Faculty Bibliography

To compare utilization of CT pulmonary angiogram (CTA) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in an emergency department (ED) with unstructured CT ordering to published rates of CT positivity in other EDs including those employing decision support and to identify pathways for improved utilization via collaboration with our pathology and ED colleagues. Two hundred seventeen patients over a 2.5-month time period who received a CTA for PE were reviewed with exclusion of pediatric patients and all sub-optimal, non-diagnostic, or equivocal scans; 21 were excluded leaving a sample of 196 patients. The rate of PE diagnosis and association of PE positivity with selected factors (D-dimer testing) was assessed. The percentage of cases positive for PE was 10.7 % (21/196) which is similar to the frequently published rate of 10 % in other emergency departments including settings that have studied the use of decision support. D-dimer testing was performed in 40.3 % of cases. In 29.6 % (58/196) of subjects, D-dimer was positive, 10.7 % (21/196) was negative, and 59.7 % (117/196) was not assessed. Prevalence of PE among D-dimer negative (0 %, 0/21) was lower versus positive D-dimer (12.1 %, 7/58) and unknown D-dimer patients (12.0 %, 14/117). D-dimer had 100 % (21/21) negative predictive value for the diagnosis of PE. While this suggests that D-dimer is useful to rule-out PE, due to the small number of patients with PE, the 95 % confidence intervals are wide and the post-test likelihood of PE could be as high as 14 %. The rate of CT positivity for PE in an ED with unstructured CT ordering is similar to that in other published series including as series in which decision support was used. While D-dimer had high negative predictive value, large studies are needed to confirm this high sensitivity and potentially increase its use in ruling out PE without CT and to reduce CT ordering particularly in patients with sufficiently low clinical pre-test probability of PE.

Purpose: To review radiation dose exposure for patients undergoing IVC filter placement in order to infer quantitative guidelines for expected doses. To identify strategies for targeted dose reduction. Materials and Methods: Records of 230 consecutive cases of IVC filter placement in Interventional Radiology at a single university hospital between 1/4/12 and 6/7/13 were reviewed. Patients under age 18 and patients with variant anatomy (e.g. duplicated IVC) or caval thrombosis were excluded. Radiation dose (mGy) was recorded from the fluoroscopic detector system; access site and patient information were noted. Subset analyses were performed, including analysis before and after exclusion of outliers (more than two SD from the mean) and before and after exclusion of cases without contrast (no DSA). Patients were stratified by access site, BMI, age, and gender; correlation with dose was analyzed using Spearman rank correlation and Mann-Whitney tests. Four access site categories were used: Right internal jugular (RIJ), left internal jugular (LIJ), right common femoral (RCF), and Other. Results: Mean radiation dose in all subjects was 67.55 mGy, and after outliers and non-contrast cases were excluded, 51.35 mGy.Radiation dose was highest in cases when IVC filters were placed via the RIJ compared with LIJ, RCF, and other access sites. Radiation dose was significantly lower in cases with filters placed via RCF than in those with filters placed via RIJ (p=0.018). Conclusion: Analysis of radiation dose in a standardized procedure-IVC filter placement-provides valuable information on expected dose range and potential dose reduction strategies. Access via RIJ (vs. RCF) resulted in significantly higher dose, raising the question: should a standard access site for IVC filter placement be considered? Additionally, this model will be implemented to identify dose reduction strategies for other standard interventional procedures. (Table Presented)

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this review is to illustrate various applications of gadofosveset trisodium in evaluating abdominal and peripheral vascular disease. The basic properties, technical considerations, and clinical and potential future applications of gadofosveset are described. CONCLUSION. Gadofosveset trisodium facilitates comprehensive high-resolution arterial and venous MR angiography. Because of its prolonged intravascular residence time, gadofosveset trisodium is particularly useful for evaluating venous, dynamic, and functional vascular disease with a single low-dose contrast injection.

