Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:shermo01

Total Results:

95


Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study

Magnussen, Robert A; Borchers, James R; Pedroza, Angela D; Huston, Laura J; Haas, Amanda K; Spindler, Kurt P; Wright, Rick W; Kaeding, Christopher C; Allen, Christina R; Anderson, Allen F; Cooper, Daniel E; DeBerardino, Thomas M; Dunn, Warren R; Lantz, Brett A; Mann, Barton; Stuart, Michael J; Albright, John P; Amendola, Annunziato; Andrish, Jack T; Annunziata, Christopher C; Arciero, Robert A; Bach, Bernard R; Baker, Champ L; Bartolozzi, Arthur R; Baumgarten, Keith M; Bechler, Jeffery R; Berg, Jeffrey H; Bernas, Geoffrey A; Brockmeier, Stephen F; Brophy, Robert H; Bush-Joseph, Charles A; Butler, J Brad; Campbell, John D; Carey, James L; Carpenter, James E; Cole, Brian J; Cooper, Jonathan M; Cox, Charles L; Creighton, R Alexander; Dahm, Diane L; David, Tal S; Flanigan, David C; Frederick, Robert W; Ganley, Theodore J; Garofoli, Elizabeth A; Gatt, Charles J; Gecha, Steven R; Giffin, James Robert; Hame, Sharon L; Hannafin, Jo A; Harner, Christopher D; Harris, Norman Lindsay; Hechtman, Keith S; Hershman, Elliott B; Hoellrich, Rudolf G; Hosea, Timothy M; Johnson, David C; Johnson, Timothy S; Jones, Morgan H; Kamath, Ganesh V; Klootwyk, Thomas E; Levy, Bruce A; Ma, C Benjamin; Maiers, G Peter; Marx, Robert G; Matava, Matthew J; Mathien, Gregory M; McAllister, David R; McCarty, Eric C; McCormack, Robert G; Miller, Bruce S; Nissen, Carl W; O'Neill, Daniel F; Owens, Brett D; Parker, Richard D; Purnell, Mark L; Ramappa, Arun J; Rauh, Michael A; Rettig, Arthur C; Sekiya, Jon K; Shea, Kevin G; Sherman, Orrin H; Slauterbeck, James R; Smith, Matthew V; Spang, Jeffrey T; Svoboda, Steven J; Taft, Timothy N; Tenuta, Joachim J; Tingstad, Edwin M; Vidal, Armando F; Viskontas, Darius G; White, Richard A; Williams, James S; Wolcott, Michelle L; Wolf, Brian R; York, James J
BACKGROUND:Articular cartilage health is an important issue following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and primary ACL reconstruction. Factors present at the time of primary ACL reconstruction may influence the subsequent progression of articular cartilage damage. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE:Larger meniscus resection at primary ACL reconstruction, increased patient age, and increased body mass index (BMI) are associated with increased odds of worsened articular cartilage damage at the time of revision ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS:Subjects who had primary and revision data in the databases of the Multicenter Orthopaedics Outcomes Network (MOON) and Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) were included. Reviewed data included chondral surface status at the time of primary and revision surgery, meniscus status at the time of primary reconstruction, primary reconstruction graft type, time from primary to revision ACL surgery, as well as demographics and Marx activity score at the time of revision. Significant progression of articular cartilage damage was defined in each compartment according to progression on the modified Outerbridge scale (increase ≥1 grade) or >25% enlargement in any area of damage. Logistic regression identified predictors of significant chondral surface change in each compartment from primary to revision surgery. RESULTS:A total of 134 patients were included, with a median age of 19.5 years at revision surgery. Progression of articular cartilage damage was noted in 34 patients (25.4%) in the lateral compartment, 32 (23.9%) in the medial compartment, and 31 (23.1%) in the patellofemoral compartment. For the lateral compartment, patients who had >33% of the lateral meniscus excised at primary reconstruction had 16.9-times greater odds of progression of articular cartilage injury than those with an intact lateral meniscus ( P < .001). For the medial compartment, patients who had <33% of the medial meniscus excised at the time of the primary reconstruction had 4.8-times greater odds of progression of articular cartilage injury than those with an intact medial meniscus ( P = .02). Odds of significant chondral surface change increased by 5% in the lateral compartment and 6% in the medial compartment for each increased year of age ( P ≤ .02). For the patellofemoral compartment, the use of allograft in primary reconstruction was associated with a 15-fold increased odds of progression of articular cartilage damage relative to a patellar tendon autograft ( P < .001). Each 1-unit increase in BMI at the time of revision surgery was associated with a 10% increase in the odds of progression of articular cartilage damage ( P = .046) in the patellofemoral compartment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Excision of the medial and lateral meniscus at primary ACL reconstruction increases the odds of articular cartilage damage in the corresponding compartment at the time of revision ACL reconstruction. Increased age is a risk factor for deterioration of articular cartilage in both tibiofemoral compartments, while increased BMI and the use of allograft for primary ACL reconstruction are associated with an increased risk of progression in the patellofemoral compartment.
PMID: 29244532
ISSN: 1552-3365
CID: 3049512

Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Allen, Christina R; Anderson, Allen F; Cooper, Daniel E; DeBerardino, Thomas M; Dunn, Warren R; Haas, Amanda K; Huston, Laura J; Lantz, Brett Brick A; Mann, Barton; Nwosu, Sam K; Spindler, Kurt P; Stuart, Michael J; Wright, Rick W; Albright, John P; Amendola, Annunziato Ned; Andrish, Jack T; Annunziata, Christopher C; Arciero, Robert A; Bach, Bernard R Jr; Baker, Champ L 3rd; Bartolozzi, Arthur R; Baumgarten, Keith M; Bechler, Jeffery R; Berg, Jeffrey H; Bernas, Geoffrey A; Brockmeier, Stephen F; Brophy, Robert H; Bush-Joseph, Charles A; Butler, J Brad 5th; Campbell, John D; Carey, James L; Carpenter, James E; Cole, Brian J; Cooper, Jonathan M; Cox, Charles L; Creighton, R Alexander; Dahm, Diane L; David, Tal S; Flanigan, David C; Frederick, Robert W; Ganley, Theodore J; Garofoli, Elizabeth A; Gatt, Charles J Jr; Gecha, Steven R; Giffin, James Robert; Hame, Sharon L; Hannafin, Jo A; Harner, Christopher D; Harris, Norman Lindsay Jr; Hechtman, Keith S; Hershman, Elliott B; Hoellrich, Rudolf G; Hosea, Timothy M; Johnson, David C; Johnson, Timothy S; Jones, Morgan H; Kaeding, Christopher C; Kamath, Ganesh V; Klootwyk, Thomas E; Levy, Bruce A; Ma, C Benjamin; Maiers, G Peter 2nd; Marx, Robert G; Matava, Matthew J; Mathien, Gregory M; McAllister, David R; McCarty, Eric C; McCormack, Robert G; Miller, Bruce S; Nissen, Carl W; O'Neill, Daniel F; Owens, Brett D; Parker, Richard D; Purnell, Mark L; Ramappa, Arun J; Rauh, Michael A; Rettig, Arthur C; Sekiya, Jon K; Shea, Kevin G; Sherman, Orrin H; Slauterbeck, James R; Smith, Matthew V; Spang, Jeffrey T; Svoboda, Steven J; Taft, Timothy N; Tenuta, Joachim J; Tingstad, Edwin M; Vidal, Armando F; Viskontas, Darius G; White, Richard A; Williams, James S Jr; Wolcott, Michelle L; Wolf, Brian R; York, James J
BACKGROUND: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes compared with primary ACL reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: Certain factors under the control of the surgeon at the time of revision surgery can both negatively and positively affect outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collected included baseline demographics, intraoperative surgical technique and joint disorders, and a series of validated patient-reported outcome instruments (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], and Marx activity rating scale) completed before surgery. Patients were followed up for 2 years and asked to complete an identical set of outcome instruments. Regression analysis was used to control for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), activity level, baseline outcome scores, revision number, time since last ACL reconstruction, and a variety of previous and current surgical variables to assess the surgical risk factors for clinical outcomes 2 years after revision ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 1205 patients (697 male [58%]) met the inclusion criteria and were successfully enrolled. The median age was 26 years, and the median time since their last ACL reconstruction was 3.4 years. Two-year follow-up was obtained on 82% (989/1205). Both previous and current surgical factors were found to be significant contributors toward poorer clinical outcomes at 2 years. Having undergone previous arthrotomy (nonarthroscopic open approach) for ACL reconstruction compared with the 1-incision technique resulted in significantly poorer outcomes for the 2-year IKDC ( P = .037; odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.05-5.88) and KOOS pain, sports/recreation, and quality of life (QOL) subscales ( P
PMCID:5675127
PMID: 28696164
ISSN: 1552-3365
CID: 2702562

Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort

Ding, David Y; Zhang, Alan L; Allen, Christina R; Anderson, Allen F; Cooper, Daniel E; DeBerardino, Thomas M; Dunn, Warren R; Haas, Amanda K; Huston, Laura J; Lantz, Brett Brick A; Mann, Barton; Spindler, Kurt P; Stuart, Michael J; Wright, Rick W; Albright, John P; Amendola, Annunziato Ned; Andrish, Jack T; Annunziata, Christopher C; Arciero, Robert A; Bach, Bernard R; Baker, Champ L; Bartolozzi, Arthur R; Baumgarten, Keith M; Bechler, Jeffery R; Berg, Jeffrey H; Bernas, Geoffrey A; Brockmeier, Stephen F; Brophy, Robert H; Bush-Joseph, Charles A; Butler, J Brad; Campbell, John D; Carey, James L; Carpenter, James E; Cole, Brian J; Cooper, Jonathan M; Cox, Charles L; Creighton, R Alexander; Dahm, Diane L; David, Tal S; Flanigan, David C; Frederick, Robert W; Ganley, Theodore J; Garofoli, Elizabeth A; Gatt, Charles J; Gecha, Steven R; Giffin, James Robert; Hame, Sharon L; Hannafin, Jo A; Harner, Christopher D; Harris, Norman Lindsay; Hechtman, Keith S; Hershman, Elliott B; Hoellrich, Rudolf G; Hosea, Timothy M; Johnson, David C; Johnson, Timothy S; Jones, Morgan H; Kaeding, Christopher C; Kamath, Ganesh V; Klootwyk, Thomas E; Levy, Bruce A; Ma, C Benjamin; Maiers, G Peter; Marx, Robert G; Matava, Matthew J; Mathien, Gregory M; McAllister, David R; McCarty, Eric C; McCormack, Robert G; Miller, Bruce S; Nissen, Carl W; O'Neill, Daniel F; Owens, Brett D; Parker, Richard D; Purnell, Mark L; Ramappa, Arun J; Rauh, Michael A; Rettig, Arthur C; Sekiya, Jon K; Shea, Kevin G; Sherman, Orrin H; Slauterbeck, James R; Smith, Matthew V; Spang, Jeffrey T; Svoboda, Steven J; Taft, Timothy N; Tenuta, Joachim J; Tingstad, Edwin M; Vidal, Armando F; Viskontas, Darius G; White, Richard A; Williams, James S; Wolcott, Michelle L; Wolf, Brian R; York, James J
BACKGROUND:While revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be performed to restore knee stability and improve patient activity levels, outcomes after this surgery are reported to be inferior to those after primary ACLR. Further reoperations after revision ACLR can have an even more profound effect on patient satisfaction and outcomes. However, there is a current lack of information regarding the rate and risk factors for subsequent surgery after revision ACLR. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To report the rate of reoperations, procedures performed, and risk factors for a reoperation 2 years after revision ACLR. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS:A total of 1205 patients who underwent revision ACLR were enrolled in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) between 2006 and 2011, composing the prospective cohort. Two-year questionnaire follow-up was obtained for 989 patients (82%), while telephone follow-up was obtained for 1112 patients (92%). If a patient reported having undergone subsequent surgery, operative reports detailing the subsequent procedure(s) were obtained and categorized. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for a reoperation. RESULTS:Of the 1112 patients included in the analysis, 122 patients (11%) underwent a total of 172 subsequent procedures on the ipsilateral knee at 2-year follow-up. Of the reoperations, 27% were meniscal procedures (69% meniscectomy, 26% repair), 19% were subsequent revision ACLR, 17% were cartilage procedures (61% chondroplasty, 17% microfracture, 13% mosaicplasty), 11% were hardware removal, and 9% were procedures for arthrofibrosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients aged <20 years had twice the odds of patients aged 20 to 29 years to undergo a reoperation. The use of an allograft at the time of revision ACLR (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; P = .007) was a significant predictor for reoperations at 2 years, while staged revision (bone grafting of tunnels before revision ACLR) (OR, 1.93; P = .052) did not reach significance. Patients with grade 4 cartilage damage seen during revision ACLR were 78% less likely to undergo subsequent operations within 2 years. Sex, body mass index, smoking history, Marx activity score, technique for femoral tunnel placement, and meniscal tearing or meniscal treatment at the time of revision ACLR showed no significant effect on the reoperation rate. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There was a significant reoperation rate after revision ACLR at 2 years (11%), with meniscal procedures most commonly involved. Independent risk factors for subsequent surgery on the ipsilateral knee included age <20 years and the use of allograft tissue at the time of revision ACLR.
PMCID:5513777
PMID: 28557557
ISSN: 1552-3365
CID: 3568522

Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Arno, Sally; Bell, Christopher P; Alaia, Michael J; Singh, Brian C; Jazrawi, Laith M; Walker, Peter S; Bansal, Ankit; Garofolo, Garret; Sherman, Orrin H
BACKGROUND: Considerable debate remains over which anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique can best restore knee stability. Traditionally, femoral tunnel drilling has been done through a previously drilled tibial tunnel; however, potential nonanatomic tunnel placement can produce a vertical graft, which although it would restore sagittal stability, it would not control rotational stability. To address this, some suggest that the femoral tunnel be created independently of the tibial tunnel through the use of an anteromedial (AM) portal, but whether this results in a more anatomic footprint or in stability comparable to that of the intact contralateral knee still remains controversial. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does the AM technique achieve footprints closer to anatomic than the transtibial (TT) technique? (2) Does the AM technique result in stability equivalent to that of the intact contralateral knee? (3) Are there differences in patient-reported outcomes between the two techniques? METHODS: Twenty male patients who underwent a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft were recruited for this study, 10 in the TT group and 10 in the AM group. Patients in each group were randomly selected from four surgeons at our institution with both groups demonstrating similar demographics. The type of procedure chosen for each patient was based on the preferred technique of the surgeon. Some surgeons exclusively used the TT technique, whereas other surgeons specifically used the AM technique. Surgeons had no input on which patients were chosen to participate in this study. Mean postoperative time was 13 +/- 2.8 and 15 +/- 3.2 months for the TT and AM groups, respectively. Patients were identified retrospectively as having either the TT or AM Technique from our institutional database. At followup, clinical outcome scores were gathered as well as the footprint placement and knee stability assessed. To assess the footprint placement and knee stability, three-dimensional surface models of the femur, tibia, and ACL were created from MRI scans. The femoral and tibial footprints of the ACL reconstruction as compared with the intact contralateral ACL were determined. In addition, the AP displacement and rotational displacement of the femur were determined. Lastly, as a secondary measurement of stability, KT-1000 measurements were obtained at the followup visit. An a priori sample size calculation indicated that with 2n = 20 patients, we could detect a difference of 1 mm with 80% power at p < 0.05. A Welch two-sample t-test (p < 0.05) was performed to determine differences in the footprint measurements, AP displacement, rotational displacement, and KT-1000 measurements between the TT and AM groups. We further used the confidence interval approach with 90% confidence intervals on the pairwise mean group differences using a Games-Howell post hoc test to assess equivalence between the TT and AM groups for the previously mentioned measures. RESULTS: The AM and TT techniques were the same in terms of footprint except in the distal-proximal location of the femur. The TT for the femoral footprint (DP%D) was 9% +/- 6%, whereas the AM was -1% +/- 13% (p = 0.04). The TT technique resulted in a more proximal footprint and therefore a more vertical graft compared with intact ACL. The AP displacement and rotation between groups were the same and clinical outcomes did not demonstrate a difference. CONCLUSIONS: Although the AM portal drilling may place the femoral footprint in a more anatomic position, clinical stability and outcomes may be similar as long as attempts are made at creating an anatomic position of the graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
PMCID:4887379
PMID: 27106125
ISSN: 1528-1132
CID: 2124602

Driving reaction time after right knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [Note]

