Faculty Bibliography

For years, the notion of chin ptosis was somehow integrated with the concept of witch's chin. That was a mistake on many levels because chin droop has four major causes, all different and with some overlap. With this article, the surgeon can quickly diagnose which type and which therapeutic modality would work best. In some cases the problem is a simple fix, in others the droop can only be stabilized, and in the final two, definite corrective procedures are available. Of note, in certain situations two types of chin ptosis may overlap because both the patient and the surgeon may each contribute to the problems. For example, in dynamic ptosis, a droop that occurs with smile in the unoperated patient can be exacerbated and further produced by certain surgical methods also. This paper classifies the variations of the problems and explains the anatomy with the final emphasis on long-term surgical correction, well described herein. This article is the ninth on this subject and a review of them all would be helpful (greatly) for understanding the enigmas of the lower face

BACKGROUND:: Large hemangiomas of the scalp, though uncommon, present unique challenges to the reconstructive surgeon. If not treated early, these lesions can result in large areas of alopecia, distortion of the hairline, or deformation of the ear. Given these potential complications and the relative pliability and redundancy of the infant scalp before 4 months of age, the authors propose early surgical excision. METHODS:: A retrospective review of the senior author's (B.M.Z.) patient records was performed; over a period of 4 years, six infants were identified who underwent resection of a large scalp hemangioma. The surgical planning and execution of each case and follow-up are detailed. RESULTS:: All six hemangiomas were excised completely. In five cases, the excisions were performed in one stage at or before 4 months of age. In a sixth case, a tissue expander was placed before excision and closure in an 18-month-old infant. In three cases, significant ear malposition was corrected by removal of the deforming mass. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS:: The authors have demonstrated that by taking advantage of the greater elasticity of the infant scalp, large hemangiomas of the scalp can be aggressively and successfully treated with surgical intervention, often in one operation. Beyond the usual indications, early surgical excision of scalp hemangiomas may be advantageous and warranted to prevent the development of large alopecic areas or the permanent distortion of the hairline and aural anatomy

BACKGROUND: Silicone chin augmentation remains a popular treatment for microgenia because its placement appears deceptively simple. However, when extrusion, displacement, capsular contracture following implant removal, overaugmentation, or malposition occurs, a revision operation may be required. Secondary chin surgery is challenging because (1) implant removal alone may produce a disfigured chin; and (2) placement of a new implant in an oversized misshapen pocket demands precision, control, and reliability. METHODS: The textured implant may be placed by means of an intraoral or extraoral route. The extraoral route is usually chosen except when transoral procedures (e.g., mentalis suspension) are required. The superior 30 to 50 percent of a standard textured implant is always removed and then tapered anteriorly at a 45-degree angle to reduce its sharp front edge. The lateral wings are also reduced and tapered. Two pilot holes are drilled in each half of the implant and then it is divided in the midline. Each half is inserted and secured individually. The medial screw is placed first and nearly fully tightened. Then, holding the implant exactly along the inferior border of the mandible, the distal screw is placed and both screws are tightened completely. The lower border of the implant should be exactly along the lower border of the mandible. The soft tissues are closed in three layers over a drain. RESULTS: This technique has been used to treat more than 100 patients. Selected photographs illustrate this technique. CONCLUSION: This article explains how to place a textured implant efficiently and effectively under light premedication and local anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Although the condition is rare, some children are born with cervical clefts or masses that require repair during infancy. The scarring in the submental region can tether the developing mandible at the menton, producing a developmental microgenia or 'tethered chin.' METHODS: A retrospective review of the senior author's (B.M.Z.) patient records was performed; three cases of tethered chin were identified. In each case, a staged surgical approach was used. RESULTS: In two cases, previous unsuccessful surgery complicated the initial presentation. In all cases, the underlying soft-tissue anomalies were addressed and the microgenia was corrected. Satisfactory aesthetic and functional results were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: The tethered chin represents a rare entity. Correction of the tethered chin requires a comprehensive understanding of the underlying abnormality and an appreciation of the multiple factors that contribute to chin function and aesthetics

BACKGROUND: Correction of the long, nonprojecting chin requires both vertical reduction and sagittal augmentation. Wedge excision-based therapy reduces chin height and allows for advancement of the distal segment, but it is associated with at least a 10 percent incidence of mental nerve injury. The authors propose two innovative ways to correct the long, nonprojecting chin. METHODS: There are two approaches, intraoral and extraoral. With the intraoral approach, following a gingivobuccal incision, a single horizontally oblique osteotomy is made at least 6 mm beneath the mental nerve foramina. The vertically long genial segment is freed and the posterior edge is contoured with a side-cutting burr. The contoured jumping genial segment is secured to the mandible with countersunk screws and contoured in situ to preserve the lower 8 to 10 mm. With the extraoral approach, following a submental incision, the anterior and posterior surfaces of the symphysis are cleared (a double-armed suture is placed through the posterior musculature). A reciprocating saw is used to remove the lower border of the symphysis to reduce the vertical excess. The tagged musculature is resuspended, and a tapered, textured implant is secured to the new symphysis. RESULTS: Aesthetic outcomes using these two techniques were good and there were no complications. Representative patients, operated on by the senior author, illustrate these techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Both the intraoral one-cut in situ contoured jumping genioplasty and the extraoral vertical reduction/sagittal augmentation genioplasty reduce excess chin height, control sagittal advancement, provide pogonion projection, and avoid the risks of a standard wedge. Both techniques provide custom projection at the lower pole of the new symphysis

BACKGROUND: Treatment of macrogenia can be a challenging problem. In this article, the authors provide novel insights for treatment of a previously poorly treated problem. The authors have developed anatomical insights that facilitate the subtly difficult preoperative evaluation of the large chin and, when applied appropriately, will provide uniformly pleasing results. METHODS: A retrospective review of the senior author's (B.M.Z.) patient records was performed. More than 50 cases of macrogenia were identified. As previously described, almost all of the cases were performed under local anesthesia with oral premedication only. RESULTS: This article demonstrates why prior modalities such as intraoral burring and lower border setback failed to treat the variety of large chins properly. The nine critical factors the surgeon must consider in developing a successful surgical plan are outlined. The surgical plan is not primarily based on radiographs as much as on direct tactile and visual analysis of the sublabial structures both in repose and while smiling. Crucial aspects of the operative technique are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: The large chin can be approached with confidence if nine parameters are appreciated. The authors have outlined these key variables that facilitate proper preoperative topographic analysis of the large chin. Once these variables are appreciated, an appropriate surgical plan can be formulated