OBJECTIVE: Total renal volume and changes in kidney volume are markers of disease progression in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) but are not used in clinical practice in part because of the complexity of manual measurements. This study aims to assess the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of a semiautomated renal volumetric algorithm using fluid-sensitive MRI pulse sequences. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Renal volumes of 17 patients with ADPKD were segmented from high-resolution coronal HASTE and true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR acquisitions. Measurements performed independently by four readers were repeated, typically after 7 days. Intraobserver agreement indexes were calculated for total kidney volume for each patient. Interobserver agreement indexes were obtained for the six paired combinations of readers as well as for two readers after rigorous formalized training. Pearson and concordance correlation coefficients, coefficients of variation (CVs), and 95% limits of agreement were determined. RESULTS: The HASTE and true FISP sequences performed similarly with a median intraobserver agreement of greater than 98.1% and a CV of less than 2.4% across all readers. The median interobserver agreement was greater than 95.2% and the CV was less than 7.1%, across all reader pairs. Reader training further lowered interobserver CV. The mean total kidney volume was 1420 mL (range, 331-3782 mL) for HASTE imaging and 1445 mL (range, 301-3714 mL) for true FISP imaging, with mean image processing times per patient of 43 and 28 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSION: This semiautomated MR volumetric algorithm provided excellent intraobserver and very good interobserver reproducibility using fluid-sensitive pulse sequences that emphasize cyst conspicuity.

Computed tomography (CT) is considered the imaging modality of choice in evaluation of renal lesions. The advantages of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to CT include superior soft tissue contrast, avoidance of ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast media, and the possibility of performing functional and advanced imaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted (DWI) and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI). Although the traditional role of MRI in the evaluation of renal mass is primarily that of a problem-solving tool, DWI and PWI are expanding the role of MRI in management of renal cell cancers. DWI and PWI have shown considerable promise not only in renal lesion detection and characterization as benign or malignant, but also in assessment of renal cell cancer subtype and nuclear grade. Furthermore, these techniques have the potential to assist with tailoring patient- and disease-specific management by providing surgical planning in patients with localized renal cell cancer and assessing treatment response in patients with advanced renal cell cancer undergoing targeted chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE:: To compare free-breathing radially sampled 3D fat suppressed T1-weighted gradient-echo acquisitions (radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) with breath-hold (BH) and free-breathing conventional (rectilinearly sampled k-space) VIBE acquisitions for postcontrast imaging of the liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Eighteen consecutive patients referred for clinically indicated liver magnetic resonance imaging were imaged at 3 T. Three minutes after a single dose of gadolinium contrast injection, free-breathing radial VIBE, BH VIBE, and free-breathing VIBE with 4 averages were acquired in random order with matching sequence parameters. Radial VIBE was acquired with the 'stack-of-stars' scheme, which uses conventional sampling in the slice direction and radial sampling in-plane.All image data sets were evaluated independently by 3 radiologists blinded to patient and sequence information. Each reader scored the following parameters: overall image quality, respiratory motion artifact, pulsation artifact, liver edge sharpness, and hepatic vessel clarity using a 5-point scale, with the highest score indicating the most optimum examination. Mixed model analysis of variance was used to compare sequences in terms of each measure of image quality. RESULTS:: When scores were averaged over readers, there was no statistically significant difference between radial VIBE and BH VIBE regarding overall image quality (P = 0.1015), respiratory motion artifact (P = 1.0), and liver edge sharpness (P = 0.2955). Radial VIBE demonstrated significantly lower pulsation artifact (P < 0.0001), but had lower hepatic vessel clarity (P = 0.0176), when compared with BH VIBE. Radial VIBE had significantly higher image quality scores for all parameters when compared with free-breathing VIBE (P < 0.0001). Acquisition time for BH VIBE was 14 seconds and that of free-breathing radial VIBE and conventional VIBE with multiple averages was 56 seconds each. CONCLUSION:: Radial VIBE can be performed during free breathing for contrast-enhanced imaging of the liver with comparable image quality to BH VIBE. However, further work is necessary to shorten the acquisition time to perform dynamic imaging

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate the utility of dual-source dual-energy MDCT in quantifying iodine concentration in a phantom and in renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of tubes containing solutions of varying iodine concentration were imaged with dual-source dual-energy MDCT. Iodine concentration was calculated and compared with known iodine concentration. Single-phase contrast-enhanced dual-source dual-energy MDCT data on 15 patients with renal lesions then were assessed independently by two readers. Dual-energy postprocessing was used to generate iodine-only images. Regions of interest were placed on the iodine image over the lesion and, as a reference, over the aorta, for recording of iodine concentration in the lesion and in the aorta. Another radiologist determined lesion enhancement by comparing truly unenhanced with contrast-enhanced images. Mixed-model analysis of variance based on ranks was used to compare lesion types (simple cyst, hemorrhagic cyst, enhancing mass) in terms of lesion iodine concentration and lesion-to-aorta iodine ratio. RESULTS: In the phantom study, there was excellent correlation between calculated and true iodine concentration (R(2) = 0.998, p < 0.0001). In the patient study, 13 nonenhancing (10 simple and three hyperdense cysts) and eight enhancing renal masses were evaluated in 15 patients. The lesion iodine concentration and lesion-to-aorta iodine ratio in enhancing masses were significantly higher than in hyperdense and simple cysts (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Iodine quantification with dual-source dual-energy MDCT is accurate in a phantom and can be used to determine the presence and concentration of iodine in a renal lesion. Characterization of renal masses may be possible with a single dual-source dual-energy MDCT acquisition without unenhanced images or reliance on a change in attenuation measurements

