Faculty Bibliography

Pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) are being increasingly used for the management of patients admitted with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and are endorsed by societal guidelines. Whether PERT improves outcomes remains unknown. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of patients with acute PE treated by a PERT versus no PERT.A systematic review and study level meta-analysis was conducted by searching PubMed and EMBASE databases from inception until November 10, 2024 and included studies evaluating efficacy of PERT vs no PERT in patients admitted for acute PE. Outcomes included all-cause mortality (in-hospital and 30-day mortality), major and clinically relevant bleeding, advanced therapies utilization, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission. Twenty-four retrospective observational studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 15,809 patients (mean age 61.6 years with 49% male) with acute PE of which 6228 were treated with a PERT and 9,581 without a PERT. Lower all-cause mortality (in-hospital or 30-day mortality) [odds ratio (OR)= 0.72; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.93; 24 studies], major or clinically relevant bleeding (OR= 0.60; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.86; 15 studies), higher utilization of advanced therapies (OR= 3.16; 95% CI: 1.81 to 5.49; 19 studies), and lower hospital LOS (MD= -1.49; 95% CI: -2.59 to -0.39; 14 studies) were seen in the patients treated by a PERT compared to those not treated by a PERT. In this large meta-analysis of observational studies comparing outcomes in patients treated by PERT versus not treated by PERT, there were significantly lower short-term mortality, lower major or clinically relevant bleeding, higher utilization of advanced therapies and lower hospital length of stay with the existence of PERT. PERT should be the standard of care for the management of patients with acute PE.

BACKGROUND:Randomized trials of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization vs medical therapy have yielded inconsistent results. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes with an initial invasive strategy (INV) vs an initial conservative strategy (CON) in patients with coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA)-determined CTO in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial. METHODS:Participants in ISCHEMIA who underwent CCTA evaluated for CTO by the core laboratory (3,113 of 5,179 randomized patients [60%]) were categorized into subgroups with (100% stenosis) and without (<100% stenosis) CTO. Primary analysis compared outcomes in those randomized to INV vs CON using an intention-to-treat approach. Secondary analyses compared outcomes using inverse probability weighting to model successful CTO revascularization (REV) in all INV participants vs CON participants. RESULTS:Of the 3,113 CCTA-evaluable participants, 1,470 had at least 1 CTO (752 INV and 718 CON). INV did not reduce cardiovascular (CV) death or myocardial infarction (MI) (5-year difference -3.5%; 95% CI: -7.8% to 0.8%) and resulted in more procedural MIs (2.5%; 95% CI: 1.0%-4.0%) but fewer spontaneous MIs (-6.3%; 95% CI: -9.7% to -3.2%) than CON. CTO REV modeled across INV had a high probability (>90%) of any lower CV death or MI, MI, spontaneous MI, unstable angina, and heart failure counterbalanced by a higher rate of procedural MI. CTO REV significantly improved angina-related quality of life (mean difference 4.6 points), Rose Dyspnea Scale score (rescaled) (mean difference 5.3 points), and EQ-5D visual analog scale score (4.6 points). CONCLUSIONS:In the ISCHEMIA trial, the risks and benefits of INV compared with CON were similar among patients with and without CCTA-determined CTO (more frequent procedural MI, less frequent spontaneous MI, and significantly improved angina and dyspnea-related quality of life). In an observational comparison, successful CTO REV was associated with a high probability of lower CV death or MI (driven by lower MI) compared with CON. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).

