Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:The videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) is an evaluation of the anatomy and physiology of swallowing, and often includes a screening evaluation of the esophagus. How the esophageal screen translates to esophageal pathology remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if abnormal esophageal clearance (EC) on VFSS correlates with esophageal function on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This is a retrospective review of 115 adult patients who underwent both VFSS with esophageal screen and HRM. EC on VFSS was scored with the modified barium swallow impairment profile (MBSImP) component 17. Motility was characterized using HRM metrics according to the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 (CCv4.0). Predictive metrics were calculated for the esophageal screen. RESULTS:An EC score o greater than or equal to 1 had a sensitivity of 66%, specificity of 57%, PPV of 52%, NPV of 70%, and OR of 2.55 (p = 0.027). EC weakly correlated with incomplete bolus clearance (rho = 0.331, p = 0.0004) and did not correlate with bolus transit time (rho = 0.17, p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS:The esophageal screen as characterized by the MBSImP is not an effective predictor of esophageal function on HREM as defined by the CCv4.0. Future work may focus on a defining a standardized VFSS protocol for the esophageal screen and potentially a more nuanced assessment of esophageal findings on VFSS that may enhance the sensitivity of the modality to motility disorders.

OBJECTIVE:The videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) is an evaluation of the anatomy and physiology of swallowing, and often includes a screening evaluation of the esophagus. How the esophageal screen translates to esophageal pathology remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if abnormal esophageal clearance (EC) on VFSS correlates with esophageal function on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This is a retrospective review of 115 adult patients who underwent both VFSS with esophageal screen and HRM. EC on VFSS was scored with the modified barium swallow impairment profile (MBSImP) component 17. Motility was characterized using HRM metrics according to the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 (CCv4.0). Predictive metrics were calculated for the esophageal screen. RESULTS:An EC score o greater than or equal to 1 had a sensitivity of 66%, specificity of 57%, PPV of 52%, NPV of 70%, and OR of 2.55 (p = 0.027). EC weakly correlated with incomplete bolus clearance (rho = 0.331, p = 0.0004) and did not correlate with bolus transit time (rho = 0.17, p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS:The esophageal screen as characterized by the MBSImP is not an effective predictor of esophageal function on HREM as defined by the CCv4.0. Future work may focus on a defining a standardized VFSS protocol for the esophageal screen and potentially a more nuanced assessment of esophageal findings on VFSS that may enhance the sensitivity of the modality to motility disorders.

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in many health conditions and can be targeted directly through swallowing therapy. This study aims to explore the outcomes of outpatient swallowing therapy in clinical practice across a diverse cohort of patients. This was a retrospective, single-site longitudinal cohort study. Patients 18 years or older with dysphagia who completed 7-8 weeks of outpatient swallowing therapy with a pre- and post-treatment videofluoroscopy were included. Therapy employed a progressive swallowing exercise regimen based on the Systematic Exercise for Treatment of Swallowing (SETS) protocol. Outcome measures included the pharyngeal components of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile, penetration-aspiration scale scores, and diet recommendations using the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative. 152 patients were included. Swallowing therapy improved all MBSImP component scores except 1, 7, and 13. Therapy improved total pharyngeal impairment scores by 2.66 points (p < .001) and total oral impairment score by 1.41 points (p < .001). Odds of elevated aspiration risk were reduced by 49% (p < .001). Patients were more likely to be on an unmodified food consistency after completion of therapy (OR 26, p = .004), but liquid consistency was not altered (OR 2.0, p = .57). Overall, 44% of patients in the cohort with an efficiency issue improved, and 50% of patients at risk for aspiration pre-therapy improved. Completing a 7-8 week course of exercise-based outpatient swallowing therapy is effective at improving multiple measures of swallowing physiology, safety and efficiency. It can also enable relaxation of diet consistency restrictions based on the IDDSI framework.

