Faculty Bibliography

IMPORTANCE/OBJECTIVE:Men have a higher risk of Achilles tendon (AT) injury, and the impact of morphological and mechanical sex differences may play a role. AIM/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature to determine whether there are sex-specific differences in AT morphological and mechanical properties and analyze how these differences may impact AT injury in both men and women. EVIDENCE REVIEW/METHODS:A systematic literature search of articles published between 2001 and 2021, in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed during May 2022 according to PRISMA. The primary outcome measures included sex-related differences in the mechanical and morphological properties of the Achilles tendon. Secondary outcomes included impact of sex on Achilles tendon properties and adaptation. FINDINGS/RESULTS:Nineteen studies with a total of 1,143 participants (613 men and 530 women) were included in this systematic review. Men had increased measurements when compared with women in the following: AT length, thickness, cross-sectional area (CSA), stiffness, peak force, loading rate, and voluntary muscle contraction. Women had an increase in CSA deformation, strain, and compliance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Our study demonstrates that men have an increased AT length, thickness, and CSA, indicating that men may be subjected biomechanically to higher loads in their day-to-day activities. In addition, men have lower deformation and compliance properties, along with increased AT stiffness, reducing their capacity to adapt during loading, potentially increasing their risk of injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:IV.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Moderate-to-severe hallux rigidus is a debilitating pathology that is optimally treated with surgical intervention. Arthrodesis produces reliable clinical outcomes but is limited by restriction in 1st metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion. The advent of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel (PVA) implants have produced early promise based on initial trials, but more recent studies have called into question the efficacy of this procedure. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes following the use of PVA for hallux rigidus. METHODS:The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. 18 studies were included. RESULTS:In total, 1349 patients (1367 feet) underwent PVA at a weighted mean follow-up of 24.1 ± 11.1 months. There were 168 patients (169 feet) included in the cheilectomy cohort and 322 patients (322 feet) included in the arthrodesis cohort. All 3 cohorts produced comparable improvements in subjective clinical outcomes. Postoperative imaging findings in the PVA cohort included joint space narrowing, peri-implant fluid, peri-implant edema and erosion of the proximal phalanx. The complication rate in the PVA cohort, cheilectomy cohort and arthrodesis cohort was 27.9%, 11.8% and 24.1%, respectively. The failure rates in the PVA cohort, cheilectomy cohort and arthrodesis cohort was 14.8%, 0.3% and 9.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review demonstrated that PVA produced a high complication rate (27.9%) together with concerning postoperative imaging findings at short-term follow-up. In addition, a moderate failure rate (14.8%) and secondary surgical procedure rate (9.5%) was noted for the PVA cohort. The findings of this review calls into question the efficacy and safety of PVA for the treatment of hallux rigidus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:IV.

