Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The PROspective Cutaneous Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (PROCLIPI) study is aprospective analysis of an international database. Here we examine front-line treatments and quality of life (QoL) inpatients with newly diagnosed mycosis fungoides (MF). OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To identify (i) differences in first-line approaches according to tumour-nodes-metastasis-blood (TNMB)staging; (ii) parameters related to a first-line systemic approach and (iii) response rates and QoL measures. METHODS:In total, 395 newly diagnosed patients with early-stage MF (stage IA-IIA) were recruited from 41 centresin 17 countries between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018 following central clinicopathological review. RESULTS:The most common first-line therapy was skin-directed therapy (SDT) (322 cases, 81·5%), while a smallerpercentage (44 cases, 11·1%) received systemic therapy. Expectant observation was used in 7·3%. In univariateanalysis, the use of systemic therapy was significantly associated with higher clinical stage (IA, 6%; IB, 14%; IIA,20%; IA-IB vs. IIA, P < 0·001), presence of plaques (T1a/T2a, 5%; T1b/T2b, 17%; P < 0·001), higher modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (> 10, 15%; ≤ 10, 7%; P = 0·01) and folliculotropic MF (FMF) (24% vs. 12%, P = 0·001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant associations with the presence of plaques (T1b/T2b vs.T1a/T2a, odds ratio 3·07) and FMF (odds ratio 2·83). The overall response rate (ORR) to first-line SDT was 73%,while the ORR to first-line systemic treatments was lower (57%) (P = 0·027). Health-related QoL improvedsignificantly both in patients with responsive disease and in those with stable disease. CONCLUSIONS:Disease characteristics such as presence of plaques and FMF influence physician treatment choices,and SDT was superior to systemic therapy even in patients with such disease characteristics. Consequently, futuretreatment guidelines for early-stage MF need to address these issues.

BACKGROUND:There is no established standard of care for treating central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA), and treatment approaches vary widely. OBJECTIVE:To develop consensus statements regarding the use of various pharmacological therapies in treating adults with CCCA. METHODS:We invited 27 dermatologists with expertise in hair and scalp disorders to participate in a 3-round modified Delphi study between January and March 2023. Statements met strong consensus if 75% of respondents agreed or disagreed. Statements met moderate consensus if 55% or more but less than 75% agreed or disagreed. RESULTS:In Round 1, 5 of 33 (15.2%) statements met strong consensus, followed by 9 of 28 (32.1%) in Round 2. After the final Round 3 meeting, strong consensus was reached for 20 of 70 (28.6%) overall statements. Two statements achieved moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:This study included only English-speaking, US-based dermatologists and did not consider non-pharmacological therapies. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite varying opinions among dermatologists, consensus was reached for several statements to help clinicians manage CCCA. We also highlight areas that lack expert consensus with the goal of advancing research and therapeutic options for CCCA.