Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a persistent and potentially disabling movement disorder associated with prolonged exposure to antipsychotics and other dopamine receptor blocking agents. Long-term safety of the approved TD medication, valbenazine, was demonstrated in 2 clinical trials (KINECT 3 [NCT02274558], KINECT 4 [NCT02405091]). Data from these trials were analyzed post hoc to evaluate the onset and resolution of adverse events (AEs). METHODS:Participants in KINECT 3 and KINECT 4 received up to 48 weeks of once-daily valbenazine (40 or 80 mg). Data from these studies were pooled and analyzed to assess the incidence, time to first occurrence, and resolution for the following AEs of potential clinical interest: akathisia, balance disorder, dizziness, parkinsonism, somnolence/sedation, suicidal behavior/ideation, and tremor. RESULTS:In the pooled population (N=314), all AEs of potential clinical interest occurred in <10% of participants, with somnolence (9.6%), suicidal behavior/ideation (6.4%), and dizziness (5.7%) being the most common AEs. Mean time to first occurrence ranged from 36 days (akathisia [n=9]) to 224 days (parkinsonism [n=2]). By end of study (or last study visit), resolution of AEs was as follows: 100% (suicidal ideation/behavior, parkinsonism); >85% (somnolence/sedation, dizziness); >70% (akathisia, balance disorder, tremor). CONCLUSIONS:In long-term clinical trials, the incidence of AEs of potential clinical interest was low (<10%) and most were resolved by end of treatment (>70-100%). All patients taking valbenazine should be routinely monitored for AEs, particularly those that may exacerbate the motor symptoms associated with TD. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

BACKGROUND:Clinician-administered measures of negative symptoms may not capture patients' subjective experiences. The Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) has shown good psychometric properties when used in outpatients with higher-level functioning schizophrenia. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the SNS in low functioning participants with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). METHODS:Participants were assessed using the following measures at two time-points; time-point 1: SNS, Wide Range Achievement Test, 4th Edition Reading Subtest (WRAT-4), and Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). Time-point 2 (within a week of time-point 1): SNS, Negative Symptom Assessment 16 items (NSA-16), Scale to Assess Unawareness in Mental Disorder-Abbreviated (SUMD-A), Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S), Simpson Angus Scale (SAS), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and the Patient Feasibility Questionnaire. RESULTS:Fifty participants with TRS were enrolled, a mean age of 43.8 years (SD = 11.19, min = 25, max = 64), a mean IQ of 80.62 (SD = 17.12, min = 65, max = 110), and a mean BACS Composite T-Score of 14.08 (SD = 17.16, min = -27, max = 49). Participants responded to SNS prompts with moderate consistency across two time-points. There were no significant correlations between the SNS and the NSA-16 Global Symptom score (Pearson r = 0.207, p = .150, Spearman r = 0.101, p = .483), NSA-16 Global Functioning score (Pearson r = 0.209, p = .145, Spearman r = 0.126, p = .384), nor the NSA-16 total score (Pearson r = 0.149, p = .302, Spearman r = 0.116, p = .421). However, when participants were stratified by BACS Composite T-score, there was a significant positive correlation between the SNS total and the NSA-16 Global Functioning score (Pearson r = 0.500, p = .048, Spearman r = 0.546, p = .029) among participants who demonstrated higher cognitive functioning. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Participants with TRS and low functioning were able to respond to questions on the SNS regarding their subjective assessment of negative symptoms. However, self-reported and clinician-rated negative symptoms were not equivalent, except in a subgroup with higher cognitive functioning. This discrepant self-reporting appeared to relate to their low levels of insight and cognitive impairments.

(Reprinted with permission from NPJ Schizophrenia (2020) 6:1).

