Faculty Bibliography

Avalglucosidase alfa, a recombinant human GAA enzyme replacement therapy with increased mannose-6-phosphate content for increased cellular uptake, is approved in the United States for late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) patients >=1 year of age and in Japan for all Pompe disease patients (NexviazymeTM, Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA). During the 49-week, double-blinded primary-analysis period (PAP) of the Phase 3 COMET trial (NCT02782741) comparing avalglucosidase alfa with alglucosidase alfa, avalglucosidase alfa resulted in greater improvements in forced vital capacity (FVC), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and other outcomes and a more favorable safety profile than alglucosidase alfa in treatment-naive LOPD participants. During the open-label extension-treatment period (ETP), 51/51 participants receiving avalglucosidase alfa during the PAP continued this treatment and 44/49 receiving alglucosidase alfa during the PAP switched to avalglucosidase alfa. Changes (LS mean [SE]) from Baseline at Week 97 are reported. Changes in FVC %predicted were + 2.65 (1.05) for avalglucosidase alfa PAP participants and + 0.36 (1.12) for alglucosidase alfa PAP participants. Changes in 6MWT distance (meters) were + 18.60 (12.01) for avalglucosidase alfa PAP participants versus +4.56 (12.44) for alglucosidase alfa PAP participants. Similar trends occurred in other Week-97 outcomes. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) during the ETP occurred in 49 (96.1%) and 42 (95.5%) participants from the avalglucosidase alfa and alglucosidase alfa PAP groups, respectively. Five participants discontinued during the ETP by Week 97 due to AEs (ocular hyperemia, erythema, urticaria, respiratory distress, acute myocardial infarction, pancreatic adenocarcinoma). Twenty-two participants had treatment-emergent serious AEs during the ETP. Patients switched from alglucosidase alfa to avalglucosidase alfa presented no safety- or immunogenicity-related concerns. Overall results demonstrate sustained treatment effect for improvements observed with avalglucosidase alfa during the PAP and stabilization of treatment effect after switching from alglucosidase alfa to avalglucosidase alfa over 97 weeks, supporting long-term maintenance of outcomes and persistence of avalglucosidase alfa's effect.
Funding(s): Sanofi-Genzyme.
Copyright

Valosin-containing protein (VCP) associated multisystem proteinopathy (MSP) is a rare inherited disorder that may result in multisystem involvement of varying phenotypes including inclusion body myopathy, Paget's disease of bone (PDB), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), parkinsonism, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), among others. An international multidisciplinary consortium of 40+ experts in neuromuscular disease, dementia, movement disorders, psychology, cardiology, pulmonology, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech and language pathology, nutrition, genetics, integrative medicine, and endocrinology were convened by the patient advocacy organization, Cure VCP Disease, in December 2020 to develop a standard of care for this heterogeneous and under-diagnosed disease. To achieve this goal, working groups collaborated to generate expert consensus recommendations in 10 key areas: genetic diagnosis, myopathy, FTD, PDB, ALS, Charcot Marie Tooth disease (CMT), parkinsonism, cardiomyopathy, pulmonology, supportive therapies, nutrition and supplements, and mental health. In April 2021, facilitated discussion of each working group's conclusions with consensus building techniques enabled final agreement on the proposed standard of care for VCP patients. Timely referral to a specialty neuromuscular center is recommended to aid in efficient diagnosis of VCP MSP via single-gene testing in the case of a known familial VCP variant, or multi-gene panel sequencing in undifferentiated cases. Additionally, regular and ongoing multidisciplinary team follow up is essential for proactive screening and management of secondary complications. The goal of our consortium is to raise awareness of VCP MSP, expedite the time to accurate diagnosis, define gaps and inequities in patient care, initiate appropriate pharmacotherapies and supportive therapies for optimal management, and elevate the recommended best practices guidelines for multidisciplinary care internationally.

BACKGROUND:Smoking cessation is the most effective means of slowing the decline of lung function associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). While effective smoking cessation treatments are available, they are underutilized and nearly half of people with COPD continue to smoke. By addressing both nicotine and behavioral dependence, electronic cigarettes (EC) could help people with COPD reduce the harm of combustible cigarettes (CC) through reductions in number of Cigarettes per Day (CPD) or quitting CC completely. The purpose of this pilot study is to identify barriers and facilitators to the use of and assess the preliminary effectiveness of EC as a harm reduction strategy among people with COPD. METHODS:In an open-label two-arm randomized controlled trial pilot study, 60 patients identified as smokers with a COPD diagnosis via electronic health records from a large urban health center are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either standard care [counseling + nicotine replacement therapy (NRT)] or counseling + EC. The NRT arm will receive nicotine patches and nicotine lozenges for 12 weeks. The EC arm will receive EC for 12 weeks. Both cohorts will receive counseling from a licensed mental health counselor. Using ecological momentary assessment, participants will report their use of CC in both arms and EC use in the EC arm daily via text message. Primary outcomes will be feasibility and acceptability of intervention, and secondary outcomes will be reduction in CPD and change in COPD symptoms as measured by COPD Assessment Tool (CAT) score at 12-weeks. EC displacement of CC. To explore attitudes towards the use of EC as a harm-reduction strategy for patients with COPD, interviews will be performed with a sample of participants from both study arms. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite decades of availability of smoking cessation medications, nearly half of people with COPD still smoke. This study aims to address the unmet need for feasible and effective strategies for reducing CC use among those with COPD, which has the potential to significantly improve the health of people with COPD who smoke. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04465318.

