a coronary artery terminates in a fistulous connection to a great vessel or cardiac chamber. In the case of those anomalies associated with a risk of sudden cardiac death, the relevant imaging features on CT angiography (CTA) associated with poorer prognosis are reviewed. Recent guidelines and appropriateness criteria favor the use of coronary CTA for the evaluation of coronary anomalies. Although invasive angiography has historically been used to diagnose coronary anomalies, multidetector CT imaging techniques have now become an accurate noninvasive alternative. Cardiac CTA provides excellent spatial and temporal resolution, allowing accurate anatomical assessment of these anomalies.

Introduction: Patients receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of atrial fibrillation typically undergo pre-procedural cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to delineate pulmonary venous anatomy and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) to exclude left atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombus (LAT). The addition of a late phase acquisition is theorized to aid CCTA identification and discrimination of LAT from slow left atrial appendage filling. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-phase, ECG-gated dual-source CCTA (64-slice Definition, Siemens) compared to TEE for identification of thrombus and to assess the added value of a late phase CCTA acquisition. Methods: Fifty-three consecutive patients (37 men; mean age 63) had both dual-phase CCTA and TEE prior to RFA. Mean time between CCTA and TEE was 9 days (range 1-22). Mean early phase and late phase scan acquisition delay times were 29 sec and 30 sec, respectively. Presence of LAT was independently graded on both early phase and combined early and late phase (CP) CCTA acquisitions using a 5-point Likert scale by 2 readers blinded to the TEE results. Diagnostic accuracy for LAT was assessed for early phase and CP CCTA acquisitions using TEE results as truth. Results: CCTA identified LAT in 2 out of 3 patients with thrombi on TEE (67%). Relative to TEE, early phase and CP CCTA acquisitions demonstrated: 47% and 67% sensitivity, 84% and 100% specificity, 54% and 100% PPV, 80% and 98% NPV, respectively. Overall diagnostic accuracy was significantly improved for CP compared to early phase acquisition (98% and 77%, respectively, p<0.001). Conclusions: CCTA has excellent specificity (100%) but only modest sensitivity (66.7%) for identification of LAT in patients undergoing RFA. Addition of a late phase CCTA acquisition significantly improves overall diagnostic accuracy