Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To characterize factors associated with increased risk of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) complication. DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/UNASSIGNED:Four hospitals within NYU Langone Health (NYULH). PATIENTS/UNASSIGNED:All patients aged ≥18 years with OPAT episodes who were admitted to an acute-care facility at NYULH between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, who had an infectious diseases consultation during admission. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< .001). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Discharge to an SARC is strongly associated with increased risks of readmission for OPAT-related complications and CRBSI. Loss to follow-up with the infectious diseases service is strongly associated with increased risk of readmission and CRBSI. CRBSI prevention during SARC admission is a critically needed public health intervention. Further work must be done for patients undergoing OPAT to improve their follow-up retention with the infectious diseases service.

The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) be considered for all patients diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection (STI). Emergency departments (EDs) are an important site for diagnosis and treatment of STIs for under-served populations. Consequently, we identified 377 patients diagnosed with a bacterial sexually transmitted infection (gonorrhea, chlamydia, and/or syphilis) at a major New York City emergency department between 1/1/2014 and 7/30/2017 to examine associations between key sociodemographic characteristics and missed opportunities for PrEP provision. In this sample, 299 (79%) emergency department patients missed their medical follow-up 90 days after STI diagnosis, as recommended. Results from adjusted generalized estimating equation regression models indicate that patients >45 yo (aOR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-3.9) and those with a primary care provider in the hospital system (aOR = 6.8, 95% CI 3.8-12.0) were more likely to return for follow-up visits, whereas Black patients (aOR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.77) were less likely to return for follow-up visits. These findings indicate that lack of STI treatment follow-up visits are significantly missed opportunities for PrEP provision and comprehensive human immunodeficiency virus prevention care.

Reports conflict on how HIV infection influences the clinical course of COVID-19. The New York City (NYC) public hospital system provides care for over 14,000 people with HIV, was central in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, and is therefore in a unique position to evaluate the intersection of these concurrent infections. Retrospective chart review of patients presenting to NYC Health and Hospitals (NYC H+H) diagnosed with COVID-19 infection from March 1, 2020, through April 28, 2020, compared people living with HIV (PLWH) and a propensity-matched (PM) control group of patients without HIV to evaluate associations between HIV status and COVID-19 outcomes. Two hundred thirty-four PLWH presented for COVID-19 testing and 110 (47%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Among 17,413 patients with COVID-19 and without HIV, 1:n nearest neighbor propensity score matching identified 194 patients matched on age, sex, race, and any comorbidity. In the sample with COVID-19 (N = 304), PLWH (9.1%) had lower rates of mortality than controls [19.1%; PM odds ratio (PM-OR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.86]. Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients (N = 179), HIV infection was associated with lower rates of mechanical ventilation (PM-OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.84) and mortality (PM-OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0. 17-0.95). In the extended pandemic period through April 2021, aggregate data by HIV status suggested elevated hospitalization and mortality rates in PLWH versus people without HIV. These results suggest that the direct biological impacts of the HIV virus do not negatively influence COVID-19-related outcomes when controlling for comorbidity and demographic variables.

Background Despite increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with HIV, studies have shown suboptimal rates of statin prescription among qualifying patients. Our initial trainee needs assessment survey revealed a lack of comfort and modifiable barriers to prescribing statins to patients with CAD and HIV on anti-retroviral therapy (ART). We sought to create a tool to mitigate these barriers and improve comfort and self-reported practice in prescribing statins to this population. Methods A 1-page tool detailing statin-ART co-administration regimens, common drug interactions and potential side effects was created and introduced to 24 cardiology and 8 infectious disease fellows at NYU School of Medicine. Ten weeks later, a post-intervention survey was conducted to assess comfort, barriers, and self-reported practice when prescribing statins to patients with HIV. Data was de-identified by a 3^rd party. Results were excluded for lack of consent for study participation and incomplete and/or duplicate survey responses. Results Of the included 11 cardiology and 6 infectious disease fellows, 53% report using the tool in clinical decision making over 10 weeks. Of these, 78% report the tool increased comfort initiating and/or adjusting statin therapy and 89% report the tool increased overall comfort managing statins in patients with HIV. In our prior needs assessment survey, the majority of fellows cited one or more barriers to prescribing statins to patients with HIV and a minority reported always considering HIV status when deciding to initiate statin therapy. After introduction of the tool, however, over half of fellows report no barriers to prescribing statins to this population and 100% report they will now always consider HIV status when deciding to initiate statin therapy. Ultimately, 65% of fellows plan to use the 1-page tool in the future and 82% recommend that it be provided to future trainees. Conclusion Introduction and use of our 1-page tool improved trainee comfort, reduced known barriers, and improved self-reported practice when prescribing statins to patients with HIV. Integration of such a tool into the curriculum can improve trainee education in caring for a vulnerable population.
Copyright

Background. Despite the high efficacy of PrEP, it continues to be underutilized. We examined the extent to which patients with a documented positive test for STIs were provided PrEP at an urban municipal medical center. Methods. We reviewed data of all patients seen between January 1, 2014 and July 30, 2017 who were > 18 years old and had an initial HIV negative test and >=1 positive test for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, or Syphilis. We examined PrEP prescription data by gender, race/ethnicity, and clinic location. Differences between groups were compared using Chi-squared analysis and logistic regression. Results. Of 1,142 initially HIV- patients who were identified as having a positive STI result, 52% were female, 89% either Black or Hispanic, with a median age of 40 years (quartiles 30, 47). 58% had Medicare/Medicaid and 34% were self-pay or uninsured (Table 1). Only 25 (2.1%) of 1,142 patients who had >=1 STI test positive were prescribed PrEP. No women received PrEP. Whites (aOR: 21.7 [95% CI:4.4, 107, P < 0.001] and Hispanics (aOR:6.64 [95% CI:1.35, 32.8, P = 0.02] were both more likely to receive PrEP than Blacks, after adjusting for age, sex, marital status, and insurance. All PrEP prescriptions originated from the Medicine, Emergency, or HIV specialty clinics although most STI testing was obtained in Emergency and Obstetrical/Gynecological clinics (Table 2). Conclusion. There were significant missed opportunities for HIV prevention among patients with STIs within the medical center, particularly among Hispanic and Black patients. Enrichment programs to educate providers and increase PrEP prescriptions may have a major impact on expanding HIV prevention, especially for women. (Figure Presented)