Faculty Bibliography

Ocular surface disorders-and dry eye, in particular-is a leading reason for visits to eye care professionals. It has been generally accepted that meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of evaporative dry eye, as well as being associated with aqueous-deficient dry eye. Yet, researchers and clinicians have lacked a global consensus on the definition of MGD, its epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Various systemic diseases and medications have been associated with the progression of both dry eye and MGD, as have several ocular disorders beyond those directly affecting the surface. It is in the best interest of patients for clinicians to be able to better identify and diagnose MGD, differentiating it from other ocular surface disorders, and to recognize the effects of MGD on the ocular surface, and thus initiate appropriate therapy. This CME activity provides expert insight into the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society's International Workshop on MGD consensus report, offering practical application of its findings to better manage MGD patient care, particularly for those patients facing or undergoing ocular surgery.

Resistance to antibiotic agents is becoming increasingly prevalent among ocular infections. Between 19% and 60% of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus isolates have been shown to be resistant to macrolide antibiotic agents, penicillin, and older fluoroquinolones. Although topical fluoroquinolones are considered first-line treatment of ocular infections, as much as 85% of methicillin-resistant S aureus isolates are resistant to ophthalmic fluoroquinolones, including the newer 8-methoxy fluoroquinolones, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin. Besifloxacin, an 8-chlorofluoroquinolone, has a lower minimum inhibitory concentration against multidrug-resistant staphylococcal strains than other fluoroquinolones and less selective pressure for resistance development because of the lack of a systemic counterpart. In addition to the development of new antibacterial agents, antibiotic resistance in ocular infections may be reduced by following the same strategies used to minimize antimicrobial resistance in systemic infections

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporine 0.05% in alleviating dry-eye signs and improving visual quality after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Private practice and university medical center, New York, New York, USA. METHODS: This randomized prospective contralaterally controlled double-masked trial comprised patients scheduled to have bilateral phacoemulsification with implantation of a refractive multifocal IOL (ReZoom). Patients received twice-daily cyclosporine 0.05% in 1 eye and an artificial tear in the other eye from 1 month before to 2 months after second-eye surgery. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and 2 months after second-eye surgery. RESULTS: The study enrolled 28 eyes of 14 patients. At baseline, there were no statistically significant between-group differences in outcome measures. Two months postoperatively, the cyclosporine group had significantly lower mean uncorrected distance visual acuity than the artificial tear group (0.11 logMAR +/- 0.03 [SD] [20/25 Snellen equivalent] versus 0.19 +/- 0.05 logMAR [20/30]; P = .045) as well as significantly lower mean corrected distance visual acuity (0.0 +/- 0.02 logMAR [20/20] versus 0.1 +/- 0.02 logMAR [20/25]; P = .005) and corneal staining scores (0.210 +/- 0.07 versus 0.645 +/- 0.18; P = .034). Treatment with cyclosporine 0.05% also improved contrast sensitivity, conjunctival staining, and tear breakup time. Significantly more patients preferred the eye treated with cyclosporine 0.05% to the eye treated with artificial tears (57.1% versus 14.3%; P = .007). CONCLUSION: Cyclosporine 0.05% therapy reduced dry-eye signs and improved visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the acceptability, ease of use, and efficacy of hydroxypropyl cellulose ophthalmic inserts in reducing signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe dry eye syndrome (DES), and improving quality of life (QoL) and activities of daily living (ADL). METHODS: The multicenter, prospective, open-label, 4-week registry comprised 520 patients with bilateral DES and a history of artificial tear use, or a desire to use artificial tears within the previous week. Visit 1 encompassed a clinical evaluation and symptom and QoL questionnaires, including the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Patients were trained to use inserts, which were used once daily, thereafter, as monotherapy or with existing therapy. At visit 2, clinical evaluation and questionnaires evaluated changes in signs, symptoms, ADL, and QoL. Adverse events were monitored throughout the registry. RESULTS: There were 418 (80.4%) completers. Statistically significant improvements in discomfort, burning, dryness, grittiness, stinging, and light sensitivity, as well as clinical signs of keratitis, conjunctival staining, and tear volume were seen (P<0.05). Mean Ocular Surface Disease Index total scores improved by 21.3% (P<0.05). Blurred vision, affecting 8.7% of patients, was the most commonly reported adverse event leading to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxypropyl cellulose ophthalmic inserts significantly improved signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe DES, as well as ADL and QoL. Benefits were additive to those seen with patients' existing care

