Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION: Falls from heights are an important cause of unintentional fatal injury. We investigated the relationship between the characteristics of fatal falls and resulting injury patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed prospectively collected data from the Office of Chief Medical Examiner in New York City between 2000 and 2010. Data included fall height, work or non-work related, use of safety equipment, intentionality, specific organ injuries, and death on impact. The primary outcome was organ injury based on fall height. RESULTS: Higher falls were associated with hemorrhage as well as rib and various organ injuries. Organ injury pattern did not differ based on work status. The presence of equipment misuse or malfunction was associated with more deaths upon impact. Victims of falls from 200 ft or higher were 11.59 times more likely to die on impact than from lower than 25 ft. CONCLUSIONS: Fall height and work-related falls were significantly associated with death on impact. This is a public health issue, as 13% of falls were work related and 4% of falls were due to improper use of safety equipment. Some work-related falls are potentially preventable with proper safety equipment use. Understanding patterns of injury may play a role in prevention and management of survivors in the acute period.

BACKGROUND: Short- and mid-term data on Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) indicate sustained weight loss and improvement in co-morbidities. Few long-term studies exist, some of which are outdated, based on open procedures or different techniques. OBJECTIVES: To investigate long-term weight loss, co-morbidity remission, nutritional status, and complication rates among patients undergoing RYGB. SETTING: An academic, university hospital in the United States. METHODS: Between October 2000 and January 2004, patients who underwent RYGB>/=10 years before study onset were eligible for chart review, office visits, and telephone interviews. Revisional surgery was an endpoint, ceasing eligibility for study follow-up. Outcomes included weight loss measures and rates of co-morbidity remission, complications, and nutritional deficiencies. RESULTS: RYGB was performed in 328 patients with a mean preoperative body mass index of 47.5 kg/m2. Of 294 eligible patients, 134 (46%) were contacted for follow-up at>/=10 years (10+Year follow-up). Mean percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) was 58.9% at 10+Year. Higher %EWL was achieved by non-super-obese versus super-obese (61.3% versus 52.9%, P = .034). Blood pressure, lipid panel, and hemoglobin A1c improved significantly. At 10 years, remission of co-morbidities was 46% for hypertension and hyperlipidemia and 58% for diabetes mellitus. Thirty patients (9%) had revisional surgery for weight regain. Sixty-four patients (19.5%) had long-term complications requiring surgery. All-cause mortality was 2.7%. Nutritional deficiencies were seen in 87% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss after RYGB appears to be significant and sustainable, especially in the non-super-obese. Co-morbidities are improved, with a substantial number in remission a decade later. Nutritional deficiencies are almost universal.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cholelithiasis correlates with obesity. Patients often present for bariatric surgery with symptomatic cholelithiasis. There is a concern of cross-contamination when performing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) with concurrent cholecystectomy. The primary goal of this study is to address the safety and feasibility of this practice. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was designed from a prospectively collected database. All LAGB patients from July 2005 to April 2013 were included. Patients undergoing LAGB with concurrent cholecystectomy comprised the study group (LAGB/chole). The control group (LAGB) consisted of patients undergoing LAGB alone, and was selected using a 3:1 (control:study) case-match based on demographic and comorbidity data. The primary outcome was overall complication rate, with secondary outcomes including operating room (OR) time, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission/reoperation, erosion, infection, and band/port revisional surgery. RESULTS: There were 4,982 patients who met criteria. Of these, 28 patients had a LAGB with concurrent cholecystectomy, comprising the LAGB/chole (study) group. The remaining 4,954 patients were eligible controls, of which 84 were selected for the LAGB (control) group. Demographic and comorbidity data, along with mean follow-up time, were similar between the two groups. OR time was longer in the LAGB/chole group, but LOS was the same. The overall complication rate in the LAGB/chole group was 21 (n = 6) versus 20 % (n = 17) in the LAGB group (p = 0.893). Thirty-day readmission and reoperation were similar. There was also no difference in port site, wound, and intra-abdominal infections. There were no band erosions in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Performing a concurrent cholecystectomy at the time of LAGB does not result in increased immediate or delayed morbidity. Although longer to perform, this safe operation would avoid a second surgery for a patient already diagnosed with symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Aims: Bariatric surgery has proven to be the most effective treatment for sustained, longterm weight loss. However, surgeons are encountering some patients with weight regain and 'weight-loss failure.' Revisional bariatric surgery is becoming more common. Our video highlights gastric banding of the gastric pouch as a feasible option for revisional surgery. Methods: The case is a 55 year-old man with morbid obesity who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 10 years prior to presentation. He suffered from significant weight regain and was again classified as morbidly obese. Workup included an upper GI series, which demonstrated a dilated gastric pouch. The patient elected to undergo gastric banding of the gastric pouch in order to provide restriction and facilitate weight loss. Operative details are illustrated. Results: The patient was discharged to home the same day and has had an uneventful recovery. Most recently, at the 4-month postoperative visit, the patient has lost 30 pounds. Conclusions: Revisional bariatric surgery is becoming more prevalent, especially for weight regain. Depending on the patient's symptoms, surgical anatomy, and preoperative workup, the 'band over bypass' technique is a feasible option for revisional surgery and is effective in managing weight regain after gastric bypass

