Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:tanvem01

Total Results:

12


Care of the terminally ill from religious perspectives: role of palliative and hospice care

Mir, Tanveer
Health care should make an attempt to understand the different religious principles that affect end-of-life decisions in patient care. With advanced illness, defining an ethical framework is essential to understanding sensitive issues. Compassionate care is crucial in all end-of-life care settings. Physician awareness is a key principle in inculcating the religious values of patients. Cultural and religious awareness on the part of the health-care team is needed to provide patients with effective end-of-life palliative and hospice care.
PMCID:3516118
PMID: 23610503
ISSN: 0899-8299
CID: 832572

Transforming the mortality review conference to assess palliative care in the acute care setting: a feasibility study

Pekmezaris, Renee; Cooper, Lynda; Efferen, Linda; Mastrangelo, Amy; Silver, Alan; Eichorn, Ann; Walia, Rajni; Mir, Tanveer; Liberman, Tara; Weiner, Joseph; Steinberg, Harry
OBJECTIVE: This project sought to evaluate the impact of a hospital-based Palliative Care Consultation (PCC) service utilizing a common practice: the resident mortality review conference. METHOD: Internal Medicine residents used a revised chart audit tool during the mortality review conference, which included domains described in the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care (2004). This study attempted to transform the common practice into a methodology for collecting data that could be used as a platform to assess the quality of hospital care near the end of life. In this review, the residents were asked not only "what care was delivered appropriately?" but "what could we have done?" to relieve the patient's and family's suffering. RESULTS: The results showed that the mortality review process could be used to assess care at the end of life. It also showed that those patients who received a PCC received better care. Symptoms were addressed at a significantly higher rate for those patients who received a PCC than for those who did not. Specifically, these were symptoms of pain (75% vs. 51%, p < .0001), dyspnea (75% vs. 59%, p < 0.0001), nausea (28% vs. 18%, p < 0.0001), and agitation (53% vs. 33%, p < 0.0001). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The mortality review process was found to be valuable in assessing care delivery for patients near the end of life. The tool yielded results that were consistent with findings of other studies looking at pain and symptom management, advance care planning, and the rate of palliative care consults across major diagnostic categories, supporting the face validity of the mortality review process.
PMID: 20875205
ISSN: 1478-9515
CID: 255552