Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:mogila01

Total Results:

102


Interruptions to preplanned movements cause changes in firing rate and spike-wave coupling in STN neurons [Meeting Abstract]

London, D; Fazl, A; Katlowitz, K; Pourfar, M; Mogilner, A
Objectives: STN stimulation is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease but has been implicated in increasing impulsivity in patients. We sought to identify single unit and local field potential signatures associated with the correction of preplanned movement sequences in response to external stimuli.
Method(s): 6 patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing
EMBASE:628797399
ISSN: 1423-0372
CID: 4034692

Patients' experience during each stage of deep brain stimulation ( [Meeting Abstract]

Delavari, N; Fazl, A; Pourfar, M; Mogilner, A
Objectives: Patient satisfaction is one determinant of quality health care (Kondziolka et al. 2013). The performance of surgical procedures on conscious patients dictates unique considerations of patient comfort, experience, and satisfaction. In this study, we sought to better understand patients' experience during each stage of deep brain stimulation (
EMBASE:628796873
ISSN: 1423-0372
CID: 4034702

Effect of deep brain simulation on arm, leg, and chin tremor in Parkinson disease

Katlowitz, Kalman; Ko, Mia; Mogilner, Alon Y; Pourfar, Michael
OBJECTIVE:The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD)-related tremor has been well established. However, the relative impact on arm, leg, and chin tremor has been less clearly elucidated. The authors evaluated the distribution of tremors in a PD cohort undergoing STN DBS and sought to evaluate the differential impact of DBS as a function of tremor location. METHODS:A retrospective study of patients with PD with tremor who underwent DBS surgery between 2012 and 2016 was performed to evaluate the impact of STN stimulation on overall and regional tremor scores. RESULTS:Across 66 patients the authors found an average of 78% overall reduction in tremor after 6 months. In this cohort, the authors found that tremor reduction was somewhat better for arm than for leg tremors, especially in instances of higher preoperative tremor (84% vs 71% reduction, respectively, for initial tremor scores ≥ 2). No significant difference in response was found between patients with medication-responsive versus medication-nonresponsive tremors. CONCLUSIONS:The authors found that although DBS improved tremor in all regions, the improvement was not uniform between chin, arm, and leg-even within the same patient. The reasons behind these differing responses are speculative but suggest that STN DBS may more reliably reduce arm tremors than leg tremors.
PMID: 30544332
ISSN: 1933-0693
CID: 4190212

Efficacy and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation in Tourette Syndrome: The International Tourette Syndrome Deep Brain Stimulation Public Database and Registry

Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel; Jimenez-Shahed, Joohi; Leckman, James Frederick; Porta, Mauro; Servello, Domenico; Meng, Fan-Gang; Kuhn, Jens; Huys, Daniel; Baldermann, Juan Carlos; Foltynie, Thomas; Hariz, Marwan I; Joyce, Eileen M; Zrinzo, Ludvic; Kefalopoulou, Zinovia; Silburn, Peter; Coyne, Terry; Mogilner, Alon Y; Pourfar, Michael H; Khandhar, Suketu M; Auyeung, Man; Ostrem, Jill Louise; Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle; Welter, Marie-Laure; Mallet, Luc; Karachi, Carine; Houeto, Jean Luc; Klassen, Bryan Timothy; Ackermans, Linda; Kaido, Takanobu; Temel, Yasin; Gross, Robert E; Walker, Harrison C; Lozano, Andres M; Walter, Benjamin L; Mari, Zoltan; Anderson, William S; Changizi, Barbara Kelly; Moro, Elena; Zauber, Sarah Elizabeth; Schrock, Lauren E; Zhang, Jian-Guo; Hu, Wei; Rizer, Kyle; Monari, Erin H; Foote, Kelly D; Malaty, Irene A; Deeb, Wissam; Gunduz, Aysegul; Okun, Michael S
Importance/UNASSIGNED:Collective evidence has strongly suggested that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for Tourette syndrome. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To assess the efficacy and safety of DBS in a multinational cohort of patients with Tourette syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants/UNASSIGNED:The prospective International Deep Brain Stimulation Database and Registry included 185 patients with medically refractory Tourette syndrome who underwent DBS implantation from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016, at 31 institutions in 10 countries worldwide. Exposures/UNASSIGNED:Patients with medically refractory symptoms received DBS implantation in the centromedian thalamic region (93 of 163 [57.1%]), the anterior globus pallidus internus (41 of 163 [25.2%]), the posterior globus pallidus internus (25 of 163 [15.3%]), and the anterior limb of the internal capsule (4 of 163 [2.5%]). Main Outcomes and Measures/UNASSIGNED:Scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale and adverse events. Results/UNASSIGNED:The International Deep Brain Stimulation Database and Registry enrolled 185 patients (of 171 with available data, 37 females and 134 males; mean [SD] age at surgery, 29.1 [10.8] years [range, 13-58 years]). Symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder were present in 97 of 151 patients (64.2%) and 32 of 148 (21.6%) had a history of self-injurious behavior. The mean (SD) total Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score improved from 75.01 (18.36) at baseline to 41.19 (20.00) at 1 year after DBS implantation (P < .001). The mean (SD) motor tic subscore improved from 21.00 (3.72) at baseline to 12.97 (5.58) after 1 year (P < .001), and the mean (SD) phonic tic subscore improved from 16.82 (6.56) at baseline to 9.63 (6.99) at 1 year (P < .001). The overall adverse event rate was 35.4% (56 of 158 patients), with intracranial hemorrhage occurring in 2 patients (1.3%), infection in 4 patients with 5 events (3.2%), and lead explantation in 1 patient (0.6%). The most common stimulation-induced adverse effects were dysarthria (10 [6.3%]) and paresthesia (13 [8.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:Deep brain stimulation was associated with symptomatic improvement in patients with Tourette syndrome but also with important adverse events. A publicly available website on outcomes of DBS in patients with Tourette syndrome has been provided.
PMCID:5885852
PMID: 29340590
ISSN: 2168-6157
CID: 2916102

