Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION: As the healthcare landscape evolves, hospital administrators are requiring healthcare providers, including anesthesiologists, to be more efficient and cost-effective. Currently, no national benchmark exists for intraoperative anesthesia induction and preparation times. Without an existing standard, healthcare administrators may have unrealistic expectations as to what the average "anesthesia induction time" should be. To help establish a baseline, we have provided the average "anesthesia induction" times for 40,120 out of 52,349 cases performed in our institution based upon the number of anesthetic procedures/interventions performed to prepare a patient for surgery. METHODS: With IRB approval, a retrospective analysis of 52,349 cases was performed from our electronic medical record in a 15-month period. 12,247 anesthetic interventions were excluded for incomplete documentation of data points or for extreme outliers in the data set, considered being five standard deviations away from mean. The average time from "wheels into the operating room" to "ready for surgical preparation and positioning" of 40,102 cases were recorded based upon the number of anesthetic procedures/ interventions performed. RESULTS: CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal the average intraoperative anesthesia ready time based on the number of anesthetic procedures/ interventions performed in an academic medical center. This data may help administrators and anesthesiology departments create realistic models toward perioperative efficiency. Further analysis of the data is needed to differentiate the average anesthesia ready time of cases based on staffing (attending alone versus with house staff or nurse anesthetist). (Figure Presented)

BACKGROUND: Recent studies described an increase in acute kidney injury when high dose gentamicin was included in perioperative prophylaxis for orthopedic surgeries. To this effect, we compared the rate of nephrotoxicity for selected orthopedic surgeries where gentamicin was included (Gentamicin Group) to those where it was not included (Control Group) for perioperative prophylaxis and evaluated risk factors for nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Spine, hip and knee surgeries performed between April 2011 and December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Gentamicin was given to eligible patients based on age, weight and Creatinine Clearance. Nephrotoxicity was assessed using Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria. RESULTS: Among selected surgeries (N = 1590 in Gentamicin Group: hip = 926, spine = 600, knee = 64; N = 2587 in CONTROL GROUP: hip = 980, spine = 902, knee = 705), patients' body weight, serum creatinine, comorbidities and surgery duration were similar in Gentamicin Group and CONTROL GROUP. Gentamicin median dose was 4.5 mg/kg of dosing weight. Nephrotoxicity rate was 2.5% in Gentamicin Group and 1.8% in CONTROL GROUP, p = 0.17. Most cases of nephrotoxicity were Risk category by RIFLE criteria (67% in Gentamicin Group and 72% in CONTROL GROUP, p = 0.49). In logistic regression, risk factors for nephrotoxicity were hospital stay >1 day prior to surgery (odds ratio = 8.1; 95% confidence interval = 2.25-28.97, p = 0.001), knee or hip surgery (odds ratio = 4.7; 95% confidence interval = 2.9-9.48, p = 0.0005) and diabetes (odds ratio = 1.95; 95% confidence interval = 1.13-3.35, p = 0.016). Receipt of gentamicin was not an independent predictor of nephrotoxicity (odds ratio = 1.5; 95% confidence interval = 0.97-2.35, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, rate of nephrotoxicity was similar between Gentamicin Group and Control Group. Single high dose gentamicin is a safe and acceptable option for perioperative prophylaxis in eligible patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries.