BACKGROUND:The Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) is an "applied" game-based assessment that uses a multi-level functional task to assess instrumental activities of daily living (iADL). This study examines the feasibility, convergent validity, and predictive ability of the VRFCAT in a sample of inpatients with chronic schizophrenia. METHODS:Inpatients with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, completed the VRFCAT prior to discharge. The UPSA-B, SLOF, and PSP were administered, both at baseline and after four-weeks in the community. VRFCAT performance scores were compared to published data from the VRFCAT validation study. RESULTS:All 62 participants completed the VRFCAT. Compared to the performance of stable outpatients, participants performed 1.50 SDs below the VRFCAT mean adjusted total time (ATT) (Validation study: Mean T Score = 32.5, SD = 16.59) with more errors. The VRFCAT ATT T-score was significantly correlated with baseline UPSA-B total score (p = 0.005) and PSP Global score (p = 0.010). 34 participants completed the follow-up period (55%), and 28 were lost to follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in VRFCAT scores between these two groups (all p > 0.29). The VRFCAT composite score at baseline was significantly associated with the UPSA-B total score (p = 0.010) and the PSP total score (p = 0.008) at four-weeks, as was the PSP Socially Useful Activities subscale score (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The VRFCAT is a valid measure of iADLs in inpatients with chronic schizophrenia. The VRFCAT predicted instrumental functioning four-weeks post-discharge. Future studies should examine other moderators of measures of functional capacity pre-discharge, predicting function later in the community.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:One of the major challenges in the treatment of schizophrenia is nonadherence, defined as the failure to take medications as prescribed. Nonadherence is a strong predictor of symptom relapse, hospital readmission, and poorer long-term outcome. Although long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) have been found to be superior to their oral analogs at reducing relapse in large-scale meta-analyses, their prevalence seldom exceeds 30% even in populations with a history of nonadherence. We review multiple barriers to the use of LAI utilization and suggest strategies to address them. METHODS/PROCEDURES/UNASSIGNED:We searched for the following terms: long-acting injectable/depot antipsychotics, schizophrenia, barriers, and attitude/perception in both the PubMed search index and Google scholar from 1995 to 2018. A total of 329 studies were selected, of which data from 13 were reviewed for this article. Only peer-reviewed studies, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses that describe barriers to using LAIs were included. FINDINGS/RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Several barriers to using LAIs were identified. These are organized into 3 overarching categories: those related to the clinician; those related to the patient; and systems barriers. Clinician factors include the perception of LAIs as coercive, fears of not being able to control the dose, as well as current practice patterns and guidelines. Patient factors include perception of the injection as painful or intrusive, general lack of knowledge, and a sense of coerciveness. For each identified barrier, we propose potential solutions. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:We identified multiple barriers to using LAIs in patients with schizophrenia. Specific strategies are suggested for overcoming each of these barriers.

BACKGROUND./UNASSIGNED:Individuals with tardive dyskinesia (TD) who completed a long-term study (KINECT 3 or KINECT 4) of valbenazine (40 or 80 mg/day, once-daily for up to 48 weeks followed by 4-week washout) were enrolled in a subsequent study (NCT02736955) that was primarily designed to further evaluate the long-term safety of valbenazine. METHODS./UNASSIGNED:Participants were initiated at 40 mg/day (following prior valbenazine washout). At week 4, dosing was escalated to 80 mg/day based on tolerability and clinical assessment of TD; reduction to 40 mg/day was allowed for tolerability. The study was planned for 72 weeks or until termination due to commercial availability of valbenazine. Assessments included the Clinical Global Impression of Severity-TD (CGIS-TD), Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS./UNASSIGNED:At study termination, 85.7% (138/161) of participants were still active. Four participants had reached week 60, and none reached week 72. The percentage of participants with a CGIS-TD score ≤2 (normal/not ill or borderline ill) increased from study baseline (14.5% [23/159]) to week 48 (64.3% [36/56]). At baseline, 98.8% (158/160) of participants rated their prior valbenazine experience with a PSQ score ≤2 (very satisfied or somewhat satisfied). At week 48, 98.2% (55/56) remained satisfied. Before week 4 (dose escalation), 9.4% of participants had ≥1 TEAE. After week 4, the TEAE incidence was 49.0%. No TEAE occurred in ≥5% of participants during treatment (before or after week 4). CONCLUSIONS./UNASSIGNED:Valbenazine was well-tolerated and persistent improvements in TD were found in adults who received once-daily treatment for >1 year.

