Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Screening colonoscopies (CS) performed before prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allow for identifying synchronous malignancies and comorbid gastrointestinal (GI) conditions. Performing these procedures prior to radiation precludes the necessity of post-SBRT pelvic instrumentation, which may lead to severe toxicity and fistulization. We review compliance of CSs, incidence of GI pathology, and the impact of pretreatment CS findings on subsequent physician-reported toxicity and patient-reported quality of life (QoL). METHODS AND MATERIALS/UNASSIGNED:We reviewed an institutional database of patients treated for prostate cancer with SBRT including toxicity and QoL outcomes. A detailed review of pretreatment CS findings was reviewed including identification of diverticulosis, location of polyp resection, and presence of hemorrhoids. Pretreatment CS findings were then correlated with outcomes following SBRT. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Identification of comorbid GI conditions was a common event, with the presence of diverticulosis in 49.5% (n = 100), hemorrhoids in 67% (n = 136), and polyps in 48% (n = 98). More than half of patients with polyps removed had at least 1 removed from the rectosigmoid. Pretreatment CS did not introduce a delay in SBRT start date. Grade 1 toxicity was significantly lower in patients who underwent CS closer to the initiation of SBRT. There was no increased risk of physician-graded toxicity in the presence of diverticulosis, hemorrhoids, or polyps. Patient-reported GI QoL pattern in our screening cohort mimicked that seen in the previously published nonscreened population. There was no overt QoL detriment observed in patients who had GI pathology identified before SBRT. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:GI pathology identified in our elderly patient population was commonly identified on pretreatment CS. Screening CS may optimize bowel health for patients heading into radiation therapy. Toxicity and QoL for patients with GI pathologies identified on pretreatment CS do not preclude the delivery of prostate SBRT. We advocate for pretreatment CS in patients eligible prior to SBRT.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Percentage of positive cores involved on a systemic prostate biopsy has been established as a risk factor for adverse oncologic outcomes and is a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) independent parameter for unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Most data from a radiation standpoint was published in an era of conventional fractionation. We explore whether the higher biological dose delivered with SBRT can mitigate this risk factor. METHODS:A large single institutional database was interrogated to identify all patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with 5-fraction SBRT without ADT. Pathology results were reviewed to determine detailed core involvement as well as Gleason score (GS). High-volume biopsy core involvement was defined as ≥ 50%. Weighted Gleason core involvement was reviewed, giving higher weight to higher-grade cancer. The PSA kinetics and oncologic outcomes were analyzed for association with core involvement. RESULTS:From 2009 to 2018, 1590 patients were identified who underwent SBRT for localized PCa. High-volume core involvement was a relatively rare event observed in 19% of our cohort, which was observed more in patients with small prostates (p < 0.0001) and/or intermediate-risk disease (p = 0.005). Higher PSA nadir was observed in those patients with low-volume core involvement within the intermediate-risk cohort (p = 0.004), which was confirmed when core involvement was analyzed as a continuous variable weighted by Gleason score (p = 0.049). High-volume core involvement was not associated with biochemical progression (p = 0.234). CONCLUSIONS:With a median follow-up of over 4 years, biochemical progression was not associated with pretreatment high-volume core involvement for patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT alone. In the era of prostate SBRT and MRI-directed prostate biopsies, the use of high-volume core involvement as an independent predictor of unfavorable intermediate risk disease should be revisited.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Modern literature has demonstrated improvements in long-term biochemical outcomes with the use of prophylactic pelvic nodal irradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost in the management of high-risk prostate cancer. However, this comes at the cost of increased treatment-related toxicity. In this study, we explore the outcomes of the largest cohort to date, which uses a stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) boost following pelvic nodal radiation for exclusively high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS/UNASSIGNED:A large institutional database was interrogated to identify all patients with high-risk clinical node-negative prostate cancer treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to the pelvis followed by a robotic SBRT boost to the prostate and seminal vesicles. The boost was uniformly delivered over three fractions. Toxicity was measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Oncologic outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were created to evaluate associations between pretreatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 440 patients with a median age of 71 years were treated, the majority of whom were diagnosed with a grade group 4 or 5 disease. Pelvic nodal irradiation was delivered at a total dose of 4,500 cGy in 25 fractions, followed by a three-fraction SBRT boost. With an early median follow-up of 2.5 years, the crude incidence of grade 2+ genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was 13% and 11%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed grade 2+ GU toxicity was associated with older age and a higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage. Multivariate analysis revealed overall survival was associated with patient age and posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Utilization of an SBRT boost following pelvic nodal irradiation in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer is oncologically effective with early follow-up and yields minimal high-grade toxicity. We demonstrate a 5-year freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBCR) of over 83% with correspondingly limited grade 3+ GU and GI toxicity measured at 3.6% and 1.6%, respectively. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate oncologic outcomes and late toxicity.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Historically, toxicity concerns have existed in patients with large prostate glands treated with radiation therapy, particularly brachytherapy. There are questions whether this risk extends to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In this retrospective review, we examine clinical outcomes of patients with prostate glands ≥100 cc treated curatively with SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed a large institutional database to identify patients with histologically confirmed localized prostate cancer in glands ≥100 cc, who were treated with definitive-robotic SBRT. Prostate volume (PV) was determined by treatment planning magnetic resonance imaging. Toxicity was measured using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Many patients received the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Quality of Life questionnaires. Minimum follow-up (FU) was 2 years. RESULTS:Seventy-one patients were identified with PV ≥100 cc. Most had grade group (GG) 1 or 2 (41% and 37%, respectively) disease. All patients received a total dose of 3500 to 3625 cGy in 5 fractions. A minority (27%) received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which was used for gland size downsizing in only 10% of cases. Nearly half (45%) were taking GU medications for urinary dysfunction before RT. Median toxicity FU was 4.0 years. Two-year rates of grade 1+ genitourinary (GU), grade 1+ gastrointestinal (GI), and grade 2+ GU toxicity were 43.5%, 15.9%, and 30.4%, respectively. Total grade 3 GU toxicities were very limited (2.8%). There were no grade 3 GI toxicities. On logistic regression analysis, pretreatment use of GU medications was significantly associated with increased rate of grade 2+ GU toxicity (odds ratio, 3.19; P = .024). Furthermore, PV (analyzed as a continuous variable) did not have an effect on toxicity, quality of life, or oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:With early FU, ultra large prostate glands do not portend increased risk of high-grade toxicity after SBRT but likely carry an elevated risk of low-grade GU toxicity.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1132777.].

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor diagnosed in adults. In patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, the incidence of post-treatment radionecrosis appears to be rising, which has been attributed to improved patient survival as well as novel systemic treatments. The impacts of concomitant immunotherapy and the interval between diagnosis and treatment on patient outcomes are unclear. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This single institution, retrospective study consisted of patients who received single or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for intact brain metastases. Exclusion criteria included neurosurgical resection prior to treatment and treatment of non-malignant histologies or primary central nervous system malignancies. A univariate screen was implemented to determine which factors were associated with radionecrosis. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare the two groups for categorical variables, and the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous data. Those factors that appeared to be associated with radionecrosis on univariate analyses were included in a multivariable model. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess potential predictors of time to local failure and time to regional failure. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 107 evaluable patients with a total of 256 individual brain metastases were identified. The majority of metastases were non-small cell lung cancer (58.98%), followed by breast cancer (16.02%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated increased risk of radionecrosis with increasing MRI maximum axial dimension (OR 1.10, p=0.0123) and a history of previous whole brain radiation therapy (OR 3.48, p=0.0243). Receipt of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of local failure (HR 0.31, p=0.0159). Time interval between diagnostic MRI and first treatment, time interval between CT simulation and first treatment, and concurrent immunotherapy had no impact on incidence of radionecrosis or regional failure. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:An optimal time interval between diagnosis and treatment for intact brain metastases that minimizes radionecrosis and maximizes local and regional control could not be identified. Concurrent immunotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of radionecrosis and may improve local control. These data further support the safety and synergistic efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND:The use of treatment planning prostate MRI for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is largely a standard, yet not all patients can receive MRI for a variety of clinical reasons. Thus, we aim to investigate the safety of patients who received CT alone based SBRT planning for the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer. METHODS:Our study analyzed 3410 patients with localized prostate cancer who were treated with SBRT at a single academic institution between 2006 and 2020. Acute and late toxicity was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaires evaluated QOL and PSA nadir was evaluated to detect biochemical failures. RESULTS:A total of 162 patients (4.75%) received CT alone for treatment planning. The CT alone group was older relative to the MRI group (69.9 vs 67.2, p < 0.001) and had higher risk and grade disease (p < 0.001). Additionally, the CT group exhibited a trend in larger CTVs (82.56 cc vs 76.90 cc; p = 0.055), lower total radiation doses (p = 0.048), and more frequent pelvic nodal radiation versus the MRI group (p < 0.001). There were only two reported cases of Grade 3 + toxicity within the CT alone group. Quality of life data within the CT alone group revealed declines in urinary and bowel scores at one month with return to baseline at subsequent follow up. Early biochemical failure data at median time of 2.3 years revealed five failures by Phoenix definition. CONCLUSIONS:While clinical differences existed between the MRI and CT alone group, we observed tolerable toxicity profiles in the CT alone cohort, which was further supported by EPIC questionnaire data. The overall clinical outcomes appear comparable in patients unable to receive MRI for their SBRT treatment plan with early clinical follow up.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a standard therapeutic option for men with prostate adenocarcinoma. The median age of prostate cancer in the US is 66 but patients as young as 35 have been reported. Many younger patients will have surgery rather than SBRT for localized prostate cancer but some will be treated with SBRT. There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of this younger subset. This study reports outcomes on patients younger than 50 treated with SBRT at a single institution and compares outcomes to older patients. MATERIALS/METHODS: Between April 2006 and December 2020, 3626 patients with prostate cancer were treated with inhomogeneous-dosed SBRT using a robotic linear accelerator and followed at an academic institution. 3173 (87.51%) of patients were treated with a median dose of 3500cGY (3500-3625) delivered over 5 consecutive fractions prescribed to the 83-85% isodose line, and the remaining 453 (12.49%) other patients receiving a median dose of 4500cGY (4500-5400) to the pelvis in conventional fractionation followed by a 3 fraction SBRT boost of 2100 cGY (1950-2100) over 3 consecutive fractions. Androgen deprivation Therapy (ADT) was prescribed in 865 (23.86%) of these cases. The mean age was 67.3 years old. 47 patients were younger than 50 years old (mean age 46.6). 3,579 patients were 50 or older. Patients were divided into prognostic D'Amico risk groups with 44.68%, 48.94%, 6.38% of patients falling in the low, intermediate, and high-risk stratifications in the younger cohort and 24.76%, 56.83%, 18.41% in the older cohort respectively. Pretreatment PSA was 1.72 - 43.2 (median: 5.4) in the younger group and 0.3 - 661 (median: 6.5) in the older group. In the younger group, Gleason scores were 6 in 48.94%, 7 in 46.81%, and 8-10 in 4.25%. 44 younger patients were treated with SBRT alone. 3 patients also received supplemental external beam radiation (median dose 4500cGY) and 5 patients (10.6%) received Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) as part of their treatment regimen. In the older group, Gleason scores were 6 in 30.57%, 7 in 54.06%, and 8-10 in 15.37%. 3129 were treated with SBRT alone. 450 patients also received supplemental external beam radiation (median dose 4500cGY) and 860 patients (24.03%) received Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) as part of their treatment regimen.
RESULT(S): At 64.8 months (range 7 months - 177 months) the 5-year biochemical relapse free survival was 98% in younger patients compared to 99% in older patients using the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure. The 5-year median post treatment PSA was 0.15 in the younger patients and 0.20 in the older patients. There were no significant differences in biochemical relapse free survival between the groups.
CONCLUSION(S): This represents the largest series evaluating outcomes in very young patients treated with definitive SBRT for prostate cancer. With 5-year follow up, SBRT is an effective treatment for this younger subset of patients. Continued follow up will be required to see if these results remain durable.
Copyright