Faculty Bibliography

Triangular resection is a reconstructive option for treatment of anterior leaflet mitral disease with segmental prolapse. In our experience, it is a safe and reproducible technique, associated with low rates of recurrent MR or need for reoperation, as well as decreased likelihood for systolic anterior motion after mitral repair. We review our experience with this technique over a 25-year experience with mitral valve reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Patients after cardiac operation pose a challenge to the treating physician-these patients may become critically ill and are among the most difficult to image using transthoracic echocardiography. Several factors contribute to this, including difficulties in positioning the patient, inability of the patient to cooperate with instructions, surgical dressings, and hyperinflated lungs. Transesophageal echocardiography may be performed when transthoracic echocardiography is not diagnostic; however, transesophageal echocardiography is semi-invasive and does not lend itself to prolonged or repeated monitoring. METHODS: Recently, a new approach to echocardiography for use in the patient after operation has been introduced with the modification of the standard mediastinal drainage tube to allow for substernal epicardial echocardiography (SEE). The SEE tube has 2 lumens. The first allows for routine mediastinal drainage and the second has a blind end that permits the insertion of a standard transesophageal echocardiographic probe for high-resolution imaging as often as is desired over the period during which the mediastinal tube is in place. CONCLUSION: This article reviews the technique of SEE including a description of the method of performance of SEE (with representative images), a review of the published literature on this new modality, examples of clinical use, and a discussion of the advantages, indications, and limitations of SEE with an eye toward future directions for research

INTRODUCTION: Although minimally invasive aortic valve surgery (MIAVR) is performed in many centers, few studies have compared its results to a standard sternotomy (SS) approach. We assessed the hypothesis that, when compared with SS in the elderly population, MIAVR has similar morbidity and mortality and allows faster hospital recovery. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 1995 through February 2002, 515 patients over age 65 underwent isolated aortic valve replacement. Using data gathered prospectively, 189 MIAVR patients were matched with 189 SS patients by age, ventricular function, valvular pathology, urgency of operation, diabetes, previous cardiac surgery, renal disease, and history of stroke. In each group, 56.1% of patients underwent non-elective procedures, and 28% were >or=80 years old. Hospital mortality (6.9%) and freedom from postoperative morbidity (82.5% versus 81.5%, P=0.79) were similar. Multivariate analysis revealed that urgent procedures [Odds Ratio (OR)=3.97; P=0.03], congestive heart failure (OR=3.94; P=0.03), and ejection fraction <30% (OR=4.16; P=0.03) were significant predictors of hospital mortality. Prolonged length of stay was associated with age (P=0.05), preoperative stroke (OR=3.5,P=0.001), CHF (OR=2.2, P=0.004), and sternotomy approach (OR=2.3,P=0.002) by multivariate analysis. More MIAVR patients were discharged home (52.6% versus 38.6%,P=0.03) rather than to rehabilitation facilities. Three year actuarial survival revealed no difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery is safe in elderly patients, with morbidity and mortality comparable to sternotomy approach. The shorter hospital stay and greater percentage of patients discharged home after MIAVR reflect enhanced recovery with this technique

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe atheromatous aortic disease (AAD) who undergo coronary artery bypass (CABG) have an increased risk of death and stroke. We hypothesized that in these high risk patients, off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) technique is associated with lower morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between June 1993 and January 2002, 5737 patients undergoing CABG had routine intra-operative TEE with 913 (15.9%) found to have severe AAD in the aortic arch or ascending aorta. Of these, 211 patients who underwent OPCAB were matched with 211 on-pump CABG patients by age, ejection fraction, history of stroke, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, renal disease, nonelective operation, and previous cardiac surgery. Hospital mortality was 11.4% (24/211) for on-pump CABG and 3.8% (8/211) for OPCAB (P=0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that increased mortality was associated with on-pump CABG (P=0.001), acute MI (P=0.03), number of grafts (P=0.01), age (P=0.01), history of stroke or cerebrovascular disease (P=0.04), CHF (P=0.02), and peripheral vascular disease (P=0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that OPCAB technique was associated with decreased stroke (P=0.05). Freedom from any complication was 78.7% for on-pump CABG and 91.9% for OPCAB (P<0.001). At 36 month follow-up multivariate analysis revealed that increased mortality was associated with age (P=0.001), previous MI (P=0.03), and renal disease (P=0.04), whereas increased survival was associated with increased number of grafts (P=0.001) and OPCAB (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB surgery in patients with severe AAD is associated with lower risk of death, stroke and complications and improved mid-term survival. Routine intra-operative TEE allows identification of these patients and directs choice of appropriate surgical technique

