Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Below the knee (BTK) lesions may be particularly challenging to treat owing to length, diffuse disease, and extent of calcification. Landmark interventional clinical studies have not reached consensus on the optimal standard of care for BTK lesions, and many published trials excluded patients with moderate or severe lesion calcification. Calcium modification with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) was shown to be superior to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the femoropopliteal artery and successful in treating BTK lesions in pilot studies. The Disrupt BTK II study is a core-lab adjudicated, prospective, multi-center single-arm study of patients with moderate to severely calcified BTK lesions treated with the Shockwave Medical Peripheral IVL System. METHODS:Disrupt BTK II enrolled 250 subjects with calcified infrapopliteal lesions and Rutherford category 3-5 presentation from 38 sites in the United States and Europe. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse limb events (MALE) or post-operative death (POD) at 30 days, a composite of all-cause death, above-ankle amputation of the index limb, and/or major reintervention of the index limb involving an infrapopliteal artery. The primary effectiveness endpoint was procedural success, defined as ≤50% residual stenosis for all treated target lesions without serious core lab-adjudicated serious angiographic complications. The study used independent angiographic and duplex ultrasound core laboratories, and follow-up is planned through two years. RESULTS:A total of 305 lesions in 250 patients were treated with a procedural success of 97.9%. Mean target lesion length was 76 ± 65mm, diameter stenosis was 78 ± 18%, and 84.8% had moderate or severe calcification as assessed by an independent angiographic core lab. After IVL, residual stenosis was reduced to 29%, and to 26% after optional post-dilatation and/or stent implantation. At 30 days, there were no deaths, MALE rate was 0.8%, and mean improvement in VascuQoL scores was 4.0 ± 5.0 (P<0.0001). Of the patients with baseline wounds, 15.8% healed and 53.4% were improved at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS:The Disrupt PAD BTK II study demonstrated that treatment with the Shockwave Medical Peripheral IVL System in patients with moderate-severe calcified lesions resulted in high procedural success, significant reduction in residual stenosis, improvements in patient QoL and wound healing, with minimal adverse events at 30-day follow-up.

BACKGROUND:Below the knee (BTK) lesions may be particularly challenging to treat owing to length, diffuse disease, and extent of calcification. Landmark interventional clinical studies have not reached consensus on the optimal standard of care for BTK lesions, and many published trials excluded patients with moderate or severe lesion calcification. Calcium modification with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) was shown to be superior to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the femoropopliteal artery and successful in treating BTK lesions in pilot studies. The Disrupt BTK II study is a core-lab adjudicated, prospective, multi-center single-arm study of patients with moderate to severely calcified BTK lesions treated with the Shockwave Medical Peripheral IVL System. METHODS:Disrupt BTK II enrolled 250 subjects with calcified infrapopliteal lesions and Rutherford category 3-5 presentation from 38 sites in the United States and Europe. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse limb events (MALE) or post-operative death (POD) at 30 days, a composite of all-cause death, above-ankle amputation of the index limb, and/or major reintervention of the index limb involving an infrapopliteal artery. The primary effectiveness endpoint was procedural success, defined as ≤50% residual stenosis for all treated target lesions without serious core lab-adjudicated serious angiographic complications. The study used independent angiographic and duplex ultrasound core laboratories, and follow-up is planned through two years. RESULTS:A total of 305 lesions in 250 patients were treated with a procedural success of 97.9%. Mean target lesion length was 76 ± 65mm, diameter stenosis was 78 ± 18%, and 84.8% had moderate or severe calcification as assessed by an independent angiographic core lab. After IVL, residual stenosis was reduced to 29%, and to 26% after optional post-dilatation and/or stent implantation. At 30 days, there were no deaths, MALE rate was 0.8%, and mean improvement in VascuQoL scores was 4.0 ± 5.0 (P<0.0001). Of the patients with baseline wounds, 15.8% healed and 53.4% were improved at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS:The Disrupt PAD BTK II study demonstrated that treatment with the Shockwave Medical Peripheral IVL System in patients with moderate-severe calcified lesions resulted in high procedural success, significant reduction in residual stenosis, improvements in patient QoL and wound healing, with minimal adverse events at 30-day follow-up.

