Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Recent evidence suggests atrial fibrillation (AF) causes cardiomyopathy due to remodeling driven by both irregular rate and rhythm. Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% has been shown to improve EF and mortality. It is unknown whether the benefits of AF ablation among patients with reduced EF are affected by the degree of pre-ablation rate control. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate AF ablation echocardiographic outcomes for patients who have EF ≤ 35% with varying degrees of pre-ablation rate control. METHODS:Single-center, retrospective study of patients with EF ≤ 35% undergoing first-time ablation of persistent AF. Primary analyses evaluated the degree to which pre-ablation rate control impacted echocardiographic outcomes. Rates of EF recovery to > 35% were compared at three different cutoffs: 110 bpm, 90 bpm, and 70 bpm. A linear regression analysis was then performed to evaluate whether baseline heart rate (HR) predicted change in EF. RESULTS: = 0.05, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS:Catheter ablation of persistent AF in patients with reduced EF frequently resulted in recovery in EF > 35%, irrespective of pre-ablation achieved rate control. While patients with HR > 70 bpm experienced a greater improvement in EF compared to those ≤ 70 bpm, patients with baseline HR below this target still experienced significant EF improvements. Further investigation into irregularity-mediated cardiomyopathy is warranted.

BACKGROUND:Combined catheter ablation (CA) with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may produce comprehensive treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) whereby rhythm control is achieved and stroke risk is reduced without the need for chronic oral anticoagulation. However, the efficacy and safety of this strategy is still controversial. METHODS:This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Eligible studies reported outcomes in patients with AF who underwent combined CA and LAAC vs CA alone. Studies performing CA without pulmonary vein isolation were excluded. RESULTS:Eight studies comprising 1878 patients were included (2 RCT, 6 observational). When comparing combined CA and LAAC vs CA alone, pooled results showed no difference in arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio (RR) 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.33), stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.27-2.22), or major periprocedural complications (RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.28-5.89). Total procedure time was shorter with CA alone (mean difference 48.45 min; 95% CI 23.06-74.62). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Combined CA with LAAC for AF is associated with similar rates of arrhythmia-free survival, stroke, and major periprocedural complications when compared to CA alone. A combined strategy may be as safe and efficacious for patients at moderate to high risk for bleeding events to negate the need for chronic oral anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:There have been limited data examining the temporal relationship between device-derived daily activity and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:We aimed to assess whether activity predicted VAs or VAs predicted changes in activity. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The CERTITUDE registry includes over 55,000 implanted devices active on Home Monitoring. Daily data on activity are captured by a 1-axis accelerometer. Temporal changes in activity during treated VAs were analyzed using the first event and 7-day activity windows (baseline, pre-event, and postevent). Baseline period was defined as 31 to 38 days prior to VA. VAs were categorized by heart rate (≤200 beats/min, >200 beats/min) and treatment (shock or antitachycardia pacing). Differences were assessed using the binomial proportion test and case-crossover analysis. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:.003). Case-crossover analyses confirmed lower activity rates following for VA events >200 beats/min with shock. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:In the CERTITUDE registry, we have shown a temporal decline in device-derived activity following VA events >200 beats/min and for VA events <200 beats/min treated with a shock, but we did not find changes in activity preceding a shock event.

BACKGROUND:Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has swiftly emerged as a safe and effective alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing. Limited data exists on the use of retractable-helix, stylet-driven leads (SDL) for LBBAP. OBJECTIVE:The objective is to prospectively evaluate performance and safety of the Solia S stylet-driven pacing lead in a rigorously controlled multi-center trial to support U.S. market application. METHODS:A multi-center, prospective, non-randomized trial enrolled patients with standard pacing indications. Implant procedural and lead data, including threshold, sensing, impedance, and capture type were collected through 3-months. Primary endpoints were freedom from LBBAP lead-related serious complications through 3-months and LBBAP implant success according to pre-specified criteria. A blinded Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudicated all potential endpoint complications. RESULTS:A total of 186 patients were included from 14 US sites. LBBAP implants were successful in 95.7% (178/186; 95% CI: 91.7%, 98.1%; p< 0.0001 for comparison to performance goal of 88%). Through the 3-month follow-up, 3 patients experienced a serious LBBAP complication, all lead dislodgements, resulting in a LBBAP lead-related complication-free rate of 98.3%. A total of 13 patients (7.8%) experienced any system-related or procedure-related complication. Mean threshold was 0.89V at 0.4ms, sensing was 10.8mV, and impedance was 608 ohms. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The short-term results from this prospective trial demonstrate both high implant success and freedom from LBBAP lead-related complications utilizing this stylet driven retractable helix lead. This trial supports the safety, use, and effectiveness of SDL for performing contemporary physiologic pacing.