BACKGROUND:Pompe disease is a rare, progressive neuromuscular disorder caused by deficiency of acid α-glucosidase (GAA) and accumulation of lysosomal glycogen. We assessed the safety and efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa, a recombinant human GAA enzyme replacement therapy specifically designed for enhanced mannose-6-phosphate-receptor targeting and enzyme uptake aimed at increased glycogen clearance, compared with the current approved standard of care, alglucosidase alfa, in patients with late-onset Pompe disease. METHODS:We did a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial at 55 sites in 20 countries. We enrolled individuals (aged ≥3 years) with enzymatically confirmed late-onset Pompe disease who had never received treatment. We used a centralised treatment allocation system to randomly allocate participants to either avalglucosidase alfa or alglucosidase alfa. Participants and investigators were unaware of their treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to week 49 in upright forced vital capacity percent (FVC%) predicted. We used a hierarchical fixed sequential testing strategy, whereby non-inferiority of avalglucosidase alfa compared with alglucosidase alfa was assessed first, with a non-inferiority margin of 1·1. If non-inferiority was seen, then superiority was tested with a 5% significance level. The key secondary objective was effect on functional endurance, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Safety was assessed, including treatment-emergent adverse events and infusion-associated reactions. The modified intent-to-treat population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. The safety population was the analysis population for safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02782741. We report results of the 49-week primary analysis period. FINDINGS/RESULTS:Between Nov 2, 2016, and March 29, 2019, 100 participants were randomly allocated avalglucosidase alfa (n=51) or alglucosidase alfa (n=49). Treatment with avalglucosidase alfa resulted in a least-squares mean improvement in upright FVC% predicted of 2·89% (SE 0·88) compared with 0·46% (0·93) with alglucosidase alfa at week 49 (difference 2·43% [95% CI -0·13 to 4·99]). Non-inferiority was shown because the lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference far exceeded the predefined non-inferiority margin but did not exclude 0 (p=0·0074). Superiority was not reached (p=0·063), so formal testing was stopped, as per the testing hierarchy. Improvements were also seen in the 6MWT with avalglucosidase alfa compared with alglucosidase alfa, with greater increases in distance covered (difference 30·01 m [95% CI 1·33 to 58·69]) and percent predicted (4·71% [0·25 to 9·17]). Treatment-emergent adverse events potentially related to treatment were reported in 23 (45%) of 51 participants in the avalglucosidase alfa group and in 24 (49%) of 49 in the alglucosidase alfa group, and infusion-associated reactions were reported in 13 (26%) participants in the avalglucosidase alfa group and 16 (33%) in the alglucosidase alfa group. Of the five trial withdrawals, all in the alglucosidase alfa group, four were due to adverse events, including two infusion-associated reactions. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in eight (16%) participants who received avalglucosidase alfa and in 12 (25%) who received alglucosidase alfa. One participant treated with alglucosidase alfa died because of acute myocardial infarction determined to be unrelated to treatment. Antidrug antibody responses were similar in both groups. High and persistent titres (≥12 800) and neutralising antibodies were more common with alglucosidase alfa (in 16 [33%] participants) than with avalglucosidase alfa (ten [20%]). INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:We consider that this study provides evidence of clinically meaningful improvement with avalglucosidase alfa therapy over alglucosidase alfa in respiratory function, ambulation, and functional endurance, with no new safety signals reported. An open-label extended-treatment period is ongoing to confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa, with the aim for this therapy to become the new standard treatment in late-onset Pompe disease. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:Sanofi Genzyme.

Clinical decision-making is based on knowledge, expertise, and authority, with clinicians approving almost every intervention-the starting point for delivery of "All the right care, but only the right care," an unachieved healthcare quality improvement goal. Unaided clinicians suffer from human cognitive limitations and biases when decisions are based only on their training, expertise, and experience. Electronic health records (EHRs) could improve healthcare with robust decision-support tools that reduce unwarranted variation of clinician decisions and actions. Current EHRs, focused on results review, documentation, and accounting, are awkward, time-consuming, and contribute to clinician stress and burnout. Decision-support tools could reduce clinician burden and enable replicable clinician decisions and actions that personalize patient care. Most current clinical decision-support tools or aids lack detail and neither reduce burden nor enable replicable actions. Clinicians must provide subjective interpretation and missing logic, thus introducing personal biases and mindless, unwarranted, variation from evidence-based practice. Replicability occurs when different clinicians, with the same patient information and context, come to the same decision and action. We propose a feasible subset of therapeutic decision-support tools based on credible clinical outcome evidence: computer protocols leading to replicable clinician actions (eActions). eActions enable different clinicians to make consistent decisions and actions when faced with the same patient input data. eActions embrace good everyday decision-making informed by evidence, experience, EHR data, and individual patient status. eActions can reduce unwarranted variation, increase quality of clinical care and research, reduce EHR noise, and could enable a learning healthcare system.