STUDY OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a persistent and potentially disabling movement disorder associated with prolonged exposure to antipsychotics and other dopamine receptor blocking agents. Valbenazine is a highly selective vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitor approved for the treatment of TD in adults. Using data from a long-term study (KINECT 3; NCT02274558), the effects of once-daily valbenazine (40 mg, 80 mg) on TD were assessed using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) in participants who were early responders based on subjective measures, including patient self-report (Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]) or clinician judgment (Clinical Impression of Change-Tardive Dyskinesia [CGI-TD]). METHODS:Data from KINECT 3 (6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled [DBPC] period; 42-week double-blind extension) were analyzed post hoc. Long-term outcomes included mean change from baseline to Week 48 in AIMS total score (sum of items 1-7) and AIMS response (≥50% total score improvement from baseline) at Week 48. These AIMS outcomes were assessed in participants who achieved early improvement, defined as a PGIC or CGI-TD score of ≤3 ("minimally improved" or better) at Week 2 (first post-baseline visit of the DBPC period). Participants who initially received placebo were not included in the analyses. RESULTS:In participants who received only valbenazine (40 or 80 mg) during KINECT 3 and had available Week 2 assessment, 50% (72/143) had early PGIC improvement (score ≤3) and 43% (61/142) had early CGI-TD improvement (score ≤3). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between participants who achieved early PGIC or CGI-TD improvement and those who did not. Based on available assessments at Week 48, mean AIMS total score change from baseline in participants with early PGIC improvement was similar to those who did not reach the early PGIC improvement threshold (-4.1 [n=35] vs -3.5 [n=41]). Mean AIMS total score change from baseline in participants with early CGI-TD improvement was similar to those who did not achieve early CGI-TD improvement (-4.2 [n=31] vs -3.5 [n=45]). AIMS response at Week 48 was also similar in those who achieved early PGIC and CGI-TD improvement (40% and 42%, respectively) compared to those who did not achieve early PGIC and CGI-TD improvement (39% and 38%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Results from this long-term valbenazine trial indicate that many participants achieved at least minimal patient- and clinician-reported improvement at Week 2. AIMS outcomes at Week 48 demonstrated long-term reductions in TD severity regardless of early response. More research is needed to understand the association between early improvement and long-term treatment effects, but early non-improvement based on subjective measures may not be predictive of long-term treatment failure. PRESENTED/UNASSIGNED:International Congress of Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders; September 22-26, 2019; Nice, France. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS/UNASSIGNED:This study was sponsored by Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Negative symptoms and cognitive deficits have a substantial predictive value for functional deficits and recovery in schizophrenia. However, the relationship between negative symptoms and cognitive abnormalities is unclear possibly due to the heterogeneity of negative symptoms. This study used the model of expressive and experiential negative symptoms subfactors to decrease this heterogeneity. It examined these subfactors and cognition before and after treatment with computerized cognitive remediation training (CRT) in chronically-hospitalized individuals with psychosis and predominant negative symptoms. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Seventy-eight adult participants with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were enrolled in a 12-week CRT program. Assessments of demographic and illness variables, baseline and endpoint assessments of psychopathology (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) and cognition (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery - MCCB) were conducted. Results/UNASSIGNED: < 0.05). Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Our findings suggest that CRT has benefits for negative symptoms in very low-functioning patients and that this change may be in part mediated by change in cognitive functions after CRT.

OBJECTIVE:A nominal group process followed by a modified Delphi method was used to survey expert opinions on best practices for tardive dyskinesia (TD) screening, diagnosis, and treatment and to identify areas lacking in clinical evidence. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:A steering committee of 11 TD experts met in nominal group format to prioritize questions to be addressed and identify core bibliographic materials and criteria for survey panelists. Of 60 invited experts, 29 (23 psychiatrists and 6 neurologists) agreed to participate. EVIDENCE/METHODS:A targeted literature search of PubMed (search term: tardive dyskinesia) and recommendations of the steering committee were used to generate core bibliographic material. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) review articles, meta-analyses, guidelines, or clinical trials; (2) publication in English between 2007 and 2017; (3) > 3 pages in length; and (4) publication in key clinical journals with impact factors ≥ 2.0. Of 29 references that met these criteria, 18 achieved a score ≥ 5 (calculated as the number of steering committee votes multiplied by journal impact factor and number of citations divided by years since publication) and were included. CONSENSUS PROCESS/METHODS:Two survey rounds were conducted anonymously through electronic media from November 2017 to January 2018; responses were collected, collated, and analyzed. Respondent agreement was defined a priori as unanimous (100%), consensus (75%-99%), or majority (50%-74%). For questions using a 5-point Likert scale, agreement was based on percentage of respondents choosing ≥ 4 ("agree completely" or "agree"). Round 1 survey included questions on TD screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Round 2 questions were refined per panelist feedback and excluded Round 1 questions with < 25% agreement and > 75% agreement (unless feedback suggested further investigation). CONCLUSIONS:Consensus was reached that (1) a brief, clinical assessment for TD should be performed at every clinical encounter in patients taking antipsychotics; (2) even mild movements in 1 body area may represent possible TD; (3) management requires an overall evaluation of treatment, including reassessment of antipsychotics and anticholinergics as well as consideration of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors; and (4) informed discussions with patients/caregivers are essential.

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), the persistence of positive symptoms despite ≥2 trials of adequate dose and duration of antipsychotic medication with documented adherence, is a serious clinical problem with heterogeneous presentations. TRS can vary in its onset (at the first episode of psychosis or upon relapse), in its severity, and in the response to subsequent therapeutic interventions (i.e., clozapine, electroconvulsive therapy). The heterogeneity of TRS indicates that the underlying neurobiology of TRS may differ not only from treatment-responsive schizophrenia but also among patients with TRS. Several hypotheses have been proposed for the neurobiological mechanisms underlying TRS, including dopamine supersensitivity, hyperdopaminergic and normodopaminergic subtypes, glutamate dysregulation, inflammation and oxidative stress, and serotonin dysregulation. Research supporting these hypotheses is limited in part by variations in the criteria used to define TRS, as well as by the biological and clinical heterogeneity of TRS. Clinical trial designs for new treatments should be informed by this heterogeneity, and further clinical research is needed to more clearly understand the underlying neurobiology of TRS and to optimize treatment for patients with TRS.