Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Effective communication is essential to good health care, and hearing loss disrupts patient-provider communication. For the more than 2 million veterans with severe hearing loss, communication is particularly challenging in noisy health care environments such as emergency departments. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe patient and provider perspectives of feasibility and potential benefit of providing a hearing assistance device, a personal amplifier, during visits to an emergency department in an urban setting affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs. METHODS:This qualitative descriptive study was conducted in parallel with a randomized controlled study. We completed a semistructured interview with 11 veterans and 10 health care providers to elicit their previous experiences with patient-provider communication in the ED setting and their perspectives on hearing screening and using the personal amplifier in the emergency department. Interview data were analyzed using content analysis and Atlas.ti V8.4 software (Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). RESULTS:The veteran sample (n = 11) had a mean age of 80.3 years (SD = 10.2). The provider sample included 7 nurses and 3 physicians. In the ED setting, hearing loss disrupts patient-provider communication. Screening for hearing loss in the emergency department was feasible except in urgent/emergent cases. The use of the personal amplifier made communication more effective and less effortful for both veterans and providers. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Providing the personal amplifier improved the ED experience for veterans and offers a promising intervention that could improve health care quality and safety for ED patient populations.

Reports an error in "International practice recommendations for the recognition and management of hearing and vision impairment in people with dementia" by Jenna Littlejohn, Michael Bowen, Fofi Constantinidou, Piers Dawes, Christine Dickinson, Patricia Heyn, Emma Hooper, Tammy Hopper, Isabel Hubbard, Donna Langenbahn, Carrie L. Nieman, Manoj Rajagopal, Chryssoula Thodi, Barbara Weinstein, Walter Wittich and Iracema Leroi (Gerontology, 2022, Vol 68[2], 121-135). In the original article, the following information was missing in the Funding Sources section: Jenna Littlejohn and Piers Dawes are supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2022-34980-002). Introduction: Hearing, vision, and cognitive impairment commonly co-occur in older people. However, the rate of recognition and appropriate management of combined hearing and vision impairment in people with dementia impairment is low. The aim of this work was to codevelop internationally relevant, multidisciplinary practice recommendations for professionals involved in the diagnosis, care, and management of older people with these concurrent conditions. Methods: We applied consensus methods with professional and lay expert stakeholders, using an adapted version of the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development. The development involved 4 phases and included: (1) collating existing evidence, (2) filling the gaps in evidence, (3) prioritising evidence, and (4) refining the final list of recommendations. Each phase encompassed various methodologies including a review of existing guidelines within the 3 clinical domains, systematic reviews, qualitative studies, a clinical professional consortium, surveys, and consensus meetings with interdisciplinary domain experts. Results: The task force evaluated an initial list of 26 recommendations, ranking them in the order of priority. A consensus was reached on 15 recommendations, which are classified into 6 domains of "awareness and knowledge," "recognition and detection," "evaluation," "management," "support," and "services and policies." Pragmatic options for implementation for each domain were then developed. Conclusion: This is the first set of international, interdisciplinary practice recommendations that will guide the development of multidisciplinary services and policy to improve the lives of people with dementia and hearing and vision impairment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Hearing, vision, and cognitive impairment commonly co-occur in older people. However, the rate of recognition and appropriate management of combined hearing and vision impairment in people with dementia impairment is low. The aim of this work was to codevelop internationally relevant, multidisciplinary practice recommendations for professionals involved in the diagnosis, care, and management of older people with these concurrent conditions. METHODS:We applied consensus methods with professional and lay expert stakeholders, using an adapted version of the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development. The development involved 4 phases and included: (1) collating existing evidence, (2) filling the gaps in evidence, (3) prioritising evidence, and (4) refining the final list of recommendations. Each phase encompassed various methodologies including a review of existing guidelines within the 3 clinical domains, systematic reviews, qualitative studies, a clinical professional consortium, surveys, and consensus meetings with interdisciplinary domain experts. RESULTS:The task force evaluated an initial list of 26 recommendations, ranking them in the order of priority. A consensus was reached on 15 recommendations, jwhich are classified into 6 domains of "awareness and knowledge," "recognition and detection," "evaluation," "management," "support," and "services and policies." Pragmatic options for implementation for each domain were then developed. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the first set of international, interdisciplinary practice recommendations that will guide the development of multidisciplinary services and policy to improve the lives of people with dementia and hearing and vision impairment.

Background: Social isolation is common among community dwelling older adults and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Its inverse, social engagement, depends on verbal communication, which can be disrupted by age-related hearing loss (AHRL). AHRL is mitigated with hearing aids, but hearing aid costs can be prohibitive for low income, under-resourced communities. As such, personal amplifiers or hearing assistance devices (HADs), are a feasible alternative that can be delivered at point-of-care to older adults with AHRL. Despite the link between social engagement and hearing, there is little research on mitigating hearing loss to improve patient-reported outcomes such as depressed mood and loneliness, particularly in low-income communities.
Method(s): This ongoing pilot study has enrolled older adults living in federally subsidized Los Angeles housing to assess the feasibility of community-based hearing assessment and provision of hearing assistance devices (HAD). We seek to understand the potential impact of HAD use on patient-reported symptoms. We measure self-reported hearing loss using the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), and at baseline, one, and two months: social isolation using a 4-item instrument, depressed mood using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9, a 6-item loneliness score, and HAD utility using the International Outcome Inventory for Alternative Interventions (IOI-AI).
Result(s): Among 36 recruited participants in three buildings thus far, 30 (83%) reported having hearing difficulties (HHI >=10) and were given Pocket-Talkers. For those with self-reported hearing-related psychosocial difficulties, 8 (27%) endorsed social isolation (>1 of 4); 18 (60%) endorsed at least mild depression (PHQ-9 > 4); and 19 (63%) endorsed loneliness (>1 of 6). Among 16 who have completed 1-month follow-up, no changes have been noted, but 1-month scores on the IOI-AI (mean: 4; range 0-5) suggest very favorable utility.
Conclusion(s): Early results from this pilot study support this as a feasible intervention with positive impact associated with Pocket- Talker use. Further follow-up and subject enrollment is needed to determine whether this intervention improves patient-reported outcomes