Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Vocal tremor (VT) poses treatment challenges due to uncertain pathophysiology. VT is typically classified into two phenotypes: isolated vocal tremor (iVT) and essential tremor-related voice tremor (ETvt). The impact of phenotypes on upper aerodigestive tract physiology during swallowing remains unclear. Qualitative and quantitative measures were employed to characterize tremor phenotypes and investigate the effects on swallowing physiology. METHODS:Eleven ETvt participants (1 Male, 10 Female; x̄ age = 74) and 8 iVT participants (1 Male, 7 Female; x̄ age = 71) swallowed 20 mL boluses in cued and uncued conditions under standardized fluoroscopic visualization. Sustained/a/productions were captured to assess the rate and extent of fundamental frequency (F0) modulation. Penetration and Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores were obtained and swallowing biomechanics were captured using Swallowtail™ software. Participants also completed the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire. RESULTS:Hypopharyngeal transit was faster in both VT phenotypes compared with Swallowtail™ normative reference data. Total pharyngeal transit times, however, were only faster in patients with iVT, relative to reference data. No significant differences were observed on the SWAL-QOL or PAS between tremor phenotypes. SWAL-QOL scores revealed that these patients rarely reported dysphagia symptoms. CONCLUSIONS:Subtle differences in swallowing patterns were observed across VT phenotypes, possibly related to adaptive mechanisms resulting in quicker pharyngeal bolus transit. Most patients did not report swallowing issues or dysphagia symptoms. This study is foundational for larger studies on this challenging population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:4 Laryngoscope, 134:4599-4603, 2024.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The objective of this study is to assess disparities in adherence to swallowing therapy for clinically diagnosed oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) patients. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Analysis was conducted on data from 600 patients with OD and confirmed impairments in swallowing safety and/or efficiency on a videofluoroscopic swallow study. Patients were classified based on their adherence to treatment sessions, defined as the number of swallow treatment sessions attended. The outcome of treatment adherence was categorized into two groups: those who attended fewer than 50% of the prescribed treatment sessions and those who attended 50% or more of the sessions. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median ± interquartile range. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-square tests and Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression models were employed to identify factors associated with successful adherence. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: > 0.05). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The variables analyzed in this study were not significantly associated with nonadherence to swallow therapy. Nevertheless, our study still addressed an important knowledge gap and future studies would benefit from exploring other relevant socioeconomic and disease-related factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Level 4.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The objective of this study is to assess disparities in adherence to swallowing therapy for clinically diagnosed oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) patients. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Analysis was conducted on data from 600 patients with OD and confirmed impairments in swallowing safety and/or efficiency on a videofluoroscopic swallow study. Patients were classified based on their adherence to treatment sessions, defined as the number of swallow treatment sessions attended. The outcome of treatment adherence was categorized into two groups: those who attended fewer than 50% of the prescribed treatment sessions and those who attended 50% or more of the sessions. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median ± interquartile range. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-square tests and Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression models were employed to identify factors associated with successful adherence. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: > 0.05). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The variables analyzed in this study were not significantly associated with nonadherence to swallow therapy. Nevertheless, our study still addressed an important knowledge gap and future studies would benefit from exploring other relevant socioeconomic and disease-related factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Level 4.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an important tool both in clinical practice and research involving patients with swallowing disorders. There are several challenges to be overcome and methodological details to be adequately reported to ensure rigor and transparency in studies utilizing PROMs in dysphagia research. For this reason, the Framework for RigOr aNd Transparency In REseaRch on Swallowing (FRONTIERS), a critical appraisal tool developed to ensure rigor and transparency in dysphagia research, has devoted a domain to PROMs. The aim of this current article, as part of a larger forum of articles, is to present the PROM section of FRONTIERS and describe its development. METHOD/UNASSIGNED:A literature review was carried out on PROMs in the field of dysphagia by three members of the FRONTIERS collaborative to identify items that were necessary for the rigorous application and transparent reporting of PROMs utilized in research of swallowing disorders in human subjects. Framework items were then subjected to an iterative process of feedback and consensus among the three members of the working group as well as all members of the FRONTIERS collaborative. Items were flagged for review and revised as needed until consensus was achieved on the final list. The final item list was compared to existing critical appraisal tools for PROMs. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The final checklist for the PROMs domain included 20 "Yes/No" questions that can be broadly divided into three categories: (a) development and validation, (b) patient population, and (c) PROM administration method. Each item is presented with a rationale for its inclusion. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The use of the FRONTIERS Framework will serve researchers and those appraising quality of research involving PROMs. More broadly, the FRONTIERS Framework will facilitate improved rigor and transparency across dysphagia research. Special considerations and future goals are discussed.

