Faculty Bibliography

Background: The ASCCP management guidelines recommend that women with an unsatisfactory Pap test (UPT) and negative HPV co-test undergo repeat age-based screening in 2 to 4 months. The rationale is that a negative HPV test in the setting of an UPT may reflect an inadequate sample and therefore should not be interpreted as truly ?negative?. For patients 25 years and older who are co-tested, if HPV is positive for the 16 or 18 genotypes, direct referral for colposcopy is recommended. Our study aimed to determine if a negative HPV co-test result is predictive of the absence of a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL) and whether these patients may be called back for repeat testing at an interval longer than 2-4 months.
Design(s): Follow up cervical cytology and biopsy results in women with UPT and HPV co-tests between 2017-2019 were collected. Original UPT and HPV co-test results were correlated with follow up Pap and biopsy results.
Result(s): There were 708 UPT cases out of 30,647 total Pap tests (2.3%). Among the 708 UPT cases, 407 had HPV co-testing (57%); 260 (37%) were followed by repeat Pap or biopsy within 2-4 months and 317 (45%) within 12 months. The total follow-up rate was 81%, with a range of 10 days to 18 months. Table 1 depicts follow up information for women with UPT and HPV co-testing. Negative predict values of HPV co-testing for LGSIL and HGSIL detection were 98% and 100%, respectively, while positive predictive values were 43% and 4.7%.
Conclusion(s): A negative HPV co-test in women with an UPT predicted the lack of HGSIL in our study. Compliance with the recommended follow up time of 2-4 months for women with UPT was low at 37%. This may be due to multiple factors, one presumably being the women's reluctance to undergo a repeat pelvic exam due to its uncomfortable nature. Even with a longer follow up time of up to 12 months, there were no HGSILs in the HPV negative group. Our study suggests that women with an UPT and a negative HPV co-test may be safely called back at an interval longer than 2-4 months

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound has become the initial approach to evaluating thyroid nodules, facilitating the distinction between benign and malignant nodules based on composition, echogenicity, nodule border or margin, shape, the presence of calcifications, and nodule dimensions. The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommended the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) as a classification system to standardize thyroid ultrasound reports and to predict the probability of malignancy in thyroid nodules using a scoring system (TR1-TR5) based on multiple ultrasound characteristics and nodule size. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is recommended as the next step for nodules that warrant further workup. The authors assessed the accuracy of the ACR TI-RADS based on the corresponding FNA cytology results (Bethesda system diagnoses I-VI). METHODS:ACR TI-RADS ultrasound reports and corresponding FNA cytology diagnoses from January 1, 2018 to August 30, 2018 were evaluated. RESULTS:From January 1, 2018 to August 30, 2018, 2306 thyroid ultrasound-guided FNAs were performed at our institution. Of 2306 cases, 361 had ACR TI-RADS reports available. The majority of FNAs were TR4 (180; 49.9%) or TR3 (108; 29.9%). No TR2 or TR3 nodules were associated with Bethesda category V or VI diagnoses. The majority of TR4 nodules (142 of 180; 78.9%) and TR5 nodules (42 of 65; 64.6%) exhibited benign (Bethesda category II) cytology. Fourteen TR5 cases (21.5%) had malignant (Bethesda category VI) cytology. CONCLUSIONS:Although there were no TR2 or TR3 malignant (Bethesda category VI) diagnoses, and there were only a few malignancies in the TR4 and TR5 categories, the current results reassert the notion that the ACR TI-RADS scoring system shows at least some correlation between benign or malignant cytology diagnoses, as illustrated by the greater number of malignant cases in the higher ACR TI-RADS categories.