BACKGROUND:Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with multiple risk factor goals is recommended for patients with chronic coronary disease (CCD), yet achieving all GDMT goals is uncommon. The relative importance of these goals and timing of their attainment on cardiovascular events is uncertain. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:This study aims to describe the relationship between achieving specific GDMT goals, when they are achieved, and clinical outcomes. METHODS:This was an observational study of participants with CCD in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death or myocardial infarction (MI). GDMT goals were systolic blood pressure (SBP) <130 mm Hg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL, not smoking, and antiplatelet therapy. Frequency of GDMT goals met at baseline and during follow-up is described. Bayesian joint modeling for longitudinal goal status and time-to-event analyses characterized the relative importance of specific GDMT goal attainment and timing with CV death/MI. RESULTS:All 5,179 ISCHEMIA participants were included. Among 4,914 participants with complete data on all 4 GDMT goals at baseline, 386 (9%), 2,073 (42%), 1,843 (38%), and 612 (12%) met 0-1, 2, 3, and 4 GDMT goals, respectively. The 4-year cumulative event rate for CV death/MI was highest for participants who attained no GDMT goals (24.5%; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 13.5%-42.2%) and lowest for those who attained all goals at baseline and remained at goal during follow-up (8.7%; 95% CrI: 6.7%-10.9%). SBP goal attainment was associated with a significant absolute event reduction in CV death/MI (-5.1%; 95% CrI: -11.3% to -1.0%), followed by antiplatelet therapy (-11.2%; 95% CrI: -29.1% to 0.8%), achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL (-2.0%; 95% CrI: -6.0% to 2.4%), and not smoking (-1.7%; 95% CrI: -9.3% to 4.2%). Ten millimeters of mercury lower SBP during follow-up was associated with 10% relative risk reduction of CV death/MI (RR [relative risk] = 0.90; 95% CrI: 0.82-0.98), after adjusting for other GDMT goals and baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS:Among participants with CCD, early attainment and maintenance of GDMT goals, especially SBP, were associated with fewer cardiovascular events. Compared with no GDMT goals at target, having all 4 GDMT goals at target at baseline was associated with an absolute 16% fewer CV deaths and MIs. (ISCHEMIA [International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches]; NCT01471522).

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The association between cardiovascular disease and advanced liver disease is incompletely understood. To explore this interaction, we compared management, clinical outcomes, readmission rates, and resource utilization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with and without liver disease. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2020) was queried to identify hospitalizations for STEMI. Cohorts were stratified by presence of liver disease. Liver disease was defined as documented diagnosis of liver cirrhosis or liver failure. Multivariable regression model and propensity score matching was used to compare the risk of outcomes. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 1,029,608 hospitalizations for STEMI; 45,478 (4.4 %) patients had a history of significant liver disease. Patient with liver disease had higher baseline prevalence of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, anemia, and heart failure. After propensity matching (N = 24,067 in each group), patients with liver disease had higher in-hospital mortality (48.8 % vs 17.3 %, aOR: 6.80 [CI: 6.55-7.06], p < 0.001) and adverse events, including cerebrovascular accidents (6.8 % vs 4.4 %, aOR:1.74 [CI: 1.62-1.86], p < 0.001), cardiac arrest (24.4 % vs 10.3 %, aOR:3.34 [CI: 3.21-3.48], p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (55.9 % vs 21.1 %, aOR: 6.4 [CI: 6.18-6.64], p < 0.001), mechanical circulatory support requirement (36.2 % vs 14.4 %, aOR: 4.2 [CI: 4.01-4.34], p < 0.001), and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (61.1 % vs 25.3 %, aOR:6.5 [CI: 6.28-6.75], p < 0.001). From 2016 to 2020, in-hospital mortality for STEMI did not change significantly for patients with liver disease (47.4 % to 48.6 % p-trend: 0.826), however percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use increased from 43.6 % to 52.2 % (p-trend <0.001). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:In STEMI hospitalizations, patients with liver disease have significantly higher mortality, and adverse events as compared with those without liver disease. Despite the increasing use of primary PCI, mortality remains high in STEMI patients with liver disease.

The role of revascularization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome is well established. However, the incremental value of revascularization over guideline-directed medical therapy is controversial. Currently available data supports the use of PCI to improve angina and quality of life for chronic coronary disease and heart failure (HF). However, there is insufficient data to support revascularization with PCI to improve mortality, reduce cardiovascular events, or improve ejection fraction over medical therapy alone. Additional trials are necessary to identify HF patients who may benefit from revascularization, and the optimal revascularization strategy for this population.

