Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: Past studies have identified a high frequency of recommendations for additional imaging (RAI) for computed tomography (CT) studies performed in an emergency department (ED), thereby potentially contributing to increased imaging utilization and costs. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of RAI within the ED setting between ED-based and organ-based subspecialty radiologists. METHODS: We identified 600 ED CT studies, comprising 200 head, chest, and abdominal CT studies, split equally between cases reviewed by ED-based and organ-based radiologists. Frequency of RAI for the three examinations was compared between these subspecialty groups. RESULTS: Frequencies of RAI were 21.5 %, 13.5 %, and 5.5 % for CT examinations of the chest, abdomen, and brain, respectively. There was a significantly higher frequency of RAI for chest CT studies interpreted by chest radiologists than by ED radiologists (28.0 % vs. 15.0 %, respectively, p = 0.036), largely due to a higher rate of RAI for incidentally detected lung nodules and masses as well as other pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities by chest radiologists. There was no significant difference in RAI on brain or abdominal CT studies between the two groups (p = 0.426-1.0). However, on abdominal studies, only ED-based radiologists provided RAI for abnormalities of the bowel or uterus, while only organ-based radiologists provided RAI for pancreatic abnormalities. Only 25.6 % of RAI were subsequently performed at our institution. CONCLUSION: For chest CT studies performed at the authors' institution, differences in management of incidental pulmonary nodules contributed to a significantly higher frequency of RAI by chest radiologists than by ED-based radiologists. Further investigation of the impact of these differences on cost and patient outcomes is warranted.

Purpose: To compare histogram analysis of voxel-based whole-lesion (WL) enhancement to qualitative assessment and region-of-interest (ROI)-based enhancement analysis in discriminating the renal cell cancer (RCC) subtype clear cell RCC (ccRCC) from papillary RCC (pRCC). Materials and Methods: In this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, 73 patients underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging prior to surgery for RCC between January 2007 and January 2010. Three-dimensional fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-echo corticomedullary phase acquisitions, obtained before and after contrast agent administration, were transferred to a workstation at which automated registration followed by semiautomated segmentation of the RCC was performed. Percent enhancement was computed on a per-voxel basis: (SI(post) - SI(pre))/SI(pre) .100, where SI(pre) and SI(post) indicate signal intensity before and after contrast enhancement, respectively. The WL quantitative parameters of mean, median, and third quartile enhancement and histogram distribution parameters kurtosis and skewness were computed for each lesion. WL enhancement parameters were compared with ROI-based analysis and qualitative assessment with regards to diagnostic accuracy and interreader agreement in differentiating ccRCC from pRCC. Results: There were 19 pRCCs and 55 ccRCCs at pathologic examination. ccRCC had significantly higher WL mean, median, and third quartile enhancement compared with pRCC and hade significantly lower kurtosis and skewness (all P < .001). Third quartile enhancement had the highest accuracy (94.6%; area under the curve, 0.980) in discriminating ccRCC from pRCC, which was significantly higher than the accuracy of qualitative assessment (86.0%; P = .04) but not significantly higher than that of ROI enhancement (89.2%; P = .52). WL enhancement parameters had higher interreader agreement (kappa = 0.91-1.0) compared with ROI enhancement or qualitative assessment (kappa = 0.83 and 0.7, respectively) in discriminating ccRCC from pRCC. Conclusion: WL enhancement histogram analysis is feasible and can potentially be used to differentiate ccRCC from pRCC with high accuracy. (c) RSNA, 2012 Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12111281/-/DC1.

Despite recent trends toward evaluation of back and neck pain with magnetic resonance imaging, myelography and postmyelography computed tomography continue to play an important role in the workup of many patients with spinal pathology. We present techniques for the safe and efficient performance of myelography, lumbar, and cervical puncture, which remain important skills to be mastered by radiology residents and fellows.

Purpose: A pilot study was performed to assess the feasibility of a single pass spiral technique to image the head and face, or head, face, and cervical spine in the emergency setting. Materials and Methods: 23 patients requiring emergency imaging of head, face and cervical spine, and 5 patients for head and face were enrolled. Radiation dose (DLP) was measured and compared with isolated CT head and face and cervical spine acquisitions. Time to perform the single spiral scan was also measured. The quality of spiral CT heads was compared with 21 consecutive trauma axial CT heads on a five point scale in a blinded fashion. Results: Average DLP for single spiral CT head, face, and cervical spine was 2581.24, compared with DLP of 2867.22 for these performed separately. Average DLP for single pass head and face (including mandible) CT was 1749.45, compared with standard 2 scan DLP of 1887.81. Time to scan a single pass CT head, face, and cervical spine ranged from 4.4 to 5.8 s. Quality of spiral head CTcomparedwith axial in trauma patients showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Single pass emergency CT head & face, and head, face, & cervical spine is both time and radiation efficient without reduction in image quality

We present the imaging findings in an 8-week-old infant with LPL deficiency. Due to markedly increased lipoproteins in the serum, abnormal hypodensity and abnormal T1-weighted hyperintensity were identified in the dural venous sinuses and medullary veins