Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

active:yes

exclude-minors:true

person:ratnea01 or peller04 or shustg01 or lightj03

Total Results:

174


Cell targeting by the bi-component leukocidin subunit HlgB drives Staphylococcus aureus pathophysiology

Sproch, Julia; Prescott, Rachel; Kim, Hee Jin; Chaguza, Chrispin; Gonzalez, Sandra; Ilmain, Juliana K; Shopsin, Bo; Ratner, Adam J; Torres, Victor J
Staphylococcus aureus is a global health concern, resulting in significant disease burden in both hospital and community settings. To establish infection, the bacteria must contend with a multitude of host defense mechanisms, including "nutritional immunity", in which nutrients are sequestered away from invading pathogens. Importantly, S. aureus requires iron for growth during infection, which it acquires through the lysis of erythrocytes (hemolysis). HlgAB, a secreted bi-component pore forming toxin, contributes to the ability of S. aureus to lyse erythrocytes to release heme iron. HlgAB consists of two subunits, the S-subunit HlgA and the F-subunit HlgB. Prior work has shown that the hemolytic activity of HlgAB is dependent on the binding of HlgA to the host receptor Duffy Antigen Receptor for Chemokines (DARC). Here we show that HlgB binds the surface of erythrocytes independently of DARC or HlgA. Our comparative genomic analysis reveals high conservation of hlgA and hlgB genes across S. aureus lineages. By performing structure-function studies, we identified a series of loops within the rim domain of HlgB that are required for the binding of HlgB to erythrocytes and erythrocyte lysis by HlgAB. The importance of HlgB-mediated host targeting was validated in a tissue culture model of S. aureus-mediated lysis of primary human erythrocytes, in an in vivo murine model of intoxication, and during in vivo systemic infection. Altogether, these findings expand our mechanistic insights into how S. aureus overcomes nutritional immunity, and the role of HlgB in S. aureus pathophysiology.
PMID: 40812424
ISSN: 1083-351x
CID: 5907692

April 2025 ACIP Meeting Update: Influenza, COVID-19, HPV, RSV and Other Immunizations

Yonts, Alexandra B; Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia; Ratner, Adam J; O'Leary, Sean T; Paulsen, Grant C
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of medical and public health experts that provides advice to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, normally meets 3 times per year to develop US vaccine recommendations for use. The ACIP Work Groups (WG) conduct an in-depth review of the available scientific information regarding specific FDA-licensed vaccines, or important vaccines in advanced stages of clinical development that are under consideration for FDA licensure and then present the information and their recommendation to the ACIP for a vote. If a recommendation receives a majority vote, it moves to the CDC Director for approval and, if approved, it is published in the CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). At that point the ACIP recommendation represents the official CDC recommendation for U.S. immunizations. The ACIP met on April 16-17, 2025, to discuss influenza vaccines, chikungunya vaccines, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines, RSV immunizations, meningococcal vaccines, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, Mpox vaccines, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccines. This update summarizes the proceedings of these meetings, with an emphasis on topics that are most relevant to the pediatric population. Major updates for pediatric clinicians include information regarding HPV and meningococcal vaccination considerations, and updates regarding RSV immunization in infants which will likely be voted on during upcoming ACIP meetings.
PMID: 40596750
ISSN: 1098-4275
CID: 5887902

Clinical progress note: Haemophilus influenzae type b

Ewing, Anne; Haldeman, Sydney; Ratner, Adam J
Vaccine-preventable diseases that have yet to be eliminated are important to review for the practicing clinician. Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) was once the leading cause of bacterial meningitis in young children and now causes rare invasive disease in young children and the elderly. Patients with immunodeficiency and impaired complement response to encapsulated organisms (e.g., sickle cell disease; asplenia) are at particular risk of invasive Hib disease. Recognition of a potential case, prompt management and reporting, and inpatient vaccine administration and education are crucial actions for hospitalists in the management of Hib disease and prevention.
PMID: 40205699
ISSN: 1553-5606
CID: 5824032

Attitudes of pregnant women in the Dominican Republic towards a future maternal Group B Streptococcus vaccine