PURPOSE: A multicenter, 2-visit, open-label, 4-week study was conducted to determine the acceptability of hydroxypropyl cellulose ophthalmic inserts in adult patients with a history of dry eye syndrome (DES). METHODS: At visit 1, patients (N = 520) were evaluated, screened by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), a validated measure of quality of life. Patients were trained in the proper placement and use of hydroxypropyl cellulose ophthalmic inserts and were contacted by telephone on day 3 of the study. At week 4, patients were given a clinical evaluation and completed a second questionnaire. Answers determined changes in symptoms and quality of life. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Four hundred eighteen patients completed the study and reported significant improvements in discomfort, burning, dryness, grittiness, stinging, and light sensitivity (P = .05) after 4 weeks use of hydroxypropyl cellulose ophthalmic inserts. Significant improvements in clinical signs (keratitis, conjunctival staining, and tear volume) were reported. Contact lens wearers reported significant improvements similar to nonwearers, with a strong trend toward improvement in light sensitivity. Mean OSDI total scores, measuring quality of life, significantly improved by 21.3% (from 41.8 +/- 22.38 to 32.9 +/- 21.97, P < or = .0215). The most commonly reported adverse event leading to discontinuation was blurred vision, observed in 8.7% of patients (n = 45). Compliance during the study was good; 41.5% of subjects were fully compliant. Of the 58.5% of subjects who missed doses, the majority (69.4%) missed only one to five. CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxypropyl cellulose ophthalmic inserts significantly reduced symptoms and clinical signs of moderate to severe DES. They also significantly improved DES in patients wearing contact lenses. Patients experienced a statistically significant improvement in quality of life, as measured by the OSDI, of 21.3%.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and antimicrobial efficacy of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% with that of moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, active-controlled, noninferiority study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 1 year of age or older with clinical manifestations of bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to either besifloxacin suspension or moxifloxacin solution, instilled in the infected eye(s) 3 times daily for 5 days, and participated in study visits on days 1, 5 (+/-1 day), and 8 (+1 day). Assessments included clinical evaluation of signs and symptoms, visual acuity, biomicroscopy, and culture of the infected eye(s) at each visit, as well as direct ophthalmoscopy on days 1 and 8. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end points were clinical resolution and microbial eradication of baseline bacterial infection on day 5 in patients with culture-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis. Secondary end points included clinical resolution and microbial eradication on day 8, individual clinical outcomes, microbial and clinical outcomes by bacterial species, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 1161 patients (533 with culture-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis) were randomized. Based on the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference, besifloxacin was noninferior to moxifloxacin for clinical resolution on day 5 (58.3% vs. 59.4%, respectively; 95% CI, -9.48 to 7.29) and day 8 (84.5% vs. 84.0%, respectively, 95% CI, -5.6% to 6.75%) and for microbial eradication on day 5 (93.3% vs. 91.1%, respectively, 95% CI, -2.44 to 6.74) and day 8 (87.3% vs. 84.7%; 95% CI, -3.32 to 8.53). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 treatment groups for either efficacy end points on days 5 or 8 (P>0.05). Besifloxacin and moxifloxacin were well tolerated. The cumulative frequency of ocular adverse events was similar between treatments (12% and 14% with besifloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively). However, eye irritation occurred more often in moxifloxacin-treated eyes (0.3% for besifloxacin vs. 1.4% for moxifloxacin; P = 0.0201). CONCLUSIONS: Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension was non inferior to moxifloxacin ophthalmic suspension and provided similar safety and efficacy (clinical and microbiological) outcomes when used for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references

OBJECTIVE: Acute conjunctivitis is an extremely common condition and can be associated with significant morbidity and economic burden. Despite this, considerable controversy exists pertaining to the prevalence, diagnosis, management, and treatment of the condition. A panel of ophthalmology experts was assembled to review and discuss the current evidence based literature as it pertains to each of these persistent controversies. METHODS AND SCOPE: An acute conjunctivitis round table symposium was convened at the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting in Atlanta, November 2008. The expert panelists consisted of four academic ophthalmologists in the field of cornea and external disease, whose discussion was informed by an English language literature survey carried out on the PubMed database for the period of January 1972 to October 2008. A narrative summary was generated from the literature review and direct transcription of this event, from which this Review article was developed. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Considerable light has been shed on acute microbial conjunctivitis and especially those cases caused by adenovirus. Many of the myths that have perpetuated for years have been debunked by emerging evidence. The advent and the implementation of better diagnostic tools and anti-viral medications will help clinicians to improve their diagnostic accuracy, improve management and treatment decisions, and ultimately benefit patients while saving overall healthcare costs

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of the ACI-7000 intracorneal inlay in increasing the depth of field in emmetropic presbyopic patients. SETTING: Beyoglu Eye Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: This prospective unmasked study comprised 39 presbyopic patients; 12 were naturally emmetropic and 27 had emmetropia resulting from previous hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. The intracorneal inlay was placed over the pupil in the patient's nondominant eye after flap lift or creation of a conventional flap using a microkeratome. The inlay was centered on the visual axis. Postoperative follow-up was 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 39 inlays implanted, 3 were explanted during the study. At 1 year, the mean uncorrected near visual acuity improved from J6 (preoperatively) to J1+. All eyes with an inlay had an uncorrected near acuity of J3 or better and 85.3%, of J1 or better. Binocularly, the mean uncorrected near acuity remained J1 or better throughout the study. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity in eyes with an inlay did not change significantly from preoperatively and remained 20/20 throughout the study period. All 3 eyes with inlay explantation returned to within +/-1.00 diopter of the preoperative refractive state for near and distance vision, with no loss of best corrected distance visual acuity. CONCLUSION: The ACI-7000 intracorneal inlay showed the potential to provide safe, effective, and reversible treatment of presbyopia