This aim of this study is to characterize the nature and pathophysiology of dysphagia after ACDF surgery by precisely and comprehensively capturing within-subject changes on videofluoroscopy between preoperative and postoperative time points. 21 adults undergoing planned primary ACDF procedures were prospectively recruited and enrolled. Participants underwent standardized preoperative and six-week postoperative videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Videos were blindly rated using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and analysis of total pharyngeal residue (%C2-4²), swallowing timing, kinematics, and anatomic change was completed. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to explore the relationships between possible predictor variables and functional outcomes of interest that changed across timepoints. There was no change in PAS scores across timepoints. Total pharyngeal residue (%C2-C4²) was increased postoperatively (p < 0.001). Our statistical model revealed significant main effects for timepoint (p = 0.002), maximum pharyngeal constriction area (MPCA_N) (p < 0.001), and maximum thickness of posterior pharyngeal (PPWT_MAX) (p = 0.004) on the expression of total pharyngeal residue. There were significant two-way interactions for timepoint and MPCA_N (p = 0.028), timepoint and PPWT_MAX (p = 0.005), and MPCA_N and PPWT_MAX (p = 0.010). Unsurprisingly, we found a significant three-way interaction between these three predictors (p = 0.027). Our findings suggest that in planned ACDF procedures without known complications, swallowing efficiency is more likely to be impaired than airway protection six weeks after surgery. The manifestation of impaired swallowing efficiency at this timepoint appears to be driven by a complex relationship between reduced pharyngeal constriction and increased prevertebral edema.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To describe the phenotypic characteristics of the epiglottis at rest and their impact on vallecular residue. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Videofluoroscopic studies (VFSS) were pooled from 2 Laryngology practices, and Image J was used to measure epiglottic anatomic features at rest. Studies were rated by the MBSImp and presence of vallecular residue following swallow of thin and puree boluses. A conditional inference tree analysis was performed to isolate which epiglottic parameters were risk factors for presence of vallecular reside followed by logistic regression. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: < .001), and this relationship was further modulated by increased distance of the epiglottic tip from the posterior pharyngeal wall. No other anatomic features of the resting epiglottis were associated with residue. Comorbidities potentially affecting swallow were infrequent in the cohort and were not associated with residue. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Abnormal epiglottic movement is associated with aspiration, and in this study we find that abnormal epiglottic movement increases the risk of vallecular residue and that older age is a risk factor for residue. The resting properties of the epiglottis do not appear to be associated with abnormal epiglottic movement or residue.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Traditionally, kinematic measures on videofluoroscopy require the use of an external scalar (such as a penny) to transform pixels to absolute distances. Videofluoroscopy is subject to image magnification based on the distance of the feature of interest to the X-ray source. However, the impact of the position/location of the external scalar on swallowing measures is unknown. Our goal was to systematically investigate the accuracy of various common external scalar locations in lateral and anterior-posterior (A-P) view. METHOD/METHODS:U.S. pennies were taped to a styrofoam head in three positions (on the left and right lateral neck and in midline submentally). Locations were measured to ensure equal left and right, as well as midline, placement. A metal screwdriver (6 mm in diameter) was inserted into the premanufactured hole that is centrally located at the bottom of the styrofoam head. The head was centered on a medical tray and placed in the middle of a Siemens Alpha C-arm Fluoroscope field. ImageJ was used to measure penny length in pixels (three locations) in both lateral and A-P views. Penny length was known (19.05 mm), and, therefore, used to derive screwdriver size (for each location) for comparison to the actual screwdriver size. RESULTS:All scalars overestimated the screwdriver size ranging from 6.55 to 7.87 mm, representing a 9%-31% inflation. Scalars closer to the X-ray source had the largest magnification. CONCLUSIONS:Our results confirm that image magnification of external scalars is a significant source of variability that is currently unaccounted for in the swallowing literature. Recommendations for future research design/measurement methods are provided.

