Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Barbed sutures (BS) have been increasingly used in the last two decades across surgical disciplines but little is known about how widespread their adoption has been in ventral hernia repair (VHR). The aim of this study was to document the use of barbed sutures in VHR in a multicenter database with associated clinical and patient-reported outcomes. METHOD/METHODS:Prospectively collected data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was retrospectively reviewed, including all adult patients who underwent VHR with fascial closure from 2020 to 2022. A univariate analysis compared patients with BS against non-barbed sutures (NBS) across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative timeframes including patient-reported outcomes concerning quality of life and pain scores. RESULTS:A total of 4054 patients that underwent ventral hernia repair with BS were compared with 6473 patients with non-barbed sutures (NBS). Overall, BS were used in 86.2% of minimally invasive ventral hernia repairs and about 92.2% of robotic surgery compared to only 9.6% of open procedures. Notable differences existed in patient selection, including a higher BMI (32 vs 30.5; p < 0.001), more incisional hernias (63.3% vs 51.1%; p < 0.001), wider hernias (4 cm vs 3 cm; p < 0.001), and higher ASA score (p < 0.001) in patients with BS. Outcomes in patients with BS included a shorter length of stay (mean days; 1.4 vs 2.4; p < 0.001), less SSI (1.5% vs 3.6%; p < 0.001), while having similar SSO (7.6% vs 7.3%; p = 0.657), readmission (3.0 vs 3.2; p = 0.691), and reoperation (1.5% vs 1.45%; p = 0.855), at a longer operative time (p < 0.001). Hernia-specific questionnaires for quality of life (HerQLes) and pain in patients with BS had a worse preoperative score that was later matched and favorable compared to NBS (p = 0.048). PRO concerning hernia recurrence suggest around 10% at two years of follow-up (p = 0.532). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Use of barbed sutures in VHR is widespread and highly related to MIS. Outcomes from this multicenter database cannot be reported as superior but suggest that barbed sutures do not have a negative impact on outcomes.

Despite the paucity of evidence on robotic ventral hernia repair (RVHR) in patients with obesity, the robotic platform is being used more frequently in hernia surgery. The impact of obesity on RVHR outcomes has not been thoroughly studied. Obesity is considered a major risk factor for the development of recurrent ventral hernias and postoperative complications; however, we hypothesize that patients undergoing robotic repairs will have similar complication profiles despite their body mass index (BMI). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients aged 18-90 years who underwent RVHR between 2013 and 2023 using data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative registry. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics were compared in non-obese and obese groups, determined using a univariate and logistic regression analysis to compare short-term outcomes. The registry identified 9742 patients; 3666 were non-obese; 6076 were classified as obese (BMI > 30 kg/m²). There was an increased odds of surgical site occurrence in patients with obesity, mostly seroma formation; however, obesity was not a significant factor for a complication requiring a procedural intervention after RVHR. In contrast, the hernia-specific quality-of-life scores significantly improved following surgery for all patients, with those with obesity having more substantial improvement from baseline. Obesity does increase the risk of certain complications following RVHR in a BMI-dependent fashion; however, the odds of requiring a procedural intervention are not significantly increased by BMI. Patients with obesity have a significant improvement in their quality of life, and RVHR should be carefully considered in this population.

Background: Barbed sutures (BS) have been increasingly used in the last two decades across surgical disciplines but little is known about how widespread their adoption has been in ventral hernia repair (VHR). The aim of this study was to document the use of barbed sutures in VHR in a multicenter database with associated clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Method: Prospectively collected data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was retrospectively reviewed, including all adult patients who underwent VHR with fascial closure from 2020 to 2022. A univariate analysis compared patients with BS against non-barbed sutures (NBS) across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative timeframes including patient-reported outcomes concerning quality of life and pain scores. Results: A total of 4054 patients that underwent ventral hernia repair with BS were compared with 6473 patients with non-barbed sutures (NBS). Overall, BS were used in 86.2% of minimally invasive ventral hernia repairs and about 92.2% of robotic surgery compared to only 9.6% of open procedures. Notable differences existed in patient selection, including a higher BMI (32 vs 30.5; p < 0.001), more incisional hernias (63.3% vs 51.1%; p < 0.001), wider hernias (4 cm vs 3 cm; p < 0.001), and higher ASA score (p < 0.001) in patients with BS. Outcomes in patients with BS included a shorter length of stay (mean days; 1.4 vs 2.4; p < 0.001), less SSI (1.5% vs 3.6%; p < 0.001), while having similar SSO (7.6% vs 7.3%; p = 0.657), readmission (3.0 vs 3.2; p = 0.691), and reoperation (1.5% vs 1.45%; p = 0.855), at a longer operative time (p < 0.001). Hernia-specific questionnaires for quality of life (HerQLes) and pain in patients with BS had a worse preoperative score that was later matched and favorable compared to NBS (p = 0.048). PRO concerning hernia recurrence suggest around 10% at two years of follow-up (p = 0.532). Conclusion: Use of barbed sutures in VHR is widespread and highly related to MIS. Outcomes from this multicenter database cannot be reported as superior but suggest that barbed sutures do not have a negative impact on outcomes.