Introduction: The Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) was designed to standardize risk stratification of thyroid nodules by ultrasonographic criteria and categorize nodules as TR1-TR5 to designate nodules for fine needle aspiration (FNA) or surveillance. Thyroid FNAs are classified according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) (categories TBS I-VI) with an associated risk of malignancy and management guideline. We utilize Thyroseq-V3 molecular testing for indeterminate cytology cases (TBS III- V). Our aim was to correlate indeterminate thyroid FNAs with TI-RADS scores and molecular results to determine if TI-RADS is accurately identifying nodules for biopsy.
Material(s) and Method(s): A retrospective review of thyroid nodules from 1/1/2018-8/30/2018 was performed. Patients with ultrasound (US) reports including TI-RADS scores, FNA reports with indeterminate cytology (TBS-III, TBS-IV and TBS-V) and molecular testing were included.
Result(s): 370 of 1000 thyroid nodules had US reports with TI-RADS scoring and concurrent cytology. 47 cases had indeterminate cytology (TBS-III n=37, TBS-IV n=7 and TBS-V n=3) and reflex molecular testing. Majority were TR4 (31/47;65.97%) and TR5 (10/47;21.27%) (Table1). 23/47 (48.94%) showed no alteration. NRAS was the most common alteration (8 cases), followed by Copy Number Alterations (CNA) (6 cases) (Figure 1). Three TBS-III cases showed dual alterations (NRAS/CNA x2 and HRAS/CNA). Two TBS-IV cases had multiple alterations (EIF1AX/NRAS/TP53 and NRAS/PTEN).
Conclusion(s): While majority of thyroid nodules had a high TI-RADS score (TR4 or TR5), most cases fell into the atypical category (TBS III). Almost half of the thyroid nodules lacked any molecular alterations thereby suggesting an over-classification by TI-RADS. Further refinement of the TI-RADS criteria may be warranted. [Figure presented] [Figure presented]
Copyright

Introduction: TBS diagnostic category rates, ASCUS/(+)hrHPV (high risk HPV) ratio, and cytotechnologist's (CT'S) concordance with the CP's final diagnosis are used as common quality monitors in gyn cytology. Additionally, extending monitoring of the hrHPV (+) rate to NILM and SIL cases has been proposed as quality indicators for cytopathologist's (CP's) performance. At our institution, Pap tests are finalized without the knowledge of hrHPV status. We investigated the impact of known hrHPV status on CPs' interpretation of cases previously screened as NILM, and stipulated its potential consequence on quality metrics. Material(s) and Method(s): 60 Pap tests previously resulted as NILM, half hrHPV (+) and half hrHPV (-), were reviewed blindly by 5 CPs in two rounds at 4 months interval. At first round, correct hrHPV results were provided to the CPs. At second round, incorrect (reversed) hrHPV results were given. McNemar chi-squared test was used to analyze the impact of knowing the hrHPV test result on Pap test interpretation. Kappa coefficient was calculated to test intra-observer agreement between the first and second review of the same slides for each CP. Result(s): ASCUS (13%) was the most upgraded diagnosis followed by 12 LSILs (2%) and 2 HSILs (0.3%). There were no significant differences in Pap test interpretation based on hrHPV status for 3 CPs and marked differences for 2 CPs (Table 1). Intra-observer agreement between round 1 and round 2 diagnoses varied from moderate to poor (Table 2). Conclusion(s): Knowledge of hrHPV status significantly biases some but not all CPs. hrHPV (+) to NILM, ASCUS and SIL ratios may not be the most objective parameters for evaluation of CP performance under these circumstances. This bias has further implications for CT performance evaluation because it impacts CT discordance rate measured against CPs final diagnosis. [Figure presented] [Figure presented]

OBJECT/OBJECTIVE:Despite the recognition of racial or ethnic differences in preterm gestation, such differences in the rate of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), frequently associated with preterm gestation, are not well studied. The authors performed the current study to identify racial or ethnic differences in the incidence of IVH-related mortality within the national population of the US. METHODS:Using the ICD-10 codes P52.0, P52.1, P52.2, P52.3, and P10.2 and the Multiple Cause of Death data from 2000 to 2009, the authors identified all IVH-related mortalities that occurred in neonates and infants aged less than 1 year. The live births for whites and African Americans from the census for 2000-2009 were used to derive the incidence of IVH-related mortality for whites and African Americans per 100,000 live births. The IVH rate ratio (RR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) and annual percent change (APC) in the incidence rates from 2000 to 2009 were also calculated. RESULTS:A total of 3249 IVH-related mortality cases were reported from 2000 to 2009. The incidence rates of IVH were higher among African American infants (16 per 100,000 live births) than among whites (7.8 per 100,000 live births). African American infants had a 2-fold higher risk of IVH-related mortality compared with whites (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2). The rate of increase over the last 10 years was less in African American infants (APC 1.6%) than in white infants (APC 4.3%). CONCLUSIONS:The rate of IVH-related mortality is 2-fold higher among African American than white neonates and infants. Further studies are required to understand the underlying reasons for this prominent disparity in one of the most significant causes of infant mortality.