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in many health conditions and can be targeted directly through swallowing therapy. This study aims to explore the outcomes of outpatient swallowing therapy in clinical practice across a diverse cohort of patients. This was a retrospective, single-site longitudinal cohort study. Patients 18 years or older with dysphagia who completed 7-8 weeks of outpatient swallowing therapy with a pre- and post-treatment videofluoroscopy were included. Therapy employed a progressive swallowing exercise regimen based on the Systematic Exercise for Treatment of Swallowing (SETS) protocol. Outcome measures included the pharyngeal components of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile, penetration-aspiration scale scores, and diet recommendations using the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative. 152 patients were included. Swallowing therapy improved all MBSImP component scores except 1, 7, and 13. Therapy improved total pharyngeal impairment scores by 2.66 points (p < .001) and total oral impairment score by 1.41 points (p < .001). Odds of elevated aspiration risk were reduced by 49% (p < .001). Patients were more likely to be on an unmodified food consistency after completion of therapy (OR 26, p = .004), but liquid consistency was not altered (OR 2.0, p = .57). Overall, 44% of patients in the cohort with an efficiency issue improved, and 50% of patients at risk for aspiration pre-therapy improved. Completing a 7-8 week course of exercise-based outpatient swallowing therapy is effective at improving multiple measures of swallowing physiology, safety and efficiency. It can also enable relaxation of diet consistency restrictions based on the IDDSI framework.

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in many health conditions and can be targeted directly through swallowing therapy. This study aims to explore the outcomes of outpatient swallowing therapy in clinical practice across a diverse cohort of patients. This was a retrospective, single-site longitudinal cohort study. Patients 18 years or older with dysphagia who completed 7-8 weeks of outpatient swallowing therapy with a pre- and post-treatment videofluoroscopy were included. Therapy employed a progressive swallowing exercise regimen based on the Systematic Exercise for Treatment of Swallowing (SETS) protocol. Outcome measures included the pharyngeal components of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile, penetration-aspiration scale scores, and diet recommendations using the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative. 152 patients were included. Swallowing therapy improved all MBSImP component scores except 1, 7, and 13. Therapy improved total pharyngeal impairment scores by 2.66 points (p < .001) and total oral impairment score by 1.41 points (p < .001). Odds of elevated aspiration risk were reduced by 49% (p < .001). Patients were more likely to be on an unmodified food consistency after completion of therapy (OR 26, p = .004), but liquid consistency was not altered (OR 2.0, p = .57). Overall, 44% of patients in the cohort with an efficiency issue improved, and 50% of patients at risk for aspiration pre-therapy improved. Completing a 7-8 week course of exercise-based outpatient swallowing therapy is effective at improving multiple measures of swallowing physiology, safety and efficiency. It can also enable relaxation of diet consistency restrictions based on the IDDSI framework.

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in many health conditions and can be targeted directly through swallowing therapy. This study aims to explore the outcomes of outpatient swallowing therapy in clinical practice across a diverse cohort of patients. This was a retrospective, single-site longitudinal cohort study. Patients 18 years or older with dysphagia who completed 7-8 weeks of outpatient swallowing therapy with a pre- and post-treatment videofluoroscopy were included. Therapy employed a progressive swallowing exercise regimen based on the Systematic Exercise for Treatment of Swallowing (SETS) protocol. Outcome measures included the pharyngeal components of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile, penetration-aspiration scale scores, and diet recommendations using the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative. 152 patients were included. Swallowing therapy improved all MBSImP component scores except 1, 7, and 13. Therapy improved total pharyngeal impairment scores by 2.66 points (p < .001) and total oral impairment score by 1.41 points (p < .001). Odds of elevated aspiration risk were reduced by 49% (p < .001). Patients were more likely to be on an unmodified food consistency after completion of therapy (OR 26, p = .004), but liquid consistency was not altered (OR 2.0, p = .57). Overall, 44% of patients in the cohort with an efficiency issue improved, and 50% of patients at risk for aspiration pre-therapy improved. Completing a 7-8 week course of exercise-based outpatient swallowing therapy is effective at improving multiple measures of swallowing physiology, safety and efficiency. It can also enable relaxation of diet consistency restrictions based on the IDDSI framework.