Deep brain stimulation for Tourette syndrome: a single-center series

Dowd, Richard S; Pourfar, Michael; Mogilner, Alon Y
OBJECTIVE Tourette syndrome (TS) is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by multiple motor and phonic tics. While pharmacological and behavioral therapy can be effective in most patients, a subset of patients remains refractory to treatment. Increasing clinical evidence from multiple centers suggests that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the medial thalamus can be effective in many cases of refractory TS. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed outcomes in 13 patients with refractory TS who underwent medial thalamic DBS performed by their team over a 7-year period. Patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, and preoperative objective assessments were performed using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. YGTSS scores were calculated at visits immediately postoperatively and at the most recent follow-up in patients with a minimum of 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Coordinates of the active DBS contacts were calculated and projected onto each patient's pre- and postoperative images. RESULTS Patients showed an average decrease of 37% (p = 0.0063) in the total tic severity at their first postoperative visit. At their latest visit, their scores achieved significance, decreasing from preoperative scores by an average of 50% (p = 0.0014). The average position of the active contact was noted to be at the junction of the posterior ventralis oralis internus/centromedian-parafascicular nuclei. Device-related complications occurred in 2 patients, necessitating additional surgeries. All patients continued to use the system at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The authors' data are consistent with the small but growing body of literature supporting DBS of the ventralis oralis internus/centromedian-parafascicular thalamus as an effective and relatively safe treatment for severe, refractory TS.
PMID: 28387621
ISSN: 1933-0693
CID: 2521712

Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial

Holtzheimer, Paul E; Husain, Mustafa M; Lisanby, Sarah H; Taylor, Stephan F; Whitworth, Louis A; McClintock, Shawn; Slavin, Konstantin V; Berman, Joshua; McKhann, Guy M; Patil, Parag G; Rittberg, Barry R; Abosch, Aviva; Pandurangi, Ananda K; Holloway, Kathryn L; Lam, Raymond W; Honey, Christopher R; Neimat, Joseph S; Henderson, Jaimie M; DeBattista, Charles; Rothschild, Anthony J; Pilitsis, Julie G; Espinoza, Randall T; Petrides, Georgios; Mogilner, Alon Y; Matthews, Keith; Peichel, DeLea; Gross, Robert E; Hamani, Clement; Lozano, Andres M; Mayberg, Helen S
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subcallosal cingulate white matter has shown promise as an intervention for patients with chronic, unremitting depression. To test the safety and efficacy of DBS for treatment-resistant depression, a prospective, randomised, sham-controlled trial was conducted. METHODS: Participants with treatment-resistant depression were implanted with a DBS system targeting bilateral subcallosal cingulate white matter and randomised to 6 months of active or sham DBS, followed by 6 months of open-label subcallosal cingulate DBS. Randomisation was computer generated with a block size of three at each site before the site started the study. The primary outcome was frequency of response (defined as a 40% or greater reduction in depression severity from baseline) averaged over months 4-6 of the double-blind phase. A futility analysis was performed when approximately half of the proposed sample received DBS implantation and completed the double-blind phase. At the conclusion of the 12-month study, a subset of patients were followed up for up to 24 months. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00617162. FINDINGS: Before the futility analysis, 90 participants were randomly assigned to active (n=60) or sham (n=30) stimulation between April 10, 2008, and Nov 21, 2012. Both groups showed improvement, but there was no statistically significant difference in response during the double-blind, sham-controlled phase (12 [20%] patients in the stimulation group vs five [17%] patients in the control group). 28 patients experienced 40 serious adverse events; eight of these (in seven patients) were deemed to be related to the study device or surgery. INTERPRETATION: This study confirmed the safety and feasibility of subcallosal cingulate DBS as a treatment for treatment-resistant depression but did not show statistically significant antidepressant efficacy in a 6-month double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Future studies are needed to investigate factors such as clinical features or electrode placement that might improve efficacy. FUNDING: Abbott (previously St Jude Medical).
PMID: 28988904
ISSN: 2215-0374
CID: 2732442

