Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:modayr01

in-biosketch:true

Total Results:

85


IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN OUTCOMES BETWEEN ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM)? A RANDOMIZED STUDY FROM AN EXPERIENCED HIGH-VOLUME OPERATOR [Meeting Abstract]

Stavropoulos, Stavros N.; Modayil, Rani J.; Zhang, Xiaocen; Khodorskiy, Dmitriy O.; Taylor, Sharon I.; Kollarus, Maria M.; Widmer, Jessica L.; Brathwaite, Collin E.; Peller, Abraham; Halwan, Bhawna; Friedel, David
ISI:000434248200137
ISSN: 0016-5107
CID: 3508502

PERORAL CHOLANGIOSCOPY WITH GASTROSCOPES: SEE MORE, DO MORE! [Meeting Abstract]

Widmer, Jessica L.; Modayil, Rani J.; Friedel, David; Allendorf, John; Grendell, James H.; Stavropoulos, Stavros N.
ISI:000434248200310
ISSN: 0016-5107
CID: 3522472

ADVANCED RESECTION AND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES FOR ENDOSCOPIC FULL THICKNESS (EFTR) IN THE GASTRIC FUNDUS [Meeting Abstract]

Stavropoulos, Stavros N.; Khodorskiy, Dmitriy O.; Zhang, Xiaocen; Modayil, Rani J.
ISI:000434248200127
ISSN: 0016-5107
CID: 3522452

A LARGE SINGLE CENTER ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD) EXPERIENCE IN A WESTERN SETTING [Meeting Abstract]

Stavropoulos, Stavros N.; Khodorskiy, Dmitriy O.; Ly, Erin K.; Modayil, Rani J.; Nithyanand, Sagarika; Bhumi, Sriya; DeMaria, Matthew J.; Zhang, Xiaocen; Widmer, Jessica L.; Grendell, James H.
ISI:000434248200393
ISSN: 0016-5107
CID: 3522492

LEARNING CURVE FOR ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD): EXPERIENCE OF A SINGLE OPERATOR IN A LARGE US REFERRAL CENTER [Meeting Abstract]

Stavropoulos, Stavros N.; Zhang, Xiaocen; Ly, Erin; Nithyanand, Sagarika; Modayil, Rani J.; Khodorskiy, Dmitriy O.; Galibov, Iosif; Widmer, Jessica L.; Friedel, David
ISI:000434248200082
ISSN: 0016-5107
CID: 3522432

Spiral enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in bariatric-length Roux-en-Y anatomy: a large single-center series and review of the literature (with video)

Ali, Mohammad F; Modayil, Rani; Gurram, Krishna C; Brathwaite, Collin E M; Friedel, David; Stavropoulos, Stavros N
BACKGROUND:Deep enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (DEA-ERCP) in post-bariatric Roux-en-Y (RY) anatomy is challenging. Laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) and EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) are technically easier and faster but are more invasive and morbid procedures. Therefore, we have used DEA-ERCP as our first-line approach, reserving EDGE and LA-ERCP for cases in which adjunctive techniques that cannot be performed through an enteroscope are required (eg, EUS-FNA, sleeve sphincter of Oddi manometry), or DEA-ERCP failures. The 2 main methods for DEA-ERCP are balloon- and spirus-assisted. Current literature on spiral enteroscopy ERCP (SE-ERCP) in bariatric RY anatomy is scant with low success rates reported. Our center has nearly exclusively used SE-ERCP for bariatric patients. Here, we report one of the largest such series to date. METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with bariatric-length RY anatomy who had SE-ERCP from December 2009 to October 2016 at a tertiary care center, by one operator (S.N.S.). Primary outcomes included success at reaching the papilla, cannulation success, success of desired therapeutic intervention, and overall SE-ERCP success. RESULTS:Thirty-five SE-ERCPs were performed (28 in bariatric RY gastric bypass and 7 other long-limb RY surgical reconstructions). The papilla was reached in 86% (30/35) of cases. Cannulation success in patients in whom deep cannulation was indicated (28/30) was 100% (28/28 cases, including the 24 cases with native papilla). Therapeutic ERCP success was 100% (28/28). Overall SE-ERCP success was 86% (30/35). Median length of stay was 3 days. Median procedure time was 189 minutes. Reasons for SE-ERCP failures included RY anastomosis stricture, adhesions (2), long Roux limb, and redundant small bowel. Two of these patients underwent interventional radiology-guided percutaneous biliary drainage, 2 patients had laparoscopy-assisted ERCP, and 1 patient had EUS-guided antegrade cholangioscopy with sphincteroplasty and stone clearance. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:With sufficient allotted time (median procedure time ∼3 hours) and high operator experience (a single-operator volume that exceeds that of other published series), SE-ERCP is safe and effective in bariatric, long-limb RY patients with an overall success rate of 86%, which is higher than previously reported.
PMID: 29317267
ISSN: 1097-6779
CID: 3498222

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with or without prior Heller's myotomy: comparing long-term outcomes in a large U.S. single-center cohort (with videos)

Zhang, Xiaocen; Modayil, Rani J; Friedel, David; Gurram, Krishna C; Brathwaite, Collin E; Taylor, Sharon I; Kollarus, Maria M; Modayil, Sony; Halwan, Bhawna; Grendell, James H; Stavropoulos, Stavros N
BACKGROUND AND AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Heller's myotomy (HM) is one of the most effective treatments for esophageal achalasia. However, failures do exist, and the success rate tends to decrease with time. The efficacy of rescue treatments for patients with failed HM is limited. A few small-scale studies have reported outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in these patients. We conducted this study to systematically assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy of POEM on patients who have had HM. METHODS:Patients at least 3 months out from POEM were selected from our prospective database: 318 consecutive POEMs performed from October 2009 to October 2016. The efficacy and safety of POEM were compared between the 46 patients with prior HM and the remaining 272 patients. RESULTS:Patients with prior HM had longer disease history, more advanced disease, more type I and less type II achalasia, lower before-POEM Eckardt scores, and lower before-POEM lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (all P < .01). Procedure parameters and follow-up results (clinical success rate, Eckardt score, LES pressure, GERD score, esophagitis, and pH testing) showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. For the 46 HM-POEM patients, no clinically significant perioperative adverse events occurred. Their overall clinical success rate (Eckardt score ≤3 and no other treatment needed) was 95.7% at a median follow-up of 28 months. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:POEM as a rescue treatment for patients with achalasia who failed HM is feasible, safe, and highly effective. It should be the treatment of choice in managing these challenging cases at centers with a high level of experience with POEM.
PMID: 29122601
ISSN: 1097-6779
CID: 3035592

Gastrocolic Fistula: A Rare Presentation of a Common Disease [Case Report]

Razzano, Anthony; Ali, Mohammad; Modayil, Rani
PMID: 29178974
ISSN: 1528-0012
CID: 3535642

Single Center Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Experience in a Western Setting [Meeting Abstract]

Modayil, Rani; Nithyanand, Sagarika; Gurram, Krishna; Bhumi, Sriya; Ly, Erin; DeMaria, Matthew; Peller, Hallie; Stavropoulos, Stavros
ISI:000439259002078
ISSN: 0002-9270
CID: 3522572

Endoscopic Tunnel-Assisted Muscle Biopsy to Diagnose Esophageal Metastasis of Urothelial Malignancy: A First of Its Kind! [Meeting Abstract]

Ali, Mohammad F.; Modayil, Rani; Donovan, Virginia; Grendell, James; Stavropoulos, Stavros
ISI:000439259004070
ISSN: 0002-9270
CID: 3522632