BACKGROUND:Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) have outcomes worse than uncomplicated ST elevation myocardial infarction. Yet, no large-scale study has compared the outcomes of large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (LBMT) with anticoagulation alone (AC). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes among patients receiving LBMT vs AC alone. METHODS:This was a two-center retrospective study that included patients with intermediate-risk PE from October 2016 - October 2023 from the institution's Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) database. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest or hemodynamic decompensation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates; Kaplan Meir curves and IPTW multivariable Cox regression were used to assess the relationship between treatment groups and outcomes. RESULTS:Of the 273 patients included in the analysis, 192 (70 %) patients received AC alone and 81 (30 %) patients received LBMT and AC. A total of 30 (10.9 %) patients experienced the primary composite outcome over a median follow-up of 30 days. The primary composite outcome was significantly lower in the group that received LBMT compared to those on AC alone (1.2 % vs 15.1 %, log-rank p < 0.001; adjusted HR: 0.02; 95 % CI: 0.002-0.17, p < 0.001) driven by a lower rate of 30-day all-cause mortality (0 % vs 7.3 %, log-rank p = 0.01), resuscitated cardiac arrest (0 % vs 6.8 %, log-rank p = 0.016) and new or worsening hemodynamic instability (4 % vs 11.1 %, log-rank p = 0.007). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this largest cohort to date comparing LBMT versus AC alone in acute intermediate-risk PE, LBMT had a significantly lower rate of the primary composite outcome including a lower rate of all-cause mortality when compared to AC alone. Ongoing randomized trials will test these associations.

BACKGROUND:Evidence is limited regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) vs catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:This observational study aimed to compare the outcomes of older adults with high-risk PE treated with MT vs CDT using a target trial emulation framework. METHODS:We included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 to 99 years admitted with high-risk PE (defined by cardiac arrest, shock, and vasopressor use) who underwent MT/CDT from 2017 to 2020. We evaluated 1-year mortality using an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach, controlling for 62 baseline covariates. We also evaluated readmissions and in-hospital outcomes, including intracranial hemorrhage. Patients were followed from the date of the index procedure to the outcomes of interest, 1 year, or December 2020. RESULTS:We included 235 and 484 patients in the MT and CDT groups, respectively. The absolute risk of 1-year mortality was 48.4% (95% CI: 34.1%-63.3%) in the MT group and 45.4% (95% CI: 37.8%-55.8%) in the CDT group, with an adjusted HR of 1.16 (95% CI: 0.84-1.59). We found no evidence that all-cause readmission (MT vs CDT; subdistribution HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.56-1.40), intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.07-1.77), or transfusions (adjusted OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.52-1.76) differed significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS:Among older adults with high-risk PE treated with catheter-based therapies, the clinical outcomes were similar between the patients treated with MT vs CDT. Randomized trials are needed to confirm our findings.

BACKGROUND:This study examined stress echocardiography (SE) in relation to coronary artery anatomy, and outcome in subjects randomized in the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) Trial. METHODS:Of 5,179 patients randomized to initial invasive or conservative strategy, SE was performed in 1,079. Coronary computed tomographic angiogram (CCTA) excluded left main disease and quantified coronary lesions. Degree of ischemia was defined by number of segments with stress-induced wall motion abnormalities (WMA) (mild < 3, moderate = 3 and severe > 3). Transient ischemic dilation (TID) was defined as a 10% increase in stress left ventricular (LV) end systolic volume. Primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death (CVD), nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. RESULTS:On CCTA, 607/715 (84%) with CCTA evaluable for ≥70% lesion had one such lesion. Features associated with coronary lesions ≥ 70% were number of ischemic/infarcted segments, 3 or more ischemic segments in the anterior territory and inability to augment LV ejection fraction 10 percentage points . TID, present in 28.5%, was significantly associated with severity of ischemia. For every 0.10 increase in peak wall motion score index (WMSI), there was 12% increased risk of CVD or MI (adjusted HR=1.12 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.21), p=0.003. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe myocardial ischemia receiving contemporary therapies, stress echocardiography identified subjects with significant CAD and WMSI provided prognostic value.