Faculty Bibliography

We describe the use of minimally invasive trigeminal ablation, an endoscopic ablative technique to treat trigeminal neuralgia in patients who are traditionally poor surgical candidates. We present 4 patients who presented with refractory unilateral trigeminal neuralgia. Three of the patients had previously failed stereotactic radiosurgery and three of them have multiple sclerosis. Due either to lack of neurovascular compression, minimally invasive trigeminal ablation was offered. Intraoperatively, an incision is made along the buccal mucosa or mid-brow and the tissue is endoscopically dissected in a plane towards the symptomatic nerve. Once isolated, the epineurium is partially ablated with thermocautery and the tissue surrounding the nerve is decompressed. All patients reported resolution of their pain post-operatively and were pain free at last follow up. Two patients had mild hypesthesia over the ablated nerve territory. Minimally invasive trigeminal ablation is a safe and effective technique for symptomatic control of trigeminal neuralgia. The efficacy, low risk, and relative ease of the procedure makes it ideal for use in patients who are refractory to medical management and have no neurovascular compression, are unable to tolerate traditional surgery or have failed other therapies.

BACKGROUND:YouTube has rapidly become one of the most widely accessed educational platforms of our time. Over 1 billion hours of YouTube content are viewed every day, including neurosurgical videos. To date, there has never been a qualitative analysis of neurosurgical content on YouTube. METHODS:By evaluating the search interest of neurosurgical terms via Google Trends, we selected 8 search terms to assess on YouTube. For each term, we selected the top 20 videos, 10 when sorting by view count and 10 when sorting by relevance. Using the DISCERN criteria, we evaluated 131 unique YouTube videos to assess bias and overall educational quality. In addition, we categorized each video based on its intended utility and the credentials of the video's commentator. The number of views, average DISCERN scores, and bias scores were compared between search terms and between video categories. RESULTS:There were 131 unique and 29 duplicate videos. The videos received 143,538,363 combined views (1,104,141 average). The average video age was 4.6 years (range, 66 days to 12.5 years). The term "brain surgery" received the most total views (62,339,885), with an average DISCERN score of 1.65 overall and 2 for bias. The average DISCERN score was 2.02 overall and 2.39 for bias. There were 45 advertisements for either hospitals, physicians, or companies, totaling 18,052,873 views and averaging a DISCERN score of 2.04. CONCLUSIONS:YouTube is a frequently viewed but biased source for neurosurgical information. Advertisements are frequently disguised as educational material, and few videos provide references or sources for their information.

BACKGROUND:The anterior skull base (ASB) remains one of the greatest challenges for reconstructive surgeons. The current armamentarium includes endoscopic placement of free grafts, endonasal vascularized pedicled flaps, regional flaps, and microvascular free flaps. As the defect size increases, reconstruction complexity increases along with potential complications. Here, we report an endoscopic-assisted paramedian forehead flap, a novel adaptation of an age-old technique, for ASB reconstruction. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS:A 66-year-old male underwent a dual bifrontal and transnasal endoscopic approach for the resection of a T4N0M0 sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. The resulting ASB defect was repaired using simultaneous pericranial and nasoseptal flaps. Adjuvant radiation therapy resulted in delayed radiation necrosis in the right frontal lobe 3 years later requiring debridement via a supraorbital approach. Recovery from this operation was complicated by an ASB defect and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. The defect remained despite multiple attempts at endoscopic repairs. Due to multiple medical comorbidities, the patient was not a candidate for microvascular reconstruction. Prior surgeries had disrupted the traditional regional flaps (i.e., pericranial, nasoseptal, and temporoparietal fascia flaps) bilaterally. Therefore the novel endoscopic-assisted paramedian forehead flap was used to successfully repair the ASB defect. Postoperatively, the patient has done well with no recurrences in the CSF leak. CONCLUSIONS:The endoscopic-assisted paramedian forehead flap is a robust regional flap whose advantages include the utilization of muscle, low donor morbidity, and endoscopic placement with avoidance of craniotomies. Therefore it should be considered an important option for ASB reconstruction of recalcitrant CSF leaks when all other options are unavailable.