BACKGROUND:Current techniques for measuring absolute lung volumes rely on bulky and expensive equipment and are complicated to use for the operator and the patient. A novel method for measurement of absolute lung volumes, the MiniBox method, is presented. RESEARCH QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:Across a population of patients and healthy participants, do values for total lung capacity (TLC) determined by the novel compact device (MiniBox, PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd.) compare favorably with measurements determined by traditional whole body plethysmography? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:). RESULTS:was 7.0% in healthy participants. In obstructed patients, the NSD was 7.9% in mild obstruction and 9.1% in severe obstruction. In restricted patients, the NSD was 7.8% in mild restriction and 13.9% in moderate and severe restriction. No significant differences were found between TLC values obtained by the two measurement techniques. Also no significant differences were found in results obtained among the five centers. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:TLC as measured by the novel MiniBox system is not significantly different from TLC measured by conventional whole body plethysmography, thus validating the MiniBox method as a reliable method to measure absolute lung volumes.

Introduction: Exertional respiratory symptoms are prominent in patients with environmental lung injury following inhalation of World Trade Center dust. Baseline pulmonary function testing in these patients is frequently normal, leaving symptoms unexplained. Although small airway dysfunction has been identified at rest, its role in producing exertional symptoms is unclear. In this study exercise evaluation with assessment of airway function was employed to uncover mechanisms for exertional dyspnea.
Method(s): 27 subjects were studied: 20 with unexplained dyspnea (normal spirometry) and 6 asymptomatic controls. Baseline pulmonary function testing was conducted along with respiratory oscillometry to assess small airway function. An incremental exercise protocol was performed that included a focused evaluation of airway function: (1) examination of tidal flow vs. volume curves during exercise to assess for dynamic hyperinflation and expiratory flow limitation; and (2) airway reactivity post-exercise using spirometry and oscillometry. Baseline: By design spirometry values were within normal limits in all subjects. Symptomatic individuals tended to have greater mean R5, R20, R5-20, and AX at baseline compared with asymptomatic controls (R5: 4.80+/-1.79 vs. 3.66+/-1.06; R20: 3.52+/-1.12 vs. 2.98+/-0.68; R5-20: 1.28+/-1.02 vs. 0.70+/-0.53; AX: 13.44+/-10.74 vs. 5.48+/-5.21). Exercise: Dyspnea was reproduced with exercise in symptomatic subjects (mean Borg dyspnea score 1.38+/-1.48 at baseline, 4.20+/-2.28 at peak exercise). Asymptomatic controls did not report significant dyspnea (mean Borg dyspnea score 0 at baseline, 1.60+/-1.14 at peak exercise). Expiratory flow limitation during exercise was noted in 13/20 symptomatic subjects compared with 0 controls. Post Exercise: Bronchial hyper-reactivity was evident in post-exercise spirometry (>10% decline in FEV1) in 3/20 symptomatic subjects vs. 1/6 controls; the fall in FEV1 was predominantly attributable to a fall in FVC, consistent with small airway dysfunction. An additional six symptomatic subjects demonstrated isolated small airway hyper-reactivity that was only revealed on oscillometry.
Conclusion(s): In patients with unexplained dyspnea and normal spirometry, symptoms were reproduced during exercise. Focused airway assessment uncovered small airway dysfunction both during and following exercise that contributed to the development of dyspnea

This study derives normative prediction equations for respiratory impedance in a healthy asymptomatic urban population using an impulse oscillation system (IOS). In addition, this study uses body mass index (BMI) in the equations to describe the effect of obesity on respiratory impedance. Data from an urban population comprising 472 healthy asymptomatic subjects that resided or worked in lower Manhattan, New York City were retrospectively analysed. This population was the control group from a previously completed case-control study of the health effects of exposure to World Trade Center dust. Since all subjects underwent spirometry and oscillometry, these previously collected data allowed a unique opportunity to derive normative prediction equations for oscillometry in an urban, lifetime non-smoking, asymptomatic population without underlying respiratory disease. Normative prediction equations for men and women were successfully developed for a broad range of respiratory oscillometry variables with narrow confidence bands. Models that used BMI as an independent predictor of oscillometry variables (in addition to age and height) demonstrated equivalent or better fit when compared with models that used weight. With increasing BMI, resistance and reactance increased compatible with lung and airway compression from mass loading. This study represents the largest cohort of healthy urban subjects assessed with an IOS device. Normative prediction equations were derived that should facilitate application of IOS in the clinical setting. In addition, the data suggest that modelling of lung function may be best performed using height and BMI as independent variables rather than the traditional approach of using height and weight.