BACKGROUND:Bed rest duration following deployment of a vascular closure device after transfemoral left-sided cardiac catheterization is not standardized. Despite research supporting reduced bed rest, many hospitals require prolonged bed rest. Delayed ambulation is associated with back pain, urine retention, difficulty eating, and longer stay. OBJECTIVE:To study length of stay, safety, and opportunity cost savings of reduced bed rest at a large urban hospital. METHODS:A single-site 12-week study of 1-hour bed rest after transfemoral cardiac catheterizations using vascular closure devices. Results were compared with historical controls treated similarly. RESULTS:The standard bed rest group included 295 patients (207 male, 88 female; mean [SD] age, 64.4 [8.6] years). The early ambulation group included 260 patients (188 male, 72 female; mean [SD] age, 64 [9.3] years). The groups had no significant difference in age (t634 = 1.18, P = .21) or sex (χ12=0.2, P = .64). Three patients in the standard bed rest group and 1 in the early ambulation group had hematomas (P = .36). The stay for diagnostic cardiac catheterizations was longer in the standard bed rest group (mean [SD], 220.7 [55.2] minutes) than in the early ambulation group (mean [SD], 182.1 [78.5] minutes; t196 = 4.06; P < .001). Stay for percutaneous coronary interventions was longer in the standard bed rest group (mean [SD], 400.2 [50.8] minutes) than in the early ambulation group (mean [SD], 381.6 [54.7] minutes; t262 = 2.86; P = .005). CONCLUSION:Reduced bed rest was safe, shortened stays, and improved efficiency by creating opportunity cost savings.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to compare the ability of two different atherectomy modalities, the directional atherectomy system (DAS) and the orbital atherectomy system (OAS), to modify plaque and augment luminal gain as evaluated by angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in patients with symptomatic femoro-popliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD). BACKGROUND:Atherectomy is frequently utilized in the treatment of complex PAD. To date, there are no head-to-head comparisons of existing devices and their selection is based mostly on operator preference rather than on supportive data. METHODS:This was a single-center, prospective, randomized trial designed to assess the impact of DAS in comparison to OAS on atherosclerotic plaque. Pre- and postatherectomy lesion characterization was performed by angiography and IVUS. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty was performed after atherectomy with similar analysis repeated. RESULTS:, p = 0.004, respectively), as well as a reduction in angiographic stenosis (40% vs. 70%, p < 0.001). After DCB, 10 patients required stenting for suboptimal results in the OAS group compared with two in the DAS group (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS:Compared to OAS, DAS demonstrated a greater plaque volume reduction and luminal gain with significantly fewer stents needed post-DCB.

BACKGROUND:With the exponential increase in the use of endovascular techniques in the treatment of peripheral artery disease, our understanding of factors that affect intervention failures continues to grow. We sought to assess the outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for isolated de novo superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease based on balloon diameter. METHODS:The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for patients undergoing percutaneous balloon angioplasty for isolated de novo atherosclerotic SFA disease. Based on the diameter of the angioplasty balloon as a surrogate measure of arterial diameter, patients were stratified into two groups: group 1, balloon diameter < 5 mm (354 patients) and group 2, balloon diameter ≥ 5 mm (1,550 patients). The primary patency and major adverse limb event (MALE) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test, based on vessel diameter. multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with the primary patency. RESULTS:From January 2010 through December 2018, a total of 1,904 patients met criteria for analysis, with a mean follow-up of 13.3 ± 4.5 months. The mean balloon diameters were 3.92 ± 0.26 mm and 5.47 ± 0.55 mm in group 1 and 2, respectively (P<.001). The mean length of treatment and distribution of TASC lesions were not statistically different between the groups. Primary patency at 18 months was significantly lower in group 1, compared with group 2 (55% vs 67%; log-rank P<.001). The MALE rate was higher in group 1 than group 2 (33% vs 26%; log-rank P<.001). Among patients with claudication, there was no significant difference in the primary patency (61% vs 68%; log-rank P=.073) and MALE (27% vs 22%; log-rank P=.176) at 18 months between groups 1 and 2, respectively. However, in patients with CLTI, group 1 had significantly lower 18-month primary patency (47% vs 64%; log-rank P<.014) and higher MALE rates (41% vs 35%; log-rank P=.012) than group 2. Cox proportional hazard analysis confirmed that balloon diameter < 5 mm was independently associated with increased risks of primary patency loss (HR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.72; P=.021) and MALE (HR 1.29; 95% CI, 1-1.67; P=.048) at 18-months. CONCLUSIONS:In patients undergoing isolated SFA balloon angioplasty for CLTI, smaller SFA (< 5mm) was associated with worse primary patency and MALE. Using balloon size as a surrogate, our findings suggest that patients with a smaller SFA diameter appear to be at increased risk for treatment failure and warrant closer surveillance. Furthermore, these patients may also be considered for alternative approaches, including open revascularization.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To report additional endpoints, including 2-year primary patency, patient outcomes, and safety results, as well as the initial assessment of hypoechogenic halo from the IMPERIAL Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:IMPERIAL RCT is a prospective, randomized (2:1), multicenter study of patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery lesions (length 30-140 mm, Rutherford category 2-4) treated with the Eluvia paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent or the Zilver PTX paclitaxel-coated stent. Two-year follow-up included patency, safety, and mortality assessments and core laboratory-reviewed B-mode ultrasound imaging to screen for hypoechogenic halo in the stented segment, and assess blood flow. RESULTS:At 24 months, all-cause mortality was 7.1% (21/295) for Eluvia and 8.3% (12/145) for Zilver PTX (P = 0.6649). The clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate was significantly less for patients treated with Eluvia vs Zilver PTX (12.7% vs 20.1%; P = 0.0495). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency at 24 months was 83.0% for Eluvia and 77.1% for Zilver PTX (log rank P = 0.1008). Transverse ultrasound imaging was implemented during the 24-month follow-up window and was evaluable for 27.5% (128/465) of patients. Hypoechogenic halo prevalence rates did not differ significantly between Eluvia and Zilver PTX study arms (33.7% [29/86] vs 21.4% [9/42]; P = 0.153). In no case was flow documented within the halo; no adverse events were associated with these ultrasound findings. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Two-year follow-up suggests a sustained advantage for Eluvia for avoiding target lesion revascularization. Initial hypoechogenic halo assessment showed no difference in prevalence between the study arms, no flow within the halo, and no associated adverse events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02574481. Date of registration: October 14, 2015. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level 1; randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: To report the clinical effect of a drug-eluting stent on femoropopliteal occlusive disease in patients with long lesions. Materials and Methods: The global IMPERIAL Long Lesion substudy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02574481) is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of the Eluvia Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent for treating femoropopliteal lesions >140 mm and ≤190 mm in length. Fifty patients (mean age 68.2 years; 32 men) with long lesions (mean length 162.8±34.7 mm) were enrolled; 20 patients had diabetes. Fourteen of the lesions were severely calcified and 16 were occluded. Primary patency (duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.4 in the absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization or bypass of the target lesion) and major adverse events [30-day all-cause death and 1-year target limb major amputation or target lesion revascularization (TLR)] were assessed at 12 months. Results: At 12 months, no deaths, target limb amputations, or stent thrombosis had occurred. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency was 91.0% (95% CI 82.5% to 99.6%). The MAE-free rate at 12 months was 93.5% due to 3 clinically-driven TLRs. The corresponding Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from TLR was 93.9% (95% CI 87.2% to 100%). Conclusion: The IMPERIAL Long Lesion substudy demonstrated excellent patency and safety through 1 year among patients with long femoropopliteal occlusive disease treated with the Eluvia stent.

