Faculty Bibliography

Two experiments were carried out to determine how manipulating the compression ratio and release time of a single-band wide dynamic range hearing aid affects sound quality. In experiment I, compression ratio was varied over the range from linear to 10:1 (low compression threshold, attack time = 5 ms, release time = 200 ms). In experiment II, compression ratios of 1.5, 2, and 3:1 were combined with release times of 60, 200, and 1000 ms (attack time = 5 ms). Twenty listeners with sensorineural hearing loss rated the clarity, pleasantness, background noise, loudness, and the overall impression of speech-in-noise (Ventilation, Apartment, Cafeteria) processed through a compression hearing aid. Results revealed that increasing compression ratio caused decreases in ratings on all scales. Increasing release time caused ratings of pleasantness to increase, and ratings of background noise and loudness to decrease. At the 3:1 compression ratio, increasing the release time caused increases in ratings of clarity, pleasantness, and overall impression, and a decrease in background noise. Significant correlations were found between scales. Regression analysis revealed that the contributions of the scales of clarity, pleasantness, background noise, and loudness to the prediction of overall impression differed as a function of the competing noise condition

The effect of adjusting the consonant-vowel (C-V) intensity ratio on consonant recognition in 18 subjects with sensorineural hearing impairment was investigated. C-V intensity ratios in a set of 48 vowel-consonant nonsense syllables were adjusted in steps of 3-6 dB depending on the subject's dynamic range of hearing. An increase in consonant intensity is referred to here as consonant enhancement (CE). The value of CE producing the highest consonant recognition score (CRmax) is defined as CEmax. Both CEmax and CRmax were determined for each subject for each of the 48 nonsense syllables. Consonant type was found to have a highly significant effect on CRmax, the gain in consonant recognition, and CEmax. The effect of vowel environment was also significant, but of much smaller magnitude. Audiogram configuration was found to have a small effect and was only significant for CRmax. The results of the study also showed that individualized adjustment of the C-V intensity ratio for each subject and consonant-vowel combination can produce substantial improvements in consonant recognition. These data can be used to estimate upper bounds of performance that, in principle, can be obtained by appropriate adjustment of the C-V intensity ratio

This paper includes an overview of the research on late-onset auditory deprivation, an evaluation of the evidence from retrospective and prospective studies, recommendations for future research, and a consideration of the theoretical and clinical implications of the research. The studies reviewed offer convincing evidence of the late-onset auditory deprivation effect both in groups of listeners and in substantial numbers of individual listeners included in the group studies. The effect appears to be reversible in some cases with the use of amplification in the previously unaided ear. This preliminary evidence supports the recommendation of binaural amplification for persons with bilateral symmetric sensorineural hearing loss. There is much that is still unknown about the deprivation effect and recovery from deprivation. Longitudinal prospective studies are needed to obtain a better understanding of the role of subject-related variables and amplification-related variables on the magnitude and time course of the deprivation effect. Behavioral and electrophysiologic measures of monaural and binaural performance using speech and nonspeech stimuli would also further our understanding of the mechanisms underlying late-onset auditory deprivation

The terminology used in studies documenting changes in auditory performance following fitting of hearing aids has been diverse. Definitions for the auditory deprivation effect and auditory acclimatization are offered as a first step in rationalization. Two statements summarize current knowledge concerning auditory deprivation effects and auditory acclimatization, as well as considering the potential implications for research, field trial and clinical practice applications. Potential areas for future research are identified

Paired-comparison judgments of quality were obtained from 20 hearing-impaired listeners for speech processed through simulated compression hearing aids varying in release time (60, 200, 1000 ms) at three different compression ratios (1.5, 2, 3:1) and for three different background noises (ventilation, apartment, cafeteria). Analysis revealed that the main effect of release time did not have a significant effect on perceived quality. The interaction between release time and noise type was found to be significant. While no significant difference in preference for release times was evident for the ventilation noise, the longer release times (200 and 1000 ms) were preferred for the higher level noises (apartment noise, cafeteria noise). Post hoc testing revealed that the mean preference scores for the 200- and 1000-ms release time were significantly greater than that of the 60-ms release time with the competing cafeteria noise (p < 0.05). Analysis of individual subject data revealed statistically significant preferences that differed from the group mean, suggesting that individualized fitting of this parameter of a compression hearing aid might be warranted

