Faculty Bibliography

Preprocedural chest or cardiac imaging for cardiothoracic surgery is focused on the imaging necessary to inform the performance of a surgical procedure after an initial diagnosis and the decision to operate has been made with consideration of patient comorbidities and anesthesia risk. The diverse range of noncoronary cardiac surgeries, coronary cardiac surgeries, and thoracic surgeries each have their own unique surgical techniques, risks, and complications, which can further vary between patients undergoing first time or repeat cardiothoracic surgery. This document reviews the literature for preprocedural chest or cardiac imaging in patients with and without a history of cardiothoracic surgery. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Cardiac imaging is an integral part of modern diagnostic imaging and a subject heavily tested on the Radiology Core exam. Therefore, radiology residency programs should provide adequate training in this area. This study aims to investigate the current state of cardiac imaging training within radiology residency programs in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Survey questionnaires using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) platform were sent to heads of cardiac/cardiothoracic sections in all US radiology residency programs for which valid email addresses were available. RESULTS:Of 163 questionnaires sent, there were 70 responses, with 82.9% completing the entire survey. In total, 85.9% reported having a cardiac imaging rotation, with 58.8% being 4 weeks, mostly in a single block. Sixteen programs (31.4%) offered a longer cardiac experience (6 to 12 wk). In total, 90.7% reported having a designated person responsible for cardiac imaging, a radiologist in 68.5% and a combined radiologist and cardiologist in 22.2%. The responsible person for reporting cardiac CT was a radiologist in 40.7%, with a combined radiologist and cardiologist in 59.3%. For cardiac MRI studies, there was combined responsibility in 69.0%, either on alternate days of coverage or with the radiologist interpreting noncardiac findings. A total of 65.5% reported having ≥6 cardiac case conferences yearly, and 75.9% had ≥6 cardiac lectures. In total, 65.6% of programs offered cardiothoracic fellowships, with 87.2% dedicating ≥3 months to cardiac imaging. Only 18.6% had dedicated cardiovascular fellowships. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our research offers crucial insights into the current trends in cardiac imaging education and practice within radiology residency programs, so that professional societies can develop guidelines to structure a more uniform and thorough approach toward cardiac imaging education.

BACKGROUND:Quantitative CT imaging may be a useful predictor of outcome in rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). RESEARCH QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:What is the utility of deep learning-based lung fibrosis quantitation on CT imaging in assessing disease severity, predicting mortality, and identifying progression in RA-ILD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:CT scans on a primary cohort of 289 patients and a validation cohort of 50 individuals with RA-ILD were assessed quantitatively by using the data-driven texture analysis (DTA) method. We examined associations between quantitative scores for extent of lung fibrosis and pulmonary function and survival. RESULTS:DTA fibrosis score at baseline showed moderate negative correlation with FVC percent predicted (primary cohort rho = -0.55; validation cohort rho = -0.50; both, P < .001), and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide percent predicted (primary cohort rho = -0.67; validation cohort rho = -0.65; both, P < .001). Longitudinal change in DTA fibrosis score was associated with changes in FVC and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide in the primary cohort (rho = -0.46 and rho = -0.43, respectively; both, P < .001). Cox multivariable models adjusted for potentially influential variables showed that the baseline DTA fibrosis score was significantly associated with mortality risk (primary cohort hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.03-1.05; P < .001]; validation cohort HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.11; P = .026]). In the primary cohort, the increase in DTA fibrosis score on sequential scans was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = .003) independent of baseline DTA extent. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:In 2 cohorts of patients with RA-ILD, quantitative assessment of lung fibrosis on CT imaging was associated with worse lung function at baseline and risk of mortality. Increase in DTA-derived lung fibrosis score on sequential scans was associated with subsequent risk of mortality. Quantitative CT imaging should be considered for use as a clinical and research outcome assessment tool in RA-ILD.

