Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are commonly used in carpal tunnel syndrome; however, recent literature has demonstrated risk of postoperative infection associated with preoperative CSIs in other orthopedic fields. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of CSIs and postoperative infection following carpal tunnel release (CTR). METHODS:A single-center retrospective review was conducted from 2010 to 2019 to identify patients who underwent CTR with subsequent antibiotic prescription for chart-documented wound infection. A demographically-matched cohort of 100 patients was identified for comparison. Information on patient demographics, comorbidities, injection history, and presence of postoperative infection was collected. RESULTS:Thirty-nine patients (0.67% of all CTR patients) were identified with postoperative infections, 3 of which (0.05% of all CTR patients) were deep infections. In the infection cohort, 16 of 39 (41%) patients received an injection prior to surgery, whereas 16 of 100 (16%) patients in the control cohort received an injection. History of CSI was significantly more common in patients with postoperative infection, and patients in the infection cohort had a significantly shorter average time from injection to surgery by approximately 55 days. CONCLUSIONS:Corticosteroid injections in the preoperative period are associated with postoperative infection after CTR. Proximity of injection to time of surgery plays a role, although comorbidities, the corticosteroid dose, and frequency of injection require further study to determine risk contribution. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic III.

Before the 1900s, distal radius fractures were misdiagnosed as radiocarpal dislocations and most were treated nonoperatively. Between the 1900s and 1920s there were several anesthesia and antiseptic advancements that led to the advancement of surgical interventions. Then after the continued use and implementation of radiographs in orthopedics, radiographic parameters allowed for a critical analysis of treatment and patient outcomes that led to the further advancement of distal radius fracture treatment. This review will detail the historical content that led us to current practices. Additionally, current methods are critiqued, and common complications are reviewed in order to allow orthopedic surgeons to avoid these complications today.

Acute instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is often underestimated but can cause devastating loss of forearm and wrist form and function. These traumatic injuries can be caused by disruption of the triangular fibrocartilage complex, the interosseous membrane, or fractures of the radius or ulna, and a comprehensive understanding of the anatomy involved is paramount to the adequate treatment of these injuries. While stable DRUJ instability can be treated with immobilization, often surgical intervention is required and is based on the anatomical restraints to the DRUJ that are disrupted.

Fractures of the carpus can be debilitating injuries and often lead to chronic pain and dysfunction when not properly treated. Although scaphoid fractures are more common, fractures of the other carpal bones account for nearly half of all injuries of the carpus. Often missed on initial presentation, a focused physical examination with imaging tailored to the suspected injury is needed to identify these fractures. In addition to plain radiographs, advanced imaging such as CT and MRI are helpful in diagnosis and management. Treatment of carpal fractures is based on the degree of displacement, stability of the fracture, and associated injuries. Those that require surgical fixation often affect the congruency of the articular surfaces, are unstable, are at risk for symptomatic nonunion, are associated with notable ligamentous injury, or are causing nerve or tendon entrapment. Surgical strategies involve percutaneous Kirschner wires, external fixation, screws and/or plates, excision, or fusion for salvage. Owing to the intimate articulations in the hand, small size of the carpal bones, and complex vascular supply, carpal fracture complications include symptomatic nonunion, osteonecrosis, and posttraumatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To identify which factors are predictive of surgical site infection in upper extremity fractures, and to assess whether the timing of operative debridement influences infection risk. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective database review. SETTING/METHODS:Hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. PATIENTS/METHODS:Patients in the NSQIP database with fractures involving the upper extremity. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Surgical management of upper extremity fracture, including operative debridement for open injuries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Surgical site infection, including both superficial and deep infections. RESULTS:A total of 22,578 patients were identified, including 1298 patients with open injuries (5.7% of total). The overall wound infection rate was 0.79%. Patients with open injuries were found to have a higher incidence of infection compared with those with closed injuries (1.7% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001). Independent risk factors for 30-day infection included open fracture diagnosis, obesity, smoking, and American Society of Anesthesiolgists class >2 (all P < 0.05). Of patients with open fractures, 79.7% were taken expediently to the operating room. The rate of infection did not differ based on whether surgery was performed expediently or not (1.8% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.431). CONCLUSIONS:Based on an analysis of the NSQIP database, the overall risk of surgical site infection following intervention for open or closed upper extremity fractures remains low. Risk factors for infection include open injury, obesity, and cigarette smoking. There was no difference in the infection rate based on the urgency of operative debridement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) arthritis occurs commonly with basal joint arthritis, but can also occur in isolation or in conjunction with other patterns of wrist arthritis, such as scapholunate advanced collapse. Surgical options depend on the specific clinical scenario encountered. Isolated STT arthritis was classically managed with arthrodesis, but is now often addressed with distal scaphoid resection (open or arthroscopic), trapeziectomy (partial or complete) and partial trapezoid resection, or implant arthroplasty. Development of postoperative dorsal intercalary segment instability is a notable concern with any of these techniques. STT arthritis in conjunction with basal joint arthritis can be managed effectively with trapeziectomy and either partial trapezoid excision or distal scaphoid excision. STT arthritis with scapholunate advanced collapse is uncommon, but can be managed with proximal row carpectomy or scaphoidectomy and four-corner fusion. If basal joint arthritis is also present, trapeziectomy can additionally be performed, but grip strength is likely to be substantially diminished.

Wrist arthroscopy is a useful surgical technique that has been steadily gaining popularity since the 1980s. In addition to being a valuable diagnostic tool, wrist arthroscopy can be used for an expanding array of therapeutic interventions and is an attractive, minimally invasive treatment modality for patients. However, wrist arthroscopy is not without its complications, and a detailed understanding of the relevant anatomy, instrumentation, and methodology is critical for success.