BACKGROUND:Genetic testing is a cornerstone in the assessment of many cardiac diseases. However, variants are frequently classified as variants of unknown significance, limiting the utility of testing. Recently, the DeepMind group (Google) developed AlphaMissense, a unique artificial intelligence-based model, based on language model principles, for the prediction of missense variant pathogenicity. We aimed to report on the performance of AlphaMissense, accessed by VarCardio, an open web-based variant annotation engine, in a real-world cardiovascular genetics center. METHODS AND RESULTS/RESULTS:<0.001). Genotype-phenotype concordance was highly aligned using VarCard.io predictions, at 95.9% (95% CI, 92.8-97.9) concordance rate. For 109 variants classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, benign, or likely benign by ClinVar, concordance with VarCard.io was high (90.5%). CONCLUSIONS:AlphaMissense, accessed via VarCard.io, may be a highly efficient tool for cardiac genetic variant interpretation. The engine's notable performance in assessing variants that are classified as variants of unknown significance in ClinVar demonstrates its potential to enhance cardiac genetic testing.

BACKGROUND:The autonomic nervous system plays an important role in atrial fibrillation (AF) and hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) lowers blood pressure (BP), but its role in AF is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to investigate whether RDN reduces AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS:This study randomized patients from 8 centers (United States, Germany) with drug-refractory AF for treatment with PVI+RDN vs PVI alone. A multielectrode radiofrequency Spyral catheter system was used for RDN. Insertable cardiac monitors were used for continuous rhythm monitoring. The primary efficacy endpoint was ≥2 minutes of AF recurrence or repeat ablation during all follow-up. The secondary endpoints included atrial arrhythmia (AA) burden, discontinuation of class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs, and BP changes from baseline. RESULTS:A total of 70 patients with AF (52 paroxysmal, 18 persistent) and uncontrolled hypertension were randomized (RDN+PVI, n = 34; PVI, n = 36). At 3.5 years, 26.2% and 21.4% of patients in RDN+PVI and PVI groups, respectively, were free from the primary efficacy endpoint (log rank P = 0.73). Patients with mean ≥1 h/d AA had less daily AA burden after RDN+PVI vs PVI (4.1 hours vs 9.2 hours; P = 0.016). More patients discontinued class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs after RDN+PVI vs PVI (45% vs 14%; P = 0.040). At 1 year, systolic BP changed by -17.8 ± 12.8 mm Hg and -13.7 ± 18.8 mm Hg after RDN+PVI and PVI, respectively (P = 0.43). The composite safety endpoint was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with AF and uncontrolled BP, RDN+PVI did not prevent AF recurrence more than PVI alone. However, RDN+PVI may reduce AF burden and antiarrhythmic drug usage, but this needs further prospective validation.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be a useful treatment strategy, however, few studies have compared CA to medical therapy (MT) in the sarcoidosis population. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To assess in-hospital outcomes and unplanned readmissions following CA for VT compared to MT in patients with sarcoidosis. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Data was obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2010 and 2019 to identify patients with sarcoidosis admitted for VT either undergoing CA or MT during elective and non-elective admission. Primary endpoints were a composite endpoint of inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and 30-day hospital readmissions. Procedural complications at index admission and causes of readmission were also identified. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.343). The most common cause of readmission were ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in both groups, however, those undergoing elective CA were less likely to be readmitted for VA compared to non-elective CA. The most common complication in the CA group was cardiac tamponade (4.8 %). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:VT ablation is associated with similar rates of 30-day readmission compared to MT and does not confer increased risk of harm with respect to inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Further research is warranted to determine if a subgroup of sarcoidosis patients admitted with VT are better served with an initial conservative management strategy followed by VT ablation.

BACKGROUND:Many patients with mildly to moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who require permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation do not have a concurrent indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. However, the risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in this population is unknown. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to describe the risk of VT/VF after PPM implantation in patients with mildly to moderately reduced LVEF. METHODS:Retrospective analysis was performed of 243 patients with LVEF between 35% and 49% who underwent PPM placement and did not meet indications for an ICD. The primary end point was occurrence of sustained VT/VF. Competing risks regression was performed to calculate subhazard ratios for the primary end point. RESULTS:Median follow-up was 27 months; 73% of patients were male, average age was 79 ± 10 years, average LVEF was 42% ± 4%, and 70% were New York Heart Association class II or above. Most PPMs were implanted for sick sinus syndrome (34%) or atrioventricular block (50%). Of 243 total patients, 11 (4.5%) met the primary end point of VT/VF. Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) was associated with significantly higher rates of VT/VF, with a subhazard ratio of 5.4 (95% CI, 1.5-20.1; P = .01). Of patients with multivessel CAD, 8 of 82 (9.8%) patients met the primary end point for an annualized risk of 4.3% per year. CONCLUSION:Patients with mildly to moderately reduced LVEF and multivessel CAD undergoing PPM implantation are at increased risk for the development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Patients in this population may benefit from additional risk stratification for VT/VF and consideration for upfront ICD implantation.