BACKGROUND:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects roughly 1% of the population and commonly involves the lungs. Of lung involvement in RA, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is well known; however, airways disease in RA is relatively understudied. RESEARCH QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:What are the baseline airways abnormalities in a prospective cohort of patients with RA based on pulmonary function testing (PFT) results, high-resolution CT (HRCT) scans, and computational imaging analysis and are there associations between these abnormalities and respiratory symptoms? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:In this single-center study, 188 patients with RA without a clinical diagnosis of ILD underwent HRCT imaging and PFT. Radiologists assessed HRCT scans for airway abnormalities. Computational imaging via VIDA Vision software and in-house quantitative CT imaging analysis was applied to 147 HRCT scans to quantify airway abnormalities. RESULTS:to FVC ratio; and higher rates of rheumatoid factor positivity. Prespecified quantitative CT scan metrics (wall thickening percentage and emphysema percentage) correlated with obstruction in PFT results and more severe respiratory symptoms, including shortness of breath and cough. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:High rates of airways abnormalities were found in this prospective RA cohort based on three methods of detection. Significant associations were identified between quantitative CT scan measures and respiratory symptoms. Airways disease may be an underrecognized extra-articular manifestation of RA and quantitative CT imaging may be a sensitive method to detect the clinical impact on respiratory symptoms.

Granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) is a lymphoproliferative and granulomatous pulmonary manifestation of primary immune deficiency diseases, notably common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), and is an important contributor of excess morbidity. As with all forms of ILD, the significance of utilizing a multidisciplinary team discussion to enhance diagnostic and treatment confidence of GLILD cannot be overstated. In this review, key clinical, radiological, and pathological features are integrated into a diagnostic algorithm to facilitate a consensus diagnosis. As the evidence for diagnosing and managing patients with GLILD is limited, the viewpoints discussed here are not meant to resolve current controversies. Instead, this review aims to provide a practical framework for diagnosing and evaluating suspected cases and emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach when caring for GLILD patients.

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. A search for the underlying cause of infection typically includes radiological imaging as part of this investigation. This document focuses on thoracic and abdominopelvic causes of sepsis. In 2017, the global incidence of sepsis was estimated to be 48.9 million cases, with 11 million sepsis-related deaths (accounting for nearly 20% of all global deaths); therefore, understanding which imaging modalities and types of studies are acceptable or not acceptable is imperative. The 5 variants provided include the most commonly encountered scenarios in the setting of sepsis along with recommendations and data for each imaging study. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

BACKGROUND:Open and robotic-assisted transthoracic approaches for diaphragm plication are accepted surgical interventions for diaphragm paralysis and eventration. However, long-term patient-reported symptom improvement and quality of life (QOL) remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN:A telephone-based survey was developed focusing on postoperative symptom improvement and QOL. Patients who underwent open or robotic-assisted transthoracic diaphragm plication (2008-2020) across three institutions were invited to participate. Patients who responded and provided consent were surveyed. Likert responses on symptom severity were dichotomized and rates before and after surgery were compared using McNemar's test. RESULTS:Forty-one percent of patients participated (43 of 105 responded, mean age 61.0 years, 67.4% male, 37.2% robotic-assisted surgery), with an average time between surgery and survey of 4.1 ± 3.2 years. Patients reported significant improvement in dyspnea while lying flat (67.4% pre- vs 27.9% postoperative, p < 0.001), dyspnea at rest (55.8% pre- vs 11.6% postoperative, p < 0.001), dyspnea with activity (90.7% pre- vs 55.8% postoperative, p < 0.001), dyspnea while bending over (79.1% pre- vs 34.9% postoperative, p < 0.001), and fatigue (67.4% pre- vs 41.9% postoperative, p = 0.008). There was no statistical improvement in chronic cough. 86% of patients reported improved overall QOL, 79% had increased exercise capacity, and 86% would recommend surgery to a friend with a similar problem. Analysis comparing open and robotic-assisted approaches found no statistically significant differences in symptom improvement or QOL responses between the groups. CONCLUSIONS:Patients report significantly improved dyspneic and fatigue symptoms after transthoracic diaphragm plication, regardless of open or robotic-assisted approach. The majority of patients report improved QOL and exercise capacity.

Routine chest imaging has been used to identify unknown or subclinical cardiothoracic abnormalities in the absence of symptoms. Various imaging modalities have been suggested for routine chest imaging. We review the evidence for or against the use of routine chest imaging in different clinical scenarios. This document aims to determine guidelines for the use of routine chest imaging as initial imaging for hospital admission, initial imaging prior to noncardiothoracic surgery, and surveillance imaging for chronic cardiopulmonary disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.