Hemostasis is a major concern during the perioperative period. Changes in platelet aggregation and coagulation factors may contribute to the delicate balance between thrombosis and bleeding. We sought to better understand perioperative hemostasis by investigating the changes in platelet aggregation and coagulation factors during the perioperative period. We performed a prospective cohort analysis of 70 subjects undergoing non-emergent orthopedic surgery of the knee (n = 28), hip (n = 35), or spine (n = 7) between August 2011 and November 2011. Plasma was collected preoperatively (T1), 1-h intraoperatively (T2), 1-h (T3), 24-h (T4) and 48-h (T5) postoperatively. Platelet function testing was performed using whole blood impedance aggregometry. Coagulation assays were performed for factor VII, factor VIII, von Willebrand Factor (vWF), and fibrinogen. Of the 70 patients, mean age was 64.1 +/- 9.8 years, 61 % were female, and 74 % were Caucasian. Platelet activity decreased until 1 h postoperatively and then significantly increased above baseline at 24- and 48-h postoperatively. Compared to baseline, coagulation factors decreased intraoperatively. Factor VII activity continued to decrease, while FVIII, vWF, and fibrinogen all increased above baseline postoperatively. The results of our study indicate significant changes in platelet activity and coagulation factors during the perioperative period. Both platelet activity and markers of coagulation decrease during the intraoperative period and then some increase postoperatively. These changes may contribute to the hypercoagulabity and/or bleeding risk that occurs in the perioperative period. Future prospective studies aimed at correlating hemostatic changes with perioperative outcomes are warranted.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus colonization before surgery reduces risk of surgical site infection (SSI). The regimen of nasal mupirocin ointment and topical chlorhexidine gluconate is effective, but cost and patient compliance may be a barrier. Nasal povidone-iodine solution may provide an alternative to mupirocin. METHODS: We conducted an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomized trial comparing SSI after arthroplasty or spine fusion in patients receiving topical chlorhexidine wipes in combination with either twice daily application of nasal mupirocin ointment during the 5 days before surgery or 2 applications of povidone-iodine solution into each nostril within 2 hours of surgical incision. The primary study end point was deep SSI within the 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: In the modified intent-to-treat analysis, a deep SSI developed after 14 of 855 surgical procedures in the mupirocin group and 6 of 842 surgical procedures in the povidone-iodine group (P = .1); S. aureus deep SSI developed after 5 surgical procedures in the mupirocin group and 1 surgical procedure in the povidone-iodine group (P = .2). In the per protocol analysis, S. aureus deep SSI developed in 5 of 763 surgical procedures in the mupirocin group and 0 of 776 surgical procedures in the povidone-iodine group (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal povidone-iodine may be considered as an alternative to mupirocin in a multifaceted approach to reduce SSI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01313182.

Led by the federal government, the payers of health care are enacting policies designed to base provider reimbursement on the quality of care they render. This study evaluated and compared patient experiences and satisfaction with nasal decolonization with either nasal povidone-iodine (PI) or nasal mupirocin ointment (MO). A total of 1903 patients were randomized to undergo preoperative nasal decolonization with either nasal MO or PI solution. All randomized patients were also given 2% chlorhexidine gluconate topical wipes. Patients were interviewed prior to discharge to assess adverse events and patient experience with their assigned preoperative antiseptic protocol. Of the 1903 randomized patients, 1679 (88.1%) were interviewed prior to discharge. Of patients receiving PI, 3.4% reported an unpleasant or very unpleasant experience, compared with 38.8% of those using nasal MO (P<.0001). Sixty-seven percent of patients using nasal MO believed it to be somewhat or very helpful in reducing surgical site infections, compared with 71% of patients receiving PI (P>.05). Being recruited as an active participant in surgical site infection prevention was a positive experience for 87.2% of MO patients and 86.3% of PI patients (P=.652). Those assigned to receive PI solution preoperatively reported significantly fewer adverse events than the nasal MO group (P<.01). Preoperative nasal decolonization with either nasal PI or MO was considered somewhat or very helpful by more than two-thirds of patients.