Aims: We present an interesting case of laparoscopic repair of a giant paraesophageal hernia with simultaneous bariatric surgery. The technical aspects of this challenging operation are reviewed. The video also highlights the resulting major morbidity that can occur. Methods: A 66 year-old woman was diagnosed with a type IV paraesophageal hernia including stomach, colon, and pancreas in the left chest. She was scheduled for laparoscopic repair of the hernia defect, expressing interest in concurrent bariatric surgery. Intraoperatively, the gastroesophageal junction could not be pulled into the abdomen without significant tension. We extended the Collis gastroplasty to perform a concomitant sleeve gastrectomy. The details of the operative approach are illustrated. Results: On postoperative day 2, an esophagram revealed normal passage of contrast without leak or obstruction. However, on postoperative day 6, she became febrile, with persistent tachycardia and leukocytosis. A CT scan showed a large mediastinal fluid collection consistent with a leak. The patient was taken emergently to the OR for EGD, thoracotomy, decortication, and repair of distal esophageal perforation with muscle interposition graft. On postoperative day 7 after esophageal repair, an esophagram revealed contrast extravasation from the distal esophagus. The patient underwent a repeat thoracotomy, debridement, and esophageal resection with exclusion due to necrosis, placement of pharyngostomy tube, as well as laparotomy, gastrostomy and jejunostomy tube placement. The patient was eventually discharged to a nursing facility after a prolonged hospitalization with pulmonary and infectious complications. She required multiple readmissions for tube maintenance and infectious complications. Several months later, after nutritional optimization, she is recovering from a right thoracotomy and Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy. Conclusions: Large paraesophageal hernias can cause debilitating symptoms, and laparoscopic repair is often complex in nature. In morbidly obese patients, extending the Collis gastroplasty into a vertical sleeve gastrectomy can help to address the morbid obesity. However, patients must be counseled on the many serious risks and complications associated with this procedure

Aims: One of the known complications of gastric bypass is the development of marginal ulcers. Without appropriate surveillance and management, these ulcers can have severe consequences, including stricture and perforation. This video presents a patient with these complications, resulting in the need for revisional surgery. Methods: The case is a 53 year-old woman with morbid obesity who underwent Roux-en- Y gastric bypass 6.5 years ago. She developed recurrent, perforated marginal ulcers requiring operative intervention prior to her presentation. Repeat endoscopy did not reveal any residual ulcers, and preoperative esophagram showed a dilated gastric pouch. The patient underwent resection of the strictured anastomosis and recreation of the gastrojejunostomy, as highlighted in the video. Results: An esophagram on the first postoperative day showed a markedly smaller gastric pouch without leak or obstruction. The patient was able to tolerated thin liquids, and was discharged to home on postoperative day 3. At her most recent office visit 2 months postoperatively, she has recovered well and is tolerating a diet. Her current BMI is 25. Conclusions: Marginal ulceration can be seen after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, and if left untreated, can result in major morbidity including stomal stricture and gastric perforation. Laparoscopic revision of the gastrojejunostomy can be performed safely and effectively

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is being performed as a conversion after adjustable gastric banding (AGB), often in a single stage. However, some argue that it should be performed in 2 stages to improve safety. Few studies compare complications between 1-stage and 2-stage procedures. Our aim is to compare the 30-day complication rates among these two groups. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients converted from AGB to SG between 8/2008 and 10/2013 and compared patients undergoing 1-stage and 2-stage techniques. Primary outcome was overall 30-day adverse event rate (postoperative complication, readmission, or reoperation). Secondary outcomes included operating room (OR) time, length of stay (LOS), leak, infection, and bleeding rates, as well as mortality. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients underwent SG after band removal; three were excluded due to short follow-up, leaving 60 1-stage and 20 2-stage. Mean time from band removal to SG for 2-stage was 438 days. Demographics, intraoperative technique (bougie size, staple reinforcement, oversewing staple line, and leak test), and mean follow-up were not statistically different. Mean OR time (132.1 min 1-stage vs. 127.8 min 2-stage, p = 0.702) and LOS (3.1 vs. 2.4 days, p = 0.676) were similar. Overall 30-day adverse event rate was 12 % for 1-stage versus 15 % for 2-stage procedures (p = 0.705). Differences in 30-day readmission (8 vs. 5 %) and reoperation (5 vs. 0 %) were not statistically significant (p = 0.999 and 0.569, respectively). Leak (3 vs. 0 %, p = 0.999), abscess (2 vs. 5 %, p = 0.440), and bleeding rates (2 vs. 0 %, p = 0.999) were not different. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: SG performed as a conversion after AGB is safe and feasible. Our findings indicate no statistical difference in 30-day outcomes when performed in 1 or 2 stages. Future studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to further investigate these differences.