Job, Megan J; Kim, Diane; Acosta, Francia; Valera, Sandra; Fernandez, Anabel; Laycock, Katherine M; Ratner, Adam J; Steenhoff, Andrew P; Feemster, Kristen; Geoghegan, Sarah
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Current protocols aim to prevent some infant GBS infection through screening and peripartum antibiotics, however such strategies cannot be widely implemented in resource-limited settings. On the other hand, maternal vaccines in development against Group B Streptococcus (GBS) can provide a feasible universal approach. The success of any vaccine will depend on uptake in the population. Rates of maternal GBS colonization in the Dominican Republic (DR) and Caribbean region are among the highest in the world, but little is known about attitudes towards maternal vaccines in this region. METHODS:A cross-sectional, multicenter, mixed-methodology survey evaluated facilitators and barriers to maternal immunization and acceptability of a hypothetical Group B Streptococcus vaccine among pregnant women in three hospitals in the DR. RESULTS:Six-hundred and fifty women completed the survey of whom 85 % had never heard of GBS. Following receipt of information about GBS and a vaccine, 94 % of women stated that they would be likely or very likely to receive a vaccine. Being 18 years or younger was associated with a lower likelihood of GBS vaccine receipt (AOR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.14-0.69). Being born in the DR was associated with a higher likelihood of GBS vaccine receipt (AOR 2.73, 95 % CI 1.25-5.97). Among women who were unlikely to receive the vaccine, uncertainty about potential harm from a novel vaccine was the prominent theme elicited from free text responses. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There was a high level of acceptance of a future GBS vaccine among this sample of pregnant women in the DR. However, knowledge of vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases was low, and most women had concerns about the safety of new vaccines. Interventions that strengthen existing maternal immunisation infrastructures, including increasing education of pregnant women about vaccines, will aid the successful implementation of a future GBS vaccine.
PMID: 39126829
ISSN: 1873-2518
CID: 5687402

Viral infections and inborn errors of immunity

Ewing, Anne; Madan, Rebecca Pellett
PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this focused review is to discuss unusual presentations of viral infections in the context of specific inborn errors of immunity. We will discuss hyper immunoglobulin E (IgE) syndromes, epidermodysplasia verruciformis, and X-linked agammaglobulinemia as examples of inborn errors of immunity associated with specific presentations of viral infection and disease. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Advances in both genetic and viral diagnostics have broadened our understanding of viral pathogenesis in the setting of immune dysfunction and the variable phenotype of inborn errors of immunity. Dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) deficiency is now recognized as an inborn error of immunity within the hyper IgE syndrome phenotype and is associated with unusually aggressive cutaneous disease caused by herpes simplex and other viruses. Studies of patients with epidermodysplasia verruciformis have proven that rarely detected human papillomavirus subtypes may cause malignancy in the absence of adequate host defenses. Finally, patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia may remain at risk for severe and chronic viral infections, even as immune globulin supplementation reduces the risk of bacterial infection. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:Susceptibility to viral infections in patients with inborn errors of immunity is conferred by specific, molecular defects. Recurrent, severe, or otherwise unusual presentations of viral disease should prompt investigation for an underlying genetic defect.
PMID: 38747352
ISSN: 1473-6527
CID: 5697782

SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in the Nasopharynx at Time of First Infection Among Unvaccinated Individuals: A Secondary Cross-Protocol Analysis of 4 Randomized Trials

Fisher, Leigh H; Kee, Jia Jin; Liu, Albert; Espinosa, Claudia M; Randhawa, April K; Ludwig, James; Magaret, Craig A; Robinson, Samuel T; Gilbert, Peter B; Hyrien, Ollivier; Kublin, James G; Rouphael, Nadine; Falsey, Ann R; Sobieszczyk, Magdalena E; El Sahly, Hana M; Grinsztejn, Beatriz; Gray, Glenda E; Kotloff, Karen L; Gay, Cynthia L; Leav, Brett; Hirsch, Ian; Struyf, Frank; Dunkle, Lisa M; Neuzil, Kathleen M; Corey, Lawrence; Huang, Yunda; Goepfert, Paul A; Walsh, Stephen R; Baden, Lindsey R; Janes, Holly; ,
IMPORTANCE:SARS-CoV-2 viral load (VL) in the nasopharynx is difficult to quantify and standardize across settings, but it may inform transmission potential and disease severity. OBJECTIVE:To characterize VL at COVID-19 diagnosis among previously uninfected and unvaccinated individuals by evaluating the association of demographic and clinical characteristics, viral variant, and trial with VL, as well as the ability of VL to predict severe disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:This secondary cross-protocol analysis used individual-level data from placebo recipients from 4 harmonized, phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials sponsored by Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax. Participants were SARS-CoV-2 negative at baseline and acquired COVID-19 during the blinded phase of the trials. The setting included the US, Brazil, South Africa, Colombia, Argentina, Peru, Chile, and Mexico; start dates were July 27, 2020, to December 27, 2020; data cutoff dates were March 26, 2021, to July 30, 2021. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2022 to June 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:Linear regression was used to assess the association of demographic and clinical characteristics, viral variant, and trial with polymerase chain reaction-measured log10 VL in nasal and/or nasopharyngeal swabs taken at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS:Among 1667 participants studied (886 [53.1%] male; 995 [59.7%] enrolled in the US; mean [SD] age, 46.7 [14.7] years; 204 [12.2%] aged 65 years or older; 196 [11.8%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 150 [9%] Black or African American, 1112 [66.7%] White; 762 [45.7%] Hispanic or Latino), median (IQR) log10 VL at diagnosis was 6.18 (4.66-7.12) log10 copies/mL. Participant characteristics and viral variant explained only 5.9% of the variability in VL. The independent factor with the highest observed differences was trial: Janssen participants had 0.54 log10 copies/mL lower mean VL vs Moderna participants (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.87 log10 copies/mL lower). In the Janssen study, which captured the largest number of COVID-19 events and variants and used the most intensive post-COVID surveillance, neither VL at diagnosis nor averaged over days 1 to 28 post diagnosis was associated with COVID-19 severity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:In this study of placebo recipients from 4 randomized phase 3 trials, high variability was observed in SARS-CoV-2 VL at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, and only a fraction was explained by individual participant characteristics or viral variant. These results suggest challenges for future studies of interventions seeking to influence VL and elevates the importance of standardized methods for specimen collection and viral load quantitation.
PMCID:11117088
PMID: 38780941
ISSN: 2574-3805
CID: 5842392