BACKGROUND:Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic orofacial pain syndrome, which manifests as severe pain in the distribution of any trigeminal nerve branch. Though traditionally responsive to anticonvulsant therapy, TN can become refractory to medications and require surgical intervention. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS:We present a case of V2 TN that was treated with minimally invasive trigeminal ablation. The patient presented with a 6-year history of type 1 TN and had failed the maximum tolerated doses of carbamazepine and gabapentin. There was no evidence of vascular compression on neuroimaging. After the patient refused stereotactic radiosurgery, she was offered minimally invasive trigeminal ablation. At 5 months postoperatively the patient reported complete alleviation of pain with tolerable sensorineural numbness. CONCLUSIONS:The endoscopic approach allows for precise targeting of V2, which is ideal in patients undergoing targeted neuroablation for pain. This is the first documented case of a transoral endoscopic approach toward ablative V2 TN management.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Occipital-frontal nerve stimulation is an off-label therapy for treating chronic refractory migraine and orofacial pain. Though effective, patients experience a high rate of complications including lead migration and erosion through the overlying skin. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS:We present a case of frontal electrode erosion that was revised via pericranial flap repair. The patient presented with multiple lead migrations, necessitating multiple revision surgeries with eventual frontal wound dehiscence. The choice was made to wrap the electrode in a pericranial flap to prevent recurrent lead migration. Two weeks postoperatively, the wound was well healed and the patient reported that the midline electrode was functioning properly. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Pericranial flap revision confers little additional risk when compared with simple wound closure, and the surgeon can proceed without total electrode removal, additional incisions, or lead tunneling. The flap provides a highly vascular additional layer of stability to the electrode, reducing the likelihood of further lead exposure without compromising the efficacy of the device. These results suggest that endoscopic pericranial flap revision is a viable technique for the repair of occipital nerve stimulation lead erosions.

OBJECTIVE:Bibliometric analysis is a commonly used analytic tool for objective determination of the most influential and peer-recognized articles within a given field. This study is the first bibliometric analysis of the literature in the field of invasive neuromodulation, excluding deep brain stimulation. The objectives of this study are to identify the 50 most cited articles in invasive neuromodulation, provide an overview of the literature to assist in clinical education, and evaluate the effect of impact factor on manuscript recognition. METHODS:Bibliometric analysis was performed using the Science Citation Index from the Institute for Scientific Information, accessed through the Web of Science. Search terms relevant to the field of invasive neuromodulation were used to identify the 50 most cited journal articles between 1900 and 2016. RESULTS:The median number of citations was 236 (range, 173-578). The most common topics among the articles were vagus nerve stimulation (n = 24), spinal cord stimulation (n = 9), and motor cortex stimulation (n = 6). Median journal impact factor was 5.57. Most of these articles (n = 19) contained level I, II, or III evidence. CONCLUSIONS:This analysis provides a brief look into the most cited articles within the field, many of which evaluated innovated procedures and therapies that helped to drive surgical neuromodulation forward. These landmark articles contain vital clinical and educational information that remains relevant to clinicians and students within the field and provide insight into areas of expanding research. Journal impact factor may play a significant role in determining the literary relevance and general awareness of invasive neuromodulation studies.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The objectives of this study are to utilize the MAUDE data base to enhance our understanding of the complication profile for Occipital Nerve Stimulation, a therapy for which the current level of evidence is limited. Additionally, it is our objective to describe a systematic approach to processing the MAUDE data, which addresses its flaws and enhances its utility. METHODS:From the FDA website, we accessed adverse events reports from the MAUDE data base for devices used in Occipital Nerve Stimulation between June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2017. All reports were sorted into an overall classification for types of adverse events, types of patient complaints, and types of specific device-related complications. We then evaluated for the total number of adverse event reports that contained each of the patient complains and device-related complications. RESULTS:A total of 1233 adverse event records were obtained. Eight hundred twenty-two records were classified as surgically manageable post-operative complications, 121 as device malfunction, 29 as patient compliance issues, and 27 as intra-operative complications. Two hundred thirty-seven records were not classified. A total of 683 records contained patient complaints including 467 complaints of ineffective stimulation, 122 complaints of inappropriate or over-stimulation, 50 complaints of device-shock, and 44 complaints of IPG site pain. We found 581 post-operative device-related complications, which included 206 instances of lead migration, 157 reports of lead erosion, 155 infections, 46 lead-fractures, and 17 lead disconnections. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The MAUDE data base is a useful tool to investigate device related complications and helps fill the current gap in ONS data. Reviewing the types and frequencies of complications reported over the years allows clinicians with less personal experience to have a more realistic expectation of complications and make informed decisions based on the patient's unique needs. Additionally, patient complaint data are useful in establishing more realistic expectations for patient outcomes.