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the relationship between most comfortable listening level and preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids as a function of variations in speech and noise level. DESIGN: A digital hearing aid test system was used to simulate six hearing aids having compression ratios of 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, and 10:1. Speech was presented in three different noises (vent, apartment, and cafeteria), with speech input level being varied (55, 70, 85 dB SPL). Subjects were 20 listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (half with a dynamic range < or = 30 dB and half with a dynamic range >30 dB). The boundaries of the most comfortable listening range were measured to estimate most comfortable listening level. Preferred listening level was measured by having subjects adjust the output of the hearing aid for satisfactory listening. RESULTS: On average, the deviation of preferred listening level from most comfortable loudness (MCL) was less than 5 dB. Dynamic range, noise type, and input level were all found to have small, but significant, effects on the deviation of preferred listening level from MCL. On average, subjects with a small dynamic range listened slightly below MCL, and subjects with a larger dynamic range listened slightly above MCL. For favorable signal-to-noise ratios, preferred listening levels were highest for high input levels and for conditions that resulted in high output levels before level adjustment. Although the pattern of average performance differed slightly at poorer signal-to-noise ratios, all preferred listening levels were close to MCL. CONCLUSIONS: The gain of a slow-acting compression hearing aid should place the output within 5 dB of MCL. The output for low and medium inputs should approximate MCL and the output for high input levels should be slightly above MCL. This pattern of gain may be obtained with mild compression ratios and a gain rule that places a speech input of 70 dB at MCL

Paired-comparison judgments of quality were obtained from 20 hearing-impaired listeners (half with a small dynamic range and half with a large dynamic range) for speech-in-noise (vent, apartment, and cafeteria) processed through a slow-acting compression hearing aid. Compression ratio was varied (1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, and 10:1). Compression threshold, attack time, and release time were fixed. Sound quality judgments were significantly affected by compression ratio, noise, and dynamic range. Preference decreased with increasing compression ratio. The selection of compression ratio. The selection of compression ratios < or = 2:1 was significantly higher than of compression ratios > 3:1. Less compression (no compression or 1.5:1) was preferred with the highest level noise (cafeteria noise) than with the lower level noises (vent or apartment). In particular, the small dynamic range group preferred compression with the vent and apartment noises (noise below the compression threshold), but preferred a linear hearing aid with the cafeteria noise (above the compression threshold). The large dynamic range group showed a slightly greater preference for the linear hearing aid for all three noises

Four noise reduction methods for use in sensory aids for hearing impairment were evaluated. These include a two-microphone adaptive noise canceller, short-term Wiener filtering, a transformed spectrum subtraction technique, and sinusoidal modelling. The largest improvements in speech recognition were obtained with the two-microphone adaptive noise canceller in a moderately reverberant room. Significant improvements were also obtained for short-term Wiener filtering for some hearing-impaired subjects. The transformed spectrum-subtraction technique failed to improve performance as the front-end of a hearing aid, but yielded improvements in performance as a preprocessor for the Nucleus Cochlear Implant. Sinusoidal modelling resulted in significant improvements in signal-to-noise ratio, but without a corresponding improvement in speech intelligibility

In orthogonal polynomial compression, the short-term speech spectrum is first approximated by a family of orthogonal polynomials. The coefficients of each polynomial, which vary over time, are then adjusted in terms of their average value and range of variation. These adjustments can be used to compress (or expand) temporal variations in the average level, slope, and various forms of curvature of the short-term speech spectrum. The analysis and reconstruction of the short-term speech spectrum using orthogonal polynomials was implemented using a digital master hearing aid. This method of compression was evaluated on eight sensorineurally hearing-impaired listeners. Speech recognition scores were obtained for a range of compression conditions and input levels with and without frequency shaping. The results showed significant advantages over conventional linear amplification when temporal variations in the average level of the short-term spectrum were compressed, a result comparable to that obtained with conventional amplitude compression. A subset of the subjects showed further improvement when temporal variations in spectrum slope were compressed, but these subjects also showed similar improvements when frequency shaping was combined with level-only compression. None of the subjects showed improved speech recognition scores when variations in quadratic curvature were compressed in addition to level and slope compression