OBJECTIVE:Vocal tremor (VT) poses treatment challenges due to uncertain pathophysiology. VT is typically classified into two phenotypes: isolated vocal tremor (iVT) and essential tremor-related voice tremor (ETvt). The impact of phenotypes on upper aerodigestive tract physiology during swallowing remains unclear. Qualitative and quantitative measures were employed to characterize tremor phenotypes and investigate the effects on swallowing physiology. METHODS:Eleven ETvt participants (1 Male, 10 Female; x̄ age = 74) and 8 iVT participants (1 Male, 7 Female; x̄ age = 71) swallowed 20 mL boluses in cued and uncued conditions under standardized fluoroscopic visualization. Sustained/a/productions were captured to assess the rate and extent of fundamental frequency (F0) modulation. Penetration and Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores were obtained and swallowing biomechanics were captured using Swallowtail™ software. Participants also completed the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire. RESULTS:Hypopharyngeal transit was faster in both VT phenotypes compared with Swallowtail™ normative reference data. Total pharyngeal transit times, however, were only faster in patients with iVT, relative to reference data. No significant differences were observed on the SWAL-QOL or PAS between tremor phenotypes. SWAL-QOL scores revealed that these patients rarely reported dysphagia symptoms. CONCLUSIONS:Subtle differences in swallowing patterns were observed across VT phenotypes, possibly related to adaptive mechanisms resulting in quicker pharyngeal bolus transit. Most patients did not report swallowing issues or dysphagia symptoms. This study is foundational for larger studies on this challenging population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:4 Laryngoscope, 134:4599-4603, 2024.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The objective of this study is to assess disparities in adherence to swallowing therapy for clinically diagnosed oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) patients. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Analysis was conducted on data from 600 patients with OD and confirmed impairments in swallowing safety and/or efficiency on a videofluoroscopic swallow study. Patients were classified based on their adherence to treatment sessions, defined as the number of swallow treatment sessions attended. The outcome of treatment adherence was categorized into two groups: those who attended fewer than 50% of the prescribed treatment sessions and those who attended 50% or more of the sessions. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median ± interquartile range. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-square tests and Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression models were employed to identify factors associated with successful adherence. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: > 0.05). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The variables analyzed in this study were not significantly associated with nonadherence to swallow therapy. Nevertheless, our study still addressed an important knowledge gap and future studies would benefit from exploring other relevant socioeconomic and disease-related factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Level 4.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an important tool both in clinical practice and research involving patients with swallowing disorders. There are several challenges to be overcome and methodological details to be adequately reported to ensure rigor and transparency in studies utilizing PROMs in dysphagia research. For this reason, the Framework for RigOr aNd Transparency In REseaRch on Swallowing (FRONTIERS), a critical appraisal tool developed to ensure rigor and transparency in dysphagia research, has devoted a domain to PROMs. The aim of this current article, as part of a larger forum of articles, is to present the PROM section of FRONTIERS and describe its development. METHOD/UNASSIGNED:A literature review was carried out on PROMs in the field of dysphagia by three members of the FRONTIERS collaborative to identify items that were necessary for the rigorous application and transparent reporting of PROMs utilized in research of swallowing disorders in human subjects. Framework items were then subjected to an iterative process of feedback and consensus among the three members of the working group as well as all members of the FRONTIERS collaborative. Items were flagged for review and revised as needed until consensus was achieved on the final list. The final item list was compared to existing critical appraisal tools for PROMs. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The final checklist for the PROMs domain included 20 "Yes/No" questions that can be broadly divided into three categories: (a) development and validation, (b) patient population, and (c) PROM administration method. Each item is presented with a rationale for its inclusion. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The use of the FRONTIERS Framework will serve researchers and those appraising quality of research involving PROMs. More broadly, the FRONTIERS Framework will facilitate improved rigor and transparency across dysphagia research. Special considerations and future goals are discussed.

This aim of this study is to characterize the nature and pathophysiology of dysphagia after ACDF surgery by precisely and comprehensively capturing within-subject changes on videofluoroscopy between preoperative and postoperative time points. 21 adults undergoing planned primary ACDF procedures were prospectively recruited and enrolled. Participants underwent standardized preoperative and six-week postoperative videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Videos were blindly rated using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and analysis of total pharyngeal residue (%C2-4²), swallowing timing, kinematics, and anatomic change was completed. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to explore the relationships between possible predictor variables and functional outcomes of interest that changed across timepoints. There was no change in PAS scores across timepoints. Total pharyngeal residue (%C2-C4²) was increased postoperatively (p < 0.001). Our statistical model revealed significant main effects for timepoint (p = 0.002), maximum pharyngeal constriction area (MPCA_N) (p < 0.001), and maximum thickness of posterior pharyngeal (PPWT_MAX) (p = 0.004) on the expression of total pharyngeal residue. There were significant two-way interactions for timepoint and MPCA_N (p = 0.028), timepoint and PPWT_MAX (p = 0.005), and MPCA_N and PPWT_MAX (p = 0.010). Unsurprisingly, we found a significant three-way interaction between these three predictors (p = 0.027). Our findings suggest that in planned ACDF procedures without known complications, swallowing efficiency is more likely to be impaired than airway protection six weeks after surgery. The manifestation of impaired swallowing efficiency at this timepoint appears to be driven by a complex relationship between reduced pharyngeal constriction and increased prevertebral edema.