Renal masses increasingly are detected incidentally in asymptomatic individuals. Accurate characterization of these lesions is important for clinical management, planning intervention, and avoiding unnecessary procedures. Ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the mainstays of renal mass detection and characterization. Ultrasonography is useful for distinguishing cystic from solid lesions and can detect lesion vascularity, especially with use of ultrasound contrast agents, but is less sensitive, less specific, and less reproducible than CT and MRI. CT, with and without intravenous contrast, is the primary imaging test for characterization and staging of renal lesions, and is utilized more often than MRI. Current multidetector CT technology provides near isotropic acquisition, with three-dimensional reformatting capabilities. Due to lack of exposure to iodinated contrast and ionizing radiation and superior soft tissue contrast, MRI is being increasingly utilized as a problem-solving tool for diagnosis, staging, and preoperative planning for renal malignancies. Future directions for imaging of primary renal neoplasm include accurate characterization of renal cell cancer subtype, assistance with treatment planning, and evaluation of treatment response

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) versus normalized liver ADC using the spleen as a reference organ for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients, 34 with liver disease and 22 control subjects, were assessed with breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging using b values of 0, 50, and 500 s/mm(2). Liver ADC and normalized liver ADC (defined as the ratio of liver ADC to spleen ADC) were compared between patients stratified by fibrosis stage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the performance of ADC and normalized liver ADC for prediction of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Reproducibility was assessed by measuring coefficient of variation (n = 7). RESULTS: Liver ADC failed to distinguish individual stages of fibrosis, except between stages 0 and 4. There were significant differences in normalized liver ADC between control livers and intermediate stages of fibrosis (stages 2-3) and cirrhosis (stage 4) and between stages 1 and 4, and there was a trend toward significance between stages 0 and 1 (p = 0.051) and stages 1 and 3 (p = 0.06). ROC analysis showed that normalized liver ADC was superior to liver ADC for detection of stage >/= 2 (area under the ROC curve, 0.864 vs 0.655; p = 0.013) and stage >/=3 (0.805 vs 0.689; p = 0.015), without a difference for diagnosing cirrhosis (0.935 vs 0.720; p = 0.185). Normalized liver ADC had higher reproducibility than ADC (mean coefficient of variation, 3.5% vs 12.6%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that normalizing liver ADC with spleen ADC improves diagnostic accuracy for detection of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis when using breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging, with better reproducibility

AIM: To compare the evaluation times and accuracy of unidirectional panoramic three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal interpretation to traditional two-dimensional (2D) and bidirectional 3D endoluminal techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients underwent computed tomography colonography (CTC) after bowel cleansing. Forty-five had no polyps and 24 had at least one polyp > or = 6 mm. Patients underwent same-day colonoscopy with segmental unblinding. Three experienced abdominal radiologists evaluated the data using one of three primary interpretation techniques: (1) 2D; (2) bidirectional 3D; (3) panoramic 3D. Mixed model analysis of variance and logistic regression for correlated data were used to compare techniques with respect to time and sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Mean evaluation times were 8.6, 14.6, and 12.1 min, for 2D, 3D, and panoramic, respectively. 2D was faster than either 3D technique (p < 0.0001), and the panoramic technique was faster than bidirectional 3D (p = 0.0139). The overall sensitivity of each technique per polyp and per patient was 68.4 and 76.7% for 2D, 78.9 and 93.3% for 3D; and 78.9 and 86.7% for panoramic 3D. CONCLUSION: 2D interpretation was the fastest overall, the panoramic technique was significantly faster than the bidirectional with similar sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity for a single reader was significantly lower using the 2D technique. Each reader should select the technique with which they are most successful