Faculty Bibliography

To test the theory that removing lens epithelial cells at the time of cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation or refractive lens exchange might decrease the rate at which the anterior capsule becomes adherent to the lens optic postoperatively, we performed the technique in approximately 200 eyes that were considered likely to require postoperative IOL exchange. In 4 eyes that had an IOL exchange procedure 6 to 12 weeks after the primary procedure, the anterior capsule was nonadherent or weakly adherent to the lens optic

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term mandibular skeletal stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal study of 12 consecutive patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia who underwent mandibular distraction had a range of 5 years of postdistraction follow-up; five patients were followed for 10 years. Records included clinical photographs, dental study models, lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms, and panoramic radiographs obtained before distraction, at the time of device removal, and 1, 5, and 10 years after distraction. The mean patient age at the time of distraction was 48 months. The device was activated an average of 21.7 mm at the rate of 1 mm per day. The mean latency period was 6.1 days, and the mean consolidation period was 60.6 days. Fifty-two parameters were examined at each of the five time intervals. RESULTS: On average, the ramal length (condylion to gonion) increased 13.04 mm in the distracted rami. At 1 year after distraction, this dimension decreased by 3.46 mm. At 5 and 10 years after distraction, the average condylion-gonion dimension increased by 3.83 and 4 mm, respectively, with an average growth rate of 0.87 mm per year; during the same period, the unaffected ramus grew 1.15 mm per year. CONCLUSIONS: The distraction technique does not eliminate the inherent growth potential of the affected mandibular side. Facial asymmetry is significantly improved after distraction, and despite mild relapse observed during the first year, surgical correction is stable in the later years of follow-up

The iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the correction of refractive disorders. Previous reports are not uniform regarding its potential to induce inflammatory reaction. We report the case of a young healthy patient who experienced persistent and intolerable iritis after implantation of an iris-claw IOL. The iritis was resolved only after explantation of the IOL