BACKGROUND:: Neuraxial local anesthetics may have neurological complications thought to be due to neurotoxicity. A primary site of action of local anesthetics is the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neuron. Physiologic differences have been noted between young and adult DRG neurons; hence, the authors examined whether there were any differences in lidocaine-induced changes in calcium and lidocaine toxicity in neonatal and adult rat DRG neurons. METHODS:: DRG neurons were cultured from postnatal day 7 (P7) and adult rats. Lidocaine-induced changes in cytosolic calcium were examined with the calcium indicator Fluo-4. Cells were incubated with varying concentrations of lidocaine and examined for viability using calcein AM and ethidium homodimer-1 staining. Live imaging of caspase-3/7 activation was performed after incubation with lidocaine. RESULTS:: The mean KCl-induced calcium transient was greater in P7 neurons (P < 0.05), and lidocaine significantly inhibited KCl-induced calcium responses in both ages (P<0.05). Frequency distribution histograms of KCl-evoked calcium increases were more heterogeneous in P7 than in adult neurons. With lidocaine, KCl-induced calcium transients in both ages became more homogeneous but remained different between the groups. Interestingly, cell viability was decreased by lidocaine in a dose-dependent manner similarly in both ages. Lidocaine treatment also activated caspase-3/7 in a dose- and time-dependent manner similarly in both ages. CONCLUSIONS:: Despite physiological differences in P7 and adult DRG neurons, lidocaine cytotoxicity is similar in P7 and adult DRG neurons in vitro. Differences in lidocaine- and KCl-evoked calcium responses suggest the similarity in lidocaine cytotoxicity involves other actions in addition to lidocaine-evoked effects on cytosolic calcium responses.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine functional outcomes following ORIF of displaced proxi- mal humerus fractures in patients who received brachial plexus blocks compared to those who underwent general anesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively col- lected data on 92 patients. Patients were grouped according to anesthesia type: regional interscalene brachial plexus block, with or without general anesthesia, or general anes- thesia alone. Patients were asked to complete the Disabili- ties of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and range of motion assessments at a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Plain radiographic films were obtained to assess fracture healing. RESULTS: Forty-five (48.9%) patients with 45 proximal humerus fractures received a regional anesthetic, while 47 (51.1%) patients with 48 proximal humerus fractures had general anesthesia. No significant differences existed in demographic information or fracture type. DASH scores at the most recent follow-up were significantly better in the regional block group (38.6) compared to the general anes- thesia group (53.1) (p = 0.003). The regional block group had significantly better passive and active forward elevation and external rotation range and equivalent internal rotation (p = 0.002, 0.005, 0.002, and 0.507, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients who received regional anesthetic via a brachial plexus interscalene blocks had better functional outcomes and range of motion at the most recent clinical follow-up. Regional anesthesia provides patients with pro- longed postoperative pain relief, which may allow for early mobilization, increasing the likelihood that the patient's function and range of motion will return to baseline.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic and bleeding complications are major concerns during orthopedic surgery. Given the frequency of orthopedic surgical procedures and the limited data in the literature, we sought to investigate the incidence and risk factors for thrombotic (myocardial necrosis and infarction) and bleeding events in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,082 consecutive subjects >/=21 years of age undergoing hip, knee, or spine surgery between November 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009. Patient characteristics were ascertained using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis coding and retrospective review of medical records, and laboratory/blood bank databases. In-hospital outcomes included myocardial necrosis (elevated troponin), major bleeding, coded myocardial infarction, and coded hemorrhage as defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, coding. Of the 3,082 subjects, mean age was 60.8 +/- 13.3 years, and 59% were female. Myocardial necrosis, coded myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and coded hemorrhage occurred in 179 (5.8%), 20 (0.7%), 165 (5.4%), and 26 (0.8%) subjects, respectively. Increasing age (P < .001), coronary artery disease (P < .001), cancer (P = .004), and chronic kidney disease (P = .01) were independent predictors of myocardial necrosis, whereas procedure type (P < .001), cancer (P < .001), female sex (P < .001), coronary artery disease (P < .001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .01) were independent predictors of major bleeding. CONCLUSION: There is a delicate balance between thrombotic and bleeding events in the perioperative period after orthopedic surgery. Perioperative risk of both thrombosis and bleeding deserves careful attention in preoperative evaluation, and future prospective studies aimed at attenuating this risk are warranted.

OBJECTIVE:: To compare the efficacy of anesthetic type on clinical outcomes after operative treatment of distal radius fractures. DESIGN:: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING:: Academic medical center. PATIENTS:: One hundred eighty-seven patients with a distal radius fracture (OTA type 23) were identified within a registry of 600 patients. INTERVENTION:: Patients with operative distal radius fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a volarly applied plate and screws under regional or general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: Clinical, radiographic, and patient-based functional outcomes were recorded at routine postoperative intervals. Complications were recorded. RESULTS:: One hundred eighty-seven patients met inclusion criteria and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. There were no differences between the groups with regard to patient demographics or fracture types treated. At both 3 and 6 months post surgery, pain was diminished among those patients who received a regional block. Wrist and finger range of motion for patients who received regional versus general anesthesia was improved at all follow-up points. Patients who received regional anesthesia also had higher functional scores as measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand at 3 months (P = 0.04) and 6 months (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION:: Patients who are candidates should be offered regional anesthesia when undergoing repair of a displaced distal radius fracture.