Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Mucosal immunity plays a critical role in preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and replication. Understanding the capacity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines to elicit both mucosal and systemic antibodies could help optimize vaccination strategies. METHODS:We conducted an open-label, phase 1/2 adaptive-design clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of COVID-19 immunizations. Healthy adults received 2 priming doses of mRNA-1273, a booster dose of mRNA-1273, and a second booster of bivalent (WA-1 and BA.4/BA.5) mRNA-1273.222. Adverse event data were collected. Serum and mucosal immunity were evaluated. RESULTS:One hundred six persons were enrolled. Thirty received all 4 study-related vaccine doses. All vaccines were well tolerated, with injection site pain, malaise, myalgias, and headache being the most frequently reported symptoms. Among those who received a second booster, 24 of 30 (80%) had serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Following the second booster, increases in geometric mean binding and pseudovirus neutralization antibody titers to the ancestral strain and BA.1 and BA.5 variants were observed. Increases in mucosal immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies in nasal and salivary samples were observed in both previously infected and infection-naive participants, although prior infection markedly boosted virus-specific mucosal IgA responses. CONCLUSIONS:The mRNA-1273.222 booster vaccine was safe and immunogenic and induced mucosal antibody responses in previously infected and infection-naive persons. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:NCT04889209.

UNLABELLED:The 2022 global outbreak of clade IIb mpox was the first major outbreak of mpox outside of African nations. To control the outbreak, public health officials began vaccination campaigns using the third-generation orthopoxvirus vaccine modified vaccinia Ankara from Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN). Prior to this outbreak, the durability of monkeypox virus (MPXV)-specific immunity induced by MVA-BN was poorly understood. In 2022, we launched the New York City Observational Study of Mpox Immunity (NYC OSMI, NCT05654883), a longitudinal study of 171 participants comprising MVA-BN vaccines and mpox convalescent individuals. Peripheral blood sampling was performed at intervals including prior to vaccination, after one dose, and after the second dose. MVA-BN vaccinees with and without a history of smallpox vaccination demonstrated detectable MPXV-specific memory B cells at 1-year post-vaccination. Additionally, MVA-BN increased MPXV neutralizing titers in smallpox vaccine-naïve vaccinees, with a comparable maximum titer reached in naïve and smallpox vaccine-experienced vaccinees. However, neutralizing titers returned to baseline within 5-7 months for naïve individuals, while remaining elevated in those with prior smallpox vaccination. Both naïve and experienced individuals generated robust IgG responses against MPXV H3 and A35, but naïve vaccinees' IgG responses showed lower avidity than experienced vaccinees. These data highlight a low avidity antibody response elicited by MVA-BN that is short-lived in naïve vaccinees. This work supports the need for long-term studies on protection induced by MVA-BN, including the potential need for booster doses as well as the development of next-generation orthopoxvirus vaccines. IMPORTANCE/OBJECTIVE:The ongoing outbreaks of mpox demonstrate the continuing threat of orthopoxviruses to global health. While previous orthopoxvirus vaccines generated lifelong antibody and cellular immunity, we show here that the current mpox vaccine, MVA-BN or JYNNEOS, fails to induce durable antibody immunity in individuals with no prior smallpox vaccination. This raises the important question of whether MVA-BN vaccinees have long-term protection from mpox. Our work highlights the need for further studies into the durability of protection generated by MVA-BN as well as whether subsequent booster doses are necessary to maintain protection.

For COVAIL recipients of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Sanofi booster vaccine, neutralizing antibody titers were assessed as a correlate of risk (CoR) of COVID-19. Peak and exposure-proximal titers were inverse CoRs with covariate-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) 0.30 (0.11, 0.78) and 0.25 (0.07, 0.85) per 10-fold increase in weighted average titer.

Neutralizing antibody titer has been a surrogate endpoint for guiding COVID-19 vaccine approval and use, although the pandemic's evolution and the introduction of variant-adapted vaccine boosters raise questions as to this surrogate's contemporary performance. For 985 recipients of an mRNA second bivalent or monovalent booster containing various Spike inserts [Prototype (Ancestral), Beta, Delta, and/or Omicron BA.1 or BA.4/5] in the COVAIL trial (NCT05289037), titers against 5 strains were assessed as correlates of risk of symptomatic COVID-19 ("COVID-19") and as correlates of relative (Pfizer-BioNTech Omicron vs. Prototype) booster protection against COVID-19 over 6 months of follow-up during the BA.2-BA.5 Omicron-dominant period. Consistently across the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine platforms and across all variant Spike inserts assessed, both peak and exposure-proximal ("predicted-at-exposure") titers correlated with lower Omicron COVID-19 risk in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, albeit significantly less so in naïve individuals [e.g., exposure-proximal hazard ratio per 10-fold increase in BA.1 titer 0.74 (95% CI 0.59, 0.94) for naïve vs. 0.41 (95% CI 0.23, 0.64) for non-naïve; interaction p = 0.013]. Neutralizing antibody titer was a strong inverse correlate of Omicron COVID-19 in non-naïve individuals and a weaker correlate in naïve individuals, posing questions about how prior infection alters the neutralization correlate.