Singh, B; Weinberg, M; Sherman, O H; Strauss, E J; Jazrawi, L M
Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to determine when patients recover the ability to safely operate the brakes of an automobile following a right knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods: A prospective case series of 27 patients who underwent a right knee ACLR, nine with a bone patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, nine patients who had hamstring (HS) tendon autograft and nine patients who had tibialis anterior (TA) tendon allograft for their reconstructions were tested in a validated computerized driving simulator. At 7-10 days, three weeks, and six weeks post operatively, patients were evaluated with respect to their brake reaction time (BRT), brake travel time (BTT), and total braking time (TBT). Each cohort was then compared with thirty healthy volunteers with similar demographics to establish normative mean values. Results: At 7-10 days post-operatively, all patients had statistically significant differences compared to controls for BRT, BTT, and TBT, regardless of the graft used for the reconstruction. By three weeks postoperatively, those reconstructed with TA allografts demonstrated a return to normal braking parameters with no statistically significant differences compared to controls between BRT, BTT, and TBT, whereas those with BPTB and HS autografts continued to have significant delays in their BTT and TBT with BPTB (p = 0.007, p = 0.009) and HS (p = 0.016, p = 0.015), respectively. By six weeks post-operatively, braking parameters for patients receiving an ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft returned to normal values while those treated with a BPTB autograft continued to demonstrate impairment in brake travel time and total braking time compared to controls; however, their brake reaction time had recovered to normative values. Conclusion: Patients who underwent a right knee ACL reconstruction with a TA allograft regained normal braking times by three weeks post-operatively and continued to improve through the six week postoperative time point. In contrast, those treated with a BPTB or HS autograft demonstrated impaired ability to operate motor vehicle brakes three weeks following surgery. While at six weeks, the braking ability of patients treated with hamstring autografts normalized, those receiving a BPTB autograft continued to demonstrate limitations in their brake travel time and total braking time. Patients should be counseled appropriately when discussing reconstruction options and when it is safe to resume driving
EMBASE:20160562648
ISSN: 2325-9671
CID: 2214082

The Masters Athlete: A Review of Current Exercise and Treatment Recommendations

Tayrose, Gregory A; Beutel, Bryan G; Cardone, Dennis A; Sherman, Orrin H
CONTEXT: With the ever-increasing number of masters athletes, it is necessary to understand how to best provide medical support to this expanding population using a multidisciplinary approach. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Relevant articles published between 2000 and 2013 using the search terms masters athlete and aging and exercise were identified using MEDLINE. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. RESULTS: Preparticipation screening should assess a variety of medical comorbidities, with emphasis on cardiovascular health in high-risk patients. The masters athlete should partake in moderate aerobic exercise and also incorporate resistance and flexibility training. A basic understanding of physiology and age-related changes in muscle composition and declines in performance are prerequisites for providing appropriate care. Osteoarthritis and joint arthroplasty are not contraindications to exercise, and analgesia has an appropriate role in the setting of acute or chronic injuries. Masters athletes should follow regular training regimens to maximize their potential while minimizing their likelihood of injuries. CONCLUSION: Overall, masters athletes represent a unique population and should be cared for utilizing a multidisciplinary approach. This care should be implemented not only during competitions but also between events when training and injury are more likely to occur. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY SORT: B.
PMCID:4482301
PMID: 26131307
ISSN: 1941-7381
CID: 1649372

T1rho MRI at 3T of menisci in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury

Wang, Ligong; Chang, Gregory; Bencardino, Jenny; Babb, James S; Rokito, Andrew; Jazrawi, Laith; Sherman, Orrin; Regatte, Ravinder R
PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility of T1rho mapping of menisci at 3T in discriminating between patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three subjects were included in the study and subdivided into two subgroups: 16 healthy controls (4 females, 12 males; mean age = 34.4 +/- 10.2 years, age range 24-63 years), 17 patients with ACL injury (3 females, 14 males; mean age = 29.8 +/- 10.8 years, age range 18-61 years). T1rho images from all subjects were acquired on a 3T MR scanner using a spin-lock-based 3D GRE sequence and computed for T1rho mapping. Clinical proton density (PD)-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) images in the sagittal (without fat saturation), axial, and coronal (fat-saturated) planes were also acquired for cartilage assessment using Whole-Organ MR Imaging Score (WORMS) grading. Mixed model two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine whether there were any significant differences among subregional, compartmental, and whole structure T1rho values of meniscus between healthy controls and ACL-injured patients. RESULTS: Lateral posterior (29 +/- 8 msec) and medial central (25 +/- 7 msec) meniscus subregions in healthy controls had significantly lower T1rho values (P < 0.05) than the corresponding meniscus subregions in ACL-injured patients. Significantly lower meniscus T1rho values (P < 0.05) were also identified in lateral compartment in healthy controls (26 +/- 6 msec) than that of ACL-injured patients (33 +/- 4 msec). Subjects' total WORMS between healthy controls and ACL-injured patients had significant differences (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results indicate that T1rho mapping is possibly feasible in detecting meniscus degeneration and may be useful in distinguishing ACL-injured patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PMID: 24616029
ISSN: 1053-1807
CID: 833192

Acute achilles tendon ruptures: a comparison of minimally invasive and open approach repairs followed by early rehabilitation