INTRODUCTION:Reinforcement of crural closure with synthetic resorbable mesh has been proposed to decrease recurrence rates after hiatal hernia repair, but continues to be controversial. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and intermediate-term results of using biosynthetic mesh to augment the hiatus. METHODS:The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed throughout this systematic review. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials tools were used to perform qualitative assessment of all studies included in this review. Recommendations were then summarized for the following pre-defined key items: protocol, research question, search strategy, study eligibility, data extraction, study design, risk of bias, publication bias, and statistical analysis. RESULTS:The systematic literature search found 520 articles, 101 of which were duplicates and 355 articles were determined to be unrelated to our study and excluded. The full text of the remaining 64 articles was thoroughly assessed. A total of 18 articles (1846 patients) were ultimately included for this review, describing hiatal hernia repair using three different biosynthetic meshes-BIO-A, Phasix ST, and polyglactin mesh. Mean operative time varied from 127 to 223 min. Mean follow up varied from 12 to 54 months. There were no mesh erosions or explants. One mesh-related complication of stenosis requiring reoperation was reported with BIO-A. Studies showed significant improvement in symptom and quality-of-life scores, as well as satisfaction with surgery. Recurrence was reported as radiologic or clinical recurrence. Overall, recurrence rate varied from 0.9 to 25%. CONCLUSION:The use of biosynthetic mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repair with low complications rates and high symptom resolution. The reported recurrence rates are highly variable due to significant heterogeneity in defining and evaluating recurrences. Further randomized controlled trials with larger samples and long-term follow-up should be performed to better analyze outcomes and recurrence rates.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Cardiac tamponade following hiatal hernia repair is a rare and potentially fatal complication most often associated with the use of mechanical fixation devices for hiatal mesh reinforcement. Only three cases have been reported with sutures alone, and none following robotic hiatal surgery. CASE PRESENTATION/METHODS:A 54-year-old patient underwent elective robotic hiatal hernia repair with Toupet fundoplication during which a sling suture was placed to elevate the left lateral segment of liver. No mesh or mechanical fixation devices were used. Eight hours postoperatively, the patient developed hemodynamic instability. Cardiac tamponade was diagnosed on bedside echocardiogram and the patient underwent emergent pericardiocentesis with subsequent stabilization. The remainder of the postoperative course was notable for pericarditis which was treated with aspirin and colchicine. CLINICAL DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:While the use of suture-based liver retraction has the advantages of avoiding an additional port and potential collision between retractor holder and robot arms, it constitutes a novel risk factor for cardiac tamponade. Prompt diagnosis via bedside echocardiography is essential and may facilitate percutaneous rather than operative management. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Suture-based liver retraction in minimally invasive foregut surgery should be used judiciously until further data is available. Surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for tamponade in the setting of postoperative hypotension after its use.

BACKGROUND:Elective paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients ≥ 65 years of age remains controversial. The widely cited Markov Monte Carlo decision analytic model recommends watchful waiting in this group, unless the mortality rate for elective repair was to reach ≤ 0.5%; at which point, surgery would become the optimal treatment. We hypothesized that with advances in minimally invasive surgery, perioperative care, and practice specialization, that mortality threshold has been reached in the contemporary era. However, the safety net would decrease as age increases, particularly in octogenarians. METHODS:We identified 12,422 patients from the 2015-2017 ACS-NSQIP database, who underwent elective minimally invasive PEH repair, of whom 5476 (44.1%) were with age ≥ 65. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), operative time, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, unplanned intubation, sepsis, bleeding requiring transfusion, readmission, and return to OR. RESULTS:Patients age ≥ 65 had a higher 30-day mortality (0.5% vs 0.2%; p < 0.001). Subset analysis of patients age 65-80 and > 80 showed a 30-day mortality of 0.4% vs. 1.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). Independent predictors of mortality in patients ≥ 65 years were age > 80 (OR 5.23, p < 0.001) and COPD (OR 2.59, p = 0.04). Patients ≥ 65 had a slightly higher incidence of pneumonia (2% vs 1.2%; p < 0.001), unplanned intubation (0.8% vs 0.5%; p < 0.05), pulmonary embolism (0.7% vs 0.3%; p = 0.001), bleeding requiring transfusion (1% vs 0.5%; p < 0.05), and LOS (2.38 vs 1.86 days, p < 0.001) with no difference in sepsis, return to OR or readmission. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the largest series evaluating elective PEH repair in the recent era. While morbidity and mortality do increase with age, the mortality remains below 0.5% until age 80. Our results support consideration for a paradigm shift in the management of patients < 80 years toward elective repair of PEH.