We compared the serologic responses of one versus two doses of a variant vaccine (Moderna mRNA-1273 Beta/Omicron BA.1 bivalent vaccine) in adults. A two-dose boosting regimen with a variant vaccine did not increase the magnitude or the durability of the serological responses compared to a single variant vaccine boost.

Vaccine protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection wanes over time, requiring updated boosters. In a phase 2, open-label, randomized clinical trial with sequentially enrolled stages at 22 US sites, we assessed safety and immunogenicity of a second boost with monovalent or bivalent variant vaccines from mRNA and protein-based platforms targeting wild-type, Beta, Delta and Omicron BA.1 spike antigens. The primary outcome was pseudovirus neutralization titers at 50% inhibitory dilution (ID₅₀ titers) with 95% confidence intervals against different SARS-CoV-2 strains. The secondary outcome assessed safety by solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs, serious AEs and AEs of special interest. Boosting with prototype/wild-type vaccines produced numerically lower ID₅₀ titers than any variant-containing vaccine against all variants. Conversely, boosting with a variant vaccine excluding prototype was not associated with decreased neutralization against D614G. Omicron BA.1 or Beta monovalent vaccines were nearly equivalent to Omicron BA.1 + prototype or Beta + prototype bivalent vaccines for neutralization of Beta, Omicron BA.1 and Omicron BA.4/5, although they were lower for contemporaneous Omicron subvariants. Safety was similar across arms and stages and comparable to previous reports. Our study shows that updated vaccines targeting Beta or Omicron BA.1 provide broadly crossprotective neutralizing antibody responses against diverse SARS-CoV-2 variants without sacrificing immunity to the ancestral strain. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05289037 .

The 2022 mpox outbreak in New York City posed challenges to rapidly scaling up treatment capacity. We describe a telehealth treatment model launched during this outbreak that facilitated healthcare provider treatment capacity, and was able to adhere to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-sponsored expanded access investigational new drug (EA-IND) protocol for tecovirimat. Sixty-nine patients were evaluated and prescribed tecovirimat for mpox through telehealth visits at NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue and NYU Langone Health from June to August 2022. Thirty-two (46.4%) were previously diagnosed with HIV. Forty-four (63.8%) reported full recovery, with the remainder lost to follow-up. Most patients (n = 60, 87.0%) attended at least one follow-up visit (either in person or through telehealth) after starting treatment. We observed favorable treatment outcomes, with no serious adverse events, hospitalizations, or deaths related to mpox. While equitable access to telehealth remains a limitation that needs to be addressed, this telehealth model enabled a rapid scale-up of tecovirimat prescription during the mpox outbreak, and should be considered as an important tool used to respond to future infectious disease outbreaks.

In a randomized clinical trial, we compare early neutralizing antibody responses after boosting with bivalent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines based on either BA.1 or BA.4/BA.5 Omicron spike protein combined with wild-type spike. Responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants exhibited the greatest reduction in titers against currently circulating Omicron subvariants for both bivalent vaccines.

As part of a multicenter study evaluating homologous and heterologous COVID-19 booster vaccines, we assessed the magnitude, breadth, and short-term durability of binding and pseudovirus-neutralizing antibody (PsVNA) responses following a single booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 in adults primed with either Ad26.COV2.S, mRNA-1273, or BNT162b2 vaccines. NVX-CoV2373 as a heterologous booster was immunogenic and associated with no safety concerns through Day 91. Fold-rises in PsVNA titers from baseline (Day 1) to Day 29 were highest for prototypic D614G variant and lowest for more recent Omicron sub-lineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1. Peak humoral responses against all SARS-CoV-2 variants were lower in those primed with Ad26.COV2.S than with mRNA vaccines. Prior SARS CoV-2 infection was associated with substantially higher baseline PsVNA titers, which remained elevated relative to previously uninfected participants through Day 91. These data support the use of heterologous protein-based booster vaccines as an acceptable alternative to mRNA or adenoviral-based COVID-19 booster vaccines. This trial was conducted under ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04889209.