OBJECTIVE:Dysphagia is the most commonly reported complication of annterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. However, the incidence of dysphagia post-ACDF varies widely-partly attributable to differing outcome measures used to capture dysphagia. Our objective was to conduct a scoping review of the literature to quantify which dysphagia outcome measures have been employed post-ACDF and examine trends by study design, year, and location. METHODS:After removing duplicates, 2396 abstracts were screened for inclusion. A total of 480 studies were eligible for full-text review. After applying exclusion criteria, data was extracted from 280 studies. We extracted the dysphagia outcome measure(s), study design (prospective vs retrospective), year, and location (country). Approximately 10% of studies were repeated for intra-rater agreement. RESULTS:In total, 317 dysphagia outcome measures were reported in 280 studies (primarily retrospective-63%). The largest proportion of outcome measures were categorized as "unvalidated patient-reported outcome measures" (46%), largely driven by use of the popular Bazaz scale. The next most common categories were "insufficient detail" and "validated patient-reported outcome measures" (both 16%) followed by "chart review/database" (13%) and instrumental assessment (7%). Studies examining dysphagia post-ACDF steadily increased over the years and the use of validated measures increased in the past 10 years. CONCLUSIONS:This scoping review of the literature highlights that nearly half of the ACDF dysphagia literature relies on unvalidated patient-reported outcome measures. The current understanding of the mechanism, timeline, and presentation of dysphagia post-ACDF are likely limited due to the metrics that are most commonly reported in the literature.

Introduction: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is an intracellular microorganism that causes cavitary disease and nodular bronchiectatic disease of the lung. Patients with NTM appear to have impaired swallow function as represented by impaired airway protection and pharyngeal bolus clearance. It is unknown whether impaired swallowing contributes to the pathophysiology of NTM. Our aim is to determine swallow physiology in patients with bronchiectasis and NTM compared with a control group.
Method(s): Video fluoroscopy (VF) was prospectively collected from 195 patients: 132 patients with NTM (90 females; ages 30-90) and 63 agematched and sex-matched controlswith noNTM(39 females; ages 27-92). Two boluses of 3, 5, 10ml thin liquid, two 5ml puree Varibar, and cracker were analyzed per subject (N = 1755 swallows). Outcome measures included ordinal ratings of residue in the valleculae and pyriform sinuses.
Result(s): Inter-and intra-rater reliability of the ordinal ratings were assessed using one-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (ICC(2,1)) on 20% of the data with good results (intra-rater: ICC = 0.92, 95% range CI 0.70-0.97 and inter-rater: ICC = 0.92, 95% range CI 0.81-0.97). The ratings of residue in the valleculae were significantly higher (worse) in the NTM group compared to the control group for one of the 3mL bolus (p = 0.008), for both 5 mL boluses (p = 0.009 and p = 0.004), both 10mL boluses (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0006), puree (p = 0.006), cracker (p = 0.005). The ratings of residue in the pyriform sinuses were also significantly higher in the NTM group for 3 mL boluses (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.01), both 5 mL boluses (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.002), both 10mL boluses (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001), both puree trials (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001).
Conclusion(s): Future work is needed to elucidate responsiveness to swallowing treatment for patients with NTM

Purpose: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can cause clinically significant lung disease and frequent pneumonias. It is unknown whether impaired swallowing contributes to the pathophysiology of NTM. Patients with NTM may exhibit decreased airway protection. Our aim is to determine airway protection and bolus clearance in patients with NTM. Method(s): Videofluoroscopy (VF) was prospectively collected from 98 patients with NTM (67 female; ages 33-88). Two boluses of 3,5,10 ml thin liquid, two 5 cc puree Varibar, cracker were analyzed per subject (N = 980 swallows).Outcome measures included Penetration/Aspiration Scale (PAS) and ordinal ratings of residue in the valleculae and pyriform sinuses. Worst PAS scores categorized subject as unsafe (C 3) or safe (B 2). The correlation between clinical information and the present of penetration/aspiration and pharyngeal residue structures was analyzed. Result(s): Inter-and intra-rater reliability of PAS ratings were assessed using two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) on 20% of the data with excellent results (intra-rater: ICC 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-0.98 and inter-rater: ICC 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-0.92). The proportion of impaired swallows in the whole dataset was 12.9% (127/980 swallows with PAS scores C 3). There was no correlation between presence of penetration/aspiration and pharyngeal residue with productive cough, pneumonia, smoking history and presence of acid reflux. Conclusions (Including Clinical Relevance): Patients with NTM appear to have impaired swallow function as represented by impaired airway protection. Future work should explore swallowing physiology compared to a control group