Tejwani, Nirmal C; Lee, James; Weatherall, Justin; Sherman, Orrin
We retrospectively compared the outcomes of early functional weight-bearing after use of 2 different approaches (minimally invasive, standard) for surgical repair of the Achilles tendon. We reviewed the cases of 63 consecutive patients who underwent repair of an acute closed Achilles tendon rupture and had follow-up of at least 6 months. Of these 63 patients, 33 were treated with a minimally invasive posterolateral approach (minimal group), and 30 were treated with a standard posteromedial approach (standard group). Two weeks after surgery, each patient was allowed to weight-bear as tolerated in a controlled ankle movement boot with a 20 degrees heel wedge. At 6 weeks, the patient was placed in a regular shoe with a heel lift. We examined range of motion and incidence of reruptures, sural nerve injuries, and wound complications at 6 weeks and 3 months and calf strength at 6 months. Neither group had any reruptures. Mean incision length was 2.5 cm (minimal group) and 7.2 cm (standard group). One patient (3.2%) in the minimal group and 6 patients (20%) in the standard group developed a superficial wound infection. Four (12.9%) of 31 minimal patients and no standard patients developed a sural nerve deficit. There were statistically significant differences between the groups' wound complication rates (P = .04) and nerve injury rates (P = .043). At final follow-up, the groups did not differ in their functional outcomes (ability to perform a single heel raise, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores). Used after a minimally invasive posterolateral or standard posteromedial approach, early functional weightbearing is an effective and safe method for treating acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon, and it has a lower rate of soft-tissue complications. A standard posteromedial approach has a higher rate of wound complications, and a minimally invasive posterolateral approach has a higher rate of sural nerve injury.
PMID: 25303448
ISSN: 1078-4519
CID: 1300212

Evaluation of Subchondral Bone Marrow Lipids of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL)-Injured Patients at 3 T

Wang, Ligong; Salibi, Nouha; Chang, Gregory; Bencardino, Jenny T; Babb, James S; Rokito, Andrew; Jazrawi, Laith; Sherman, Orrin; Regatte, Ravinder R
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to investigate the changes in compartment-specific subchondral bone marrow lipids of femoral-tibial bone in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured patients compared to that of healthy volunteers and patients with osteoarthritis (OA) (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade 2-3). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 55 subjects were recruited in the study and subdivided into three subgroups: 17 healthy controls (4 females, 13 males; mean age = 41 +/- 16, age range 24-78 years), 17 patients with acute ACL injury (3 females, 14 males; mean age = 30 +/- 11, age range 18-61 years), and 21 patients with KL2-3 OA (12 females, 9 males; mean age = 65 +/- 12, age range 44-89 years). Routine clinical proton density-weighted fast spin echo images in sagittal (without fat saturation), axial, and coronal (fat saturation) planes were acquired on a 3 T clinical scanner for cartilage morphology using Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score grading. A voxel of 10 x 10 x 10 mm3 was positioned in the medial and lateral compartments of the tibia and femur for proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements using the single voxel stimulated echo acquisition mode pulse sequence. All proton magnetic resonance data were processed with Java-based magnetic resonance user interface. Wilcoxon rank sum test and mixed model two-way analysis of variance were performed to determine significant differences between different compartments and examine the effect of ACL injury, OA grade and compartment, and their interactions. RESULTS: The index of unsaturation in lateral tibial compartment in ACL-injured patients was significantly higher (P < .05) than all compartments except lateral femoral in patients with KL2-3 OA. Significantly lower values (P < .05) were also identified in saturated lipids at 2.03 ppm in all compartments in ACL-injured patients than those of all compartments in patients with KL2-3 OA. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results suggest that the indices of unsaturation in the lateral tibial compartment and the peaks of saturated lipids at 1.3 and 2.03 ppm in medial tibial compartment may be clinically useful to characterize subchondral bone marrow among healthy controls, acute ACL-injured patients, and patients with OA.
PMCID:4037703
PMID: 24717549
ISSN: 1076-6332
CID: 895832

Risk factors and prevention strategies of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries

Laible, Catherine; Sherman, Orrin H
In recent years, the number of women playing sports has increased significantly. The passage of Title IX in 1972 had a significant effect in encouraging female participation in sports. This increase in women's sports participation also led to a rise in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. As ACL injuries in young female athletes have be- come a public health issue, much research has been done on risk factors and prevention strategies.
PMID: 25150329
ISSN: 2328-5273
CID: 3568462