Intraparenchymal Cysts Following Deep Brain Stimulation: Variable Presentations and Clinical Courses

Katlowitz, Kalman; Pourfar, Michael H; Israel, Zvi; Mogilner, Alon Y
BACKGROUND: The development of cysts at the electrode lead is a rare complication of deep brain stimulation (DBS), with only 3 cases reported in the literature. A better understanding of the variable clinical presentations and courses of these cysts may help increase awareness of this potentially life-threatening complication. OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical presentation of patients with intraparenchymal cysts following DBS implantations. METHODS: We report 3 patients who developed a cyst along the course of the DBS lead. These patients received DBS for different indications and in different brain locations. RESULTS: Clinical courses differed considerably with 1 asymptomatic patient followed conservatively, 1 mildly symptomatic patient who had the DBS hardware removed for insidious worsening over months, and 1 who had it emergently removed for acute development of hydrocephalus. Serial imaging revealed spontaneous reduction in cyst size over time in the asymptomatic patient, and following removal in 1 of the symptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: This report highlights the variable clinical presentation and course of patients who develop cysts along the DBS lead. It suggests that some cases can be followed clinically without removal of hardware but that ongoing vigilance is required given the potential for serious adverse events.
PMID: 28922879
ISSN: 2332-4260
CID: 2708142

Rescue leads for suboptimal results following deep brain stimulation for parkinson's disease [Meeting Abstract]

Fazl, A; Pourfar, M H; Mogilner, A
Out of approximately 600 deep brain stimulation surgeries performed at our center over 10 years, 5 patients received "rescue"
EMBASE:614675569
ISSN: 1876-4754
CID: 2477762

Palliative CT-Guided Cordotomy for Medically Intractable Pain in Patients with Cancer

Shepherd, T M; Hoch, M J; Cohen, B A; Bruno, M T; Fieremans, E; Rosen, G; Pacione, D; Mogilner, A Y
Palliative cervical cordotomy can be performed via percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of the lateral C1-2 spinothalamic tract. This rare procedure can be safe, effective, and advantageous in mitigating medically intractable unilateral extremity pain for selected patients with end-stage cancer. This report reviews the indications, techniques, risks, and potential benefits of cordotomy. We describe our recent experience treating 3 patients with CT-guided C1-2 cordotomy and provide the first characterization of spinal cord diffusion MR imaging changes associated with successful cordotomy.
PMID: 27811129
ISSN: 1936-959x
CID: 2296992

Lead Angle Matters: Side Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation Improved With Adjustment of Lead Angle [Case Report]

Pourfar, Michael H; Mogilner, Alon Y
BACKGROUND: Targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) using standard stereotactic coordinates in conjunction with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generally results in effective symptomatic relief for the cardinal motor features of Parkinson's disease (PD). The angle of approach, however, influences the resultant field of stimulation and can lead to undesired side effects. METHODS: We review a case where symptomatic improvement was accompanied by significant side effects despite reasonable STN stereotactic base coordinates. Revision of the lead using similar base coordinates but a significantly different angle of approach greatly improved the outcome. RESULTS: Stimulation ventromedial to the STN improved tremors but brought about dysarthria and dystonia. Computer-based stimulation field modeling helped understand the regions associated with the side effects and illustrate the difference between pre- and post-revision stimulation fields. CONCLUSION: Lead angle can impact DBS outcome and should be taken into consideration.
PMID: 27489123
ISSN: 1525-1403
CID: 2199522