BACKGROUND:Bivalirudin may be an effective alternative anticoagulant to heparin for use in percutaneous peripheral interventions. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin as the procedural anticoagulant agent in patients undergoing percutaneous peripheral intervention. METHODS:For this meta-analysis and systematic review, we conducted a search in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane for all the clinical studies in which bivalirudin was compared to heparin as the procedural anticoagulant in percutaneous peripheral interventions. Outcomes studied included all-cause mortality, all-bleeding, major and minor bleeding, and access site complications. RESULTS:Eleven studies were included in the analysis, totaling 20,137 patients. There was a significant difference favoring bivalirudin over heparin for all-cause mortality (risk ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87), all-bleeding (risk ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.78), major bleeding (risk ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96), minor bleeding (risk ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.92), and access site complications (risk ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.84). There was no significant difference in peri-procedural need for blood transfusions (risk ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.57-1.08), myocardial infarction (risk ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.59-1.28), stroke (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.59-1.01), intracranial bleeding (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.29-2.02), or amputations (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.53-1.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our meta-analysis suggests that bivalirudin use for percutaneous peripheral interventions is associated with lower all-cause mortality, bleeding, and access site complications as compared to heparin. Further large randomized trials are needed to confirm the current results.

BACKGROUND:The clinical effect of a drug-eluting stent in the femoropopliteal segment has not been investigated in a randomised trial with a contemporary comparator. The IMPERIAL study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting Eluvia stent with the polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated Zilver PTX stent for treatment of femoropopliteal artery segment lesions. METHODS:In this randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority study, patients with symptomatic lower-limb ischaemia manifesting as claudication (Rutherford category 2, 3, or 4) with atherosclerotic lesions in the native superficial femoral artery or proximal popliteal artery were enrolled at 65 centres in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with a site-specific, web-based randomisation schedule to receive treatment with Eluvia or Zilver PTX. All patients, site personnel, and investigators were masked to treatment assignment until all patients had completed 12 months of follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was primary patency (defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2·4, without clinically driven target lesion revascularisation or bypass of the target lesion) and the primary safety endpoint was major adverse events (ie, all causes of death through 1 month, major amputation of target limb through 12 months, and target lesion revascularisation through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of -10% at 12 months. Primary non-inferiority analyses were done when the minimum sample size required for adequate statistical power had completed 12 months of follow-up. The primary safety non-inferiority analysis included all patients who had completed 12 months of follow-up or had a major adverse event through 12 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02574481. FINDINGS/RESULTS:Between Dec 2, 2015, and Feb 15, 2017, 465 patients were randomly assigned to Eluvia (n=309) or to Zilver PTX (n=156). Non-inferiority was shown for both efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months: primary patency was 86·8% (231/266) in the Eluvia group and 81·5% (106/130) in the Zilver PTX group (difference 5·3% [one-sided lower bound of 95% CI -0·66]; p<0·0001). 259 (94·9%) of 273 patients in the Eluvia group and 121 (91·0%) of 133 patients in the Zilver PTX group had not had a major adverse event at 12 months (difference 3·9% [one-sided lower bound of 95% CI -0·46]; p<0.0001). No deaths were reported in either group. One patient in the Eluvia group had a major amputation and 13 patients in each group required target lesion revascularisation. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:The Eluvia stent was non-inferior to the Zilver PTX stent in terms of primary patency and major adverse events at 12 months after treatment of patients for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:Boston Scientific.