IMPORTANCE/OBJECTIVE:Peri-operative blood loss during joint replacement procedures is a modifiable risk factor that impacts wound complications, hospital stay and total costs. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an anti-fibrinolytic that has been widely used in orthopedic surgery, but its efficacy in the setting of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has not been quantified to date. AIM/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of administering TXA in patients undergoing TAA. EVIDENCE REVIEW/METHODS:The Medline, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Five comparative studies examining blood loss following administration of TXA for patients undergoing TAA were included. The outcome measures of interest were blood loss, reduction in hemoglobin concentration, transfusion requirements, total complications and wound complications. FINDINGS/RESULTS:In total, 194 patients received TXA and 187 patients did not receive TXA while undergoing TAA. Based on the common-effects model for total blood loss for the TXA group versus control, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was -0.7832 (95% CI, -1.1544, -0.4120; P<.0001), in favor of lower total blood loss for TXA. Based on the random-effects model for reduction in hemoglobin for the TXA group versus control, the SMD was -0.9548 (95% CI, -1.7850, -0.1246; P=.0242) in favor of lower hemoglobin loss for TXA. Based on the random-effects model for total complications for the TXA group versus control, the risk ratio was 0.512 (95% CI, 0.1588, 1.6512; P=.1876), in favor of lower total complications for TXA but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS:This current review demonstrated that administration of TXA led to a reduction in blood loss and hemoglobin loss without an increased risk of the development of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing TAA. No difference was observed with respect to total complication rates between the TXA cohort and the control group. TXA appears to be an effective hemostatic agent in the setting of TAA, but further studies are necessary to identify the optimal timing, dosage and route of TXA during TAA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this retrospective case series was to evaluate clinical outcomes following both conservative treatment and arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for the management of symptomatic subtalar osteochondral lesions (OCLs). DESIGN/METHODS:All symptomatic subtalar OCLs with a minimum of 12 months follow-up having undergone either a conservative management or arthroscopic procedure were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected via questionnaires consisting of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain in rest, during walking, during stair climbing, and during running. In addition, return to sports data, return to work data, reoperations, and complications were collected and assessed. In total, 11 patients across 2 academic institutions were included (3 males, 8 females). The median age was 43 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 32-53). RESULTS:All patients underwent conservative treatment first; in addition, 9 patients underwent subtalar arthroscopic debridement with or without BMS. The median follow-up time was 15 months (IQR: 14-100). In the surgically treated group, the median NRS scores were 2 (IQR: 1-3) during rest, 3 (IQR: 2-4) during walking, 4 (IQR: 4-5) during stair climbing, 5 (IQR: 4-5) during running and the median FAOS score at final follow-up was 74 (IQR: 65-83). In the conservatively treated patients, the median NRS scores were all 0 (IQR: 0-0) and the median FAOS scores were 90 (IQR: 85-94). In the group of surgical treated patients, 4 were able to return to the same level of sports, 2 returned to a lower level of sports. Both conservatively treated patients returned to the sport and the same level of prior participation. All patients except one in the surgical group returned to work. CONCLUSIONS:This retrospective case series demonstrated that a high number of patients converted to surgery after initial conservative treatment. In addition, debridement and BMS show good clinical outcomes for the management of symptomatic subtalar OCLs at short-term follow-up. No complications nor secondary surgical procedures were noted in the surgically treated group. The high rate of failure of conservative treatment suggests that surgical intervention for symptomatic subtalar OCLs can be the primary treatment strategy; however, further research is warranted in light of the small number of patients.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes together with the complication rates and failure rates at short-term follow-up following particulated juvenile cartilage allograft (PJCA) for the management of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). METHODS:During October 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies examining outcomes following PJCA for the management of OLTs. Data regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, lesion characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, complications and failures were extracted and analysed. RESULTS:. Prior surgical intervention was recorded in seven studies, the most common of which was microfracture (65.9%). The weighted mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from a preoperative score of 58.5 ± 3.2 to a postoperative score of 83.9 ± 5.3. The weighted mean postoperative magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score was 48.2 ± 3.3. The complication rate was 25.2%, the most common of which was allograft hypertrophy (13.2%). Thirty failures (12.4%) were observed at a weighted mean time of 9.8 ± 9.6 months following the index procedure. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review demonstrated a moderate improvement in subjective clinical outcomes following PJCA for the treatment of OLT at short term follow-up. However, postoperative MOCART scores were reported as poor. In addition, a high complication rate (25.2%) and a high failure rate (12.4%) at short-term follow-up was observed, calling into question the efficacy of PJCA for the treatment of large OLTs. In light of the available evidence, PJCA for the treatment of large OLTs cannot be currently recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV.

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an Artificial Intelligence Large Language Model (AI-LLM) at improving the readability foot and ankle orthopedic radiology reports. METHODS:The radiology reports from 100 foot or ankle X-Rays, 100 computed tomography (CT) scans and 100 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were randomly sampled from the institution's database. The following prompt command was inserted into the AI-LLM: "Explain this radiology report to a patient in layman's terms in the second person: [Report Text]". The mean report length, Flesch reading ease score (FRES) and Flesch-Kincaid reading level (FKRL) were evaluated for both the original radiology report and the AI-LLM generated report. The accuracy of the information contained within the AI-LLM report was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale. Additionally, any "hallucinations" generated by the AI-LLM report were recorded. RESULTS:There was a statistically significant improvement in mean FRES scores in the AI-LLM generated X-Ray report (33.8 ± 6.8 to 72.7 ± 5.4), CT report (27.8 ± 4.6 to 67.5 ± 4.9) and MRI report (20.3 ± 7.2 to 66.9 ± 3.9), all p < 0.001. There was also a statistically significant improvement in mean FKRL scores in the AI-LLM generated X-Ray report (12.2 ± 1.1 to 8.5 ± 0.4), CT report (15.4 ± 2.0 to 8.4 ± 0.6) and MRI report (14.1 ± 1.6 to 8.5 ± 0.5), all p < 0.001. Superior FRES scores were observed in the AI-LLM generated X-Ray report compared to the AI-LLM generated CT report and MRI report, p < 0.001. The mean Likert score for the AI-LLM generated X-Ray report, CT report and MRI report was 4.0 ± 0.3, 3.9 ± 0.4, and 3.9 ± 0.4, respectively. The rate of hallucinations in the AI-LLM generated X-Ray report, CT report and MRI report was 4%, 7% and 6%, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:AI-LLM was an efficacious tool for improving the readability of foot and ankle radiological reports across multiple imaging modalities. Superior FRES scores together with superior Likert scores were observed in the X-Ray AI-LLM reports compared to the CT and MRI AI-LLM reports. This study demonstrates the potential use of AI-LLMs as a new patient-centric approach for enhancing patient understanding of their foot and ankle radiology reports. Jel Classifications: IV.

