Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:smallw03

in-biosketch:yes

Total Results:

3


Electronic Health Record Messaging Patterns of Health Care Professionals in Inpatient Medicine

Small, William; Iturrate, Eduardo; Austrian, Jonathan; Genes, Nicholas
PMID: 38147337
ISSN: 2574-3805
CID: 5623492

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Incidentally Detected Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodule

,; Martin, Maria D; Henry, Travis S; Berry, Mark F; Johnson, Geoffrey B; Kelly, Aine Marie; Ko, Jane P; Kuzniewski, Christopher T; Lee, Elizabeth; Maldonado, Fabien; Morris, Michael F; Munden, Reginald F; Raptis, Constantine A; Shim, Kyungran; Sirajuddin, Arlene; Small, William; Tong, Betty C; Wu, Carol C; Donnelly, Edwin F
Incidental pulmonary nodules are common. Although the majority are benign, most are indeterminate for malignancy when first encountered making their management challenging. CT remains the primary imaging modality to first characterize and follow-up incidental lung nodules. This document reviews available literature on various imaging modalities and summarizes management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected incidentally. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
PMID: 38040464
ISSN: 1558-349x
CID: 5590512

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer: 2022 Update

Hayward, Jessica H; Linden, Olivia E; Lewin, Alana A; Weinstein, Susan P; Bachorik, Alexandra E; Balija, Tara M; Kuzmiak, Cherie M; Paulis, Lisa V; Salkowski, Lonie R; Sanford, Matthew F; Scheel, John R; Sharpe, Richard E; Small, William; Ulaner, Gary A; Slanetz, Priscilla J
Imaging plays a vital role in managing patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as treatment decisions rely heavily on accurate assessment of response to therapy. This document provides evidence-based guidelines for imaging breast cancer before, during, and after initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
PMID: 37236739
ISSN: 1558-349x
CID: 5541822