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe atheromatous aortic disease (AAD) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have increased operative risks. The 'off-pump' CABG (OPCAB) technique was evaluated in patients given the diagnosis of severe AAD by routine transesophageal echocardiography. METHODS: A total of 5737 patients underwent CABG, with 913 having transesophageal echocardiography findings of severe AAD. Of the patients with severe AAD, 678 (74.3%) had conventional CABG and 235 (25.7%) had OPCAB. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 8.7% for conventional CABG and 5.1% for OPCAB (P =.08). Multivariate analysis revealed that increased mortality was significantly associated with acute myocardial infarction, conventional CABG, age, renal disease, history of stroke, and ejection fraction < 30%. Neurologic complications occurred in 6.3% of patients undergoing CABG and in 2.1% undergoing OPCAB (P =.01). Freedom from any complication was significantly greater with OPCAB. CONCLUSION: Routine intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography identifies patients with severe AAD. In these patients, OPCAB technique is associated with a lower risk of death, stroke, and all complications

BACKGROUND: Patients with reduced ventricular function undergoing aortic valve replacement have increased operative risks, but the impact of valvular pathophysiology and other risk factors has not been clearly defined. METHODS: From June 1992 through June 2002, 1,402 consecutive patients underwent isolated aortic valve surgery with or without coronary artery bypass grafting; of these patients, 416 had an ejection fraction less than 40% and are the subject of this report. These patients (mean age, 68.6) had severe stenosis (62.5%), severe regurgitation (30.3%), or mixed disease (7.2%). Aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 48.4% of patients, and 27% had previous cardiac surgery. Follow-up included echocardiography and survival analysis. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 10.1% (42 of 416), with no difference between aortic stenosis (9.6%) and regurgitation (11.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that age (p = 0.002) and renal disease (odds ratio = 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 9.3; p = 0.001) were independently associated predictors of mortality. Valvular pathophysiology had no impact on mortality. Peripheral vascular disease, multivessel coronary disease, and renal disease were associated risks for any postoperative complication. Peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio = 12.3, p = 0.02), history of cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio = 4.8, p = 0.038), and diabetes (odds ratio = 2.7, p = 0.04) were associated risks for stroke. The ejection fraction was more than 40% in 52% of the patients who had postoperative echocardiography (mean follow-up, 6 months). Actuarial survival revealed no difference between pathophysiologic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve surgery in patients with impaired ventricular function carries an acceptable operative risk that can be stratified by age and comorbidities. The type of valvular pathophysiology does not significantly affect mortality

OBJECTIVE: Although minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) has recently become popular, additional outcome evaluation is required. This study analyzed a single institutional experience with MIAVR with respect to hospital morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Between 12/96 and 06/02, 482 consecutive patients at a single institution underwent MIAVR, including concomitant procedures in 123 pts: 55 multiple valves, 18 CABGs, 21 myomectomies, and 29 other procedures. These patients (mean age 65 yrs; range 15-94) had severe stenosis (58.9%), severe insufficiency (33.0%), or mixed disease (8.1%). Thirty-three percent had a previous MI, 13.3% had a previous cardiac operation, and 17.3% were >80 years old. Right anterior minithoracotomy was performed in 87.3%. Ascending aortic cannulation was used in 68% of the patients while direct external cross clamping was used in 97% of cases. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 6.2% (30/482) overall and 5.3% (19/359) for isolated AVR. Mean aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 87 and 122 min, respectively. Postoperative complications included stroke in 2.3% (11/482) and 82.5% of patients were free from any complications. Neither aortic dissection nor mediastinitis was observed. Univariant analysis demonstrated that female gender, renal failure, CHF, and age >80 years were risk factors for mortality. Multivariable analysis revealed that age and CHF were independently associated with increased risk of mortality (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that MIAVR is a safe procedure, with low morbidity and acceptable perioperative mortality, and may be used routinely in a large series of patients