Cefiderocol Red Wine Urine Syndrome in Pediatric Patients: A Multicenter Case Series

Shapiro, Kate; Ungar, Stephanie P; Krugman, Jessica; McGarrity, Orlagh; Cross, Shane J; Indrakumar, Bairavi; Hatcher, James; Ratner, Adam J; Wolf, Joshua
Cefiderocol is a novel cephalosporin antibiotic with activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria and limited pediatric experience. This case series describes 3 immunocompromised children receiving blood transfusion who developed benign red or purple urine with administration of cefiderocol. Interaction with iron from blood products is a possible mechanism. It is important to recognize this phenomenon and distinguish it from hematuria to avoid unnecessary diagnostic testing.
PMID: 37922468
ISSN: 1532-0987
CID: 5607072

Group B Streptococcal Infections

Chapter by: Ratner, Adam J.; Nizet, Victor; Puopolo, Karen Marie
in: Remington and Klein's Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant, Ninth Edition by
[S.l.] : Elsevier, 2024
pp. 348-378.e11
ISBN: 9780323795272
CID: 5715692

A group B Streptococcus indexed transposon mutant library to accelerate genetic research on an important perinatal pathogen

Bhavana, Venkata H; Hillebrand, Gideon H; Gopalakrishna, Kathyayini P; Rapp, Rebekah A; Ratner, Adam J; Tettelin, Hervé; Hooven, Thomas A
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a significant global cause of serious infections, most of which affect pregnant women, newborns, and infants. Studying GBS genetic mutant strains is a valuable approach for learning more about how these infections are caused and is a key step toward developing more effective preventative and treatment strategies. In this resource report, we describe a newly created library of defined GBS genetic mutants, containing over 1,900 genetic variants, each with a unique disruption to its chromosome. An indexed library of this scale is unprecedented in the GBS field; it includes strains with mutations in hundreds of genes whose potential functions in human disease remain unknown. We have made this resource freely available to the broader research community through deposition in a publicly funded bacterial maintenance and distribution repository.
PMCID:10714824
PMID: 37933989
ISSN: 2165-0497
CID: 5620302

Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination

Rick, Anne-Marie; Laurens, Matthew B; Huang, Ying; Yu, Chenchen; Martin, Thomas C S; Rodriguez, Carina A; Rostad, Christina A; Maboa, Rebone M; Baden, Lindsey R; El Sahly, Hana M; Grinsztejn, Beatriz; Gray, Glenda E; Gay, Cynthia L; Gilbert, Peter B; Janes, Holly E; Kublin, James G; Huang, Yunda; Leav, Brett; Hirsch, Ian; Struyf, Frank; Dunkle, Lisa M; Neuzil, Kathleen M; Corey, Lawrence; Goepfert, Paul A; Walsh, Stephen R; Follmann, Dean; Kotloff, Karen L; ,
BACKGROUND:While vaccines have established utility against COVID-19, phase 3 efficacy studies have generally not comprehensively evaluated protection provided by previous infection or hybrid immunity (previous infection plus vaccination). Individual patient data from US government-supported harmonized vaccine trials provide an unprecedented sample population to address this issue. We characterized the protective efficacy of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against COVID-19 early in the pandemic over three-to six-month follow-up and compared with vaccine-associated protection. METHODS:In this post-hoc cross-protocol analysis of the Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, we allocated participants into four groups based on previous-infection status at enrolment and treatment: no previous infection/placebo; previous infection/placebo; no previous infection/vaccine; and previous infection/vaccine. The main outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 >7-15 days (per original protocols) after final study injection. We calculated crude and adjusted efficacy measures. FINDINGS/RESULTS:Previous infection/placebo participants had a 92% decreased risk of future COVID-19 compared to no previous infection/placebo participants (overall hazard ratio [HR] ratio: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05-0.13). Among single-dose Janssen participants, hybrid immunity conferred greater protection than vaccine alone (HR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01-0.10). Too few infections were observed to draw statistical inferences comparing hybrid immunity to vaccine alone for other trials. Vaccination, previous infection, and hybrid immunity all provided near-complete protection against severe disease. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:Previous infection, any hybrid immunity, and two-dose vaccination all provided substantial protection against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 through the early Delta period. Thus, as a surrogate for natural infection, vaccination remains the safest approach to protection. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:National Institutes of Health.
PMCID:10518569
PMID: 37738833
ISSN: 2352-3964
CID: 5605592