In-office needle arthroscopy (IONA) has gained increased attention as a minimally invasive alternative to standard arthroscopy performed in the operating room (OR) setting. IONA uses instrumentation that is markedly smaller in size and diameter making arthroscopy less invasive. Less OR equipment and less OR staff are required resulting in procedures that may be more accessible and less expensive. IONA is typically performed using local intra-articular blocks, thereby reducing the need for regional anesthesia or general anesthesia along with its associated risks. Using a clinic setting rather than an OR reduces the cost and increases the efficiency of the procedure. This article will present the indications for IONA in upper and lower extremity injuries and will describe the best practice office setup. Technical pearls and pitfalls will also be discussed.

Numerous interference screws of different compositions exist including titanium screws, bioabsorbable screws and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) screws. PEEK-based implants are frequently used in orthopedic surgery due to their biocompatibility, similar elastic modulus to cortical bone and purported negligible risk of osteolysis compared with bioabsorbable screws. In this case report, we present the case of a 48-year old healthy female who experienced a massive osteolytic reaction in the talus and fibula 11-weeks following implantation of PEEK-based interference screws during lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. The patient subsequently underwent removal of the PEEK screws and specimens were sent for microbiological and histopathological analysis. The specimens report demonstrated fibrotic tenosynovial soft tissue with patchy chronic inflammation, edematous reactive changes, histiocytic reaction with no evidence of any significant acute inflammation. The patient recovered well and was asymptomatic at 6-months postoperatively. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a massive osteolytic reaction to PEEK-based interference screws.

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients undergoing scarf osteotomy and scarf-Akin osteotomy for the management of hallux valgus deformity. METHODS:A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting clinical data following scarf osteotomy and scarf-Akin osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus were included and assessed. The level and quality of evidence of the included studies were also evaluated. RESULTS:Four studies were included. In total, 388 patients (408 toes) underwent scarf osteotomy alone and 287 patients (295 toes) underwent scarf-Akin osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity. There was no difference in postoperative American orthopedic foot and ankle society scores (p = 0.7828), visual analog scale scores (p = 0.4558), hallux valgus angle (p = 0.5116), intermetatarsal angle (p = 0.4830), proximal to distal phalangeal articular angle (p = 0.2411) between the scarf alone cohort and the scarf-Akin cohort. Similarly, there was no difference in complication rates (p = 0.6881) nor secondary surgical procedure rates (p = 0.3678) between the 2 cohorts. Finally, there was a higher recurrence rate in the scarf-alone cohort (11.4%) compared to the scarf-Akin cohort (5.7%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.4414). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review demonstrates lower recurrence rates following scarf-Akin osteotomy compared to scarf osteotomy alone for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity. No difference in complication rates were noted between the 2 cohorts. Our review demonstrates that both the scarf osteotomy and the scarf-Akin osteotomy may be effective and safe procedures, however, the scarf-Akin osteotomy may provide more long-term benefit in the setting of moderate to severe hallux valgus.

Stem cell therapies have become widely popular in orthopaedic surgery, with a recent interest in adipose-derived therapeutics. Adipose-derived mesenchymal signaling cells (ADSCs) and micronized adipose tissue (MAT) are unique therapies derived from different processing methods. Characterizing the most influential studies in lipoaspirate research can help clarify controversies in definitions, identify core literature, and further collective knowledge for educational purposes. The Science Citation Index Expanded subsection of the Web of Science Core Collection was systematically searched to identify the top 50 most cited publications (based on citation/year) on orthopaedic ADSCs or MAT research. Publication and study characteristics were extracted and reported using descriptive statistics. Level of evidence was assessed for applicable studies, and Spearman correlations were calculated to assess the relationship between citation data and level of evidence. The top 50 articles were published between the years 2003 and 2020, with 78% published in the year 2010 or later. The mean number of citations was 103.1 ± 81.1. The mean citation rate was 12.4 ± 6.0 citations per year. Of the 21 studies for which level of evidence was assessed, the majority were level III (10, 47.6%). The single study design most common among the top 50 cited articles was in vitro basic science studies (17 studies, 34%). Twenty-nine articles (58%) were classified as basic science or translational. Application to treat knee osteoarthritis was the most common focus of studies (14 studies, 28%), followed by in vitro analysis of growth factor and cell signaling markers (11 studies, 22%). No correlation was found between rank, citation rate, or year of publication and level of evidence. This study provides a current landscape on the most cited articles in lipoaspirates in orthopaedic surgery. With the expansion of ADSCs and MAT in the past two decades, this study provides the first historical landmark of the literature and a launching point for future research. Studies should explicitly state their processing methodology and whether their study investigates ADSCs or MAT to avoid misinformation.