Faculty Bibliography

This department highlights nursing leaders who have demonstrated a commitment to innovation and patient care leadership in practice, policy, research, education and theory. This interview profiles Terry Fulmer, PhD, RN, FAAN, chairperson of the Robert Wood Johnson Executive Nurse Fellows Advisory Committee and dean of the Bouve College of Health Sciences at Northeastern University.

The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and utility of screening for elder mistreatment in a dental clinic population. We approached older adults in a busy dental clinic and enrolled 139 persons over the age of 65 who completed an Audio Computer Assisted Self Interview (ACASI), which included the Hwalek-Sengstock Elder Abuse Screening Test (HS-EAST). Overall, 48.4% of the participants scored 3 or greater on the HS-EAST, and 28.3% scored 4 or greater. Our study suggests that there is an opportunity to screen in busy dental clinics and to facilitate early detection for those patients who screen positive for elder mistreatment.

Interprofessional education is a critical precursor to effective teamwork and the collaboration of health care professionals in clinical settings. Numerous barriers have been identified that preclude scalable and sustainable interprofessional education (IPE) efforts. This article describes NYU3T: Teaching, Technology, Teamwork, a model that uses novel technologies such as Web-based learning, virtual patients, and high-fidelity simulation to overcome some of the common barriers and drive implementation of evidence-based teamwork curricula. It outlines the program's curricular components, implementation strategy, evaluation methods, and lessons learned from the first year of delivery and describes implications for future large-scale IPE initiatives.

We appreciate that Stadtlander views dental practices as having the potential to serve as important alternate sites for identifying systemic health disorders, a potential that we argued is especially critical for the many millions of adults and children in the United States who visit a dentist but not a general health provider in a given year. Toward this end, Stadtlander encourages the development and use of detailed health questionnaires before the dental visit to identify or exclude risk factors for systemic disease. We agree that this would be useful; research has demonstrated the value of using dental patients' health information to identify those at high risk for diabetes.(1-3) We also agree with Stadtlander that the collection of vital signs would be helpful. We would add to this the value of collecting saliva or blood samples to screen for infectious or chronic disease. Targeted dental provider education regarding the value and importance of this screening to both patients and providers would likely increase providers' use of patients' health histories, vital signs, and biological samples for this purpose, as would demonstration of its feasibility and acceptability in busy dental practices. In fact, research has demonstrated dental providers' and dental patients' appreciation for chronic disease screening at dental visits.(4-6) (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print July 19, 2012: e1. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300866).

Gerodontology 2012; doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00405.x Screening for elder mistreatment in dental and medical clinics Objective: Elder mistreatment (EM) is a potentially fatal and largely unrecognised problem in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of EM in busy clinics and specifically, we report on the feasibility of screening for EM as well as the appropriate instrumentation for screening. Background: Prevalence estimates for elder mistreatment vary, but recent data from a national sample of community-residing adults over 60 years of age indicate that 11.4% of older adults report some form of elder mistreatment. There is a paucity of research related to screening in dental and medical clinics to understand the prevalence in such practice settings. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2008 to March 2009. We enrolled 241 patients at two clinics: a medical clinic (n = 102) and dental clinics (n = 139). A mini-mental status exam was conducted with a minimum of 18 or better for inclusion. An elder mistreatment screen was next used [elder assessment instrument (EAI-R) for medical and Hwalek-Sengstock elder abuse screening test (HS-EAST) for dental]. Results: For the 241 patients, we were able to compare data from the EAI-R with the HS-EAST. This pilot work demonstrates the feasibility of screening for EM in busy clinics since we documented patient enrolment of 20% in the medical clinics and 66% in dental clinics. Patients are willing to answer extremely-sensitive questions related to elder mistreatment and are also willing to use computer technology for interviewing. Conclusion: Dental and medical clinics are important practice venues to screen for elder mistreatment.

We appreciate the response to our article regarding the proportion and characteristics of patients who saw a dentist but not a primary care health provider in 2008. Like Greenberg and Glick, we also performed an earlier analysis using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. We determined the proportion of individuals at increased risk of having diabetes, but who were unaware of that increased risk.(1) We found that 93% of US persons over 20 years of age, undiagnosed with diabetes but with moderate or severe periodontal disease, have risk factors indicating the importance of diabetes screening. We determined that 50% of those persons had seen a dentist in the past year and could have been screened for diabetes in the dental office. We appreciate Greenberg and Glick's analysis regarding the potential use of the dental visit to identify males at increased risk for developing a severe cardiovascular event.(2) Like their subsequent analyses demonstrating dental provider and patient willingness to participate in patient screening for medical conditions in the dental office,(3,4) our research has shown the willingness of dentists and patients to be screened for diabetes.(5) This is especially the case if screening involves the use of oral blood from at-risk patients with periodontal disease. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print May 17, 2012: e1. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300742).

To address the faculty shortage problem, schools of nursing are reexamining how they provide clinical education to undergraduate students to find ways to use faculty resources more efficiently and to maintain student enrollment. We describe a unique clinical teaching model implemented at the New York University College of Nursing. The new model currently being evaluated shifts from the traditional clinical education model, in which all clinical education is in a hospital or agency setting, to a model that substitutes high-fidelity human patient simulation for up to half of the clinical education experience. This article describes the clinical teaching model and its effects on nurse faculty capacity.

We assessed the proportion and characteristics of patients who do not regularly visit general health care providers but do visit dentists and whose unaddressed systemic health conditions could therefore be identified by their dentist. Of the 26.0% of children and 24.1% of adults that did not access general outpatient health care in 2008, 34.7% and 23.1%, respectively, visited a dentist. They varied by census region, family income, and sociodemographics. Dental practices can serve as alternate sites of opportunity to identify health concerns among diverse groups of US patients.

The Institute of Medicine Report called for a greater role for nurses within the context of oral health in two recent publications, Advancing Oral Health in America (2011) and Improving Access to Oral Health Care for Vulnerable and Underserved Populations (2011). Nurses provide care for many vulnerable persons, including frail and functionally dependent older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. These persons are the least likely to receive necessary, health-sustaining dental care (which is distinct from mouth care). The mouth, or more accurately, plaque, serves as a reservoir for bacteria and pathogens. The link between mouth care, oral health, and systemic health is well-documented; infections such as pneumonia have been linked to poor oral health. Nurses, therefore, need to reframe mouth care as oral infection control and infection control more broadly. The can provide the preventive measure that are crucial to minimizing systemic infections. Nurses in all settings can potentially provide mouth care, conduct oral health assessments, educate patients about best mouth care practices, and make dental referrals. Yet, nurses are often hesitant to do anything beyond basic oral hygiene-and even in this area, often fail to provide mouth care based on best practices.