Bibliometric analysis is a common method to determine the most influential articles in medical specialties, as it is an objective measure of peer recognition of scientific work. This study is the first bibliometric analysis of the literature in facial plastic surgery, to determine the most cited papers in the field. Bibliometric analysis was performed using the Science Citation Index from the Institute for Scientific Information, accessed through the Web of Science. Filter terms relevant to the field of facial plastic surgery were used to identify the 50 most cited journal articles between 1900 and 2016. The median number of citations was 150 (range 116-1091). The articles spanned a wide range of topics in the field, with the most common topics being free flap reconstruction (n = 10), nasal surgery (n = 9), and rhytidectomy (n = 6). The majority of these articles (n = 29) presented findings supported by level IV or V evidence. This analysis provides an overview of the most cited articles in facial plastic surgery, many of which introduced some of the most fundamental principles and techniques in the field. These landmark articles represent important educational points that should be reviewed by all clinicians and trainees in this field. Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Importance: Research in facial aging has focused on soft-tissue changes rather than bony changes despite evidence of the importance of underlying bony structural changes. Research has also been limited by comparing different patients in separate age groups rather than the same patients over time. Objective: To longitudinally document patterns of change in the facial skeleton and determine a consistent methodology for measuring these changes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Case series study of university hospital system records using facial computed tomographic (CT) images timed at least 8 years apart in adults initially aged 40 to 55 years with no history of facial surgery who required repeated facial imaging that included the entire midface and cranium. Main Outcomes and Measures: Face CTs were analyzed for 3-dimensional constructions and 2-dimensional measurements to document changes in glabellar, piriform, and maxillary angles and piriform height and width. Results: Fourteen patients (5 men, 9 women; mean [SD] age, 51.1 [5.8] years) with mean (SD) follow-up of 9.7 (1.4) years were eligible for 2-dimensional analysis, which revealed statistically significant decreases in mean (SD) glabellar angles (from 68.8 degrees [7.6 degrees ] to 66.5 degrees [8.6 degrees ]) and maxillary angles on both the right (from 82.5 degrees [6.3 degrees ] to 81.0 degrees [7.1 degrees ]) and left (from 83.0 degrees [5.8 degrees ] to 81.0 degrees [7.0 degrees ]), as well as increases in mean (SD) piriform width (from 24.5 [1.6] mm to 25.5 [1.3] mm). Nine patients (3 men, 6 women; mean [SD] age, 51.4 [6.3] years) with mean (SD) follow-up imaging at 9.6 (1.5) years were eligible for 3-dimensional analysis, which revealed statistically significant decreases in mean (SD) maxillary angles (from 56.5 degrees [6.6 degrees ] to 51.6 degrees [7.6 degrees ]) and piriform angles (from 50.8 degrees [3.4 degrees ] to 49.1 degrees [3.4 degrees ]). Statistically significant differences between the sexes were also noted: Initial mean (SD) glabellar angle for men was 61.7 degrees (5.7 degrees ) vs 72.7 degrees (5.4 degrees ) for women, with final values of 57.9 degrees (4.9 degrees ) vs 71.2 degrees (6.0 degrees ). Mean (SD) maxillary angle initial values were 87.8 degrees (6.1 degrees ) (right) and 87.1 degrees (4.9 degrees ) (left) for men, with 79.6 degrees (4.3 degrees ) and 80.6 degrees (5.0 degrees ) for women, respectively. Final values were 87.0 degrees (4.4 degrees ) and 86.9 degrees (4.1 degrees ) for men and 77.7 degrees (6.1 degrees ) and 77.7 degrees (6.2 degrees ) for women, respectively. Mean (SD) piriform height for men was 35.0 (2.0) mm initially and 35.5 (2.1) mm finally, vs 31.3 (2.8) and 31.6 (3.0) mm for women, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Our pilot study of repeated CT images of patients over several years supports previous studies of bony facial aging and further characterizes these changes. This study is the first, to our knowledge, to document bony changes of the face in the same group of patients at different time points to better characterize facial aging. We also detail an improved methodology to study bony aging to contribute to additional research in the field. Level of Evidence: NA.